Judee Burgoon on Expectancy Violations Theory

A First Look at Communication Theory
29 Jan 201407:40

Summary

TLDRIn this interview, Judee Burgoon from the University of Arizona discusses Expectancy Violations Theory, which challenges the conventional wisdom of conforming to others' expectations. She explains that sometimes violating expectations can lead to positive outcomes, especially when the behavior is ambiguous or has positive meaning. Burgoon emphasizes the importance of theory in communication studies, highlighting how it helps explain and predict human behavior, and stresses the role of choice and strategy in effective communication.

Takeaways

  • 📚 Expectancy Violations Theory challenges the conventional wisdom of always conforming to others' expectations, suggesting that there are times when violating expectations can be beneficial.
  • 🌟 Positive violations occur when behavior deviates from expectations in a way that is perceived positively, often due to the behavior's positive meaning or the ambiguity it introduces.
  • 🤔 The theory posits that focusing on the source of a violation, especially if the source has positive characteristics, can lead to a more favorable perception of that source.
  • 🤝 An example of a positive violation is when someone is friendlier than expected, leading to an increase in the observer's positive feelings and potential persuasion.
  • 🧐 The theory emerged from the need to make sense of proxemic literature, which initially lacked a communication theory framework.
  • 🔍 The interviewee, Judee Burgoon, emphasizes that effective communication requires authenticity and is not about deliberately manipulating interactions.
  • 🎓 Judee's graduate training and fascination with communication led her to develop theories to explain and predict human behavior in communication.
  • 🧠 The development of theories is a natural outcome of empirical study in communication, as each study raises new questions and directions for exploration.
  • 💡 Theories are described as systematic hunches about how things operate, built on previous knowledge and literature, aiming to explain and predict behavior.
  • 🌱 Judee believes in the importance of choice in communication, suggesting that while some aspects may be automated or biologically driven, strategic and goal-driven communication is possible and trainable.
  • 🙂 The interview concludes with an appreciation for Judee's choice to participate, highlighting the value of her contributions to the field of communication.

Q & A

  • What is Expectancy Violations Theory?

    -Expectancy Violations Theory suggests that there are times when violating social expectations can have positive outcomes rather than negative ones. It challenges the notion that conformity is always beneficial and posits that 'positive violations' can lead to more favorable perceptions and interactions.

  • How does a 'positive violation' work according to Judee Burgoon?

    -A 'positive violation' occurs when someone's behavior exceeds positive expectations, leading to an increase in the observer's attention and favorability towards the violator. For instance, if someone is friendlier than expected, it can make the observer more aware of their positive qualities and more favorably disposed towards them.

  • What advice does Judee Burgoon give regarding when to violate expectations?

    -Judee Burgoon suggests that one should be cautious about violating expectations without knowing the context well. She implies that there are many situations where it might be better not to risk a violation unless one is certain of the positive outcome.

  • How did Judee Burgoon become interested in studying communication and developing theories?

    -Judee Burgoon's interest in communication and theory development was sparked during her graduate training, where she was tasked with making sense of proxemic literature. Her fascination with communication led her to develop theories to explain and predict human behavior in communicative contexts.

  • What was the initial assignment that led Judee Burgoon to study space in communication?

    -Judee Burgoon was given an assignment as a student to make sense of the proxemic literature, which led her to explore the area of space in communication and eventually develop Expectancy Violations Theory.

  • Does Judee Burgoon believe in strategic communication?

    -Yes, Judee Burgoon believes in strategic communication. She emphasizes the importance of making wise strategic choices to minimize unintended consequences and to be more effective communicators.

  • How does Judee Burgoon define a theory in the context of communication studies?

    -Judee Burgoon defines a theory as a set of systematic hunches about how things operate in communication. Theories are built on existing knowledge and literature, and their purpose is to explain and predict human behavior in communicative contexts.

  • What role does choice play in communication according to Judee Burgoon?

    -Judee Burgoon believes that communication is a choice-driven, goal-driven, strategic activity. While some aspects of communication may be automated or biologically driven, she asserts that we have the ability to craft messages and make strategic choices to improve our communication.

