How Family Structure Drives Ideology

Summary

This video explores the profound impact of family structures on political ideologies and societal development across the 20th century. It delves into Emmanuel Todd's theory from 'The Origins of Ideology,' which suggests that the type of family one comes from significantly influences broader politics. The video examines eight distinct family structures, from exogamous communitarian in Russia and China to egalitarian nuclear in Anglo-Saxon countries, and how these molds shape ideologies such as communism, fascism, and liberalism. It challenges conventional wisdom and offers an unconventional lens through which to view global politics and societal evolution.

Takeaways

• 🌏 The video discusses how different societies reacted to the 20th-century changes like the Industrial Revolution and world wars, suggesting an underlying scheme related to family structures.
• 🏠 It introduces the concept of eight different family structures around the world and their impact on political ideologies and broader societal behaviors.
• 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 The 'exogamous communitarian' family, common in Russia, China, and parts of Eastern Europe, is characterized by large family units living under one roof, leading to authoritarian political structures.
• 🤝 The 'endogamous communitarian' family, aligning with the Islamic world, practices in-marriage within the clan, which corresponds with Islam's social conservatism and resistance to change.
• 👑 The 'authoritarian' family structure, found in countries like Germany and Japan, emphasizes inheritance by the oldest son and has historically led to nationalist and fascist ideologies.
• 👫 The 'egalitarian nuclear' family, prevalent in France and Italy, divides inheritance equally among sons, fostering a balance between freedom and equality, often leading to democratic capitalist societies.
• 🏛️ The 'absolute nuclear' family, typical in Anglo-Saxon countries, allows parents to divide inheritance as they wish, promoting individualism and liberal capitalism.
• 🤔 The 'asymmetric' family structure, found in Southern India, is tied to the caste system and has unique marital practices that emphasize the importance of uncles in family life.
• 👪 The 'anomic' family system, present in Southeast Asia and among native Latin American peoples, lacks a defined structure, leading to societies without clear principles or social trust.
• 🔄 The 'flexible' family system in Africa is characterized by a mix of family structures and high levels of polygamy, which has social implications such as increased violence and instability.
• 🔮 The video raises questions about the potential social shifts resulting from rapid changes in family structures worldwide and their implications for the future.

Q & A

How did different societies react to the changes brought by the Industrial Revolution and World Wars?

Different societies reacted by adopting various ideologies such as fascism, liberalism, and communism, rather than a single global ideology as initially thought.

What is the connection between family structures and political ideologies as suggested by Emmanuel Todd?

Emmanuel Todd suggests that there is an uncanny resemblance between the political ideologies a nation picks and its family structures, which can inform broader politics.

What is the exogamous communitarian family structure?

The exogamous communitarian family structure is characterized by the whole family living together under the same roof or in the same clan, with people marrying outside their clan and maintaining a strong patriarchal authority.

Which regions are predominantly exogamous communitarian and what political systems have they historically favored?

Regions like Russia, China, parts of Eastern Europe, Northern India, Cuba, and parts of central France and Italy are predominantly exogamous communitarian. Historically, these societies have favored absolutist kings or dictatorships.

Why are exogamous communitarian societies considered the worst for women?

Exogamous communitarian societies are considered the worst for women due to the ingrained idea of unfair power, where sons oppress their wives to resolve the tension of living under the same roof with multiple adult males and their jealous wives.

What is the endogamous communitarian family structure and its relation to Islam?

The endogamous communitarian family structure involves people marrying within their clan, often in arranged marriages with close relatives like third cousins. This structure is closely related to Islam, as the Islamic world's geography matches this family type.

How does the authoritarian family structure differ from the exogamous communitarian structure?

The authoritarian family structure involves only the oldest son inheriting the family's assets, with the rest of the sons having to find their own way in the world, often leading to professions like priesthood or military.

Which societies are known for their authoritarian family structure and what political ideologies have they typically adopted?

Societies like Koreans, Japanese, Germans, Jews, Scandinavians, and North Spanish have authoritarian family structures. They have adopted a range of political ideologies from fascism and nationalism to democratic socialism and hard Catholicism.

What is the egalitarian nuclear family and how does it influence the societies it is prevalent in?

The egalitarian nuclear family involves a nuclear family unit where inheritance is divided equally among all sons. This structure promotes democratic capitalist societies with a focus on individual freedom and equality, as seen in regions like Italy, France, and Latin America.

How does the absolute nuclear family structure differ from the egalitarian nuclear family and which societies does it influence?

The absolute nuclear family allows parents to divide their inheritance as they see fit, often resulting in unequal distribution. This structure is prevalent in Anglo-Saxon societies like the U.S, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and England, promoting liberal capitalism and individual responsibility.

What are asymmetric families and where are they predominantly found?

Asymmetric families are based on marrying cousins through female relatives and living in families built through the mother's female relatives. This system is predominantly found in Southern India and is influenced by the caste system.

What is the anomic family system and its historical prevalence?

The anomic family system is an anti-system found in nomadic cultures with no fixed family structure, allowing for various family arrangements and sexual relationships. Historically, it was prevalent in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and among the native peoples of Latin America.

How does the flexible family system in Africa differ from other family systems?

The flexible family system in Africa is characterized by a weaker nuclear family with the clan playing a significant role in raising children. It also allows for higher levels of polygamy and is influenced by various factors such as the caste system in India and the rise of the state.

What are the potential social changes that could result from the current shifts in family structures worldwide?

The shifts in family structures worldwide could lead to significant social changes, such as changes in birth rates, social stability, and the development of societies. For instance, the breakdown of traditional family structures in countries like Russia and China could be contributing to low birth rates and social problems.

Outlines

00:00

🌏 Impact of Family Structures on Global Politics

This paragraph explores the relationship between family structures and political ideologies, suggesting that the type of family one comes from can predict the political leanings of a society. It discusses how different societies reacted to the Industrial Revolution and world wars, leading to varied political systems such as fascism, liberalism, and communism. The speaker introduces the idea that family structures may have a significant influence on the broader political landscape, setting the stage for a deeper dive into this theory.

05:02

🏡 Exogamous Communitarian Family Dynamics

The second paragraph delves into the exogamous communitarian family structure, prevalent in regions like Russia, China, and parts of Eastern Europe, where large families live together under one roof or in close clans. This structure often leads to tension due to the concentration of power in the father figure and results in poor treatment of women as a means to alleviate this tension. The paragraph also touches on how this family structure is linked to absolutist regimes and the appeal of communism, which aligns with the collectivist and conformist tendencies ingrained in these societies.

10:03

🕌 Endogamous Communitarian and Islamic World Parallels

This section examines the endogamous communitarian family structure, characterized by marriages within the clan and a strong emphasis on clan unity. The paragraph draws parallels between this family structure and the Islamic world, suggesting that the social conservatism inherent in Islam is well-suited to societies with this family type. It also discusses how Islam provides a stable framework for these societies, which value continuity and tradition, and contrasts the treatment of women in this structure with that in exogamous communitarian societies.

