Picu Demo Peringatan Darurat, Kenapa DPR dan Pemerintah Tabrak Putusan MK?

Kompas.com

22 Aug 202408:18

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the recent political tension in Indonesia following a controversial ruling by the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the 2024 regional elections (Pilkada). The court revised the requirements for political party support and candidate age, sparking opposition from the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR). The DPR's move to reverse MK's decision has led to widespread concern and protests, as it is seen as politically motivated. The situation is further complicated by the potential candidacy of President Jokowi's son, Kaesang Pangarep, raising questions about the integrity of the election process.

Takeaways

📢 The video discusses the increasing tension in Indonesian politics as social media buzzes with emergency warnings, particularly related to the upcoming regional elections (Pilkada) in 2024.
⚖️ The Constitutional Court (MK) recently made a ruling on August 20, 2024, which included changes to the requirements for candidates running in the Pilkada, such as political party support thresholds and candidate age requirements.
🗳️ The MK ruling reduced the political party support threshold required to nominate a candidate in regions with a smaller electorate, which could affect smaller parties' ability to participate without forming coalitions.
🎂 The MK also ruled that the minimum age requirement for candidates should be calculated at the time the Electoral Commission (KPU) finalizes the candidate list, rather than at the time of inauguration.
🏛️ Despite the MK's ruling, the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) and the government later held a meeting on August 21, 2024, where they proposed revisions that contradict the MK's decisions, such as reverting the threshold back to 25% and changing the age requirement calculation to the inauguration date.
⚠️ The DPR's actions are seen as politically motivated and have sparked public concern and resistance, with civil society and grassroots movements beginning to mobilize.
🔍 Critics argue that the DPR and government's revisions are intended to serve the interests of the political elite, rather than uphold democratic principles.
🤝 A large coalition, named Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus, has formed to support prominent candidates in the upcoming Pilkada, including Ridwan Kamil for governor and Suswono as his running mate.
🚫 The MK ruling initially provided hope for the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) to run in the Pilkada without needing to form a coalition, but the DPR's revisions have dashed those hopes.
👶 Speculation arises that the age requirement revision was made to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, who will turn 30 just before the 2024 Pilkada, to run for vice governor in Central Java.

Q & A

What triggered the recent social media outcry and civil society protests in Indonesia?
-The social media outcry and protests were triggered by the delay in the parliamentary session by the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), which was supposed to pass the Regional Head Election Law (RUU Pilkada). The delay and subsequent political maneuvers have led to widespread dissatisfaction among civil society and grassroots movements.
What was the key ruling made by the Constitutional Court (MK) on August 20, 2024, concerning the Pilkada?
-The Constitutional Court (MK) ruled to amend the requirements for candidates in the 2024 Regional Head Elections (Pilkada). The key changes included adjusting the threshold for political party support based on population size and setting specific age requirements for candidates at the time of their official candidacy by the KPU.
How did the DPR RI respond to the Constitutional Court's ruling on the Pilkada law?
-The DPR RI held a working committee meeting where they reversed the Constitutional Court's decision by reverting the political party support threshold back to the original 25% and changing the age requirement for candidates to be calculated from the time of their inauguration rather than their official candidacy.
Why is there tension between the DPR RI and the Constitutional Court (MK) over the Pilkada law?
-The tension arises because the DPR RI's actions are seen as defying the Constitutional Court's final and binding decision. This has led to concerns about the rule of law and the potential for political manipulation by the ruling elite.
What specific changes did the Constitutional Court (MK) make regarding the candidacy requirements in the Pilkada?
-The Constitutional Court (MK) altered the political party support threshold for candidates based on the number of eligible voters in a region and set the age requirement for candidates to be calculated at the time of official candidacy, not at the time of inauguration.
What are the potential consequences if the DPR RI passes its version of the Pilkada law?
-If the DPR RI passes its version of the Pilkada law, it could undermine the authority of the Constitutional Court and lead to increased public distrust in the political process. It might also provoke further civil unrest and legal challenges.
Why is the age requirement for Pilkada candidates a contentious issue?
-The age requirement is contentious because it is perceived as being politically motivated. Specifically, there are suspicions that the DPR RI's version of the law was designed to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, who would not meet the age requirement at the time of candidacy, to run in the Pilkada by calculating the age requirement at the time of inauguration.
What was the role of the Constitutional Democracy Initiative in the debate over the Pilkada law?
-The Constitutional Democracy Initiative, led by Kolil Pasaribu, criticized the revisions to the Pilkada law, arguing that they were driven by pragmatic political interests and reflected the power struggle among the elite.
How has the public reacted to the ongoing debate and changes to the Pilkada law?
-The public reaction has been one of dissatisfaction and concern, leading to social media campaigns and protests. There is growing fear that the changes are eroding democratic principles and favoring political elites over the public interest.
What is the significance of the coalition 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus' in the Jakarta Pilkada?
-The 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus' is a significant political alliance consisting of 12 parties.

