Di Jakarta, Demokrasi Telah Kembali | Opini Tempo

Summary

The Jakarta gubernatorial election saw Pramono Anung and Rano Karno emerge victorious, with Pramono securing 50.07% of the vote, signaling a strong rejection of manipulative political strategies. However, voter turnout was alarmingly low at just 58%, the lowest in Jakarta's history, reflecting public disillusionment with corrupt practices. Analysts point to public apathy and widespread political manipulation as factors, with figures like Prabowo Subianto contributing to the problem. The election highlighted the importance of political and economic independence, with a more educated and economically stable electorate making rational, ethical choices, unlike regions dominated by political patronage.

Takeaways

• 😀 Pramono Anung leads the Jakarta gubernatorial race with 50.07% of the votes, showing public resistance to political manipulation.
• 😀 Voter participation in the 2024 Jakarta gubernatorial election is at a low 58%, the lowest in Jakarta's election history.
• 😀 Despite the low turnout, Pramono's victory appears solid based on exit polls and the official results from the General Election Commission.
• 😀 The low voter turnout is attributed to public disillusionment with political manipulation and the influence of power players like Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto.
• 😀 Political analysts believe that the apathy in voting reflects public frustration with tactics used by ruling elites to manipulate elections.
• 😀 Prabowo Subianto's role in promoting candidates such as Ridwan Kamil and Suswono is seen as unethical and a violation of electoral fairness.
• 😀 The General Election Commission (Bawaslu) cleared Prabowo's campaign of violations, despite accusations of using state resources for political gain.
• 😀 Voters with higher education and independent economic status are more likely to make rational political choices, resisting manipulation by money or social welfare benefits.
• 😀 Jakarta’s electorate, with an average education level equivalent to high school, demonstrates more rational voting compared to provinces with lower education and income levels.
• 😀 The script draws historical parallels to Soekarno's era, highlighting the ongoing struggle to maintain a healthy, democratic system in Indonesia, as previously critiqued by Muhammad Hatta.

Q & A

What was the key outcome of the Jakarta gubernatorial election in 2024?

Pramono Anung won the Jakarta gubernatorial election with 50.07% of the vote, making him the 18th governor of Jakarta for the 2024-2029 period.

Why was voter turnout in the Jakarta gubernatorial election of 2024 considered low?

The voter turnout was only 58%, which is the lowest in Jakarta's history. This low turnout was attributed to public disillusionment and apathy towards the political system, partly due to manipulation and dirty tactics used by political elites.

What factors are believed to have caused the low voter participation in the 2024 election?

Political analysts suggest that the low voter participation was due to public dissatisfaction with political manipulation, money politics, and the perceived corruption in the election process.

How did political figures like Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto influence the election?

Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto were involved in promoting certain candidates, including Ridwan Kamil, which many perceived as attempts to influence the outcome of the election in favor of specific political figures.

What is the significance of the 50% vote threshold in the Jakarta gubernatorial election?

According to Indonesia’s election laws, a candidate must secure more than 50% of the votes to be elected as governor. Pramono Anung’s 50.07% was enough to ensure his victory, assuming no major issues with the vote count.

What role did political money and patronage play in the election, according to the transcript?

The transcript highlights the influence of political money and patronage, noting how voters in regions with lower education levels and economic independence were more susceptible to manipulation through financial incentives and social welfare programs.

How does the education and income level of Jakarta's population relate to voting behavior?

The transcript points out that residents of Jakarta, with higher education and income levels, tend to be more rational and independent in their political choices, resisting manipulation through money politics, unlike voters in other provinces like Sumatera Utara and Jawa Timur.

What historical comparison is made in the article regarding Indonesia's democracy?

The article compares the current state of Indonesian democracy to past critiques by Muhammad Hatta, who criticized the weakening of democratic values during the era of President Sukarno, particularly when democracy was replaced by guided democracy.

What is the central criticism of Prabowo Subianto’s actions during the election?

Prabowo Subianto is criticized for undermining democracy by continuing to manipulate the election process. Despite being a president candidate, he reportedly interfered in the election to benefit his preferred candidates, disregarding ethical and legal constraints.

How does the article define the relationship between democracy and economic independence?

The article suggests that a healthy democracy requires political freedom and economic independence. Without economic independence, citizens may fall prey to political manipulation through money and patronage, undermining democratic processes.