Sejarah Pilpres 2009

Summary

The 2009 Indonesian Presidential Election (Pilpres) marked a pivotal moment in the nation's political history. Incumbent President SBY faced challenges from Megawati and Prabowo, and JK with Wiranto, in a tense and competitive race. Despite controversy, including the distribution of direct cash assistance (BLT) and electoral irregularities, SBY secured a landslide victory with 60.8% of the vote. The election also highlighted the growing influence of social media campaigns and marked the last presidential run for SBY. The aftermath of the 2009 Pilpres set the stage for Indonesia's future political landscape, including the 2014 presidential race.

Takeaways

• 😀 The 2009 Presidential Election (Pilpres) in Indonesia marked the second time that President SBY ran for re-election, following the 2004 elections.
• 😀 The 2009 election saw three main candidates: SBY-Budiono (incumbent), Megawati-Prabowo, and JK-Wiranto.
• 😀 The election had notable dynamics, such as a split between SBY and his former vice president, JK, who ran for president with Wiranto.
• 😀 Megawati Soekarnoputri, despite having a strong political history, faced off against SBY and was supported by the PDIP and Gerindra parties.
• 😀 SBY’s main rival in 2009 was Megawati, with Prabowo as her running mate. This was the first time Prabowo participated in a presidential race.
• 😀 The 2009 Pilpres had a single-round election due to SBY and Budiono winning more than 50% of the votes across Indonesia’s provinces.
• 😀 The media played an important role in the 2009 campaign, with notable slogans like 'Mega Pro' for Megawati-Prabowo and 'Lebih Cepat Lebih Baik' ('Faster, Better') for JK-Wiranto.
• 😀 There were controversies surrounding unethical practices such as the distribution of direct cash aid (BLT) before the election, which some felt helped SBY’s chances.
• 😀 Despite disputes over election results, the Constitutional Court rejected the claims made by Megawati and Prabowo regarding voter discrepancies.
• 😀 The election's outcome solidified SBY and Budiono’s position for a second term, with their official inauguration taking place in October 2009, marking the end of SBY’s eligibility to run for a third term.

Q & A

What is the significance of the 2009 Indonesian presidential election?

The 2009 Indonesian presidential election was significant as it marked the second time in history that an incumbent president, SBY (Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono), ran for re-election. It was also notable for the competition between political figures who had participated in the 2004 election, as well as the emergence of new candidates and the role of media, particularly social media, in the campaign.

How did the 2009 election differ from the 2004 presidential election?

The 2009 election differed from the 2004 presidential election because several candidates who had participated in 2004, like SBY and JK (Jusuf Kalla), were running again, while others like Prabowo Subianto and Megawati Soekarnoputri were making a comeback after having lost in the previous election. Additionally, there was an increase in media influence, with social media being used for campaigning.

What was the unique political dynamic between SBY and JK during the 2009 election?

The unique dynamic between SBY and JK in the 2009 election was that although they had been running mates in 2004, they were now political rivals. JK ran as a presidential candidate with Wiranto, while SBY partnered with Budiono. This rivalry was exacerbated by the larger support base for JK's party, Golkar, compared to SBY's Democratic Party.

What were the key issues surrounding the 2009 presidential election campaigns?

Key issues during the 2009 campaign included accusations of unethical practices, such as the distribution of direct cash assistance (BLT) during the campaign period, which some viewed as an attempt to influence voters. Additionally, there were debates about the fairness of the voter list (DPT) and allegations of vote manipulation.

Who were the main candidates in the 2009 Indonesian presidential election?

The main candidates in the 2009 election were incumbent president SBY, running with Budiono as vice president; Megawati Soekarnoputri with Prabowo Subianto as vice president; and Jusuf Kalla with Wiranto as vice president.

What was the result of the 2009 presidential election in terms of votes?

In the 2009 presidential election, SBY and Budiono won with 60.80% of the vote, securing a landslide victory. Megawati and Prabowo received 26.79%, and JK with Wiranto received 12.41%.

What were the legal challenges and controversies that followed the 2009 election results?

There were legal challenges from the losing candidates, particularly JK and Megawati, who contested the election results due to alleged issues like voter list inaccuracies, vote manipulation, and improper conduct by election officials. However, the Constitutional Court rejected all claims, and the results were upheld.

What role did political parties play in the 2009 presidential election?

Political parties played a crucial role in the 2009 presidential election by supporting various candidates. SBY's Democratic Party was the dominant force, with broad backing from several parties. Other candidates, like Megawati and Prabowo, were supported by the PDIP and Gerindra, while JK and Wiranto were backed by Golkar and Hanura, among others.

How did the distribution of political power in the parliament shift after the 2009 election?

After the 2009 election, the political landscape in Indonesia shifted significantly. The Democratic Party emerged as the dominant force, and the chairmanship of the MPR (People's Consultative Assembly) changed hands from PKS to PDIP, signaling a shift in political influence.

How did the 2009 presidential election influence the 2014 election?

The 2009 election had a lasting impact on the 2014 presidential election, particularly in the political alliances formed after the 2009 defeat. The coalition between Megawati's PDIP and Prabowo's Gerindra, which formed after the 2009 election, created a strong political force, influencing the dynamics of future elections and sparking controversies over unfulfilled agreements.