Jeffrey Sachs Interivew - The Geopolitics of NATO Enlargement
Summary
TLDRこのビデオスクリプトは、2022年のロシアの侵攻から始まったと西側メディアが言う戦争とは異なり、その根底はソビエト連邦の崩壊の終わりに遡る。アメリカは冷戦後の軍事同盟の解体を約束し、NATOの東拡大を計画した。ウクライナの中立を求めるロシアと対立し、2014年のクーデターと戦争の拡大につながった。米国は平和を築く代わりに軍事支援を増やし、核戦争へのリスクを高める。若者たちは平和で協力的かつ環境に配慮した世界を築くべきだ。
Takeaways
- 🌏 この対立は数十年にわたって存在しており、2022年のロシアの侵攻から始まったとは限りません。
- 🤝 1990年代にアメリカとドイツはソビエト連邦に対して、ソビエト軍事同盟を解体すればNATOは東へ一インチも移動しないと約束しましたが、アメリカはその約束を破りました。
- 📈 アメリカはソビエト連邦が崩壊した後すぐにNATOの東拡大を計画し始め、1992年にはウクライナもそのリストに上がっていました。
- 🔄 2008年にジョージ・W・ブッシュ大統領はNATOの拡大を強力に推進し、ウクライナが加盟することを宣言しましたが、ロシアはこれに激しく反発しました。
- 🏆 2010年にウクライナの大統領選挙で中立を掲げるヴィクトル・ヤナコーヴィチが選ばれましたが、その後もNATOに傾倒する政治家がいたため、中立を脅かしました。
- 💥 2014年にアメリカが関与したウクライナでの政権交代が激しい緊張を引き起こし、ロシアは中立を求めるべきだと主張しました。
- 📝 2021年にバイデン政権が就任後もNATOの拡大を支持し、ロシアとの緊張を高め続けました。
- 🛑 2022年2月24日にロシアは軍事侵攻を開始し、NATO拡大に関する理解が達成されなかったことがロシアの行動の核心となったと述べています。
- 🕊️ ロシアとウクライナは2022年3月に平和協議を進めていたが、アメリカがそれを妨害し、ウクライナに戦いを続けるように促しました。
- 💔 この戦争はウクライナの破壊と核戦争へのリスクをもたらし、アメリカの硬直した姿勢は危険で無責任だと思います。
- 🌱 若い世代は平和で協力的で環境に配慮した、そして公正な世界を築くべきだと述べています。
Q & A
2022年のロシアの侵攻が西部の主流メディアで述べられるように、この紛争はいつ始まったとされていますか?
-この紛争は2022年のロシアの侵攻から始まったとは言えず、実際にはソビエト連邦の崩壊の終わり頃の1990年代の地理政治学に遡ります。
1990年に米国とドイツはミハイル・ゴルバチョフに何を約束しましたか?
-米国とドイツは、ゴルバチョフがソビエト軍事連盟を解体すれば、NATOは東wardに1インチも移動しないと約束しました。
米国がNATOの東拡大計画をいつ始めましたか?
-1991年にソビエト連邦が終結した後すぐに、ワシントンの政策立案者、特にペンタゴンと米国の恒久国家はNATOの東拡大を計画し始めました。
2008年にジョージ・W・ブッシュはどのようにNATOの拡大を推進しましたか?
-2008年のブカレストNATOサミットで、ジョージ・W・ブッシュはNATOがウクライナをメンバー国にする旨を発表しました。
2010年のウクライナの大統領選挙でヴィクトル・ヤナコビッチはどのような政見で勝利しましたか?
-ヴィクトル・ヤナコビッチは、ウクライナが2つの超大国間の戦場になりたくないという中立を求める政見で選挙に勝利しました。
2014年に米国が行ったとされる政変の性質は何ですか?
-2014年に米国は、中立を求めるプロロシアのヤナコビッチ大統領を暴力的に失奪し、政変に関与しました。
2021年にバイデン政権がNATO拡大を支持した結果として何が起こりましたか?
