FBE601 Bilimsel Araştırma Teknikleri ve Yayın Etiği - 2

Summary

This lecture addresses key issues in academic publishing, focusing on authorship ethics in research papers. It emphasizes the importance of proper authorship order, where the first author should be the person who made the major contribution to the work. The lecture also discusses 'gift authorship,' where individuals are added to the authorship list without significant contribution, which is considered unethical. Additionally, it covers the role of graduate students in publications, the involvement of advisors, and the correct procedure for listing acknowledgments and research funding sources.

Takeaways

• 😀 The importance of proper authorship order in academic papers: The primary contributor should be listed first, with senior authors appearing later in the order.
• 😀 The issue of including unrelated people as authors in academic papers: This can occur due to factors like gaining points, prestige, or promotion, but it is unethical.
• 😀 Acknowledging contributions: It's crucial to mention individuals or organizations who helped in any way, such as advisors, institutions, or funding bodies, in the acknowledgment section.
• 😀 Ethical concerns with honorary authorship: Including individuals who haven't contributed significantly is unethical and should be avoided.
• 😀 Writing and submitting a paper to a journal: After completing the research and writing process, the next step is to choose the appropriate journal and submit the paper for review.
• 😀 The role of thesis advisors in academic publishing: A thesis advisor's name should always be included in a paper related to the thesis, as they are crucial to the academic journey.
• 😀 Potential issues with publishing with someone other than your thesis advisor: While it's possible to publish with another faculty member, bypassing your thesis advisor could lead to complications.
• 😀 The importance of maintaining ethical standards in collaborative publications: When working with other researchers, all contributors should be properly credited for their efforts.
• 😀 Issues with publishing without your thesis advisor's name: A publication where the advisor's name is missing could indicate a larger problem with the academic relationship, especially if the research is related to the thesis topic.
• 😀 The challenges and ethical implications of multiple authorship in scientific papers: In large, collaborative research projects, authorship can be extensive, and it's important to manage contributions and attributions carefully.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the video?

The video discusses the process of academic authorship, particularly focusing on the issues related to author order, ethics in publication, and the roles of students and advisors in academic writing.

How should the author order be determined in a scientific paper?

The order of authors should reflect the level of contribution to the work. The first author is typically the person who contributed most significantly to the research, such as conducting the study and writing the paper. Senior contributors or advisors may be listed later.

What is the issue with adding unrelated individuals to the author list?

Adding individuals who have not contributed significantly to the research or writing process to the author list is unethical. It may happen for reasons such as gaining points, prestige, or career advancement, but it compromises the integrity of the paper.

What should be included in the acknowledgements section of a paper?

In the acknowledgements section, authors should express gratitude to those who contributed to the project, such as advisors, colleagues, or institutions. This can include thanks for financial support from funding bodies like TÜBİTAK.

Can a master's or PhD student collaborate with other faculty members on a publication?

Yes, a student can collaborate with other faculty members on publications, especially if the research is unrelated to the student's thesis topic. However, collaborating with a faculty member on the student’s thesis research without involving the advisor may lead to ethical issues.

What are the ethical considerations when a student receives a scholarship from a faculty member?

If a student receives a scholarship from a faculty member, they are expected to fulfill their academic responsibilities to that faculty member. Collaborating with other faculty members without the advisor’s involvement could raise ethical concerns.

Is it ethical for a student's advisor to be excluded from a paper if they have contributed to the research?

No, it is unethical for a student's advisor to be excluded from a paper if they have contributed to the research. The advisor should be listed, particularly if they played a significant role in guiding the research.

Can a student submit a paper without their advisor’s name if the advisor did not contribute to the research?

If the advisor did not contribute to the research, it might be acceptable for the advisor’s name to be excluded. However, this situation is rare, and careful consideration of the advisor's role is necessary.

What should a student do if their name is missing from a paper that originated from their thesis research?

It is considered unethical for a student’s name to be omitted from a paper that arises from their thesis research. If this happens, it would be a violation of academic integrity.

What are the guidelines for determining the correspondence address for a paper?

The correspondence address should be the one where the author is reachable. For students, it is typically the address of the institution they are affiliated with. If the student works at another organization, that address may also be used.