Is Teaching an Art or a Science?.wmv

Daniel Willingham
29 May 201208:42

Summary

TLDRThe transcript explores the nuanced relationship between science and education, arguing that while educational practices can draw on scientific principles, teaching is not a strict science. Unlike medicine, where standardized treatments apply, education must adapt to individual differences among students. The analogy of education as akin to architecture illustrates that educators need to respect foundational principles (must-haves) while also exercising creativity and flexibility (could-dos) in their teaching methods. Ultimately, effective education blends scientific understanding with artistic expression, enabling teachers to craft engaging and meaningful learning experiences.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Education is not a science; its goal is to change the world rather than simply describe it.
  • 🤔 Science can inform education by providing insights into how children learn, but classroom conditions are often uncontrolled.
  • 🔍 Two primary ways science aids education: it inspires practice and helps evaluate educational methods through experimentation.
  • 🧪 Laboratory studies may not directly translate to classroom settings due to their controlled nature.
  • 📊 Using scientific methods to evaluate teaching effectiveness can help identify what works in education.
  • ⚖️ Unlike medicine, which often has a best treatment approach, education must accommodate diverse learning styles among students.
  • 🏗️ The analogy between education and architecture emphasizes the importance of must-haves (fundamental principles) and could-dos (creative strategies).
  • 🔧 Must-have principles in education ensure certain conditions are met for effective learning.
  • ✨ Could-dos provide educators with tools and techniques that can enhance teaching but are not mandatory.
  • 🎨 Teaching is characterized as a blend of science and art, requiring both systematic knowledge and creative application.

Q & A

  • What is the main difference between science and education, according to the transcript?

    -The main difference is that science aims to describe the natural world, while education seeks to change the world and improve children's knowledge and abilities.

  • How can science be applied to education?

    -Science can be applied to education in two main ways: by using principles from basic sciences to inspire educational practices and by employing scientific methods to evaluate the effectiveness of these practices.

  • What is a challenge mentioned regarding applying laboratory findings to classrooms?

    -A challenge is that classroom environments are not as controlled as laboratory settings, making it uncertain whether findings from controlled studies will be applicable in real-world educational scenarios.

  • What does the speaker mean by 'boundary conditions' in education?

    -'Boundary conditions' refer to essential principles that must be considered in teaching; ignoring them could lead to ineffective educational practices.

  • Can you give examples of 'must-have principles' in education?

    -Examples include the necessity of providing practice for skill acquisition and the importance of explicit instruction in letter-sound correspondences when teaching reading.

  • What are 'could dues' in the context of educational practices?

    -'Could dues' are methods or techniques that may help achieve the 'must-have principles,' though they are not mandatory for effective teaching.

  • How does the speaker compare education to architecture?

    -Education is compared to architecture by emphasizing that both fields have must-haves (fundamental principles that must be respected) and could dues (methods that can aid in achieving those principles), allowing for creativity within certain boundaries.

  • Is teaching considered a science or an art, based on the transcript?

    -Teaching is not strictly considered a science or an art; it is described as something in between, where knowledge of scientific findings is combined with creativity and ingenuity.

  • What is the speaker's view on the use of science in medicine versus education?

    -The speaker notes that while medicine often has one best treatment for specific conditions, education is more complex, and there is no single best way to teach every child.

  • What potential issue does the speaker raise regarding historical medical practices?

    -The speaker highlights that historical medical practices, such as bloodletting, persisted without systematic evaluation, underscoring the need for scientific methods to assess the effectiveness of treatments in education as well.

Outlines

plate

هذا القسم متوفر فقط للمشتركين. يرجى الترقية للوصول إلى هذه الميزة.

قم بالترقية الآن

Mindmap

plate

هذا القسم متوفر فقط للمشتركين. يرجى الترقية للوصول إلى هذه الميزة.

قم بالترقية الآن

Keywords

plate

هذا القسم متوفر فقط للمشتركين. يرجى الترقية للوصول إلى هذه الميزة.

قم بالترقية الآن

Highlights

plate

هذا القسم متوفر فقط للمشتركين. يرجى الترقية للوصول إلى هذه الميزة.

قم بالترقية الآن

Transcripts

plate

هذا القسم متوفر فقط للمشتركين. يرجى الترقية للوصول إلى هذه الميزة.

قم بالترقية الآن
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

الوسوم ذات الصلة
Education ScienceTeaching MethodsLearning PrinciplesEducational PsychologyScience ApplicationTeacher TrainingClassroom StrategiesLearning OutcomesEducational ReformMust-Have Principles
هل تحتاج إلى تلخيص باللغة الإنجليزية؟