-バイデン政権がNATO拡大を支持した結果、プーチンは強く反発し、2021年12月17日にNATO拡大を認めない安保保障条約案を提案しましたが、バイデン政権はその問題について交渉する意思がありませんでした。
ウクライナが中立を認めるという宣言はいつされましたか?
-ロシアの侵攻の4週間後の2022年、ゼレンスキーがウクライナが中立を認めると宣言しました。
アメリカがウクライナとの平和協定を妨害した理由は何ですか?
-アメリカはウクライナが中立ではなく、NATO国であり、また西側の武器と経済制裁によって戦争が勝利すると考えていたため、平和協定を妨害しました。
バイデン政権がNATOの拡大を支持し続けた結果として何が起こりましたか?
-プーチンはNATO拡大に対する反発として、2022年の夏に数十万人のロシア人を動員し、軍事エスカレーションの道を歩みました。
アメリカが持っているとされる世界経済の割合はどのくらいですか?
-アメリカは世界人口の4.1%しか持っておらず、世界を支配する権利を持つことはできません。
中国が最近行ったとされる外交的な成功とは何ですか?
-中国は最近、サウジアラビアとイランの間の穏やかな調停を行っており、これは外交的な成功として高く評価されています。
Outlines
🌏 NATO拡大とロシアの反応
第1段落では、西側メディアがロシアの2022年の侵攻を戦争の原因としている一方で、その根拠はソビエト連邦の末期にさかのぼると説明されています。1990年代に米国とドイツはミハイル・ゴルバチョフにNATOの東拡大を約束しなかったと主張していますが、実際にはNATOは東拡大を計画していたと指摘。さらに、2008年にジョージ・W・ブッシュはウクライナのNATO加盟を推進し、ロシアはこれに激しく反発したとされています。2010年に中立を提唱したウクライナのヴィクター・ヤナコーヴィチ大統領が米国の関与によって破壊されたと語り、その後の対立と米ロ対立が2021年に繰り広げられ、プーチンは米ロ安全保障協定の案を提示したが、バイデン政権はそれに応じなかったと述べています。
🏳️ ウクライナ中立化と米ロ間の緊張
第2段落では、2021年12月17日にロシアがNATO拡大の停止を求めたが、バイデン政権はそれに応じなかったとされ、2022年2月24日にロシアが侵攻に乗り出したと説明されています。ウクライナが中立を接受し、ロシアと平和交渉を進めたが、アメリカはウクライナに戦いを続けるように促し、平和協定を妨害したと指摘。アメリカはウクライナをNATO国家とし、経済制裁と武器供与でロシアを打ち破るつもりだったという考え方を明かしていますが、プーチンはこれに反発し、軍事エスカレーションを続けたと語っています。
💡 アメリカの傲慢と世界経済への影響
第3段落では、アメリカが世界を支配するべきだと主張する考え方と、アメリカの傲慢と無知が他の国に与える影響について述べています。アメリカは世界人口の4.1%しかなく、世界を支配するべきではないと主張。アメリカは経済制裁の下で自分自身も被害を受け、他の国の通貨強化につながっていると指摘。また、中国が世界的経済大国として台頭し、アメリカはこれを受け入れることができないと感じていますが、中国の成功は彼らの努力と賢明な経済政策によるものであると語っています。
🤝 中国の平和的役割と通貨多様化
第4段落では、中国が中東地域での紛争を和解に導く平和の仲介者として活躍していると紹介。特に、サウジアラビアとイランの間の和解は中国による外交的成果と評価されており、これにより地域の安定化と経済発展が促られると期待されています。アメリカは対立を煽る一方で、中国は協力を促進する姿勢を示していると述べています。また、アメリカは自国の通貨を武器化し、国際的な金融システムを脅かしていると指摘され、これは他の国が他の通貨を保有するよう求める一因となっていると語っています。
🔄 台湾情勢と国際政治の未来
第5段落では、台湾情勢がウクライナと同様に危険であり、冷静な対応が必要なと警告しています。台湾、中国、アメリカの3つの政府はすべて一つの中国政策を擁護しているが、アメリカは台湾との軍事的同盟を形成し、緊張を高めていると指摘。冲突を回避するためには、緊張を緩和し、協議と平和的な手段で解決する必要があると強調。また、若い世代が平和と協力、環境永続可能性、公平な世界を築くべきだと述べ、現在の暴力と環境破壊のサイクルから抜け出す必要性を訴えています。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡ソビエト連邦の崩壊
💡NATOの東拡大
💡ミハイル・ゴルバチョフ
💡ブカレストNATO首脳会議
💡ウクライナの中立
💡ミンスク合意
💡バイデン政権
💡核戦争
💡アメリカの傲慢
💡多通貨国際システム
Highlights
The conflict's roots trace back to the end of the Soviet Union and the geopolitical dynamics of that era.
