Rodrigo Gomes: Se estuda para PF ou PRF, CUIDADO!!

Summary

In this video, the speaker emphasizes the importance of smart studying for various Brazilian police exams, particularly focusing on the PF and PRF. For the PF, the speaker advises not to over-focus on Constitutional Law, as it only contributes to three questions, with other areas like Portuguese and Informatics being more critical. For the PRF, which leans more on legal knowledge, the speaker stresses the importance of studying the CTB and legal topics. The key message is to avoid overcomplicating study strategies and to focus on the core material relevant to the exams.

Takeaways

• 😀 Many people failed because they studied too much, leading to mistakes in key areas like Constitutional Law.
• 😀 In Federal Police (PF) exams, Constitutional Law is not a major focus—it's more of a secondary subject, with only three questions on it.
• 😀 If you fail an exam, don't blame a single question when you've made multiple other mistakes. Be realistic about your errors.
• 😀 In the PF exam, it’s common for candidates to claim they missed the cut-off by just one point, when they actually made several other mistakes.
• 😀 The PF exam includes a mix of subjects like Portuguese, Accounting, and Logic. Candidates need to focus on these subjects to perform well.
• 😀 The minimum passing score for the PF is 68, but this is based on 90 questions, so careful studying is necessary across different subjects.
• 😀 Candidates should avoid getting overly focused on Constitutional Law in PF exams, as it's not a significant factor in scoring.
• 😀 The PRF exam is more law-oriented, with 70 out of 100 questions based on legal topics, including 40 on the Traffic Code (CTB) and 30 on other laws.
• 😀 The PRF exam has a higher weight on legal subjects, making it important for candidates to focus on law-related topics rather than just general knowledge.
• 😀 Candidates should be strategic about their study approach, recognizing the specific subject weight in different exams (e.g., PRF, PF).

Q & A

What is the main issue the speaker highlights about people failing exams?

The speaker points out that many people fail exams because they focus too much on studying certain subjects, like constitutional law, and end up neglecting others. This leads to mistakes on other questions, even though they may have studied thoroughly in some areas.

What is the speaker's perspective on the role of constitutional law in the Federal Police (PF) exam?

The speaker believes that constitutional law is a minor subject for the PF exam, mentioning that only a few questions related to it are asked. Therefore, it should not be a primary focus when studying for the exam.

What does the speaker suggest about the difficulty level of constitutional law questions in the PRF and PF exams?

The speaker suggests that the constitutional law questions in both the PRF and PF exams are not difficult, and that anyone familiar with the basics of the subject should be able to answer them without much trouble.

How does the speaker explain the importance of understanding the weight of each subject in law enforcement exams?

The speaker emphasizes that understanding the weight of each subject helps prioritize study efforts. By focusing on the most significant subjects, such as Portuguese and specific laws for the PRF and PF exams, candidates can better align their study strategies with the requirements of the test.

Why does the speaker caution against over-studying for certain subjects like constitutional law?

The speaker cautions against over-studying constitutional law because it is not a central part of the exam, and excessive focus on it can lead to neglecting more critical subjects that carry more weight in the overall score.

What is the speaker's advice regarding studying for the PRF exam?

The speaker advises that the PRF exam has a heavy focus on legal knowledge, particularly with 40 questions on the CTB (Brazilian Traffic Code) and 30 on other legal topics, making it a more law-focused exam compared to others. Candidates should focus on mastering these subjects.

How does the speaker differentiate between the PRF and PF exams?

The speaker explains that the PRF exam is more focused on legal knowledge, with a large portion of questions related to the CTB and other laws. In contrast, the PF exam has a broader range of subjects, but constitutional law is less important.

What does the speaker mean by 'not diving into the deep end' when it comes to constitutional law?

The speaker uses this metaphor to suggest that candidates should not overcomplicate their study of constitutional law. Instead, they should only focus on the basics, similar to dipping their toes in the water, rather than trying to master every detail.

What is the 'theory of Evandro' mentioned in the script?

The 'theory of Evandro' refers to the speaker's belief in simplifying study strategies and not overcomplicating the approach to exams. The speaker advocates for focusing on what is essential and practical rather than getting caught up in theoretical details.

Why does the speaker mention 'gourmetization' in the context of studying for law enforcement exams?

The speaker uses the term 'gourmetization' to criticize over-complicating the study process. They argue that trying to make studying 'fancy' or unnecessarily detailed can hinder one's ability to pass the exam, especially for practical and law-focused tests like those for the PRF.