15:04

👑 Authoritarian Family and Its Cultural Impact

The fourth paragraph discusses the authoritarian family structure, where only the eldest son inherits, leading to a society that values inequality and has a strong sense of lineage and history. This structure is associated with cultures such as the Koreans, Japanese, Germans, and Jews, and has historically led to the rise of ideologies like fascism and nationalism. The paragraph explores how this family structure fosters a deep sense of discipline and unity, but also a tendency towards aggression and the maintenance of strict social hierarchies.

20:04

🏛 Egalitarian Nuclear Family and Democratic Capitalism

The fifth paragraph introduces the egalitarian nuclear family, which is characterized by equal inheritance among all sons and a focus on the individual. This family structure is prevalent in countries like Italy, France, and parts of Latin America, and it fosters a tension between freedom and equality. The paragraph discusses how this structure leads to societies that oscillate between different political systems, often valuing revolutionary liberalism and having a strong sense of brotherhood among citizens.

25:06

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Absolute Nuclear Family and Liberal Capitalism

This section focuses on the absolute nuclear family, which is common in Anglo-Saxon countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The absolute nuclear family allows for inheritance to be divided as the parents see fit, often leading to a mix of egalitarian and authoritarian elements. The paragraph explores how this structure promotes liberal capitalism, individualism, and a strong sense of personal responsibility, contributing to the stability and success of these societies.

30:06

🔄 Asymmetric Family System of Southern India

The sixth paragraph examines the asymmetric family system found in Southern India, which is heavily influenced by the caste system. This structure is based on marriages through female relatives and results in a society where uncles play a significant role. The paragraph discusses how this system has led to a more equitable treatment of women and a more prosperous and creative society, with a unique political landscape that has seen successful communist movements and effective governance.

35:09

🌐 Anomic Family System and Its Societal Effects

The seventh paragraph describes the anomic family system, which lacks a defined structure and is prevalent in Southeast Asia and among indigenous peoples of Latin America. This system allows for a wide range of family configurations and sexual relationships. The paragraph discusses how the lack of structure leads to societies without clear principles or stakes, often resulting in oppressive empires and disaffected populations. It also touches on the historical significance of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage and its impact on social trust.

40:09

🌍 Flexible Family Systems in Africa

The eighth paragraph explores the flexible family system in Africa, which is characterized by a diversity of family structures and a strong emphasis on clans. This system allows for a range of family configurations, including polygamy, and is influenced by various factors such as ethnicity and religion. The paragraph discusses how this system has led to a society with a weaker nuclear family structure, a large class of sexually frustrated young men, and a cycle of violence. It also touches on the potential for social change as Africa continues to develop and strengthen its families.

45:10

🔁 Global Family Structure Shifts and Future Societal Changes

The final paragraph contemplates the rapid changes in family structures worldwide and their potential impact on society. It discusses the shifts in countries like Russia and China, where traditional family structures have been disrupted by communism, and in Western countries, where the family's power is weakening. The paragraph raises questions about the future of society as these changes continue, particularly in light of high divorce rates and the potential for significant social shifts.

Keywords

💡Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution refers to the period of significant industrial growth that began in the late 18th century and continued into the 19th and early 20th centuries. It marked a major turning point in history as agrarian societies became more industrialized and urbanized. In the video's context, it's mentioned as one of the massive changes that different societies reacted to throughout the 20th century, shaping the political and social ideologies that emerged during that time.

💡World Wars

The term 'World Wars' typically refers to two global conflicts that occurred in the 20th century: World War I (1914-1918) and World War II (1939-1945). These wars had profound impacts on the political landscape and the course of history. In the script, the World Wars are mentioned alongside the Industrial Revolution as catalysts for societal change and the development of various ideologies.

💡Political Ideologies

Political ideologies are systems of ideas and ideals about how a society should be organized, governed, and administered. Examples include liberalism, communism, and fascism. The video discusses how different societies adopted various ideologies like fascism in Germany and Japan, liberalism in the Anglo-Saxon world and France, and communism in China and Russia, which were influenced by their respective family structures.

💡Family Structures

Family structures refer to the organization and roles of family members within a household. The video posits that the type of family structure prevalent in a society can significantly influence its broader political and social systems. It outlines several types of family structures, such as exogamous communitarian, endogamous communitarian, authoritarian, egalitarian nuclear, and others, each with distinct implications for societal norms and political leanings.

💡Exogamous Communitarian Family

An exogamous communitarian family is characterized by the practice of marrying outside one's clan while living together in large, extended family units. The video suggests that this type of family structure is prevalent in countries like Russia, China, and parts of Eastern Europe, and it is linked to the development of absolutist political systems and poor treatment of women.

💡Endogamous Communitarian Family

An endogamous communitarian family structure involves marrying within one's clan and living together as a unit. This is closely associated with the Islamic world, where the video suggests that the stability of Islamic law and social conservatism align with the internal cohesion of these families. This structure is said to promote a strong sense of community and care for insiders.

💡Authoritarian Family

The authoritarian family structure is defined by inheritance practices where only the oldest son inherits the family's wealth and status, while the rest of the siblings must forge their own paths. This structure is linked to societies like Korea, Japan, and Germany, which have historically exhibited strong nationalistic tendencies and have been prone to aggressive behaviors to establish themselves.

💡Egalitarian Nuclear Family

The egalitarian nuclear family is characterized by a nuclear family unit where parents and children live together, and inheritance is divided equally among all sons. This structure is prevalent in regions like Italy, France, and parts of Latin America. The video suggests that this family structure leads to societies with a tension between freedom and equality, often resulting in revolutionary liberalism.

💡Absolute Nuclear Family

The absolute nuclear family is similar to the egalitarian nuclear family but with inheritance distributed at the parents' discretion, often leading to unequal distribution. This structure is typical in Anglo-Saxon societies, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The video posits that this family structure fosters liberal capitalism and individualism, with a focus on personal responsibility and success.

💡Anomic Family

The anomic family type is described as an anti-system with no fixed family structure, often found in nomadic cultures. It allows for a wide range of familial and sexual arrangements, from nuclear families to incestuous relationships. The video suggests that this lack of structure leads to societies without clear principles or stakes, often resulting in oppressive empires and disaffected populations.

Highlights

The 20th century saw diverse societal reactions to the Industrial Revolution and world wars, leading to the rise of various ideologies like fascism, liberalism, and communism.

An underlying scheme influenced political ideologies based on family structures, with different regions adopting different systems such as exogamous communitarian or endogamous communitarian families.

Exogamous communitarian family structures, prevalent in Russia, China, and Northern India, involve entire families living together and are linked to absolutist regimes and poor treatment of women.