  • How does Judee Burgoon view the relationship between theory and empirical study in communication?

    -Judee Burgoon sees a close relationship between theory and empirical study in communication. She suggests that as one gets immersed in empirical studies, it becomes necessary to develop theories to make sense of observations and to guide further research.

  • What does Judee Burgoon think about the criticism that empiricists deny human choice?

    -Judee Burgoon acknowledges that some communication behaviors may be automated or involuntary, but she firmly believes in the role of choice in communication. She argues that as communication scholars, they must believe in the ability to make strategic choices to be effective communicators.

  • How does Judee Burgoon describe the process of theory development?

    -Judee Burgoon describes theory development as a process of forming systematic hunches based on existing knowledge, which are then tested through empirical studies. The goal is to see if these informed hunches hold true and to use them to explain and predict human behavior in communication.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Expectancy Violations Theory Explained

In this segment, Judee Burgoon from the University of Arizona introduces Expectancy Violations Theory, which challenges the conventional wisdom of conforming to others' expectations in communication. The theory posits that there are instances where violating expectations can lead to positive outcomes, known as 'positive violations.' These occur when the unexpected behavior is perceived positively or when it clarifies the communicator's positive attributes. Burgoon illustrates this with an example of increased friendliness leading to a more favorable impression of the communicator. She also discusses the uncertainty in knowing when to violate expectations, suggesting caution in such situations.

05:00

🧠 The Role of Theory in Communication Studies

Judee Burgoon delves into the importance of theory in communication studies, emphasizing that theories are systematic hunches based on existing knowledge and research. She explains that theories help explain and predict human behavior in communication, and that the process of testing these theories is crucial for understanding their validity. Burgoon also touches on the criticism of empiricists, asserting that while some communication is automated or involuntary, there is a significant element of choice and strategy in effective communication. She believes in the power of crafting messages and making strategic choices to enhance communication effectiveness.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Expectancy Violations Theory

Expectancy Violations Theory, as introduced by Judee Burgoon, posits that violating social expectations can sometimes lead to positive outcomes rather than negative ones. This theory challenges the conventional wisdom of 'when in Rome, do as the Romans do,' suggesting that there are instances where non-conformity can be beneficial. In the script, Burgoon explains that a 'positive violation' can occur when a behavior has positive meaning or when it makes the source of the behavior more relevant, leading to a more favorable perception of the violator.

💡Conformity

Conformity refers to the act of matching attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors to group norms. The script discusses how societal pressures often encourage individuals to conform to avoid negative consequences. However, Expectancy Violations Theory suggests that there are strategic times when non-conformity, or not going along with the group, can lead to more positive interpersonal outcomes.

💡Positive Violation

A 'positive violation' is a concept within Expectancy Violations Theory where a person's behavior deviates from expectations in a way that is perceived positively by others. The script provides an example of this where if someone is friendlier than expected, it can lead to an increase in the perceiver's awareness and appreciation of the violator's positive qualities.

💡Proxemic Literature

Proxemic literature pertains to the study of human spatial behavior, specifically how people use and perceive space in social interactions. In the script, Burgoon mentions being assigned to make sense of this literature as a student, which led to the development of her theoretical work in communication.

💡Authentic Interchange

Authentic interchange in communication implies a genuine and spontaneous interaction without premeditated or strategic behavior. Burgoon discusses the importance of being authentic and not overly self-conscious during communication, suggesting that strategic planning can detract from the authenticity of an interaction.

💡Communication Theory

Communication theory refers to a set of principles that explain how communication processes work. The script highlights how Burgoon's work contributes to communication theory by challenging existing notions and proposing new ways of understanding how people communicate.

💡Empirical Study

Empirical study involves the collection and analysis of observable, measurable data to draw conclusions. The script mentions how empirical studies in communication can lead to the development of new theories and a deeper understanding of human behavior.

💡Strategic Communication

Strategic communication is the deliberate and purposeful use of communication to achieve specific goals. Burgoon emphasizes the importance of making strategic choices in communication to minimize unintended consequences and to be more effective.