Outlines

00:00

🗳️ Political Turmoil and MK's Ruling Impact on Pilkada

The first paragraph discusses the political unrest in Indonesia triggered by social media outcry and grassroots movements. It explains how the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) postponed a plenary session to pass the Pilkada Law, ignoring the Constitutional Court's (MK) ruling on regional elections. The MK had altered rules regarding party support and candidate age requirements for the 2024 Pilkada. The MK's ruling included changes like reducing the candidacy threshold based on population and adjusting the age requirement for candidates. Despite the MK's decisions, the DPR opposed the changes, proposing new calculations and reverting to the previous thresholds.

05:01

🔍 DPR's Political Maneuvering and Social Response

The second paragraph delves into the DPR's and the government's political interests in manipulating the MK's decision, which has sparked widespread public dissatisfaction and resistance. It highlights the revision of the Pilkada Law, reflecting the influence of political elites. The paragraph also describes the formation of a political coalition, 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus,' for the Jakarta Pilkada, consisting of 12 parties supporting prominent candidates. The potential of facing an empty box in the election is discussed, as well as the implications for PDIP and other political actors, especially concerning age requirements designed to favor specific candidates, such as the President's youngest son.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK)

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia (MK) is a judicial body that makes decisions on the constitutionality of laws. In the video, MK's decision on the rules for regional elections (Pilkada) plays a crucial role, particularly concerning the age requirement for candidates and the threshold of political party support. The MK's decision becomes a point of contention, as the DPR and government attempt to overturn it.

💡Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR)

The People's Representative Council (DPR) is Indonesia's legislative body. In the video, the DPR is shown opposing the MK's ruling by proposing changes to the regional election law, indicating a conflict between legislative and judicial branches. This conflict highlights the tension in Indonesian politics over the control and direction of electoral rules.

💡Pilkada 2024

Pilkada refers to regional elections in Indonesia, scheduled for 2024 in this context. The video discusses how the rules governing Pilkada are being contested, particularly the eligibility requirements for candidates and the political dynamics influencing these rules. The Pilkada is significant because it determines local leadership, which can have broader implications for national politics.

💡Threshold (Ambang Batas)

In the context of Indonesian elections, the threshold (ambang batas) refers to the minimum percentage of votes a political party or coalition must secure to nominate candidates. The video details how the MK adjusted the threshold based on population, while the DPR seeks to revert it to the original 25%, reflecting a power struggle over election rules.

💡Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus

Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus is a political coalition mentioned in the video, comprising 12 parties supporting candidates in the Jakarta regional elections. This coalition is a key player in the Pilkada, highlighting the strategic alliances formed to meet electoral thresholds and influence election outcomes.

💡Usia Pencalonan (Age Requirement)

Usia Pencalonan refers to the age requirement for candidates in regional elections. The MK ruled that candidates must meet the age criteria when officially nominated by the KPU, while the DPR's revision suggests this requirement should apply at the time of inauguration. This change is suspected to benefit specific political figures, illustrating how rules can be manipulated for political gain.

💡Konflik Politik (Political Conflict)

The video underscores a political conflict between the legislative and judicial branches, particularly involving the DPR's resistance to the MK's rulings. This conflict exemplifies the broader struggle for power and control over the rules governing Indonesia's electoral processes.

💡Koalisi Gemuk

Koalisi Gemuk, or 'Fat Coalition,' refers to a large and diverse political coalition. In the video, it describes the extensive alliances formed by parties in the Pilkada, reflecting the complexity and strategic nature of Indonesian political coalitions, where numerous parties join forces to increase their electoral chances.

💡Putusan MK

Putusan MK refers to the rulings of the Constitutional Court. In the video, the focus is on how these rulings, particularly concerning the regional election law, are being challenged by the DPR and the government. The court's decisions are legally binding, yet the legislative body’s actions suggest an attempt to bypass or alter these decisions.

💡Kepentingan Politik (Political Interests)

Kepentingan Politik refers to the underlying political interests that drive actions and decisions within the government and legislative bodies. The video suggests that the DPR and government’s attempts to revise the Pilkada law are motivated by political interests, possibly to benefit certain political elites or to maintain power, thus raising concerns about the integrity of the legal and electoral processes.

Highlights

Social media has been flooded with emergency warnings and civil society has united to protest against political elites.

The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) delayed the plenary session for the approval of the 2024 Pilkada bill.

The Constitutional Court (MK) issued a ruling on August 20, 2024, regarding the requirements for regional election candidates.

The MK ruling included changes to two key requirements: political party support and age eligibility for regional election candidates.

The MK ruling adjusted the threshold for political party support based on the population of the electorate.

The age requirement for gubernatorial candidates remains at 30 years, while for regent and mayoral candidates, it's 25 years.

The MK emphasized that age requirements must be met when the General Elections Commission (KPU) sets the candidates.

Despite the MK ruling, the DPR RI amended the age requirement calculation to begin from the date of inauguration.

The DPR RI returned the threshold for political party support to the original 25% for individual parties or coalitions.

There is concern that the DPR's actions are politically motivated and intended to counter the MK's decision.

The Jakarta gubernatorial election sees the emergence of the Indonesia Maju Plus Coalition, consisting of 12 parties.

The coalition supports candidates Ridwan Kamil for governor and Suswono for deputy governor.

The MK's decision could have favored PDIP, allowing them to participate in the Pilkada without forming a coalition.

There is speculation that the new age rule was designed to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, to run in the Pilkada.

Concerns are raised that the laws are being manipulated for political gain, leading to unrest among the public.