Debunking Custom ISOS & Windows Optimizations

Summary

In this video, Chris debunks myths around Windows optimization, comparing performance on Windows 10 vs. Windows 11, and the impact of admin accounts. He clarifies that the 24 H2 update doesn't inherently boost game performance and criticizes misleading YouTube benchmarks. Chris tested various custom Windows ISOs and found minimal performance differences, concluding that most optimizations are negligible, especially on newer hardware. He emphasizes the importance of genuine factors like CPU, GPU, and monitor choice for actual performance gains, dismissing placebo effects and urging viewers to focus on stable, secure Windows installations.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video benchmarks customized Windows builds to test performance differences between Windows 10 and 11, as well as admin versus local accounts.
• 🔍 The creator spent a significant amount of time debunking myths around performance, particularly the idea that Windows 11's 24 H2 update or admin accounts inherently improve performance.
• 🏁 The video emphasizes that running games as an administrator can improve performance in some cases, but this is not due to the 24 H2 update.
• 🛠️ The testing methodology involved measuring average FPS, 1% lows, and system latency, with the results suggesting minimal performance gains from Windows optimizations.
• 🚫 The video discourages the use of custom ISOs due to potential security risks such as malware or spyware, advocating for a clean Windows installation instead.
• 🛑 The creator challenges viewers to prove the benefits of custom ISOs or specific Windows settings with clear, concise, and fair benchmarks.
• 🔄 The script highlights that benchmarks are variable and should not be taken at face value, urging viewers to understand the nuances of benchmarking.
• 📊 The results showed that most optimizations offer little to no performance gains, with the exception of older hardware where disabling Windows Defender could provide improvements.
• 💻 The video suggests that server versions of Windows performed better in CPU-bound scenarios in the Modern Warfare 2 benchmark, but this was an unexplained outlier.
• 🎮 For gamers, the focus should be on hardware optimization, including the fastest gaming CPU and GPU, resolution and game settings, and RAM optimizations.
• 🛡️ The conclusion is that most Windows optimizations are unnecessary, and that stability, good hardware, and proper settings are what truly matter for performance.

Q & A

What was the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video was to benchmark customized Windows builds to test performance differences and debunk myths around Windows optimization, specifically focusing on the impact of using admin accounts and the differences between Windows 10 and Windows 11.

Why did the author choose Windows 11 as the base for most tests?

The author chose Windows 11 as the base for most tests because Windows 10 is going to drop support in about a year, making Windows 11 a more relevant choice for testing.

What is the 24 H2 update mentioned in the script?

The 24 H2 update refers to a specific update version for Windows operating systems. The script mentions that there is no performance difference when running games or benchmarks on Windows 10 or Windows 11 admin or local account across all versions as long as the game is run as an administrator.

What did the author find regarding the performance of games when launched as an administrator?

The author found that some games do run better when launched as an administrator with the 24 H2 update, and future Windows plans aim to address this so that games won't need to be run as admin to achieve optimal performance.

What is the UAC setting mentioned in the script, and why was it disabled in the tests?

UAC stands for User Account Control. It was disabled in the tests to rule out any performance differences that might be attributed to the UAC setting, ensuring that the tests were focused on other variables.

Why did the author decide not to test Enterprise LTSC versions of Windows?

The author decided not to test Enterprise LTSC versions because they are essentially branches of standard Windows builds with some features removed and only receive security updates. Testing LTSC was deemed unnecessary as it does not offer significant differences from standard Windows builds.

What was the conclusion regarding custom ISOs tested in the video?

The conclusion was that most Windows optimizations, including custom ISOs, offer little to no performance gains. The differences observed in benchmarks were due to natural variation in benchmark runs rather than the optimizations themselves.

What did the author find as the exception to the rule regarding performance in the tests?

The exception to the rule was that Windows 11 2025 server and Windows 10 2022 server performed significantly better when CPU-bound in the 1080p Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark, which was unexplainable from the author's perspective.

Why did the author challenge the viewers and custom ISO creators in the video?

The author challenged viewers and custom ISO creators to prove their claims of performance improvements with clear, concise, and fair benchmark runs. This was to counter the misinformation and placebo effects often seen in the custom ISO and optimization communities.

What are some factors that the author believes truly matter when optimizing for more frames and lower latency?