Endogamous communitarian societies, matching the Islamic World, practice in-marriage within the clan and have social conservatism aligning with Islam's teachings.

Authoritarian families, found in Korea, Japan, and parts of Europe, have the oldest son inherit everything, fostering a sense of lineage and contributing to nationalistic and aggressive tendencies.

Egalitarian nuclear families, present in much of Italy, France, and Latin America, divide inheritance equally among sons, leading to tensions between freedom and equality.

Absolute nuclear families, typical in Anglo-Saxon countries, allow parents to divide inheritance as they wish, promoting liberal capitalism and individual responsibility.

Asymmetric families, specific to Southern India, are based on marrying through female relatives and have uncles playing a significant role in family dynamics.

Anomic families, common in Southeast Asia and among Native Latin Americans, lack a defined family structure and are associated with conservative societies and ineffective military.

Flexible family systems, widespread in Africa, have clans being more influential than nuclear families, with polygamy being more prevalent and leading to social issues.

The breakdown of traditional family structures in Russia and China due to communism has led to low birth rates and significant social problems.

Germany's shift from an authoritarian to an egalitarian nuclear family structure may indicate future societal changes similar to France.

The Western world is experiencing a weakening of family power with the spread of African family structures and higher rates of divorce, potentially leading to unknown societal impacts.

The rise of the state and conversion to Christianity and Islam in Africa are causing rapid changes in family structures, which may lead to increased development.

The book 'The Origins of Ideology' by Emmanuel Todd encapsulates the theory of how family structures influence broader political and societal norms.

Investment in fine art has been a historical hedge against inflation and economic volatility, as promoted by Masterworks for the wealthy.

Transcripts

over the course of the 20th century it's

been fascinating to see how different

societies have reacted to the massive

changes that have come from the

Industrial Revolution and the pain of

the world wars however much as people

thought a single ideologic liberalism

communism or the like might dominate the

world what happened instead was that

Germany and Japan went for fascism the

Anglo-Saxon World in France stayed

liberal well China Russia and the like

went communist what if I were to tell

you that there was an underlying scheme

for why this happened and it's almost

certainly not what you think the

resemblances between what political

ideologies and Nation picks and its

family structures uncanny don't believe

me this will be a tour through the

world's family structures and how they

inform broader politics prepare for an

insane ride that will totally change how

you view the world

[Music]

