Long Run Review: Hoka Skyward X

Summary

In this video, the reviewer tests the Hoka Skyward X running shoe over a long run, addressing concerns about its weight compared to lighter speed training shoes. They share initial impressions, noting the shoe's comfort, protective cushioning, and responsiveness despite its heft. The Skyward X, with a 50mm stack, offers a stable and easy running experience, making it suitable for various paces. The reviewer also compares the Skyward X with other shoes like the SC Trainer V2 and the On Cloud Monster Hyper, discussing their suitability for different types of runs and training needs. The video concludes with a focus on the value and price of the Skyward X, suggesting it might be a worthwhile investment for runners seeking a protective and bouncy long-distance shoe.

Takeaways

• 👟 The Hoka Skyward X is being tested for long-distance running to address concerns about its weight of approximately 330g.
• 🔍 A comparison was made with the Topo Cyclone 2, which is nearly a third lighter at 200g, to evaluate the Skyward X's performance despite its bulkier build.
• 🏃‍♂️ The Skyward X has been favored for speed training due to its higher stack and protective nature, similar to the Topo Cyclone 2.
• 🤔 The Skyward X features a stack of nearly 50mm in the midsole, utilizing peba foam for responsiveness and super critical EVA for stability.
• 📏 The shoe is noted for its width and stability, especially when compared to the SC Trainer V1, which has less girth.
• ⏱ After a 16-mile run, the Skyward X proved to be comfortable and protective, suitable for long runs and capable of handling faster paces.
• 💰 The high price point of $225 raises questions about the value and performance relative to other shoes in the market.
• 👀 The Skyward X is positioned as a protective, high-stacked shoe that could be a good option for those looking to increase mileage without adding strain to the legs.
• 🆚 When compared to other shoes like the SC Trainer V2 and the On Cloud Monster Hyper, the Skyward X offers more bounce and protection but at a higher weight.
• 👍 The shoe's durability is a point of interest, especially when considering its weight and the need for it to withstand long runs and fast paces.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the Hoka Skyward X shoe review?

The main focus of the Hoka Skyward X shoe review is to test how the shoe performs over a longer run, addressing concerns about its weight and evaluating its comfort, cushioning, and suitability for faster paces.

How does the Hoka Skyward X compare in weight to the Topo Cyclone 2?

The Hoka Skyward X is significantly heavier than the Topo Cyclone 2, weighing about 330g compared to the Cyclone 2's 200g.

What type of midsole material does the Hoka Skyward X use?

The Hoka Skyward X uses a high stack of PEBA foam for the midsole, which is the same foam used in racing shoes for its responsiveness and cushioning.

How does the Hoka Skyward X's stack height compare to other shoes?

The Hoka Skyward X has a nearly 50mm stack height in the midsole, which is considered quite high and provides a lot of cushioning.

What was the runner's initial impression of the Hoka Skyward X after the first run?

The runner's initial impression was positive, finding the Hoka Skyward X comfortable for a recovery run and enjoying the bouncy fast feeling from the forefoot despite its weight.

How did the Hoka Skyward X perform during the 16-mile long run test?

The Hoka Skyward X performed well during the 16-mile long run, providing comfort, protection, and a good balance for various paces without causing fatigue or discomfort.

What is the Hoka Skyward X's price point, and how does it compare to other shoes in terms of value?

The Hoka Skyward X is priced at $225, which is on the higher end compared to other shoes like the SC Trainer V2 at $180. The value proposition is based on the protection, cushioning, and performance it offers.

How does the Hoka Skyward X's design and performance compare to the SC Trainer V1?

The Hoka Skyward X is heavier and more protective than the SC Trainer V1, with a wider and taller design for additional stability. It also has a more comfort-oriented experience rather than a speed-oriented one.

What are some of the shoes that could be considered as alternatives or complements to the Hoka Skyward X?

Some alternatives or complementary shoes to the Hoka Skyward X include the ASICS DynaFlyte, New Balance FuelCell, and On Cloud Monster Hyper, each offering different levels of cushioning, weight, and performance.

How does the Hoka Skyward X compare to the Hoka Clifton X1 in terms of weight and performance?

The Hoka Clifton X1 is lighter and more aggressive in midsole geometry, making it more suitable for racing and faster training. The Skyward X, while heavier, offers more cushioning and protection, making it better for longer, more comfortable runs.