The author believes that factors such as having the fastest gaming CPU, the fastest gaming GPU, optimal RAM settings, a high refresh rate monitor, lowest latency mouse and keyboard, overclocking, good driver settings, and low game config settings truly matter when optimizing for more frames and lower latency.

Outlines

00:00

🖥️ Windows Benchmarking & Optimization Myths

Chris, the YouTuber, introduces his video on benchmarking customized Windows builds to test performance differences between Windows 10 and 11, admin versus local accounts, and the impact of the 24 H2 update. He clarifies that running games as an administrator doesn't inherently improve performance across all versions, and that the 24 H2 update isn't a performance fix. He also mentions that disabling User Account Control (UAC) in stock Windows versions was part of the testing to eliminate it as a variable. The video aims to debunk myths and provide clarity on Windows optimization.

05:01

📊 Benchmark Analysis & Testing Methodology

The paragraph discusses the importance of understanding benchmark variations and the methodology used for testing. Chris explains that due to time constraints, he conducted single runs for benchmarks, deleting any that were significantly flawed. He emphasizes that while some YouTubers may average out multiple runs, his approach was to focus on quick, consistent testing. The video will not extensively display the results but will provide links for those interested. Chris also challenges the audience and other custom ISO creators to prove their optimizations with clear and fair benchmarks.

10:02

🚫 Debunking Custom ISOs & Performance Gains

Chris addresses the lack of significant performance gains from most Windows optimizations, stating that they are negligible, especially on newer hardware. He explains that the perceived benefits are often due to older or low-end CPUs where disabling background processes and Windows Defender can make a noticeable difference. He warns against the risks of installing custom ISOs that could contain malware or other harmful software, advocating for a clean Windows installation and simple script optimizations if necessary.

15:03

🎮 Real Factors Affecting Gaming Performance

In this paragraph, Chris outlines the true factors that impact gaming performance, such as having the fastest gaming CPU and GPU, resolution and game settings, RAM optimizations, high refresh rate monitors, and low latency input devices. He also touches on the importance of stability in component performance and the right graphics driver settings. Chris stresses that these elements are what truly matter for competitive gamers seeking higher frame rates and lower latency.

20:03

🛠️ System Optimization & Background Processes

Chris concludes by emphasizing the basics of system optimization, such as disabling unnecessary background programs that consume CPU and GPU resources. He provides insights into the impact of Windows Defender and background apps, especially on low-end systems, and suggests checking for such processes using Task Manager. He also mentions the importance of proper power plans and BIOS settings for Intel CPUs to prevent downclocking during gaming. Lastly, he encourages checking the GitHub guide for more information on testing methodology and system details.

Keywords

💡Benchmarking

Benchmarking refers to the process of evaluating the performance, quality, or effectiveness of a system or component. In the context of the video, the host has been benchmarking customized Windows builds to test their performance. The video aims to debunk myths around certain optimizations, showing that many custom ISOs and tweaks do not provide significant performance gains, especially on modern hardware.

💡Windows 10 vs. Windows 11

This key concept refers to the comparison between two major versions of the Windows operating system. The video discusses the performance differences, if any, when running games or benchmarks on these two versions. The host concludes that there is no significant performance difference between Windows 10 and Windows 11, which is a central theme in debunking optimization myths.

💡Admin Account

An admin account is a user account on a Windows system that has elevated privileges to perform tasks that regular user accounts cannot. The video addresses the myth that running games as an admin account can lead to performance improvements. The host clarifies that while some games may run better when launched as an administrator, it is not a universal performance fix.

💡UAC (User Account Control)

User Account Control is a security feature in Windows that prompts users for confirmation before making significant changes to the system. The script mentions that disabling UAC in certain Windows builds was done to rule out its impact on performance tests. This is relevant as UAC can sometimes be implicated in performance discussions, though the host found it not to be a significant factor.

💡ISOs

ISOs, or disk images, are files that contain an exact copy of data that can be written to a disk. In the video, the host tests various customized Windows ISOs to determine if they offer any performance advantages over stock Windows installations. The conclusion is that most optimizations in these ISOs do not result in measurable performance gains.