thank you

in most societies it's common for kids

to stay with their parents for a long

time into their adulthood much longer

than we'd expect in the U.S given that

we all have to make it on our own pretty

early on in this country it's important

that we find intelligent ways to make

and invest our money but as we've seen

this year the traditional methods of

investing might not be as effective as

they once were even crypto has taken a

big hit inflation's eating into American

Savings and the real estate markets on

the verge of major decline as many

people think but there's one asset the

wealthiest Among Us they're all

migrating to and have been putting cash

into one that's historically hedged

against inflation and economic

volatility that being fine art for

centuries the wealthiest members of

society have helped enslave their wealth

of Art and today's sponsor Masterworks

helped you do the same Masterworks buys

paintings up front and then qualifies

them with the SEC which allows you to

invest in shares of artwork from

legendary artists like Picasso Monet and

Banksy for a fraction of the cost

billionaires pay it's no wonder that

nearly 600 000 people have signed up so

far with demand growing there's a wait

list but my subscribers can get Priority

Access at the link in the description

see important regulation A disclosures

masterworks.com CD

I'm going to be straight here and say a

lot of the content in this video comes

from a single book the origins of

ideology by Emmanuel Todd the book

shorted around 170 pages but it's really

remarkable in encapsulating this whole

Theory and the original idea behind it

was positive but not articulated by the

legendary French historian fernan

browdell who once said the history of

the world could be written just off

family structure and with this I'm

officially rebranding what a faultist

that show that jerks off and revives

obscure mid 20th century French

historians there are eight different

family structures around the world and

this video will go through each to

explain what they are the psychology

that follows from it and how they

manifest politically number one the

exogamous communitarian family as a fair

warning a lot of these terms get fairly

analytical and complicated but I'll

break them down to a More explainable

Level each time what exogamous

communitarian means is that the whole

family lives together under the same

roof or in the same Clan communitarian

means people live largely in Clans

rather than breaking away and forming

individual nuclear families Clan family

structures are largely the norm across

most of history and the world with the

exception of the West

exogamous means that people marry

outside their Clan so you shouldn't

marry a cousin but instead someone from

a totally different family the exogamous

communitarian family dominates Russia

China areas of Eastern Europe like

former Yugoslavia Hungary and Finland as

well as Northern India Cuba and parts of

central France and Italy it's another

piece of the evidence of the former

Mongol Empire Iron Curtain block being a

broader cultural institution outside of

just the cold war or the modern

russo-chinese Alliance this is by far

the largest family group in the world

where when Emmanuel Todd was writing in

the 70s it was 40 of the world's

population while all other groups

hovered around 10 percent or less the

main reality of the exogamous

humanitarian family is just the stress

that comes from having so many adult

males and their wives under the same

roof when men get married they bring

their wives back home where they live

under the same father who can Lord over

and Order his descendants around into

adulthood until he died eyes when the

father dies the family breaks up and

each son reforms a new household lording

over them as a grandfather in turn

having this many adult males and their

jealous wives who want more autonomy

under the same roof breeds a lot of

tension households like this have a lot

of stress with so many families in

proximity having to negotiate together

to deal with all this tension the father

has large amounts of power over the

family likewise in all of these cultures

except Russia and Eastern Europe women

are treated very poorly since to resolve

the tension of having so many people

having to live together and the

resentment of the sons being ruled over

by their father is to let the sons

oppress their wives the exogamous

communitarian world has been the worst

place for women of any large Society in

the world this family system ingrains an

idea of unfair power and thus it's no

surprise that these societies have

always been absolutist Kings or

dictatorships whether under Russia's

czars the cruel dynasties of Northern

India or China's Emperors a great

example of this is the bad Emperor

problem as Francis fukuyama talks about

in the origins of political order in

that China's political establishment was

largely more advanced than the rest of

the world except for that their leaders

had no accountability which then

resulted in them making horrifically

dumb decisions holding all their

societies back at the same time the

sheer amount of power the older father

had over his sons prevents the idea of

political Independence or the individual

from developing the parents literally

pick their son's mates and then live

with them with them providing their

children work with this attitude common

it's easy to see how regimes in this

part of the world treat their

populations often like tan and fodder

with service periods for conscripts in

the Russian army of 25 years common

under the czars and before that for life

and how Chinese Emperors would call it

massive parts of their population for

vanity projects like the Great Wall the

Terracotta Army or for giant armies of

Millions with that many people trying to

coordinate working together you need to

enforce some kind of conformity in order

just so weird and consistent agencies

with your relatives personalities don't

drive you crazy for these reasons these

cultures prize Conformity discipline and

fitting into a mold rather than

creativity this is a big reason why

Confucianism an ideology that prizes

following social duties Above All Else

and respect for authority has become

China's de facto religion for most of

its history likewise the idea of the

father is the symbol for the family

results in state worship being normal in

this part of the world in Russia the

state was used a vehicle of glory and

identity for the entire Russian race

Wetland China the states literally

viewed as sacred under Confucian law and

the manifestation of the will of the

Chinese people you can explain a lot of

historic quirks looking in this lens for

example the West's incomprehensibility

to Russia and Russia's lack of Freedom

cruelty and what has been seen as its

Oriental character well at the same time

the Russians have been physically

indistinguishable from other Europeans

and Christians it all makes more sense

in between arranged marriages Clan life

and rule by a strong patriarch the

Russians lived lives much more like that

of Asians than Europeans Russia did

however give women much better treatment

more in line with European standards

than Asian ones I do wonder if Todd was

correct in labeling all of European

areas he did as being part of this group

looking from their history and how they

develop a societies and how arranged

marriage has been incredibly rare across

Western history I doubt the baltics are

part of this group but when he was

writing in the 70s they were part of the

Soviet Union meaning the Soviets would

have suppressed data showing cultural

differences from the Russians and said

data would have been pretty hard to find

the West anyway likewise Finland was a

nomadic herder Society until recently

which was extremely loose and free

dealing so I kind of doubt it functioned

in reality close to China or Northern

India one of the jokes in the waterfall

test staff is India as the exception to

every rule in history if you want to

make any kind of principle that the past

just write India out since there's no

way it will conform and it'll just keep

doing its India thing India doesn't

conform to a lot of the principles of

these kind of societies India doesn't

really have self-imposed native

tyrannies or strong government and the

like however the collectivism and poor

treatment of women does carry and I

think this is due to the caste system

which is a bigger factor for more

details in the caste system watch my

video on India but long and short every

person's life in Indian history has been

ruled by caste or their tiny

self-contained occupational group they

must breed in working Associated and the

like and this caste system has

overwrought the powerful pro-government

forces that you normally see from

exogamous communitarian societies the

exogamous communitarian world is gone

for communism very strongly in the 20th

century for reasons that may seem

obvious given this movement's emphasis

on Authority cooperation and conformity

in fact you really struggle to find any

successful self-contained communist

movements outside of this cultural area

the map of the exogamous communitarian

world accepting India are basically the

same as the second world communist block

during the Cold War Yugoslavia and

especially Cuba totally cut off from the

rest of the world with very different

geography and culture but still being

exogenous communitarian societies are

