Inikah Market Leader Monitor Indonesia ⁉️ LG 24GN650

Summary

This review critically analyzes LG monitors, focusing on their competitive position in the Indonesian market. While LG is known for its popular electronics, its monitors are criticized for underperforming in gaming, color accuracy, and contrast compared to competitors like Viewsonic, Samsung, and Lenovo. The review highlights issues with response time, misleading marketing, and poor color reproduction. LG's shorter warranty and higher prices are also noted as drawbacks. Despite their appealing design, LG's monitors are deemed less valuable than alternatives, leading to a decline in their market leadership in Indonesia.

Takeaways

• 😀 LG is a market leader in Indonesia for monitor shipments, but its current offerings face challenges in performance and value compared to competitors like Viewsonic.
• 😀 LG's monitor response time and preset settings are often criticized for being inaccurate and not suitable for optimal viewing or gaming experiences.
• 😀 Many LG monitors lack color accuracy, with red and white balance issues making them unsuitable for professional editing or color-sensitive work.
• 😀 The contrast ratio of LG monitors is lower than expected, falling short of industry standards for gaming and multimedia displays.
• 😀 Despite being marketed as high-performance products, LG's monitors struggle with marketing claims about speed and accuracy, often delivering subpar results in real-world tests.
• 😀 Viewsonic, a competitor, is noted for offering better performance, faster response times, and longer warranties (up to 2 years) at a lower price point compared to LG.
• 😀 LG's warranty policy is criticized for being shorter (1 year) compared to other brands, especially given the relatively high price of their monitors in the Indonesian market.
• 😀 For those on a budget, Viewsonic is recommended as a better option for gaming or FPS-focused users, with faster response times and better value.
• 😀 LG's design and build quality are highlighted as visually appealing, but this does not compensate for its performance and accuracy shortcomings.
• 😀 In terms of gaming and multitasking, LG monitors are less competitive compared to other brands offering 240Hz refresh rates and superior adaptive sync features at a more affordable price.

Q & A

What is the main criticism of LG monitors in the review?

The main criticism of LG monitors is their poor performance in areas like response time, color accuracy, and overall value for money when compared to competitors like ViewSonic and Samsung. The review argues that LG's marketing claims, such as the fastest response time and high-quality color accuracy, are misleading and not reflected in real-world use.

Why does the reviewer believe LG has lost its position as a market leader?

The reviewer suggests that LG has lost its market leader status due to the inferior performance of its monitors compared to competitors. Despite LG's strong market share, brands like ViewSonic offer better features, longer warranties, and more competitive pricing, especially for gaming monitors.

How do LG’s response times compare to those of competitors?

LG's response times are considered slower and less reliable compared to competitors like ViewSonic. While LG markets itself as having the fastest response times, the reviewer finds that in practice, its performance falls short, particularly in competitive gaming scenarios.

What role does color accuracy play in the review of LG monitors?

Color accuracy is a major point of critique for LG monitors. The review highlights that LG monitors struggle with color precision, with red and white balance issues being particularly noticeable. In comparison, competitors like Samsung and ViewSonic offer better color accuracy and overall display quality.

What are the issues with the preset settings on LG monitors?

The preset settings on LG monitors are criticized for being ineffective. These presets, which are marketed as enhancing performance, do not provide meaningful improvements and often result in suboptimal visual performance, particularly in gaming and editing scenarios.

How does LG’s warranty compare to its competitors?

LG offers a 1-year warranty on its monitors, which the reviewer finds to be insufficient compared to competitors like ViewSonic, which provides a 2-year warranty. The shorter warranty makes LG monitors less appealing, especially for consumers looking for better post-purchase support.

What is the reviewer’s opinion on LG’s design quality?

The reviewer acknowledges that LG monitors have a sleek and attractive design, with smooth finishes and a cool body. However, the aesthetic appeal of the design is not enough to compensate for the performance issues and value concerns raised in the review.

Which brand does the reviewer recommend over LG, and why?

The reviewer recommends ViewSonic over LG, particularly for gaming and budget-conscious consumers. ViewSonic offers better performance, faster response times, more accurate color reproduction, and a longer warranty at a more affordable price point, making it a more appealing option than LG.

What is the significance of the comparison between LG and ViewSonic monitors?

The comparison highlights the key differences between the two brands in terms of performance, value, and warranty. ViewSonic is portrayed as providing superior value for money, especially for gamers, with better response times, color accuracy, and a longer warranty, making it a more competitive option in the market.

How does the reviewer view LG’s marketing strategies?

The reviewer is critical of LG’s marketing strategies, particularly the claims made about their monitors’ speed and color accuracy. These marketing claims are seen as misleading, as the actual performance does not meet the advertised standards. The review suggests that LG’s marketing is more focused on gimmicks than delivering real-world value.