💡Performance Variation

Performance variation refers to the differences in results obtained from repeated tests or measurements. The video emphasizes that benchmark results can vary, and that small differences are often due to natural variation rather than the effectiveness of an optimization. This concept is crucial for understanding the video's message that many claimed optimizations are not supported by consistent benchmark results.

💡Hardware

Hardware refers to the physical components of a computer system. The video suggests that the impact of Windows optimizations is more noticeable on older or low-end hardware, where reducing background processes and disabling features like Windows Defender can lead to improvements. However, on modern, high-end systems, these optimizations have minimal impact.

💡Malware

Malware is software designed to harm or exploit computer systems without the owner's consent. The video warns against the risks of installing custom ISOs, which could potentially contain malware, spyware, or other harmful elements. This serves as a cautionary note against blindly trusting unverified optimization solutions.

💡Server Builds

Server builds of Windows are versions of the operating system optimized for use on servers rather than personal computers. The video includes tests on server builds and finds that, contrary to expectations, certain server versions perform better in specific CPU-bound scenarios. This finding is presented as an exception to the general theme that most optimizations are ineffective.

💡Optimization

Optimization in the context of the video refers to the process of modifying or enhancing a system to achieve better performance. The host challenges the effectiveness of many claimed Windows optimizations, arguing that they provide little to no real-world performance gains, especially on modern hardware.

Highlights

Chris has spent a significant amount of time benchmarking customized Windows builds to test performance claims.

Windows 10 and Windows 11 show no performance difference when running games or benchmarks, regardless of admin or local account status.

The 24 H2 update does not provide a golden performance fix as commonly misunderstood; some games run better when launched as administrator.

Chris challenges the effectiveness of custom ISOs and Windows optimization guides, emphasizing the importance of understanding benchmark variations.

Custom ISOs tested include Atlas OS, Kiros, Spectre OS, Fox OS, XOS, Colonel OS, and GG OS, all based on Windows 11 23 H2.

Windows Server versions performed unexpectedly better in CPU-bound scenarios in the Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark.

Chris emphasizes that most Windows optimizations offer little to no performance gains, especially on newer hardware.

Background processes and Windows Defender can impact performance on older or low-end CPUs, but not on modern systems.

Chris warns against the risks of installing custom ISOs that could contain malware or other security threats.

Lany benchmark tools are often misunderstood and misused in the tweaking community, not accurately reflecting real-world performance.

The importance of using a fast gaming CPU to match GPU capabilities is highlighted for achieving higher frame rates.

Resolution and game settings play a crucial role in performance, with higher settings requiring more powerful hardware.

RAM optimizations, such as XMP profiles, are noted as important for speeding up the CPU.

The choice of monitor, including refresh rate and panel type, significantly affects input lag and overall gaming experience.

Overclocking and ensuring system stability are key for maximizing performance without causing crashes or instability.

Chris concludes that many Windows optimizations are unnecessary and potentially a scam, advocating for a clean Windows installation.