💡Choice-Driven Behavior

Choice-driven behavior refers to actions that are consciously selected rather than being automatic or involuntary. In the context of the script, Burgoon argues that while some communication behaviors may be biologically driven, much of communication is a choice-driven, goal-oriented activity.

💡Systematic Hunches

Systematic hunches are educated guesses or hypotheses that are based on existing knowledge and are testable. Burgoon describes theories as systematic hunches about how human behavior functions, which are informed by previous research and are meant to be tested for their validity.

Highlights

Expectancy Violations Theory challenges the notion that conformity is always necessary in communication.

The theory suggests that there are times when violating expectations can lead to positive outcomes.

Positive violations occur when behavior has positive meaning or when it makes the source of the behavior more relevant.

A positive violation can enhance one's perception of the violator, leading to increased persuasion and credibility.

The decision to violate expectations should be made with caution, as there are circumstances where it may not be advisable.

Judee Burgoon's interest in communication was sparked by the need to make sense of proxemic literature.

The development of Expectancy Violations Theory was serendipitous, originating from an assignment to interpret literature on space.

Effective communication requires authenticity and cannot be reduced to a series of deliberate, calculated actions.

Judee Burgoon emphasizes the importance of theory in understanding and predicting human communication.

Theories are described as systematic hunches that are informed by existing knowledge and research.

Empiricists are not denying human choice; rather, they recognize both automatic and strategic aspects of communication.

Communication scholars believe in the power of strategic messaging and the ability to make wise choices in communication.

Judee Burgoon's graduate training focused on understanding the complexities of human communication.

The process of studying communication leads to the development of new theories as each study raises new questions.

The interview highlights the importance of making informed choices in communication to maximize effectiveness.

Judee Burgoon's work on Expectancy Violations Theory has had a significant impact on the field of communication.

Transcripts

play00:00

I’m talking with Judee Burgoon from the University of Arizona. Judee is the author

play00:07

of Expectancy Violations Theory. We often hear, “when in Rome, do as the Romans do;”

play00:14

conform to other people’s expectations; don’t rock the boat; and go along to get

play00:21

along. Expectancy Violations Theory suggests there may be times when we don’t have to

play00:27

conform or do as others do so and, in fact, it may be better if we don’t. Judee, could

play00:34

you give us a thumbnail sketch of Expectancy Violations Theory.

play00:39

Sure. One of the things that’s always intrigued me in communication is looking at things that

play00:45

are counterintuitive, things that challenge the basic truisms, things that everybody holds

play00:52

we should all buy into. And Expectancy Violations Theory is one of those cases where really

play00:57

what we’re proposing is that there are occasions where violation is not a negative. There’s

play01:03

a lot of literature that would suggest doing a violation is always going to have negative

play01:09

consequences. And the idea of the theory is that there are occasions when it may actually

play01:14

be beneficial to violate in what is called a “positive violation.” These can include

play01:22

situations where the behavior itself has a lot of positive meaning; or it may be a case

play01:29

where the behavior itself has some ambiguities to it, and by doing the violation, you make

play01:36

the source of the violation more relevant. There’s more focus on the source; and if

play01:42

that source has positive characteristics, that makes the violation a more positive kind

play01:48

of violation. So, for example, if I think really positively of you, and you become…

play01:53

Oh you do, you do!

play01:55

And I do… and I am engaged in an interaction with you and you become even friendlier than

play02:01

I had expected, I might in this case become even more aware of what you’re doing, be

play02:06

even more aware of all your wonderful sterling qualities; and as a result of your doing the

play02:12

violation, I’m actually even more favorably disposed toward you. I might be more persuaded

play02:17

by you; I might better remember what you had to say; I might even think of you as more

play02:21

credible than if you had gone along and done what was expected.

play02:26

How could I know?

play02:28

How could you know when to do it and when not?

play02:30

(Griffin: Mmm hmm.)

play02:31

There are a lot of circumstances where you don’t know. And under those circumstances

play02:35

maybe you’d be better off not to risk a violation.

play02:39

How did you get started in this? I mean, was there some violation that you did with good

play02:47

effect or did someone violate your expectations and this ticked you off, or what?

