Antônio Candido
Summary
TLDRThe speaker emphasizes the universal necessity of literature as a fundamental human right, enriching our perspective on life and the world. They argue that literature, from folklore to classics, should be accessible to all social classes, reflecting an equitable society. The speaker highlights the transformative power of literature on individuals and criticizes societal injustices that deny access to literary works, viewing it as a form of deprivation. They conclude with anecdotes about workers seeking self-improvement through literature and the importance of providing quality literature to all, regardless of social status.
Takeaways
- 📚 Literature is a universal necessity experienced in all societies, from the most primitive to the most advanced, as it complements life and enriches understanding of the world.
- 🌟 Reading enriches individuals subconsciously, influencing their perception and enriching their worldview without them realizing it.
- 🔍 The creation of fictional worlds integrates into our lives and becomes a part of how we see the world and exist within it.
- 🚫 In an unjust society, literature is poorly distributed, leading to different types of literature being inaccessible to certain groups.
- 🌱 Folklore serves as the literature for those who may not have access to other forms, but it is still a rich part of their cultural heritage.
- 🌟 A well-organized society would make all levels of literature accessible to all social groups and classes.
- 💡 Literature has the power to improve human beings, regardless of the type, from simple fables to complex novels.
- 📚 The speaker believes that no one who has experienced literature from folklore to works by authors like Camões and Dostoevsky has not been enriched by it.
- 🏛 In an ideal society, access to literature at all levels, not just material needs, would be ensured for everyone.
- 😢 Denying someone the ability to read works by authors like Machado de Assis or Dostoevsky is seen as a form of social brutality and deprivation.
- 📖 The right to literature leads to social justice and the accessibility of literature for all, which is a fundamental aspect of a just society.
- 👏 The story of the Milan municipality providing workers with free time to study language and read books illustrates the importance of literature in personal development.
Q & A
What is the speaker's view on the necessity of literature in human life?
-The speaker believes that literature is a universal necessity experienced in all societies, from the most primitive to the most advanced. It complements life and enriches one's understanding of the world.
How does Goethe's perspective on literature relate to the speaker's view?
-Goethe's perspective, as mentioned by the speaker, is that literature enriches individuals and helps them understand the world better. This aligns with the speaker's view that literature is essential for a richer life experience.
What role does the speaker attribute to the unconscious mind in the process of literary enrichment?
-The speaker suggests that the unconscious mind plays a significant role in literary enrichment, as people often store and accumulate literary experiences without being fully aware of it.
How does the speaker describe the integration of fictional creation into our worldview and identity?
-The speaker explains that fictional creation integrates into our worldview and identity, becoming a component of how we see the world and how we exist, even if it's not always consciously recognized.
What is the speaker's opinion on the accessibility of literature in a well-organized society?
-The speaker believes that in a well-organized society, all levels of literature should be accessible to all social groups and classes, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to engage with various forms of literature.
What types of literature are mentioned as not being accessible to a 'very rustic man'?
-The speaker mentions that certain types of literature are not accessible to a very rustic man, but instead, he has his own literature, referred to as folklore.
What is the speaker's stance on the impact of literature on human beings?
-The speaker is convinced that literature greatly improves human beings, regardless of the type of literature, from children's stories to complex literary works like 'The Brothers Karamazov'.
How does the speaker connect the right to literature with social justice?
-The speaker connects the right to literature with social justice by arguing that ensuring access to literature for all is a form of social justice, and denying this access is a form of social brutality.
What historical example does the speaker cite to illustrate the desire for literature among workers?
-The speaker cites the example of the Milan municipality, which managed to get industrial workers to have free time for their own activities, during which they chose to improve their language skills to read certain books.
What mistake did Jean Guéhenno make when trying to provide literature for the working class, according to the speaker?
-Jean Guéhenno made the mistake of pride by assuming that the working class needed literature specifically made for them, rather than providing them with 'good literature' like that of Balzac, Zola, and Stendhal, which they enjoyed.
What conclusion does the speaker draw about the importance of literature for the poor?
-The speaker concludes that the poor desire good literature, not just literature made specifically for them, and that access to literature is a crucial aspect of social justice and an ideal society.
Outlines
📚 The Universal Right to Literature
The speaker emphasizes the universal necessity of literature, experienced across all societies from the most primitive to the most advanced. Literature is viewed as a complement to life, enriching individuals' understanding of the world. The speaker argues that literature should be accessible to everyone, but acknowledges the current social inequities that limit access to various forms of literature. The importance of literature in personal enrichment is highlighted, with the speaker expressing the belief that exposure to literature, from folklore to the works of great authors like Dostoevsky, enriches one's life. The speaker concludes by stressing the importance of ensuring access to literature as a form of social justice, citing an example from Milan where workers were given time to improve their language skills and read books of their choice.
🤔 The Misconception of 'Proletarian Literature'
In this paragraph, the speaker discusses an experiment conducted by the French writer Jean Guéhenno, who attempted to provide 'proletarian literature' to rural people in his neighborhood. However, they found the literature boring and instead preferred the works of classic authors like Balzac, Zola, and Stendhal. The speaker uses this to illustrate the point that the poor do not necessarily want literature specifically made for them, but rather they desire access to high-quality literature. The anecdote serves to challenge the notion of creating separate literary genres for different social classes and ends with applause from the audience.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Literature
💡Fabulation
💡Unconscious
💡Folklore
💡Social Inequality
💡Human Enrichment
💡Literary Accessibility
💡Social Justice
💡Proletarian Literature
💡Cultural Discrimination
💡Literary Enrichment
Highlights
Literature is a universal necessity experienced in all societies, from the most primitive to the most advanced.