Transcripts

YouTube it's Chris welcome back to the

channel I've just spent a good part of

my life the past week benchmarking

customized Windows builds to one proof a

point and two I wanted to do this for

quite a long time so in advance I

apologize if I leave anything out in

this video there's a link down in the

description has has a description of

everything all the benchmarks The

Benchmark files and everything if you

guys are interested in taking and having

a look so this video we're talking about

debunking isos and windows optimization

Windows 10 versus Windows 11 versus

admin account right it's already been

debunked there's a link there this is

the video previously if you want to go

check it out so because there was no

difference between 10 or 11 I've decided

and I've chosen Windows 11 uh as using

that as a base for most of the tests

here in between testing customized

Windows is also because 10 is going to

drop support in about a year so that

sort of made more sense let's clear up

confusion around the 24 H2 update there

is no performance difference when

running games or benchmarks on Windows

10 or Windows 11 admin or local account

across all's versions as long as you're

running the game as

administrator right there's a lot of

carry on in the internet right now and a

lots of YouTubers are showing benchmarks

of uh you know admin account versus not

admin account and admin versus not admin

the explanations from YouTubers on this

topic have become muddled and misleading

people are mistaken thinking that 24h do

is some kind of a golden performance fix

it's simply not the case yes some games

do run better when launched as

administrator the 24 H2 update and

future Windows plans to address this so

games won't need to be ran as admin to

achieve Optimal Performance due to this

the stock Windows 10 Stock Windows 11

Windows 10 server and windows 11 server

have UAC disabled to rule out this issue

in any of the tests so long story short

it wasn't an admin thing uh admin

account thing right the hidden admin

account it was just like you could run

the game as administrator and like the

issue was fixed and it only happens with

some games and some benchmarks

regardless of VBS so I've seen that ages

before I remember a long time ago when

pubg first came out if you didn't run it

as admin your frames were like worse and

so that's debunked want to get that out

of the way before we go and talk about

the further testing so iso's tested

right so my optimization pack Windows 11

23 H2 packs here we did Atlas OS um 23

H2 uh revision so revios or revision

whatever they call it Kiros is a um

operating system kind of Base towards

Counter

Strike um Spectre

OS um I did use the super light version

so all of these are windows 1123 H2

we've got uh Fox OS by cat gamer op

probably one of the cringier ones um xos

OS I I I was suggested to test this out

by my Discord Community I I have no idea

what this was it was uh interesting um

Colonel OS the fact that this Discord

Community has

76,000 members is just crazy I mean

anyway GG OS um and it's quite

interesting a lot of these isos in

particular revision

Kirby uh Fox

OS um and ggos they are all people that

came from my community from the

beginning a long time ago and they've

kind of got gone and made their own take

on a custom windows ISO which is

interesting um I did Windows

XL um I chose 24 H2 for that one uh I

just want to mix things up a little bit

right

um use this the light version of that um

and then yeah just like Windows 10 Stock

Windows 11 stock Windows uh 2025 server

which is 24 H2 Windows 11 and Windows 10

server 2022 which is 21

H2 now I decided not to test Enterprise

ltsc cuz I already had enough of my

plate it's been a nightmare to do all

this so testing ltsc isn't unnecessary

since it's essentially a branch of

standard Windows builds with some blow

removed and only security updates so

there's no point me testing ltsc when

it's just like Windows 10 or Windows 11

with like some of the uwp not there uwp

blow apps like there's just there's just

no point so I didn't bother testing

those I thought it was worth testing

server cuz they're a slightly different

build um yeah anyway so before you look

at these results and I'm not actually

going to really show you guys many of

the results in this video I'm sorry I'm

not trying to clickbait you to go to the

GitHub link B it's just like there's

just no point and you'll see why soon

you're analyzing these benchmarks to

choose the best ISO stop the bench the

differences are simply due to variation

in Benchmark runs you guys need to

understand this I have have limited time

and I already wasted a week so I've only

done a single run okay if the Run was

completely messed up I delete it and do

another run right but most proper

YouTubers will actually Benchmark

properly and they'll do like 10 runs and

average it out and maybe remove a bad

run before they average it out and

they'll actually test more or less more

in a game situation so it's more CPU

heavy right there actual more of a

reality of what's going on in game I

have limited time I needed something

really consistent so I've measured you

know average frames 1% lows or 0.1% lows

and through Lany in short burst tests in

actual benchmarks so it was the best way

for me to do it quick

concisely and

consistently right so if you're going to

read these like blue is average FPS um

like dark gray is 1% lows and really

light gray is 0.1% lows on the left here

please don't don't forget the left part

it is through put and end system leny

okay using my external to it's all

explained down here okay all my testing

methodology and my settings I've been as

