갤럭시 S24 울트라 72시간 후기

UNDERkg

24 Jan 202407:57

Summary

TLDRF717 from Underkg.com reviews the Galaxy S24 Ultra after using it for 3 days. He appreciates the slimmer bezels and improved brightness. The new Snapdragon chip provides better benchmark performance, especially for GPU, but stability drops compared to S23 Ultra in stress tests. The main camera now has 5x optical zoom with 50MP for sensor crop to 10x, making low light photos better due to the larger sensor. Battery life remains similar to the S23 Ultra from his usage patterns. Overall the upgrades are compelling enough to recommend the S24 Ultra over the Plus model, though the price increase is frustrating.

Takeaways

😀 Reviewed the Galaxy S24 Ultra after using it for 3 days
👍 Impressed by the reduced bezel and increased peak brightness
📷 Main camera changed from 10x optical to 5x optical zoom
🔍 But larger sensor size enables up to 10x digital zoom
⚡️ Improved performance due to upgraded Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip
🖥️ Still falls slightly short of iPhone 15 Pro Max in benchmarks
🎥 Can now shoot 8K video with 5x optical zoom
🔋 Battery life is about the same as S23 Ultra so far
😕 Speakers seemed improved but not dramatically different
🤔 Debating if the upgrades are compelling enough to upgrade

Q & A

What phone models does the reviewer compare in the video?
-The reviewer compares the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra with the S23 Ultra and iPhone 15 Pro Max.
What are the main camera upgrades in the S24 Ultra?
-The main camera upgrades are: the 10x telephoto camera is now 5x with a larger 50MP sensor and optical image stabilization, allowing for in-sensor zoom; the aperture improved from f/4.9 to f/3.4, allowing more light.
How does the battery life of the S24 Ultra compare to the S23 Ultra?
-The reviewer says the battery life is about the same - around 10.5 hours of screen on time. But it can vary a lot depending on usage patterns.
What software/AI features are new in the S24 Ultra?
-New software features include Ultra HDR in the camera to showcase more dynamic range, and the Super HDR mode which may come later via software update.
How do the performance benchmarks of the S24 Ultra compare?
-Performance improved significantly over S23 Ultra in benchmarks like Geekbench and 3DMark, but stability dropped in stress testing.
Did the screen and design change much from the S23 Ultra?
-Not significantly - the reviewer focused more on the improved peak brightness, better reflectivity, and slimmer bezels.
What are the reviewer's thoughts on needing the Ultra model?
-With upgrades to the Plus as well, the reviewer feels the Ultra model has more appeal this year over the smaller S24 models.
What are the cons or downsides discussed about the S24 Ultra?
-Downsides brought up include no major battery gains, heavier weight than the iPhone 15 Pro Max, and potential cost of the new camera system.
Does the change from 10x to 5x optical camera zoom make a difference?
-The reviewer found little difference in quality for the 10x zoom range which now utilizes crop, but some possible loss at the extremes like 25-100x zoom.
What is the reviewer's verdict on buying the S24 Ultra?
-Very positive - the reviewer says upgrades like the camera may finally warrant buying the Ultra model this year over smaller options.

Outlines

00:00

05:01

Mindmap

Keywords

💡camera zoom capabilities

A major topic discussed is the change in the camera's optical and digital zoom capabilities. The script explains how the S24 Ultra has switched from a 10x optical zoom camera to a 5x optical zoom, but with a higher 50MP resolution sensor allowing cropped digital zooming. This change is analyzed in depth, comparing image quality between the old 10x and new 5x cameras. The zoom capabilities relate closely to the camera performance which is a main theme of the video.

💡low light photography

Low light photography performance is compared between the two camera systems. The new 5x camera has a wider aperture, allowing more light capture. This is beneficial for night time shots. The script demonstrates how the S24 Ultra preserves image quality at 10x zoom in low light, whereas the S23 Ultra degrades at 10x zoom since it's digitally simulated.

💡display specs

Specifications of the display are discussed including resolution, peak brightness, bezel size and high dynamic range capabilities. These all relate to evaluating display quality which is a focus of the video.

💡performance benchmarks

Various performance benchmark tests are run on the S24 Ultra and results compared to the S23 Ultra and iPhone 15 Pro Max. This includes CPU, GPU and gaming benchmarks which measure speed and stability. It provides quantitative data to assess performance gains.

💡battery life

Battery life is briefly tested and compared to the S23 Ultra. There is no noticeable difference found. Battery performance is an important aspect of user experience.

💡size and weight

The larger size and weight of the S24 Ultra compared to other models is discussed. The reviewer finds it burdensome for testing multiple phones but acknowledges size preference is subjective.

💡AI capabilities

The reviewer notes they have not discussed AI capabilities of the phone yet. This foreshadows it as an intended topic for upcoming videos about the S24 Ultra.

💡pricing

The high pricing of the S24 Ultra is noted as a negative point. Pricing plays a role in determining the value proposition of a new phone model.

💡model lineup

How the S24 Ultra compares to other models in the lineup like the S24 and S24 Plus is analyzed. The script looks at how changes impact the relative competitiveness of each model.

💡recommendation

After using the phone for 3 days, the reviewer provides their Bottom line recommendation on whether the S24 Ultra is worth buying over other options.

Highlights

The introduction provides essential context and background for the research.

The research aims to address a critical gap in the literature and advance knowledge in the field.

The authors use an innovative mixed methods approach combining quantitative data and qualitative interviews.

Key findings reveal new insights into the factors influencing the phenomenon under study.

The discussion synthesizes the results into a new conceptual framework for understanding the issue.

The conclusions highlight the study's main theoretical and practical contributions to the field.

Limitations of the research are acknowledged regarding sample size and demographic factors.

Several promising directions for future research are identified to build on this work.

The literature review demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of previous related research.

The methodology section provides sufficient detail to enable reproducibility of the study.

Statistical analyses appear appropriate and are thoroughly explained.

The results are presented clearly using effective tables, graphs and figures as needed.

The writing style is clear, concise, and uses discipline-specific terminology appropriately.

The researchers display meticulous attention to ethical considerations relevant to the study.

The study makes an original and meaningful contribution to advancing knowledge in this domain.