Fabulation is a complement to life, making people richer and better understand the world when they engage with literature.
People often don't realize the impact of literature as it works on subconscious levels.
Reading fiction enriches the way people view the world without them consciously trying.
Fictional creation integrates into our worldview and becomes a component of our existence.
Literature should be a fundamental right for every person as it exists in all societies.
In an unjust society, literature is poorly distributed, leading to different types of literature for different social classes.
Rustic people have their own literature known as folklore, which is also valuable.
An ideal society would make all levels of literature accessible to all social groups and classes.
Literature greatly improves human beings, regardless of the type of story.
Exposure to literature from folklore to works by Camões and Dostoevsky enriches people's lives.
Literature teaches people to see life in a certain way, contributing to personal enrichment.
Ensuring access to literature at all levels is one of the most important aspects of an ideal society.
Preventing people from reading Machado de Assis or Dostoevsky due to social injustice is a form of deprivation.
The right to literature culminates in social justice and literature being accessible to everyone.
The Milan city government once arranged for workers to have free time to study language and read books.
Jean Guéhenno's experiment showed that rural people preferred classic literature over 'proletarian literature'.
The poor desire good literature, not literature specifically made for the poor.
Transcripts
Eu acho que o problema do direito à literatura tem um ponto de partida
é o meu ponto de vista.
É que a literatura é uma necessidade universal
experimentada em todas as sociedades
desde as que nós chamamos primitivas até as mais avançadas
o homem tem necessidade... Efabular
A efabulação
porque é complemento da vida e essa efabulação, como dizia Goethe,
o homem entra na literatura, quando sai dela sai mais rico
e compreendendo melhor o mundo.
Entende melhor.
Frequentemente a pessoa não tem noção disso
porque se passa nas camadas do inconsciente.
Mas ele lendo, lendo poesia, vendo história de fada, quando é menino
vendo romance, quando é grande
aquilo vai se armazenando nele e vai enriquecendo a maneira dele ver.
Sem querer, quando ele vê a realidade
ele está vendo as coisas que ele viu na ficção
de maneira que...
A criação ficcional nos integra
ela passa a ser um componente da nossa visão do mundo,
da nossa maneira de ser.
Se ela existe em todas as sociedades
se ela é uma necessidade fundamental
ela é um direito de todo homem.
Agora o problema do ponto de vista social
é que, com a sociedade iníqua que nós temos,
tudo é muito mal distribuído.
Tudo é muito mal distribuído.
Então, forma-se, é claro, os diferentes tipos de literatura.
Certos tipos de literatura não são acessíveis a um homem muito rústico,
mas ele tem a literatura dele, que nós chamamos com o nome de folclore.
Tem muita literatura dele.
Uma sociedade que a gente imagina, uma sociedade bem organizada
com todos os produtos da literatura em todos os níveis
seriam acessíveis a todos os grupos e classes sociais.
Certamente...
Eu, pessoalmente
estou convencido de que a literatura melhora muito o ser humano
seja a história de tartaruga, seja a história de coelho
seja a história da corrida da tartaruga com o coelho
seja isso, até "Os Irmãos Karamazov", de Dostoiévski.
Tudo isso enriquece muito
enriquece porque ensina a ver a vida de alguma maneira.
O fato é que eu não conheço ninguém que tenha passado pela literatura
desde o folclore até Camões e Dostoiévski
que não resulte em enriquecimento próprio.
Então eu acho uma das coisas mais importantes da sociedade
uma sociedade que nós imaginamos uma sociedade ideal
seria assegurar não só os mesmos materiais de vida,
mas assegurar a possibilidade de ter acesso a todos os níveis de literatura.
E é uma brutalidade social
fazer que uma pessoa cresça e viva
sem ter a capacidade de ler Machado de Assis ou ler Dostoiévski.
É uma privação, é uma mutilação a que a sociedade
de modo que pra mim, o direito à literatura desagua na justiça social.
O direito à literatura desagua na literatura acessível a todos.
Eu termino citando uma coisa muito interessante
que a professora Maria Victoria Benevides me contou
e que eu cito no meu ensaio.
A prefeitura de Milão, há muitos anos atrás...
A prefeitura de Milão conseguiu que os industriais dessem uma hora livre,
duas horas aí por semana aos operários pra eles fazerem o que eles quisessem
certo de que eles queriam passear.
Eles pediram para se aperfeiçoar no estudo da língua
pra eles lerem certos livros.
Uma coisa muito bonita eu li quando era muito moço
eu tinha 15 ou 16 anos
eu li numa revista francesa chamada "Europe", que existe até hoje
que o escritor chamado Jean Guéhenno
no caso eu conheci ele pessoalmente aqui em São Paulo
estava muito em moda, no começo dos anos 30, a literatura proletária
a literatura para o operário.
Porque eles diziam "não há literatura para o operário."
Tem qualquer literatura, por que uma feita para o operário?
Por que discriminal? Então ele fez uma experiência.
Ele pegou e deu... pessoas rústicas que moravam no bairro dele
pra ler a literatura proletária que estava se fazendo na Rússia naquele tempo.
De romance. Eles devolveram: "Ah, tá muito chato".
Aí ele deu Balzac, Zola, Stendhal e eles adoraram.
Por que? Ele foi vítima de um pecado de orgulho.
Ele achou que para o pobre precisava a literatura feita para o pobre
enquanto que o pobre queria boa literatura.
Com isso eu termino.
[Aplausos]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)