[FULL] Ulas Tuntas Kronologi Kasus DPR: Dari Tunjangan-Buat Demo Ricuh | BERUT

Summary

Massive public protests erupted across Indonesia in late August 2025, sparked by outrage over the Indonesian House of Representatives' (DPR) excessive allowances and insensitive remarks by members such as Ahmad Sahroni and Nava Urbah. Demonstrations began in Jakarta and spread to Bandung, escalating into looting and destruction of DPR members' homes. President Prabowo Subianto ordered strict action to curb the unrest, while political parties suspended offending DPR members effective September 1, 2025. In response, DPR leadership pledged to review allowances and overseas visit policies. Experts highlighted that addressing deeper socio-economic injustices is crucial to prevent recurring public anger and unrest.

Takeaways

• 😡 Public anger erupted in Indonesia in late August 2025 due to excessive allowances and insensitive remarks by DPR members.
• 📅 Demonstrations began on August 25, 2025, at the DPR building in Jakarta and later spread to Bandung and other regions.
• 🏛️ Protesters demanded accountability from DPR members, but many officials chose to work from home, escalating public frustration.
• 🔥 Some demonstrations turned violent, resulting in looting and destruction of private homes of politicians, including Ahmad Sahroni, Nafa Urbah, Eko Hendro Purnomo, and Surya Utama.
• 👮 President Prabowo Subianto ordered the police and TNI to take firm action against destructive protests and looting.
• ⚖️ The Nasdem Party suspended Ahmad Sahroni and Nafa Urbah; PAN suspended Eko Hendro Purnomo and Surya Utama; Golkar suspended Adis Kadir, effective September 1, 2025.
• 🙏 The suspended DPR members publicly apologized for their statements and actions that offended the public.
• 💰 The DPR leadership announced plans to review and possibly revoke extravagant member allowances and imposed a moratorium on overseas working visits.
• 📊 Economist Renal Kasali emphasized addressing the root causes of public dissatisfaction, including unjust policies and tax burdens, rather than only punishing officials.
• 📰 The events highlighted a significant disconnect between government officials and public sentiment, prompting both disciplinary actions and policy evaluations.