open as I can with everything so if

anyone wants to to dissect my testing

methodology or isn't happy with it um

they can simply go do it themselves or

they can go see the raw files I wasn't

at all biased in any of these tests

either I made it sure to be completely

consistent as I good and if anyone else

um genuinely thinks that uh X is better

than y and they can do clear concise

Fair Benchmark runs and show me

otherwise then I'll test it out myself I

actually challenge you guys I challenge

any of the people that have customized

isos or um Carry On about customized

isos or X or Y Windows setting that it's

that great you know I'm on this OS and

it's that great like I challenge you um

I've done a video on how to measure

frames and system length you but easily

reframe you there's a testing

methodology that you can use prove it to

me okay prove it to me if you guys don't

think this testing methodology is good

enough do something and prove it to me

challenge you any of the people that are

making custom isos and whatever so

anyway the results all come down to

Benchmark variation there's nothing to

really talk about I'm not going to show

these you guys can go to the GitHub link

Down Below in the description of the

video if you want to see them there was

an outlier though it was a little weird

server ran way better than Modern

Warfare 2 Benchmark and I came to the

same conclusion in game which is kind of

why I've also included

separate um just in-game whole

benchmarks here right so

you can see like servers clearly

performing better in 4k and Incredibly

better in 1080P so that tells me it's

like some kind of a CPU issue uh with

that g engine specifically on normal

Windows 10 Windows 11 not sure what's

going on there but um I'll read what

I've wrote about it just here in a

second I'll scroll down so conclusion

when considering Benchmark variations

and I really hope you guys are

considering that not looking at like the

top one and thinking that it's the best

or trying to look at the lowest latency

monitor uh results and think it's the

best benchmarks are variable like they

are okay PCS are variable uh you won't

ever ever get the exact same run every

time it'll always be slightly different

right and laty tool is variable um only

only slightly but these things happen

right so most Windows optimizations

offer little to no performance gains so

even demarking myself here and some of

my guides right the exception lies with

older and Hardware where where minimal

background processes and disabling

Windows Defender can provide noticeable

improvements due to CP usage right this

likely explains the Benchmark

differences often seen when people

promote custom isos most of the time

these tests are usually conducted on

systems with a few generation old

low-end CPUs I've seen this quite often

a bunch of these optimization guides

they will show you benchmarks to show

I'm getting 50 more frames in Counter

Strike or something like that when in

reality they're using a really old CPU

like a

4770k and um you know the default bloat

and defender on is causing 40% you know

30% CPU usage on their system so like

there's that we have to take that into

consideration and when you have a really

really good CPU that's not so much of an

issue so there's that that's the real

conclusion that I've come down to now

why risk installing a custom ISO that

could contain malware spyware bad

optimizations key loggers or even

Bitcoin miners a vanilla Windows

installation is sufficient safe and you

can Achi achieve optimizations using

simple scripts instead if needed at all

now I won't deny that you can vastly

improve your desktop experience being

experience by optimizing Windows there's

that but in reality when you do the

right things that actually matter

there's no difference when you're

comparing an actual real game with real

frames real 1% lows and actual through

laty so anyway the exception to the rule

and the odd one out that I found in

these tests there's one one exception I

can't explain Windows 11 2025 server and

Windows 10 2022 server perform

significantly better when CPU Bound in

the 1080p Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark

right after reinstalling and retesting

Windows 10 11 Windows 11 server Windows

10 server yes I did all of these and

then I reinstalled these just to make

sure the my sanity was being challenged

at this point but anyway and running the

Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark as well as

testing in a real match I realized the

same I reached the same conclusion for

some reason server versions are

performing better when CPU Bound in

Modern Warfare

2 this seems unexplainable from my

perspective likely due to poor engine

optimization side note Modern Warfare 2

performed poorly on Windows 10 server

20122 and those chipset drivers are

installed benchmarks are identical on

the other windows builds with or without

chipset drivers right so what on Warfare

2 is performing better on server 10 or

11 doesn't matter significantly better

okay we're going from like roughly 380

FPS right with those 1% lows you guys

can go to the GitHub link if you want to

have a look at it so like 446 443 FPS

like there's variation in these

benchmarks it's not I mean like not just

the frames have gone up the 1% lows have

gone up as well so like there's

something going on I don't know I can't

explain it like I said I think it's just

probably the developers I'm going to

blame them at this point I'm not telling

you all to go server

my next videos are actually going to be

um how to install server and set it up

and use it but that's besides the point