The U.S. and Germany allegedly promised Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward post-Soviet Union dissolution.
Despite the promise, NATO planners began to seek Eastern expansion almost immediately after the Soviet Union's end.
Ukraine was on the list for NATO expansion as early as 1992, indicating a disregard for initial promises.
The U.S. pushed for NATO expansion at the 2008 Bucharest Summit, causing significant Russian opposition.
In 2010, a Ukrainian president advocating for neutrality was overthrown, with U.S. involvement alleged.
The Minsk agreements of 2014-2015, aimed at granting autonomy to breakaway regions, were not implemented by Ukraine.
Biden's administration continued the push for NATO enlargement, which Putin resisted, leading to heightened tensions.
Russia proposed a U.S.-Russia security agreement in December 2021, which the U.S. was unwilling to negotiate.
The initial Russian invasion in 2022 led to Ukraine's acceptance of neutrality and peace talks mediated by Turkey.
The U.S. allegedly blocked a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, prioritizing military support and sanctions.
The speaker criticizes the lack of negotiation between Biden and Putin since the invasion began.
The speaker expresses concern over the potential for nuclear war and the destruction of Ukraine due to ongoing conflict.
The U.S. is accused of having an arrogant and naive foreign policy, with a history of military interventions worldwide.
The speaker argues that the U.S. should not aspire to dominate the world and should respect the sovereignty of other nations.
The role of the U.S. dollar in global trade and its use as a tool of economic warfare is discussed.
The shift towards a multi-currency international system is highlighted as a response to U.S. economic policies.
China's role as a peacemaker, particularly in the Middle East, is praised, contrasting with the U.S. approach to foreign policy.
The situation in Taiwan is compared to that of Ukraine, with a call for cool heads to avoid conflict.
The speaker calls for an end to the war through political solutions, with the U.S. and Russia stepping back from military action.
The importance of building a peaceful, cooperative, environmentally sustainable, and fair world for future generations is emphasized.
Transcripts
this conflict is actually decades in the
making it didn't just come out of a
Russian invasion in 2022 as is often
said in the western mainstream media the
wars often defined as an unprovoked
attack in 2022. actually the roots of
this war go back to the end of the
Soviet Union and to the geopolitics
around that in 1990 the U.S at Germany
promised the Soviet government at the
time Mikhail Gorbachev the president
that NATO would not move one inch
Eastward if Gorbachev went ahead and
disbanded the Soviet military Alliance
in other words there would be a deal
that on the Soviet side the military
Alliance the so-called Warsaw Pact would
be added and on the western side NATO
would not take advantage and Germany
would be reunified but NATO would not
move one inch Eastward the U.S cheated
did on that because as soon as the
Soviet Union ended in 1991 the policy
makers in Washington especially in the
Pentagon and in the permanent state in
the United States immediately planned
for the Eastern expansion of NATO and by
1992 Ukraine was already on the list
that NATO would go that far in fact it's
big new Brzezinski a U.S major
geostrategist wrote in 1997 the timeline
for NATO expansion including that
Ukraine would become candidate between
2005 and 2010 which is exactly what
happened so this war started in my
opinion because the United States could
not accept a piece in which the military
alliances of both sides of the Cold War
would stand down well many things
happened over the 30 years between the
early 1990s and today but probably the
highlights to mention are that in 2008
George W Bush Jr forced NATO pushed NATO
but really pressed that NATO would
announce that Ukraine would become a
member and that happened at the
Bucharest NATO Summit in 2008 the
Russian leadership was Furious they had
warned again and again don't do that we
don't want your military right up
against our 2 000 kilometer border with
Ukraine then a Ukrainian president won
the election in 2010 on the program of
neutrality for Ukraine victriana kovich
won the election based on the idea that
Ukraine doesn't want to become the
battlefield between two superpowers and
called for neutrality which had been
enshrined in the original Ukrainian
Declaration of Independence but then was
abandoned by some of the nato-oriented
politicians of Ukraine later on so in
2010 janakovich called for for
neutrality but he was overthrown