very strong evidence for this on top of

this the Italian and French communist

parties were based out of the parts of

their countries that had exogamous

communitarian societies and were very

weak outside of those blocks there are

three big reasons why communism is so

appealing to exogamous communitarian

societies one being that the father's

rule creates resentment among the

brothers who can rebel against the

Father which seems like a perfect Coral

area to the rebellion of the proletariat

against the bourgeoisie most society's

conceptions of God and the government

deviate from how fathers act in their

society and so resentment against the

father naturally leads to communism's

atheism the pent-up resentment against

the father wants the sons gain power

which promulgates further tyranny seems

like a perfect model for how the

resentful Communists filled the shoes of

the all already cruel and corrupt

regimes they replaced the second reason

being the structure of families and

societies is that once the father dies

the family breaks up and each son

becomes his own family immediately

tearing up the family this is a great

corollary to how the nation is torn up

in the great Revolution and culture

totally changes likewise the massive

cultural changes that have happened with

stuff like Ivan the Terrible Peter the

Great chishi huangdi and Zhu huangshi

all predating communism as well as later

Communists like Stalin and Mao make

sense given since the families totally

reform every generation erasing its

history it creates the idea that the

nation can do the same as well the third

reason being that an exogamous

communitarian family is the family picks

the mate occupation and governs the

children through their whole adult lives

until their parents die and thus it

intuitively makes sense that the state

which is the manifestation of the family

would provide the citizen with

everything across their whole lives

which is communism part 2 endogamous

communitarian we're moving from one type

of Clan structure to another this time

from those who marry outside their Clan

to inside it an endogamous communitarian

societies people marry their third

cousin in arranged marriages and then

live together as a clan under the same

roof this may sound like a tiny

difference but it's had profound effects

around how these cultures have evolved

over time the endogamous Unitarian world

is the same as the Islamic World

Geography I mean I could sugarcoat that

a little by saying Islamic world is

bigger with some stuff in Africa

Bangladesh or Malaya but for the most

part the borders of the Islamic World

exactly match this region if communism

is the classic ideology for exogamous

humanitarian Society is Islam is that

for this one this is since the structure

of Islam fits well with the social

conservatism that comes from internally

bound Clan life one of the key

differences between Islam and

Christianity is that Jesus said love thy

neighbor and don't be a douche and then

got crucified meanwhile Muhammad created

legal code founded an Empire and

transcribed the exact words of God

Christianity believed that God's law is

written in our hearts and up for

interpretation while Islam believes the

Quran is literally the word of God

itself it should be felt without

question Islam was able to conquer and

maintain control over this area due to

the shared family structure that worked

well with its ideology the Muslims kept

control of turkey and lost control of

Spain converted Pakistan but not India

since the local family structures meshed

better with Islam this works for the

conservatism that comes from these kinds

of societies bringing in outside wives

causes immense social tension in the

exogamous families but since you're

marrying your fourth cousin it's all in

the family and pretty frictionless since

everyone knows everyone else and is

related there's a quote from an Arab

that sounds strange to Western ears of I

love her since she's my second cousin

through my uncle Islam provides stable

laws for fundamentally unchanging and

conservative Clan Society

uninteresting and massive difference in

exogamous and endogamous Clan societies

and since the whole clan stays intact

through inbreeding there's a lot less

power and tension in the father's hands

since the family is so intact that

upbringing and family discipline doesn't

just fall on the father's hands given

there are so many uncles cousins and

grandfathers lying around the Islamic

father is not an overbearing Force just

a part of an interconnected web of

family that encompasses all of life thus

the idea of atheisms unimaginable to the

Muslim World which has always been

religious likewise the moral laws that

govern interpersonal relations inside

the clan cannot be blamed on a single

Force since they're upheld by all males

this is shown that the religious laws of

the Islamic world are maintained by a

council of male Elders called the ulama

rather than the pope or a hierarchical

church as in the west something a lot of

westerners don't believe is that

historically the Muslim world has of the

four main Eurasian civilizations treated

women the third worst after in India and

then China a woman in the Muslim world

isn't a dangerous Outsider controlled as

in those other two societies but a

beloved cousin to be taken care of not

to say the Muslim world's great but this

lack of tension is why female Liberation

has not occurred in the Muslim world but

has in much of the rest of the world

Islam conceptualizes the world through

the Klan when the greatest Islamic

historian IBN khaldoon wrote a history

of the world he did it through the lens

of the moral strength of the strongest

Clan determining the success of the

nation the clan allows great treatment

of insiders when I've been to Muslim

countries I've been shocked at how

hospitable and casually kind they have

been I never felt threatened traveling

to Egypt and was shocked no one tried to

sell me [ __ ] or get in my face likewise

it's shocking to go to dirt poor Muslim

countries and see no Beggars since the

Clans take care of their own however at

the same time since the Clinton doesn't

interface with the rest of society at

all really these societies have often

been terrible to Outsiders Islam was the

only one of the major four Eurasian

civilizations to practice slavery in a

truly massive scale until very recently

and still does in small ways even today

if you border a Muslim country you have

twice as high a chance of being at War

than an average religion the Muslim idea

of violently spreading the house of

family of Islam Dar all Islam seems like

the way Clans you the world through

expanding their genes part 3

authoritarian families in some ways I

feel like the authoritarian family is

the weirdest ideologically and

geographically and that's partially by

design for a lot of these family groups

they have a single ideology that kind of

encompasses their world view with the

notable previous examples being Islam

and communism likewise they have a

single block of coherent territory

whether Dar all Islam or the former

Mongol Empire however for the

authoritarian culture there is no such

Unity the cultures this family style as

part of includes the Koreans Japanese

Germans Jews Scandinavians North Spanish

gypsies oxita willoons Celtic people

like the Scots Irish Breton or the

quebecois in Canada likewise they

followed political ideologies ranging

from fascism nationalism Democratic

socialism hard Catholicism and the like

however once you dig a bit deeper you

find a broader cultural Unity that makes

all this diversity a feature not a bug

an authoritarian family is only the

oldest son inherits the rest get nothing

and have defined their way in the world

many of these Sons end up in the

priesthood or in the military and these

cultures often have a combination with

Warrior monks like in Ireland the

Teutonic Knights or Zen Samurai all

these young people need to push out to

establish themselves makes these

societies often irrationally aggressive

this worldview where only the oldest son

inherits naturally leads these cultures

viewing inequality as a natural part of

the world and so every naturally fascist

country in the world has come from one

of these cultures this includes Hitler's

Germany Imperial Japan two countries

that share their very little except this

family structure Franco Spain was based

out of the authoritarian north of that

country and Mussolini's Italy is the

only outlier but they also fill part of

the egalitarian nuclear model we'll talk

about in the next section of Macho

strongman and also they were the least

effective of all the fascist States

since the ancestral line gets passed on

from father to eldest son it creates the

idea of an indestructible lineage that

must be preserved at all costs bar

nothing these countries have a deep

sense of history and stubbornness that

allows survival and nationalism seeming

normal even Noble the idea of a racing

history that comes naturally to the

endogamous community structure seems

disgusting and perverse to cultures in

the authority-based family structure a

point Emmanuel Todd makes is that the

Jews and gypsies have very little in

common except they share this family

structure and they face centuries of

horrifying depredations that gave them

every right to lose their culture

however for these societies losing the

ancestral lineage is disgusting this is

why these cultures are all these tiny

dots on the map since they just [ __ ]

