ETIKA ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK “DISKRIMINASI” | KELOMPOK 7

Summary

This presentation delves into ethics in public administration, focusing on the discrimination faced by individuals with disabilities within Indonesia's civil service (ASN). The case of Dr. Romi, a dentist using a wheelchair, highlights the challenges of ableism in the recruitment process, where despite excelling in the selection stages, Romi was unjustly disqualified. The students emphasize the importance of fairness, professionalism, and transparency in public service, advocating for equal treatment and highlighting the consequences of discriminatory practices. The discussion calls for ASNs to uphold ethical standards and neutrality, ensuring public trust and equitable service for all citizens.

Takeaways

• 😀 Discrimination against people with disabilities in public administration, especially for those using wheelchairs, remains a significant issue in Indonesia.
• 😀 Dr. Romi Ismail, a dentist who uses a wheelchair, was rejected from the civil service despite excelling in all stages of the selection process.
• 😀 Romi's rejection was based on his disability, even though he provided a medical certificate confirming his ability to perform his job.
• 😀 Discriminatory practices like these highlight the harmful stigma that people with disabilities are not capable of fulfilling public roles.
• 😀 The presenters call for an end to such discriminatory practices and stress the importance of fairness and equality in public service hiring processes.
• 😀 Ethical principles in public administration, including professionalism, justice, and accountability, should guide how public servants treat all citizens.
• 😀 Discrimination violates these ethical principles, erodes trust in government institutions, and harms the quality of public service.
• 😀 Legal action, including Romi’s lawsuit, plays a crucial role in challenging discriminatory decisions and restoring the rights of affected individuals.
• 😀 The presenters argue that civil servants must be neutral and avoid letting personal biases, such as political affiliation or disability, influence their work.
• 😀 Public servants should provide equal and fair services to all citizens, irrespective of their background, ensuring no discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, gender, or disability.
• 😀 The case of Romi highlights the need for systemic change in how civil servants are selected and treated, advocating for greater inclusion of people with disabilities in the workforce.

Q & A

What is the central issue discussed in the transcript?

The central issue discussed is discrimination in the Indonesian Civil Service (ASN) system, particularly focusing on the case of Dr. Romi Ismail, a dentist with a disability, who faced unfair treatment despite excelling in the recruitment process.

How did Dr. Romi Ismail's disability impact his employment opportunity?

Despite Dr. Romi's strong performance in the selection process, his disability led to the revocation of his appointment letter, as authorities believed he was incapable of performing his duties, reflecting discriminatory practices.

What ethical principles are emphasized in the transcript in relation to public administration?

The ethical principles emphasized include justice (ensuring fair treatment for all), professionalism (acting with integrity), accountability (responsibility for actions), and non-discrimination (ensuring equal treatment regardless of disability, gender, race, or background).

What role does discrimination play in the effectiveness of public administration?

Discrimination in public administration undermines trust in government institutions, reduces the quality of public service, and prevents deserving individuals, like Dr. Romi, from contributing effectively to public service.

How was Dr. Romi's case legally addressed after his appointment was revoked?

Dr. Romi pursued legal action by filing a lawsuit against the government (the Solok Selatan Regency and BKN) in the Administrative Court to overturn the revocation of his appointment and restore his rights as a successful candidate.

What does the case of Dr. Romi illustrate about the treatment of people with disabilities in public service?

The case illustrates that despite the achievements of individuals with disabilities, systemic biases and outdated stereotypes can still lead to discrimination, denying them equal opportunities in public service roles.

What does the transcript suggest about the broader societal implications of discrimination in public service?

The transcript highlights that discrimination within public service not only affects the individuals directly involved but also erodes public trust, diminishes fairness, and compromises the quality of services provided to the public.

What is the significance of professionalism and accountability for ASN according to the transcript?

Professionalism and accountability are crucial for ASN to carry out their duties effectively and ethically. They are expected to act impartially, uphold fairness, and ensure that their actions serve the public good, without any bias or discrimination.

What were the consequences of the discrimination faced by Dr. Romi for the public sector?

The discrimination faced by Dr. Romi resulted in public scrutiny and highlighted the failure of the ASN system to ensure equality and non-discriminatory practices. It also led to a potential legal precedent that could challenge future discriminatory practices.

Why is it important for public administration to follow ethical guidelines, especially regarding non-discrimination?

It is important because adherence to ethical guidelines, particularly non-discrimination, ensures that all citizens have equal access to public services and employment opportunities, thus fostering a fairer, more just society where trust in government is upheld.