violently in early 2014 with the U.S
participation so this was really a
terrible escalation because the
relatively pro-russian president but one
who called for neutrality which I think
was the only safe course for Ukraine was
overthrown and the United States played
a significant role in that people know
about the famous tape of Victoria
Newland who is now our under Secretary
of State at the time she was the
assistant Secretary of State and she
described who the U.S would see as the
next government three weeks before a
violent overthrow it's it's pretty ugly
business in my opinion well in any event
the war started in February 2014 it
escalated between 2014 and 2021 the
attempt to end the fighting at the end
of 2014 in early 2015 came into two
agreements called the Minsk agreements
in which the government of Ukraine
agreed with the Breakaway regions of
eastern Ukraine that those regions would
gain autonomy and then the government of
Ukraine failed to implement the Minsk to
agreements even though they were
endorsed by the U.N security Council so
the diplomacy failed again and when
Biden came into office in 2021 rather
than trying to de-escalate he called for
NATO enlargement and reinforced the U.S
push to expand Eastward Putin strongly
pushed back Biden pushed back the U.S
signed several statements in 2021
confirming that NATO would enlarge I
think this was all absolutely
irresponsible Russia masked troops on
its border and put on the table a draft
U.S Russia security agreement on
December 17
2021 based on no NATO enlargement the
Biden Administration formally replied
that it was not willing to negotiate
over that issue in a response in January
then Russia invaded on February 24th
2022 making clear that it was the
failure to reach an understanding on the
NATO question that was Central to
Russia's action four weeks later
zelenski declared that Ukraine was
accepting of neutrality in other words
the initial Russian invasion brought
Ukraine to the negotiating table and
during the second half of March with the
Turkish government being the mediators
Russia and Ukraine hammered out a peace
agreement incredibly the United States
blocked it because the United States
told the Ukrainian government you fight
on because American policy makers had
two ideas one was that the Ukraine
should not be neutral it should be a
NATO country and second that the war
would be won by some combination of
Western armaments and financial
sanctions and so the U.S ratcheted up
the war Putin said no we don't stand
down we fight and mobilize the hundreds
of thousands of Russians in the summer
of 2022 and since then we've been on a
path of military escalation I resent the
fact as a citizen threatened by this
that Biden has not negotiated over NATO
and that Biden and Putin have not talked
once as far as we know since February 24
2022 you know when two sides are
fighting they need to talk and negotiate
but that's rejected the hardliners in
the United States Newland Lincoln
Sullivan Biden say why negotiate we just
escalate we'll defeat Russia this is in
my view utterly Reckless and
irresponsible first it leads to the
destruction of Ukraine and second it
risks the escalation to nuclear war so
I'm very unhappy about this is and I
very much resent that the Main Street
Media like the New York Times repeats
the falsehood all the time that this was
an unprovoked action on February 24
2022 seemingly wanting us to be without
any context or history to understand
where this conflict came from and how it
can end and a newspaper like the New
York Times as a responsibility to tell
the truth and they're not doing it
indeed as Citizens we have the rights
you know a country is not looking after
in the U.S the prosperity of its own
citizens going out conducting these
irresponsible ones when we don't have
time with other things with the
environment ironically what seems to be
behind it all is this insistence on a
unipolar world insistence on dominance
and while the U.S wants to hold on to
its status as a reserve currency it
seems under those economic sanctions
that U.S has also suffered it might even
be hastening strengthening the current
cities of other countries well the basic
point is the U.S has 4.1 percent of the
world population so how could it presume
to be the world leader you know the U.S
is a powerful country it's a rich
country but it doesn't run the world and
it should not aspire to run the world
that's a kind of Madness and the U.S
ideology for a long time has been that
the U.S should run the world it's to my
mind unbelievable but then again I've
spent most of my career outside the U.S
seeing the other
95.9 of the world and I know that the
other 95 of the world doesn't want the
United States to run the world it's not