refused to die I'm half Irish and my

mom's side's got a good amount of

Scottish and this is a part I understand

from my own family basis my father is a

bit of an Irish Nationalist and he'd

sing me rebel songs as a child and my

friends sometimes make fun of me for

Rudyard why do you keep holding on to

this Irish stuff given your family's

been in America for 200 years and your

other half is British or the irish's

greatest enemies and it sent an Irish

culture the idea of throwing away a

lineage it stretches back took a colion

and Beyond and your ancestors struggled

centuries to protect seems unimaginable

this is how the English stole the

irish's land kept them from owning

property obtaining an education voting

and starving them however with each

humiliation the Irish just grew tougher

building their entire personality around

Rebellion these kinds of cultures

instill a lot of discipline among their

members an example being suicidal

bravery when look at how an impossibly

horribly outnumbered conflicts like the

Germans or Japanese in World War II the

heavily Scottish descended Confederates

in the U.S Civil War or the Jews

rebelling against the Romans of how

authoritarian cultures are willing to

basically commit suicide for their own

Pride I mean I grew up assuming that a

society's willingness to fight

suicidally like this for something

profound like National survival or honor

was something deeply Noble and then I

talked to friends and their reaction was

that just sounds insane to which my

reaction was how can you not get this

this discipline manifests in politics as

well in which once these society's make

a decision their entire culture moves in

lockstep to change immediately the

cultures that have gone through the

fastest transitions are all in this

category this includes Japan and

Germany's post-world War II 180 degree

turns Scotland and Japan's insanely

Rapid industrializations or Quebec and

Ireland's extremely rapid shifts from

extremely Catholic to being very secular

the way these societies get get this

much discipline is through the idea that

their ancestral lineage goes back into

Infinity something I was unironically

told as a child was that as the only

male heir to my family the honor and

survival of my entire ancestral line

hung on my shoulders also with the

oldest son taking everything from his

father it creates an immense amount of

pressure the parents put on the oldest

son with the rest of the children

growing up with the same atmosphere but

with the expectation of making it in the

rest of the world the amount of pressure

these parents apply on their children

creates a lot of weird neuroses making

these cultures remarkably not chill with

the weird eccentricities of the Japanese

Jews Germans Irish and the rest likely

stemming from these overbearing parents

an interesting point Todd Emanuel makes

about Freud's theories of hatred of the

father stemming as much from Freud's

cultural context as a German Jew than

anything else these neuroses manifest in

society with Emmanuel Todd making an

interesting correlation between areas in

Germany that burned the most witches in

the 1600s and those who supported the

Nazis and they're the same areas both

witch burnings and the Nazis are

fundamentally paranoid neuroses the

overbearing and unequal family does have

a lot of advantages it always amuses me

when feminists push for collectivism

given women do much better in

individualistic Societies in which they

pair off with a single man and use their

sex as leverage rather than Clans where

they have no such leverage and are Pawns

of their Elders these authoritarian

societies tend to give women Authority

as part of the ruling couple pair and

thus they tend to prize education also

since family lands are divided up every

generation these countries often have

large middle classes an important point

to make is that even though this is

called the authoritarian system these

countries tend to not be as

authoritarian for controlling the

individual as lots of other systems

notably the exogamous communitarian and

that's because our societies have so

much plan that it's difficult for the

government to Lord over the individual

and if you look at countries like Nazi

Germany or imperial Japan they weren't

that horrible to the very Japanese or

Germans that they ruled under but

leveled their hatred at conquered

populations these countries tend to view

God and government in the same way with

an overbearing force that expects

dignity and respect the most socially

conservative Catholic areas have tended

to be in this region while big

government paternalistic socialism tends

for dominate in areas that aren't

Catholic these countries tend to be

pretty uniparty political systems since

one grows up and gets deep loyalty to a

certain political party and parties Live

and Die in a generational basis with the

same parties ruling in say Sweden Japan

or Quebec and the like for whole

Generations the largest flaw of the

authoritarian model is the overweening

pride that comes from believing their

ancestral group is the center of the

universe and all others are useless

these countries make terrible Empires

and if you look at Western Europe it's

never the authoritarian areas that unify

countries when they try to form empires

coalitions of literally everyone in

their vicinity tries to form to prevent

them from winning it's not a coincidence

that the ancient Greek city-states which

were authoritarian family structure were

never able to forge large Empires while

the egalitarian Roman family structure

starting in a tiny City in the Tiber

River or was able to conquer the Known

World likewise even inside their own

countries these nations have been

terrible at maintaining political Unity

given they're so split by local

governments and families then imagine

themselves as special and infinitely

stretching back into history the Celts

have never been able to unify

independently of conquest and the Irish

make jokes about how difficult it is to

make them work together the Germans and

Japanese have been split into tiny

States for large Parts if not most of

their modern histories circling back to

the beginning the reason the

authoritarian family is split into so

many tiny splotches around the world and

it splits so many ideologies as they

can't unify or spread easily but they're

also so impossibly hard to get rid of

number four the egalitarian nuclear

family now we move on to the nuclear

family something that seems like gets

mentioned on a daily basis by Americans

which as you'll see makes sense with how

much it drives Society but there are two

separate kinds of nuclear family both of

which evolve into Democratic capitalist

societies but one with inherently

different characters the egalitarian

nuclear family is based out of much of

Italy accepting the middle little bit

Southern Iberia most of northern France

Romania Poland Ethiopia and the mostly

white or mestizo parts of Latin America

the egalitarian nuclear family Works

through a nuclear family or the mother

and father move away and live as a

separate couple and then upon their

death their inheritance is divide up

equally among all the sons this sort of

world view creates an inherent tension

between freedom and equality which are

inherently contradictory since once you

start to give people freedom to act as

they would like they start to achieve

different results thus not allowing

equality in nuclear families people move

away from their parents and marry

through love not arranged marriages and

thus there's an idea of an individual in

freedom but also since all the sons

inherent equally there's an idea that

people deserve economic equality as a

sense of fairness to a certain degree

this worldview is largely encapsulated

in the French revolution's egalite

or a quality Liberty and Brotherhood

across this in the next section will be

strongly compared to the

English-speaking world's in egalitarian

nuclear system and its life liberty and

the pursuit of happiness these countries

often have a socialistic government

redistributionist bent to them and that

they view the idea of the government

redis reading the wealthiest money to

the poor as an ethical natural thing and

so they often see the tension especially

in Latin American countries between

redistributionist demagogue bugs and

technocrats who want to establish

capitalism to a greater degree and

alternating between them the ideology of

this region could be called

revolutionary liberalism with the French

Revolution followed by napoleoning its

perfect encapsulation a problem here is

that ironically unlike the authoritarian

societies that tend to prize inequality

but actually tend to be fairly equal and

have a strong middle class in these

countries since lands divided equally it

means that each generation lands are

divided meaning lots of families that

can't feed themselves and have to sell

their land which results in the wealthy

buying up their small uninhabitable

lands these societies prize equality as

an abstract but have a social code that

actively promotes inequality which

causes revolutions this critical tension

means that these societies often

oscillate between military dictatorships

and used to have chill absolutist

monarchies and democracies to read a

history of a Latin American country

Italy France Spain and the like over the

last 200 years is an endless Litany of

regime changes in monarchy military

dictatorship and democracy Francis had

five republics with different

constitutions while the U.S has remained

under the same Constitution for a longer

period however these societies still

value the individual in their search for

a life and so they have tended to

respect property rights in the general

functioning Society more so than other

groups a strong part of this kind of

nuclear family missing in the

English-speaking worlds version is the

Brotherhood that comes from all the

brothers inheriting equally well the

daughters get nothing this creates a

culture of machismo that comes from the

idea that the men are literally Superior

in these societies these cultures

produce preening alpha males as

dictators on a frequent basis however

since everyone inherits equally no

matter what said printing alpha males

are often not actually effective since

they have no incentive to be this

culture of male solidarity also

predisposes these countries being

military dictatorships when not

democracies given the male solid area

that also exists in the military these

cultures find the insane discipline