so there's that okay now hopefully both

of you out there are smart enough to

realize Benchmark variation and don't

look at these benchmarks and think oh my

God you know um oh I play Call of Duty

and server 2022 is better I'm going to

go on that like please if you understand

oh sorry not Call of Duty 2 sorry the

other ones like as an example

you know I play Hitman 3 so I'm going to

go on ggos cuz that I mean that game

it's like guys honestly like the the

numbers are they're all the same the

numbers Mason like they're they're

literally the same they're within

variations of runs maybe some isos have

slightly worse 1% lows because of bad

optimizations but that's not what I'm

really seeing here like it's all just

Placebo dumb so speaking of placebo

dumb and you people that are doing

custom isos or these custom ISO

communities obsessed with this stupid

stuff what about Lyon benchmarks so's

some link to Lyon and exper in delad

exper with um Windows tools leny Monitor

and exper are only useful for diagnosing

driver issues or audio dropouts related

to drivers their purpose has been

misunderstood in the tweaking

communities with many mistakenly believe

they measure real enter and Lany in

reality driver Lany is a minor part of

the Lany CH so obsessing over these

numbers is a waste of time and it really

is okay how many times I don't know how

to have to argue with you people this is

end to end system Lany right here okay

try to zoom in the whole page here so

you guys can see right you're obsessing

over this and probably only a small part

of this right with using Lany mod or

exper okay like lowering those numbers

ain't going to do like you want to

lower those numbers disable like ccd1 on

your CPU U you know as an example and

have worse frames or like disable like

smt or hyperthreading and you're going

to have worse frames so you're going to

have way worse latency like like it's

just it's so dumb I'm over it like you

know strip out everything in Windows so

Lany of course it's going to look like

lower you have less drivers running and

less stuff running but is it actually

affecting really real throughput Lany

like real throughput Lany like no it's

not so people that are obsessing over

that you need to wake up and stop and

especially people that are using that as

a benchmark to show a custom ISO is

better is not the reality of the real

end user experience it is such a small

part and like I said it should only be

used diagnosing issues with certain

drivers um and as as Gamers we don't

usually have to do that like graphic

driver developers they know what they're

doing Windows know what they're doing

it's pretty rare that a r bad driver

comes out and usually if it's like a

driver causing an issue and spiking it's

probably come down to like a faulty

heart I do remember having an old

motherboard that had a um you know

killer eth in it and that was causing

lots of issues but that's a story for

another day that's that's that's a

hardware issue okay so what really

matters then it all boils down to the

basics here's my take on what truly

matters when optimizing for more frames

and lower actual latency real latency

I'm planning on to demonstrate scaling

with these factors in future videos but

for now here are my thoughts no promises

on the videos but we'll see about that

so what actually matters you want to get

more frames you want to lower your

laning right you're obsessed with these

things or your competitive player the

things that matter fastest gaming CPU to

spit out frames keep up with a

GPU it's a thing I mean at the end of

the day guys you're tweaking your

settings you're trying to make minimal

background tasks you're lowering your

settings in games to make it more CPU

bound so the CPU can sped out as many

frames as you can so the GPU is not like

loaded up right there that fastest

gaming GPU to sped out frames to keep up

with the CPU resolution and game

settings right okay I do see a lot of

people that think oh well I'm still on

1080p I should probably just get a 4

4060 instead of a 4090 well there's so

much more to it than that because you

know your card's going to be able to

speed out more frames even if you're

still on 1080P and it's going to have

lower GP usage so it's still going to be

lower input lag okay is that I from

memory actually remember optimal Tech

testing this you know um and you know

testing like 1080p going from like I

think it was a 470 to a 490 and there

was like 1.5 millisecond lower input

like simply for the fact that it was low

GP usage even though the frames were

similar in that particular scenario so

yeah like buying the fastest card is

kind of PID to win like that right not

to mention you could probably up some

settings and have the similar latency

because it's such a good card so make

your game look pretty and have lower

input lag okay Ram optimizations decent

Ram kit XMP DCP Expo to speed up the CPU

right that's pretty self-explanatory

okay fastest High refresh rate monitor

includes lower resolution okay so that's

pretty self-explanatory OLED instead of

va IPS and TN OLED is King right now

it's unfortunate that for the 1080p

Gamers there aren't really any like

1080p esport oleds out but they will

come out soon mark my words um oled's

just King when it comes to Pure

throughput latency um hard one box sorry

monitors on box have measured this um

the a a 4K 240 OLED is lower input lag

than a 540 her TN because oed's that

good so you know there are 3604 40p

Leeds that are out that's kind of The

Sweet Spot there're going to be better P

panels that'll come out um and 1080p or

panels that will come out for you guys

that do e Sports and mark my words they