against the United States it just says
let us have our own part of the world we
don't want you running the world we
don't want you deciding what our
government is who we are how we rule
ourselves you know you're just one place
and this the United States leader don't
understand they're very arrogant they're
very ignorant because of the two big
oceans they're very unaware of the
history of other parts of the world and
we end up with this arrogant and naive
and dangerous foreign policy because
there's no doubt the United States is
Rich and powerful and it makes lots of
weapon systems and I'm 68 years old and
the United States has been at War almost
every year of my life from Vietnam and
Laos and Cambodia at Nicaragua at
Afghanistan and Iraq and Syria at Libya
and now Ukraine come on give it a break
and the U.S is also experiencing the
reality that other places in the world
are catching up on technology indeed
leading on Technologies as well and
China is a very successful very
industrious very hard-working society
which in the last 40 years has gone from
poverty to a very significant World
important economy and the U.S is a very
hard time accepting that the U.S
attitude if you listen to congressmen
who don't seem to know anything is oh if
China's successful must be because
they're cheating what about because
they're saving more than 40 percent of
GDP that the Chinese people have that
engaging in a remarkable upgrading of
Education hundreds of thousands of phds
minted each year massive scientific
research programs come on this is the
truth and so this arrogance is not
allowing the truth to come through but
you mentioned one specific point which
is the role of the U.S dollar part of
the U.S strength after World War II is
well the U.S was basically the only
economy standing and it was a
technologically advanced Rich large
economy the world's largest and the
dollar was really the only International
usable currency for quite a long time so
the dollar system became the center of
how you do International Trade when you
traded Goods they're denominated in
dollars when you buy the Imports you pay
in dollars meaning you use accounts in
U.S dollars typically the U.S banking
system when the transaction is closed
it's closed through the so-called Swift
interbank system and so the U.S has had
a what France long ago called an
exorbitant privilege that it could a lot
of money because the rest of the world
was holding dollars using dollars the
dollar was the basis of the world
economy that's changing now and it's
changing for three basic reasons one is
the share of the US and the world
economy is diminishing so this means
that the predominance of the U.S is
bound to diminish the second is
technologically settlements are going to
occur in all sorts of ways other than
through U.S banks and so-called digital
currencies especially Central Bank
digital currencies will mean other ways
to make settlements we'll settle in
Redmond B when we buy in China or settle
in Rubles or settle in rupees when trade
is with India and so forth so there will
be multiple currencies and then the
third part which is really a matter of a
bad set of decision making the U.S has
militarized the dollar meaning that
usually you think about money well
you're to have it you can use it you can
spend it but the United States has come
to say if we don't like you you don't
necessarily have access to your money
anymore if it's in our banks so the U.S
froze the dollar Holdings of Russia the
U.S has frozen the dollar Holdings of
Venezuela the U.S froze the dollar
Holdings of Afghanistan my advice to any
government that's not getting along with
the U.S government is be careful about
your body because the U.S might come in
and freeze your money and so countries
are looking to hold their reserves in
other ways now perfectly understandable
and I think that this is another part of
the move to a multi-currency
International System from a dollar-based
International System and you mentioned
the possibility of a reserve currency
being the remnb and so there's other
things that are not often reported about
China One and I know that you've written
about this as well is that they're
stepping in where America policy of DC
stabilizing and it's destructive China
in some cases in the Middle East is
stepping in as a peacemaker and it's
less expensive if we can achieve peace
well probably the most remarkable
diplomatic achievement of recent years I
would say is China brokering a peace
agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran
in the American idea those two countries
were implacable foes they could never
agree and for the United States Iran was
the enemy and Saudi Arabia was the Ally
but the whole idea of U.S foreign policy