expected of the authoritarian society's

distasteful and as the Catholic Church

became more conservative in the

counter-reformation have tended towards

chill Catholicism in general secularism

among the men while women have often

been religious from a world perspective

being part of nuclear families of a man

and wife stuck together women have a lot

of de facto influence in these societies

given that they have lots of negotiating

power over their husbands due to sex and

running the household the idea of

Brotherhood of lousy societies to become

very successful Empires through the idea

that all citizens of the Empire are

inherently Brothers all the Latin States

in Western Europe are built off these

egalitarian Parts Conquering the other

regions while the Roman Empire is kind

of the OG EG egalitarian Empire with All

Sons inheriting equally thus allowing a

sense of Brotherhood among all men of

the Empire allowing Mass assimilation of

conquer peoples unlike the Greeks as

well as the Republic degrading into

military dictatorships as a final note

Ethiopia's inclusion this list is

fascinating it shows that this family

system almost certainly stems from

Christianity with Joseph Heinrich

talking about this in his fabulous book

the weirdest people in the world it also

explains what Ethiopia has been the only

stable state in sub-Saharan Africa for

thousands of years and why it's the only

big country in sub-Saharan Africa to be

industrializing alongside its

oscillations between democracy and

Military dictatorship over the next

couple decades I would watch out for

Ethiopia part 5 the absolute nuclear

family the absolute nuclear family could

also be called the Anglo-Saxon without

much of a stretch since it exists in

England it's diaspora countries like the

U.S Canada Australia and New Zealand

alongside this the country is the

Anglo-Saxons came from on the European

continent such as the Netherlands

Denmark as well as Normandy and all Zhu

which colonized England its dominant

ideology is liberal capitalism for most

of my viewers the absolute nuclear

family doesn't need much explanation

given it's the system we just assumed to

be normal a family forcing a mother and

a father from love not arranged marriage

moves away from their parents and the

parents can divide up their inheritance

however they would like disinheriting

children that piss them off giving kids

they like more inheritance Etc each

child is expected to find their own way

in the world and it's nice if they

happen to inherit something from their

parents the de facto reality has often

been an egalitarian split inheritance

among the common people and the

authoritarian oldest son inherits all

among the nobility making this cultural

system culturally between

authoritarian and egalitarian nuclear

family systems which makes sense given

Britain's history of shared German and

French colonization it combines parts of

the pressure and discipline of the

authoritarian system and part of the

globalizing and Free Spirit of the

egalitarian nuclear family an

interesting point Emmanuel Todd made

that these countries trees were often

deeply racist in the manner of an

authoritarian country until the middle

of the 19th century and the working

classes gained more influence over the

aristocrats from which they moved to

more Universal views the dominant

Assumption of cultures like this is that

each individual is an atom responsible

for its own success and conduct

responsible for its own results and if

someone succeeds good for them your own

life is in your own hands as long as you

don't totally fail and become a weirdo

and then get rejected from the broader

social system or getting disinherited

something anglos have trouble

understanding and why their social model

is so hard to apply to the rest of the

world is that this cultural system often

appears alien and bizarre if not

disgusting to other cultures the

atomization is often viewed as

inherently cold and impersonal I've

talked to a Frenchman and they've tried

to impart upon me how inherently

disgusting the amount of wealth of

America's billionaires is in of itself

to which my reply is I'm happy they're

able to succeed to that level the

absolute nuclear family promotes Rife

capitalism in the idea that the end

result is fair even if it's unequal

gives the societies immense stability

since it can reconcile equality and

Freedom by going with freedom the

English-speaking world the Netherlands

and Denmark really don't have rebellions

crises or political instability

meanwhile the idea that everyone has to

play the capitalism and democracy game

gives an onus to make this an unfair and

functional given that that's the

structure of their families of providing

children with equal upbringings and then

expecting unequal results this idea of

free choice manifests under capitalism

liberalism and protestantism which

believes the individual's connection

with God is personal and means these

were the first countries in the world to

become multi-party democracies or have

religious freedom in the Western World

the ideas of God in these societies are

that how you worship God is up to you

and God judges you for going to heaven

and hell upon your death based off the

multiform choices you've made in your

life without a state-sponsored or

Catholic Church necessary which sounds a

lot like a parent judging their child in

whether or not they should inherit after

their death these cultures have to have

high social trust and stability given

that the individual cannot expect

anything from their families which are

in turn cut off from their extended

families which means that people have to

turn to other communities like churches

Boeing leagues and the like to fish for

friends and social networks as well as

employers and employees these cultures

tend to have a lot of unity given how

isolated people are from their families

and need to rely on the community at the

same time with the collapsed social

communities like this as seen in

building alone the negative effects in

society have been incalculable since

each individual is viewed as an atom in

these societies these countries foreign

policies tend to be isolationist and

principle and actually very

interventionist in actions since

everything is up to independent and

personal choice England the Netherlands

in America of all play the game of

proclaiming Glorious isolationism or

refusing foreign entanglements and then

bombing anyone that pisses them off and

making giant Alliance science coalitions

in the same way as the people in their

societies for all these reasons the

absolute nuclear family has been the

most successful in history is God from a

group of tiny marshlands in the North

Sea to ruling the world these are

incredibly wealthy successful capable

and stable countries I'd like to Hazard

some modesty here given that the wheel

of History eventually pones everyone and

so we'll probably eventually see a lot

of flaws in this family structure that

we can't now but I kind of find it

amusing Emmanuel Todd literally gives

this culture which dominates the world

two pages and is 170 page book since it

fits so perfectly in the French

historiographic tradition of not being

able to admit how hard the anglos beat

them part 6 asymmetric families I'm

going to warn all of you that this is

the one that makes the least sense of

all of them to me this family system is

based out of Southern India and is based

off the assumptions born out of that

culture and especially the caste system

the way it works you can only marry the

cousins of your female relatives through

their female relatives which works

through arranged marriage people then

live in families as built through their

mother's female relatives in this

process the uncle or your mother's

brother Becomes Her male protector who

helps manage this system this means that

uncles are super important to child's

development it's hard at times to

disentangle this system from just the

broader Indian cultural context which I

cover in Greater detail in these videos

however there are some important details

that separates this part of India from

Northern India this is a post in

Northern India which has possibly been

the area where women have been the worst

treated in the world over history

firstly this part of India is much

wealthier and more creative with India's

tech center being based out of Bangalore

for example this makes sense given women

are treated much better in Southern

India and in societies which women are

given more social status they can bring

their ideas into society but also it

forces men to try harder in order to

impress them this part of India has also

had the only success communist movements

ever in world history with the only

democratically elected communist

movements ever which have not in turn

turned themselves into totalitarian

States and in another example of India

breaking every role have actually been

very good government making West Bengal

and Tamil Nadu peaceful and successful

societies number seven the anomic family

the anomic family type is an anti-system

in a nomad cultures there is no family

structure you can have a nuclear family

but you can also live with your clan

incest is okay marrying your cousins is

okay and if you don't want America

cousins that's fine sometimes the

youngest daughter takes care of the

parents and sometimes she doesn't anomic

systems largely allow the individual to

do whatever they want sexually and with

their families this system predominates

in Southeast Asia and among the native

peoples of Latin America it used to be

much larger for example encapsulating

the Middle East Bronze Age States like

Egypt or Babylon as well as the Inca

Empire a very interesting book I've

mentioned before is Joseph Han Rex the

weirdest evil in the world which talks

about how the Catholic Church Banning

cousin marriage was one of the biggest

shifts in history since it broke down

Clan structures and forced westerners to

get more social trust due to not having

Clans having to associate with broader

Society while creating the individual

however this kind of nuclear family is

dependent upon Banning incest and cousin

marriage which does not exist in these

societies the lack of any kind of

structure for breeding or parenting

results in societies without clear

principles or Stakes the dominant

political system of this part of the

world has been oppressive Empires ruling

over disaffected peasants with across

the pre-columbian states in the new

