SSC CGL 2024 RESULT SCAM🤬 | @GaganPratapMaths exposed💯 | SSC CGL Scam | SSC Ghotala #ssc #ssccgl

Summary

In this video, Vitesh Yadav discusses concerns regarding the 2024 SSC CGL exam results and the unusually high cutoff of 153. He criticizes inconsistencies in the normalization process, suggesting possible manipulation and corruption within the system. The speaker questions the integrity of certain coaching educators, particularly Gagan Sir, accusing them of promoting courses for profit while downplaying systemic flaws. Vitesh calls for greater transparency and accountability in the SSC process, urging students to focus on their studies despite the controversy, as real success will come from hard work, not external influences.

Takeaways

• 😀 The cut-off for SSC CGL 2024 has reached an unusually high 153, which has left many deserving candidates frustrated, especially those scoring around 140-145 marks.
• 😀 There are widespread allegations of corruption and manipulation in the SSC CGL selection process, with suspicions of jobs being awarded through backdoor channels.
• 😀 Gagan Sir, a prominent coaching figure, initially raised concerns about the integrity of the SSC CGL 2024 exam but later reversed his stance, supporting the SSC's actions.
• 😀 The normalization process used to adjust scores is unclear, and students feel that they deserve more transparency about how their marks were calculated and adjusted.
• 😀 Despite the rise in vacancies this year (18,000+), the cut-off has increased dramatically, which has caused confusion and skepticism among students.
• 😀 Coaching institutes, like Gagan Sir’s, are accused of shifting their focus from student welfare to monetizing courses, causing further frustration among students.
• 😀 Many students who were on the verge of qualifying are now demotivated because of the inflated cut-off, and there are concerns about the fairness of the entire process.
• 😀 The lack of transparency regarding the normalization score increases doubts among candidates about whether the results were manipulated to favor specific individuals.
• 😀 The speaker calls for a collective demand for transparency in the exam results, urging SSC to release detailed information about score normalization and selection criteria.
• 😀 The video also criticizes the role of money in influencing the exam process, with claims that wealthier individuals may have a better chance of securing jobs through corruption.
• 😀 The speaker advises students to stay focused on their studies and not be swayed by the controversies, as they believe that hard work and integrity will lead to true success in competitive exams.

Q & A

What is the main concern raised in the video regarding the SSC CGL 2024 exam results?

The main concern is the unusually high cut-off marks, which some believe indicate corruption or manipulation in the SSC CGL exam process. The speaker highlights that many students who scored around 140 marks did not make the cut-off, while others with higher marks (e.g., 153) did, raising suspicions about the fairness of the results.

Why does the speaker criticize Gagan Sir and other coaching institutes?

The speaker accuses Gagan Sir and other coaching institutes of exploiting students by manipulating the system for personal gain. They are criticized for promoting their courses under the guise of helping students, while not addressing the underlying issues of the exam, like the potential corruption in the results.

What explanation does the speaker offer for the rise in the cut-off marks?

The speaker suggests that the rise in cut-off marks is due to the increased number of candidates, particularly from 2022 and 2023 who were already selected but reappeared for the exam in 2024. This, combined with the higher number of vacancies, may have contributed to the inflated cut-off.

What is the speaker's view on the transparency of the SSC CGL normalization process?

The speaker calls for more transparency in the normalization process. They advocate for SSC to disclose the normalization scores and show how marks were adjusted across different exam shifts, as this would help restore trust among candidates and ensure fairness in the process.

How does the speaker feel about the handling of the SSC CGL 2024 results?

The speaker is frustrated and disillusioned, believing that the exam system is unfairly structured, and that many students have been wronged. They feel that the high cut-off marks and lack of transparency have caused unnecessary hardship for deserving candidates.

What role does the speaker suggest coaching institutes play in the exam controversy?

The speaker suggests that coaching institutes are exploiting students’ desperation by profiting from their courses. These institutes, according to the speaker, may be contributing to a cycle of misinformation, prioritizing financial gain over addressing the core issues of fairness in the examination process.

What does the speaker propose as a solution to the alleged issues with SSC CGL 2024?

The speaker proposes that SSC should conduct a thorough investigation into the normalization process and provide full transparency regarding the scoring adjustments. They also advocate for a more open and honest discussion about the issues faced by students to prevent future manipulation.

What is the speaker's opinion on the fairness of SSC exams like MTS and CHSL?

The speaker expresses doubts about the fairness of exams like MTS and CHSL, claiming that corruption is widespread in these exams as well. They believe that candidates with money or connections have an unfair advantage, and the system is flawed.

How does the speaker view the impact of the high cut-off on students?

The speaker believes the high cut-off has a devastating impact on students who worked hard but could not meet the new cut-off. These students, according to the speaker, are likely feeling demotivated and frustrated, as their efforts did not result in a fair outcome.

Why does the speaker suggest that students should focus on their studies instead of getting caught up in controversies?

The speaker encourages students to remain focused on their studies and not get distracted by the ongoing controversies surrounding the exam. They emphasize that students' success depends on hard work and preparation, rather than getting involved in the debate over corruption or manipulation.