is you bring countries under your
Authority as an ally of the United
States like Saudi Arabia and you fight
your enemies on the other side but China
has a different idea which is that Saudi
Arabia and Iran had no fundamental
reasons for this dissension but they
have plenty of reasons for cooperation
for one thing they're both being hard
hit by climate change they need to
cooperate because the Water Crisis is
quite severe they're both hydrocarbon
economies they meet an energy
transformation which is very profound
and so the Chinese facilitated a
Reconciliation between the two I'm very
happy about that reconciliation by the
way the fighting between the bitterness
between Iran and Saudi Arabia divided
Western Asia it contributed to
absolutely devastating war in Yemen in
which the United States gave its
military support that killed a lot of
people and it destabilized a region that
needs a lot of economic transformation
and technological upgrading and change
and so this agreement is really a big
help for the whole region not only for
the two countries involved and China
gets a lot of credit in my view for
having the wisdom to see that that was a
conflict that could be solved not just
exacerbated but the U.S approach was
always to push at it I even when the U.S
made an agreement with Iran the nuclear
agreement called the jcpoa the U.S
government walked away from it and then
it maintained sanctions on Iran because
the U.S is not really serious at making
peace most of the time it's got it US
versus that mentality and I find that
very destructive and not in the U.S
interest yes
approach because says it's dangerous
what's happening now in Taiwan and just
help us understand this situation like
and that through lines between these
proxy wars and what could happen in
China well the situation in Taiwan is
like the situation in Ukraine very
explosive very dangerous and it requires
cool heads to avoid a conflict the fact
of the matter is that actually all three
governments let me say the United States
Taiwan and China have a policy that
there's one China and whether it is the
government in Taiwan or the government
in Beijing they both say there's one
China they disagree on what happened in
1949 and how China should be governed
but they don't say there are two
countries and the United States when it
established diplomatic relations with
the People's Republic of China very
clearly said that there is one China and
has one China policy and that is how to
keep peace and to make sure that this 10
tension between Beijing and Taipei does
not boil over to open conflict but the
United States started to play games with
this it started to form a military
alliance with Taiwan in effect which is
really coming into a military Alliance
in the middle of one country and this is
an extremely dangerous and imprudent
thing to do and Biden starts talking
about how we're going to defend Taiwan
and the American politicians talk about
how a war is coming it's all utterly
Reckless irresponsible and what we
should have is trying to reduce tensions
diffuse tensions through negotiation
through talk through peace building
ideas rather than stoking the idea that
some conflict is inevitable a conflict
would be devastating of course first and
foremost for Taiwan but actually for the
whole world and so this needs to be
avoided and we need cool heads and we
shouldn't have American politicians safe
rattling we should not have speaker
Nancy Pelosi fly to Taiwan after the
Chinese government has repeatedly said
don't do that don't provoke don't stir
up things don't make conflicts where
there don't have to be conflicts but the
United States leadership doesn't listen
very well it's the same thing that when
Putin said many many many times do not
expand NATO to Ukraine the United States
oh sorry we don't hear you you have
nothing to say about that that's none of
your business and that war comes this is
very typical of American foreign policy
because American foreign policy leaders
are too arrogant and they don't listen
yes and now 61 years since the Cuban
Missile Crisis you defend think we
learned our lesson and of course America
would never accept military Alliance on
its doorstep you know say coming down
from Canada or something like that well
of course when Cuba aligned with the
Soviet Union in 1960 the U.S idea was
invade that's it it didn't say Oh Mr
Castro you could do what you want it's
an open door if you want to be with
Soviet Union that's fine with us no it
said well we invade so that was 1961 in
1962 in the repercussions of that and in
a really Reckless gamble Reckless action
by the Soviet Union putting missiles
into Cuba this whole conflict escalated
to just the brink of nuclear war in the
Cuban Missile Crisis and then in 1963
