Adv Mngomezulu lodge case against Judge Ratha Mokgoatleng ! Ziyakhala 😮‍💨

Summary

The murder trial for the death of Senzo Meyiwa continues with drama and intrigue. Defense lawyer Zulu accuses the judge of bias and calls for a special entry application due to irregularities. He cross-examines investigator Brigadier Ginda about the warrant of arrest. Ginda claims it was a hit not a robbery gone wrong, but witness stories don't add up. The defense, accused, witnesses and judge are frustrated as it seems the judge has already decided. Tensions run high as the public wants to know who killed Meyiwa, but the case provides more twists than answers.

Takeaways

• 📕 The trial involves five men accused of the 2014 murder of a captain in the Bufan Buana, focusing on issues within the legal proceedings.
• 🔥 Advocate Tulani Zulu, representing two of the accused, plans to highlight trial irregularities, suggesting a contentious relationship with Judge M.
• 📝 Brigadier Bongani Ginda, the lead investigator, is under cross-examination about the admissibility of confession statements from two accused.
• 🤨 A 'trial within a trial' is being conducted to determine the legitimacy of these confessions, indicating complex legal maneuvers.
• 🚨 Zulu's questioning of Ginda aims to challenge the arrest warrant's validity, urging the court to maintain impartiality.
• 🙁 The defense alleges bias from Judge M, accusing him of favoring witnesses and possibly prejudicing the trial's outcome.
• 📚 A special entry application is being considered, used to appeal convictions based on procedural irregularities or legal missteps.
• 💬 Public interest in the case is high, with speculation surrounding the murder's motive—whether it was a targeted hit or a robbery gone wrong.
• 🙄 Witness credibility is under scrutiny, with conflicting testimonies adding to the trial's complexity and frustration for all parties involved.
• 😮 Advocate Zulu's criticisms suggest concerns over Judge M's impartiality, fearing a predetermined judgment that could undermine the defense.

Q & A

What is the lawyer for two of the accused asking the court to do?

The lawyer is asking the court to flag any irregularities in the trial.

Who was back on the witness stand for cross-examination?

Brigadier Bongani Ginda, the lead investigator, was back on the witness stand for cross-examination.

What are the five men on trial accused of?

The five men are on trial for the 2014 murder of Sénamé Maya and his bodyguards.

What is a 'trial within a trial' referring to?

A 'trial within a trial' is held to determine the admissibility of confession statements by two of the accused.

Why does the defense lawyer accuse the judge of unfairness?

The defense lawyer believes the judge is biased against the defense and favoring the prosecution's witness.

What is a special entry application?

A special entry application is made when an accused believes the court proceedings have been irregular or illegal.

What twist does the narrator say has occurred in the case?

A twist occurred when Brigadier Ginda claimed it was a hit instead of a robbery gone wrong, contradicting previous witness testimony.

Why does the narrator say Judge M seems to have already made a ruling?

The judge appears to uncritically believe the witnesses and favor the prosecution side.

Who does the narrator say wants resolution in this case?

The narrator says everyone involved wants resolution - the defense, prosecution, witnesses and judge.

What does the narrator invite viewers to share?

The narrator invites viewers to share their thoughts on the case in the comments section.