Debat 1 Pilkada DKI Jakarta 2017 - Solusi Masalah Ketimpangan Sosial dan Tenaga Kerja

Summary

In a debate for Jakarta's gubernatorial election, three candidates present their strategies for addressing the city's high inequality and poverty. Candidate 1 focuses on immediate aid for the poor, such as food subsidies and housing projects, alongside long-term job creation through infrastructure. Candidate 2 highlights their past successes in reducing unemployment and inequality, proposing a mix of public services and profit-sharing models to empower small businesses. Candidate 3 advocates for connecting small-scale industries to larger businesses to create sustainable job opportunities. Each candidate proposes unique solutions to reduce poverty and promote economic growth in Jakarta.

Takeaways

• 😀 The poverty gap in Jakarta is significant, with 360,000 people or 128,000 families still living in poverty. The candidates are asked to present solutions to this issue, focusing on job creation and reducing wealth disparity.
• 😀 Paslon 1 (Candidate 1) proposes short-term aid programs, including food assistance, as well as long-term economic growth strategies to create more job opportunities, especially in micro-enterprises and infrastructure projects.
• 😀 Paslon 2 (Candidate 2) highlights their success in reducing the poverty gap and unemployment rate since taking office in 2013. They emphasize government assistance programs like healthcare, education, transportation, and subsidized food to alleviate poverty.
• 😀 Paslon 3 (Candidate 3) argues that poverty should not be seen just as a social issue but as a matter of economic advancement. They propose creating economic growth hubs in Jakarta to stimulate job creation through small and medium enterprises (SMEs) linked to large industries.
• 😀 Paslon 1 stresses that addressing poverty and inequality is a constitutional duty, asserting that providing temporary assistance to the poor is necessary and feasible, given Jakarta's budget of 70 trillion IDR.
• 😀 Paslon 2 rejects direct cash transfers, arguing that it is more effective to provide support through business development programs that encourage hard work and self-sufficiency. They also highlight their experience in reducing poverty and promoting job creation.
• 😀 Paslon 3 criticizes the current system for worsening inequality and failing to support small businesses. They emphasize the importance of mentorship and support for SMEs to ensure long-term success and sustainable growth.
• 😀 Paslon 2 discusses their success in providing support to citizens, including health insurance, educational opportunities, affordable housing, and transportation subsidies for low-income workers.
• 😀 Paslon 3 introduces the concept of 'economic growth centers' in Jakarta, aiming to integrate small businesses with large-scale industries to create better job opportunities and reduce dependence on government welfare programs.
• 😀 The debate showcases differing views on how to reduce Jakarta's poverty and inequality, with some candidates focusing on direct assistance and others on fostering economic growth through entrepreneurship and infrastructure.

Q & A

What is the main issue addressed by the candidates in this debate?

The main issue discussed is the high social inequality and poverty in Jakarta, with a focus on reducing the gap between the rich and the poor, creating jobs, and improving living conditions.

How does Paslon 1 propose to reduce poverty in Jakarta?

Paslon 1 proposes to provide immediate assistance to the poor through food programs and cash transfers, alongside macroeconomic growth initiatives that would create jobs and reduce unemployment, with a focus on infrastructure projects and micro-business loans.

What is Paslon 2's stance on direct cash transfers to the poor?

Paslon 2 opposes direct cash transfers, arguing that such programs do not promote self-sufficiency. Instead, they advocate for long-term support through subsidies for healthcare, education, and transport, as well as profit-sharing models for small businesses.

What specific programs does Paslon 3 propose to address inequality?

Paslon 3 proposes creating 44 economic hubs across Jakarta to stimulate job creation, connecting home-based industries with large-scale companies to provide opportunities for small businesses, and focusing on sustainable economic growth.

How does Paslon 1 intend to create jobs through infrastructure?

Paslon 1 plans to implement infrastructure projects like the 'people's housing program' to address the backlog of 300,000 housing units in Jakarta, which would also create job opportunities for local workers.

What are the different strategies proposed by Paslon 2 to support small businesses?

Paslon 2 proposes providing subsidies for small businesses, offering capital through profit-sharing schemes, and ensuring that public transportation and health programs are accessible to workers, thus reducing financial pressures on low-income groups.

What is the role of BUMD (Regional-Owned Enterprises) in Paslon 2's program?

BUMD plays a key role in Paslon 2’s strategy by working with local businesses to stabilize prices for basic goods and ensure the availability of necessities like rice and vegetables, which is crucial in reducing the financial burden on the poor.

How does Paslon 3 plan to foster the growth of small businesses in Jakarta?

Paslon 3 plans to connect local home industries with large-scale industries, enabling small business owners to expand their reach. They also propose mentorship and support programs for entrepreneurs to grow and thrive in a more interconnected economy.

What is the main criticism that Paslon 1 faces from the other candidates?

Paslon 1 is criticized for focusing too much on providing temporary aid to the poor, which other candidates argue could be insufficient without addressing the structural issues that lead to poverty and inequality.

How do the candidates measure the success of their poverty alleviation programs?

The success of poverty alleviation programs is measured through job creation, reduction in unemployment rates, improvements in living conditions, and the ability of small businesses to thrive and contribute to the local economy.