they will take over the market because

they they're just incredible um lowest

latency Mouse lowest latency keyboard

don't need to talk about that

overclocking Ram CPU and GPU to make

your components run faster stability

this is a huge one and honestly a lot of

my clients that come to me for more

optimization service that's literally

what it comes down to stability like

they might have a incompatible Ram kit

with their certain motherboard or CPU

have to make it work or they got a

faulty Ram kit or you know a faulty CPU

or like something is wrong like that

causes frame rate and ly issues

massively good performance and graphics

driver settings so I mean I don't want

to talk about this too much but like

it's just stuff the performance in the

nid control panel like vsync stuff gsync

stuff there is also a thing with like

display scaling slightly better but I'm

not going to talk about that too much

here good low game config and in game

settings probably a huge one in

here as well um you know to achieve

higher frames and lower GP usage right

um flip modeling game I recently talked

about this in my um capture card video

if you guys want to go check that out

you want to be in Hardware independent

Flip or Legacy flip um I'm not going to

go too much more in depth about that

lowering R lowering resolution DSS or

FSR techniques to achieve higher FPS and

lower GPU usage obviously that can be

counted with just buying a better

graphics card right faster graphics card

but yeah not everyone has the luxury of

buying a 490 so you have things like

that that you can use one thing I will

add you don't want to be using frame

generation okay that's going to that's a

different topic that's going to add

input lag but just pure DSS or FSR is

just literally like running a lower

resolution okay you can get more frames

if you're seeing more frames the length

are coming down to aside from frame

generation okay as discussed here the

conclusion is that Defender and

background blow primarily impact low-end

CPUs and systems the most and look I

seen this myself okay at the end of the

day doesn't matter what cust ISO you're

on or what optimizations you're

doing my son's really old dual core

laptop could barely run roadblocks at 20

FPS I remov Defender and background apps

and it could run a clean 60 so that's a

pretty hard cor example of that but a

lot of these customized isos and their

benchmarks that you're showing they're

showing you look at the game they're

testing and look at how the hardware is

and then you can come to your own

conclusion there okay so there's that

not telling you all you should be like

removing Defender b or disabling it but

that is pretty much literally most of

the time what it comes down to I will

also mention Intel like AMD if you're on

AMD CPU doesn't really matter the power

plan doesn't matter but if you're on

Intel CPU generally speaking you want to

do c States off in BIOS and run a decent

power plan in Windows otherwise you CP

might be downclocking in game so like

obviously that's going to affect

performance of the game right so there's

that to consider but I don't wanted to

go I just wanted to cover the real

Basics here so anyway background

programs that use CPU GPU usage and like

these are there are lots of things like

NZXT um IQ software better you just go

into task manager and check CPU you can

check that like I see a lot lot of

people like using um GeForce filters

you're losing like 80 frames in a GP

bound situation well I am um depending

on the card and the game settings right

um and you know I see people using like

um Nvidia broadcast it's like tanking GP

usage like things things like that

things that are running in the

background that cause CPU and GP usage

like most of you can just go to task

manager and just check it's quite easy

to do so anyway down below is just more

info on the system and my testing

methodology I kept things very very fair

throughout all customized isos and all

builds are use the same graphics card

overclock Nvidia driver settings and

Spector settings by same buyer settings

same game config same game Launcher

settings um any post install

optimization scripts that are included

in the isos I ran them right I've left

the Nvidia graphic some of these

customized isos came with some scripts

to run different Nvidia driver settings

they do impact things okay that is

measurable I wanted to keep it fair so

I've used exactly the same Invidia

graphics driver settings from my

optimization guide to be fair okay I

think everyone could agree on that and

look Windows 10 versus Windows 11 like

Windows 11 has hags on by default

Windows 10 doesn't so hags is on both

windows 11 has VBS on or core isolation

on by default whereas Windows 10 doesn't

so that there it's off on both and

because of this whole new debacle and

some specific games have a problem if

they don't run an admin uac's disabled

on both local account on both as well

not a Microsoft account just to stop all

the sinking background um and

that's pretty much all we need to talk

about

so I've covered everything we're already

up to 22 minutes go check out the GitHub

guide um yeah I

mean a lot of Windows optimizations and

customizes are a waste of time there's

just no point to bother been wanting to

do this video for a long time to give a

bit of a f you to some of the people

that have been in my Discord and had a

fall out with me and caus a bunch of

drama and then created these custom isos

and just constantly talk about me

so screw you windows optimizations are a

scam a lot of it doesn't matter that is

all I have to say appreciate you guys

love you all peace out bye