world the ancient Middle East in

Southeast Asia it often being a norm for

one-third the population to be slaves

without family structures these

societies and the peasantries on top of

them really don't have a concept on how

to politically organize the ruling

classes of these countries in order to

balance the sexual openness of their

populations have often practiced incest

in order to keep asthma much inside

their families as possible so as to

control their populations this incestor

never looking outside their families

creates attitudes of conservatism and

foolishness which is why these countries

are often so fragile and able to be

conquered so quickly and easily as has

been the case with Mesopotamia Egypt the

Inca or the military ineffectiveness of

Southeast Asian countries the reason

this group has shrunk so much is its

ineffectiveness and the reason it likely

survives in Southeast Asia is due to

that region being the area that has

faced the least military competition of

anywhere in the world I don't mean this

to be opponing southeast Asia video

because you can't judge the quality of a

society based off its political and

Military institutions and as I said

before my video on southeast Asia this

is one of my favorite areas in Asia for

different reasons so if I do come across

as judgmental to certain Societies in

this video don't take that as a personal

attack attack against the value of your

Society without boundaries people really

don't know where to look or how to look

at the world these societies don't

really see a lot of inner-driven social

change they tend to view the world

matter-of-factly and not have techniques

on how to think critically about the

world rather than just accepting it if

whatever works sexually works then what

other principles do you need to

understand the world in general these

societies tend to be very culturally

conservative where if you look at

mesoamerica the mdns the Egyptians or

the Sumerians they keep their artifacts

and culture and religions basically

identical for periods of 3000 years and

there are differences in which gods are

more important but the fundamental

structure is pretty similar and if you

look at southeast Asia I once read a

history of Southeast Asia that said

there was very little to none social

change between 800 and 1800 A.D in

Mainland southeast Asia these Societies

in general today are chill military

dictatorships societies tending military

dictatorships when they don't have any

other strong social institutions since

the military has to exist these military

dictatorships often face coups of the

underlying structure doesn't change and

the military doesn't really try to

change the social order but just lets

things be part 8 the flexible system

Africa is truly vast and diverse with

more genetic diversity than the rest of

the world combined and as well as that

hundreds and thousands of different

ethnicities and languages and Todd

Emanuel were first this area as the

flexible family system partially because

we just do not fully understand the

different African families and there is

a good amount of diversity inside of

Africa where the native koisan peoples

of southern Africa have their own

communitarian family structure with a

lot of gender equality and this has

influenced the Bantu is migrating South

who in southern Africa have a more

monogamous and less

patriarchal society once you get to West

Africa you have very high levels of

polygamy where 50 of the female

population are part of polygamous

marriages and in East Africa you have a

separate family structure and as we

talked about before Islam and Ethiopia

are part of non-african larger family

structures the system is also called

flexible because the clan is much more

power vis-a-vis the nuclear family

father might not have as much influence

but the slack is picked up by various

cousins grandpas uncles and the like

and this is also an area of the world

that practices polygamy to a much higher

degree than elsewhere in most countries

before European colonialism polygamy was

practiced but by a tiny minority of the

population in a lot of countries in

Africa it was the norm for five percent

of men to have a third of the women the

flexible system predominates in Africa

and Echoes through its diaspora

and these societies the actual family is

much weaker with the clan and especially

the women of the clan doing much of the

job of raising the children and on top

of that the men wants the structure of

society is often the farming and child

rearing is done by women while the men

wage war and herd cattle and as our

God's fabulous book War in human

civilization he explains how this system

of polygamy often plays out in reality

in a polygamist society which a few men

of most of the women it creates a large

class of sexless young men as a force in

society in of itself who live and fight

together as Ralph Linton says it is

incredible the tree of culture he talks

about how the norm in many African

cultures was for young men to live in

the same tent as a war ban from puberty

onwards and wage war together this is

since in a society in which so many

women are in the hands of a small amount

of men it creates no sex for large

amounts of young men who in turn turn to

violence so as to take women or to

improve their social status

this creates large amounts of violence

in which society's polygamy often have

large amounts of crime the vast majority

of the top 10 countries for polygamy are

currently in a civil war this creates a

cycle in which young men wage war since

they're sexually frustrated and then in

turn that kills them off which also

lowers the supply of young men which as

they die off means Young Women Marry the

older men who aren't Waging War thus

making the problem even worse this is

how basically all Societies in the world

were until the rise of the state but as

the state lessened violence the rule of

law and militaries it forced Elites to

practice polygamy to a lesser extent

however since the state's so recent and

much of sub-Saharan Africa this process

is only now occurring likewise the

development of the plow which only men

had the strength to push also pushed

more intact families where in previous

societies and in Africa agriculture has

been done with hoes in Societies in

which the nuclear family and strict

family struck occurs weaker with the

clan being more important it allows much

more male promiscuity an interesting

thing Todd Emanuel looks at is that aids

is more powerful the less strong

polygamy is where in Islamic Africa

where polygamy is entrenched in the

religion there is no AIDS in West Africa

with higher polygamy it's a lot less and

in southern Africa which is more

monogamous part of Africa AIDS is much

higher and I really don't know why that

is

JD Unwin said in his fascinating book

sex and civilization a society's ability

to control sex is indicative of its

level of development and what Society is

lessened sexual restrictions their level

of development Falls this has since men

are incentivized to work harder if they

know their paternities assured and women

to put more effort into their children

energy is channeled into things besides

getting laid people aren't suspicious of

other people trying to compete for their

sex fathers establish an idea of

discipline for children without it it's

hard to have a conception of a unified

God which is pretty recent and much of

sub-Saharan Africa as well as rule of

law which is also the worst in

sub-Saharan Africa of anywhere in the

world tribal Africa is traditionally

fear-based as opposed to Europe that's

guilt-based in Asia that's shame-based

in fear-based societies are animist in

their world view viewing reality as a

series of different spirits and

individual forces that have to be

appeased in their own separate way

rather than creating broader principles

like loyalty to Nation causal logic

rationality religious law and the like

this means that for lots of African male

culture they try to push prowess and

power rather than integrity and

responsibility and the result of this is

that if you talk to people who try to do

business in Africa it's difficult to get

African workers to show up at the same

time at the same day because there isn't

that culture of responsibility and this

might sound like a racist rant on my

part but cross-referenced this with

someone who has lived or tried to work

in Africa and they'll just tell you that

this is the case women tend to be viewed

with con Ascension much of Africa while

in fact being the Bedrock of the society

I don't want this to be an owning Africa

section rather part of the explanation

for why Africa is the poorest area in

the world and hasn't moved from a tribal

to a national level we still have to

keep in mind most of Africa as

illiterate had no State organized

religion and the like only a little bit

more than a century ago and that

perspective Africa's progress since has

been absolutely remarkable likewise

Africa is already changing these Norms

as evident in the declines in polygamy

almost certainly caused by the

continent's mass conversion to

Christianity and Islam alongside the

rise of the state which makes wide-scale

war no longer tenable this leads me to

the next point where Africa will over

time gradually strengthen the power of

its families and also at the same time

become a more developed Society but also

you're seeing very rapid changes in

family structure around the world and

from that you would expect to see

massive social changes and it really

begs the question of

what huge social shifts will come from

that I mean for example in both Russia

and China they're old big family Clan

lives were broken down by communism

people live in nuclear families I think

that's part of the reason for why those

countries have such low birth rates and

are having such large social problems

because their previous social structure

for Millennia has been destroyed

overnight Germany today has switched

from having their authoritarian family

structure to having the French

egalitarian nuclear family structure so

should we expect Germany to become more

like France alternately in the west

you're seeing the weakening power of the

family wherein for example the US the

African family structure is spread to

much larger amounts of the white

community and a family has this much

impact upon how societies develop it

really begs the question now that half

of all marriages ends in divorce what

will that do to society and these are

all questions for a future video