both President Kennedy and Soviet
chairman Nikita Khrushchev said you know
we have to pull back from the brink we
have to live together we should not be
coming to the edge of global nuclear war
and they say the partial nuclear Test
Ban Treaty in the summer of 1963 proving
that even at the height of the Cold War
if the mindset is right you can make
peace and that's the mindset that we
need now you yes it seems like the
neocon mindset never really went away
you know just help us understand because
to my mind you know Ukraine is not
indispensable for the US right it's just
this idea of NATO enlargement but
there's other forces behind the scenes
that are you know profiting or pushing
and I understand that zielinski you know
secured 110 billion dollars in usaid and
of course humanitarian Financial
Military Support also like key
Partnerships with you know the BlackRock
Venture Capital firm Goldman Sachs to
privatize Ukrainian assets so that would
then deepen the country's debt so help
us understand that a little the path
forward how do we get out of this well
when the debate raged initially in the
1990s about the wisdom or lack of wisdom
of NATO enlargement which was contrary
to what we had promised and was not wise
a lobbying campaign took place in the
United States led by the military
industrial complex very crude that's how
American politics Works bring out the
big bucks so it was Raytheon and
Lockheed Barton and other big companies
became the lobbyists and then you know
American congressmen they salute money
they salute campaign contributions they
salute the lobbyists and so this is how
American politics works there are always
Financial interests that are also
playing a role here so we have a mix of
ideology confusion lack of historical
sense arrogance and money all stirring
the pot it has very little to do with
the American people though the American
people are not asked about anything the
votes on money for Ukraine are generally
almost secret because they're not really
debated they're just measures stuck into
some other piece of legislation so that
you never have to debate the fact that
we've spent more than 110 billion
dollars so far on Ukraine and nobody's
really been asked about it nothing of
the American people haven't really
really been asked so this is how
American politics works now what should
be done this war should end by the
United States saying that NATO will not
enlarge and Russia say we take our
troops home that's the core of this that
was available in December 2021 it was
available in March 2022 and it's still
available now it doesn't solve many many
other issues what happens to the
territories what happens to Crimea these
are for negotiations but the basic idea
is that the two superpowers back off and
that the war stops and that we go to
political Solutions not military
Solutions and that should be our
priority and so finally as you think
about the future of the prospect of
nuclear war the kind of world that we're
leaving the Next Generation what would
you like young people to know preserve
and remember young people should lead
the way to a safer Cooperative peaceful
and environmentally sustainable and fair
world this is the point we need to build
the future we want not to feel trapped
in this mindless cycle of violence and
environmental destruction the problems
that we Face are solvable and they are
not driven by the needs of the people
they're driven by greed or power seeking
of Elites and we need to have a new
generation say this is not working we
want a world that is at peace that is
shared in prosperity and that solves the
environmental crises which have become
so deep and are neglected in part
because we are wasting our time our
lives our resources on these useless
Wars
Ver más vídeos relacionados
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wytEpskCMTc/hq720.jpg?v=6659b1cf)
LIVE: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy holds a press conference in Sweden
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ramBFRt1Uzk/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLCi4wyGp6Jyv2ikbsCnKJGrAqG1WQ)
The surprising decline in violence | Steven Pinker
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lwKB10rivVU/hq720.jpg)
Russia steps up attacks in Eastern Ukraine | BBC News
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yZseFzC6I7w/hq720.jpg)
ジョージアはロシアと欧州どちらに向かうのか 「スパイ法」を解説
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gCDsPkxU8T8/hq720.jpg)
【紛争の原点】中東戦争って何?現在のイスラエル・パレスチナ対立につながる歴史を解説します!
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9To4VEOWyvY/hq720.jpg)
Germany marks 80 years since Nazis invaded the Soviet Union | DW News
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)