play02:55

Serendipity. A lot of these things come by accident. I was given an assignment as a student

play03:00

to make sense out of the proxemic literature. That’s how we started out in the area of

play03:04

space. At the time there was almost nothing in the way of communication theory, and we

play03:10

were told to make sense of this literature. And so, from a communication standpoint, what

play03:15

do we know here about spacing behavior? Is there any kind of communication potential here?

play03:21

This sounds like it could be Machiavellian, that I’m moving around during the day saying

play03:27

“should I violate this person’s space, or should I talk louder?” I mean, do you

play03:34

do this? [laughter] Do you think this stuff as you go through the day?

play03:38

No, I don’t, and I think anybody who knows anything about effective communication that

play03:44

you can’t have an authentic interchange if you’re busy standing back sort of watching

play03:50

yourself go through the motions and…

play03:51

(Griffin: That’s a very self-conscious thing.)

play03:53

Yes …and behaving very deliberately. But I think there are times when I think we plan

play03:57

our communication where you could make choices.

play03:59

Judee, I’m intrigued because it seems to me that you almost ooze theory. You’re constantly

play04:06

referring to a number of theories, and these are theories that you’ve put forth. This

play04:11

is unusual. You’re the only person that I’m interviewing that has two theories that

play04:17

we’re talking about. What is it that gets a person theorizing? Is there a certain mindset

play04:26

or personality, or…

play04:31

I think part of it is my graduate training, that one of the reasons people come into communication

play04:36

is trying to understand this endlessly fascinating area of human communication; and there’s

play04:41

nothing so practical as a good theory. Theories are helping us explain why people do what

play04:47

they do, and try to predict what they do. So my whole education was geared toward trying

play04:53

to make sense out of communication. And because studying it is so fascinating – we’ve

play05:00

done so many studies, and each study raises new questions and sends you off in new directions.

play05:05

And that’s why one theory sort of spawns another theory. So, the more you get immersed

play05:12

in the actual empirical study of communication, of necessity you’re trying to make sense

play05:17

of things… you have to ask, “what’s your theory of why things happen the way they do?"

play05:21

So, if I’m going to be a person who cares about communication, trying to make sense

play05:27

out of things, I’m almost of necessity going to do theory?

play05:33

You have to. A theory is nothing more than your set of systematic hunches about the way

play05:42

things operate, and the point of trying to test theories is to see if your hunches work

play05:47

out. Now, those should be informed hunches. They should be built on a foundation of what

play05:51

other people already know, what they theorized about, what literature people have already

play05:56

developed. That’s all it is, it's a set of systematic predictions about how human behavior functions.

play06:04

So, it’d be okay if I wrote a book called Communication Hunches, but they better be

play06:09

informed hunches?

play06:10

That’s it; that’s what theory is.

play06:13

Judee, it strikes me that empiricists are often criticized because they say, or people

play06:21

think they say, that human beings have no choice. I hear you saying all the time that

play06:29

we have choice.

play06:30

Absolutely. I think you have to understand that there are certain aspects of communication

play06:34

in which we are operating in a fairly automated fashion. Even some of those things began as

play06:41

choice behavior, voluntary behavior. There are other things… I am a firm believer in

play06:45

part of what happens in our communication being biologically driven and somewhat involuntary,

play06:54

following genetically programmed routines. But as communication scholars, we have to

play07:00

believe, or we might be out of business, that we can craft our messages and we can do a

play07:06

lot of strategic things to be more effective as communicators. And that’s what we’re

play07:11

trying to train people to do – how to make the wise strategic choices to minimize those

play07:16

things that are inadvertent byproducts of our communication, to bring more and more

play07:22

under our strategic control. So, that by its very nature means communication is a choice-driven,

play07:30

goal-driven, strategic activity.

play07:33

I’m glad you made the choice to be here.

play07:37

Thank you.

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
Communication TheoryExpectancy ViolationsPositive ViolationsAuthentic InterchangeStrategic ChoicesHuman BehaviorEffective CommunicationEmpirical StudyProxemic LiteratureCommunication Scholar
您是否需要英文摘要?