LAPOR MAS WAPRES!

Summary

The video explores the controversy surrounding Indonesia's 'Lapor Mas Wapres' initiative, where Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka receives direct complaints from citizens. The discussion questions whether this task is appropriate for the Vice President, whose role is often undefined and flexible. Critics argue that such a responsibility should not fall to a high-ranking official but be handled through technology or local government structures. The video also critiques the efficiency and effectiveness of this initiative, highlighting issues with leadership accountability and governance in Indonesia's political system.

Takeaways

• 😀 The script discusses Gibran's initiative 'Lapor Mas Wapres', which allows citizens to submit complaints directly to the Vice President of Indonesia, Gibran Rakabuming.
• 😀 The project has faced some criticism, with some questioning the appropriateness of a Vice President handling citizens' complaints.
• 😀 The duties of the Vice President in Indonesia are not clearly defined by law and depend on the President's assignments, with a historical lack of standardized responsibilities.
• 😀 The role of the Vice President has traditionally been shaped by the President's needs, and Gibran’s role appears to focus on receiving citizen reports, similar to past examples from other administrations.
• 😀 There is a comparison made between Gibran's initiative and former President BJ Habibie's focus on technology and economic development during his tenure as Vice President.
• 😀 Gibran's handling of complaints, such as via the 'Lapor Mas Wapres' platform, may be seen as a form of inefficient governance due to its reliance on a manual, non-automated process.
• 😀 The effectiveness of receiving complaints via the Vice President’s office raises questions about the lack of technological integration, such as AI sorting, which could improve efficiency in handling such complaints.
• 😀 The script critiques how government leaders, like Gibran and Jokowi, may publicly express surprise or frustration over issues they should already be aware of, which questions their leadership capabilities.
• 😀 There is a focus on the lack of transparency in government operations, including how complaints from citizens are handled and the chain of command within the administration.
• 😀 The role of 'Lapor Mas Wapres' may be seen as a public relations tool rather than a substantive government action, with questions raised about whether the initiative truly addresses underlying governmental inefficiencies.

Q & A

What is the purpose of the 'Lapor Mas Wapres' initiative launched by Gibran?

The 'Lapor Mas Wapres' initiative allows the people of Indonesia to directly report their complaints and issues to the Vice President, Gibran Rakabuming, at the Presidential Palace. It is intended to facilitate direct communication between citizens and the government.

Why is the 'Lapor Mas Wapres' initiative controversial?

The initiative is controversial because some people feel it undermines the role of local government officials, such as mayors and governors, by allowing citizens to bypass them and report directly to the Vice President. This raises questions about the efficiency and clarity of government processes.

What is the traditional role of the Vice President in Indonesia's government?

The role of the Vice President in Indonesia is not strictly defined by law, but is generally based on the responsibilities assigned by the President. Historically, Vice Presidents have had varying duties, from economic management to education, depending on the President's preferences.

How does Gibran's initiative relate to past practices by other Indonesian leaders?

The initiative mirrors practices by previous leaders like Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok), who received citizen complaints in his role as Governor of Jakarta. The approach of directly engaging with the public, however, is seen as an attempt to strengthen the link between government and citizens, though it has sparked criticism for overstepping local governance roles.

What criticism is directed at Gibran's handling of citizen complaints?

Critics argue that Gibran’s decision to personally handle citizen complaints may be inefficient and impractical, especially given the scale of issues that need addressing. They also question whether it is appropriate for a Vice President to take on such a hands-on, customer service-like role instead of focusing on more strategic governance issues.

How does the use of technology play a role in government services like 'Lapor Mas Wapres'?

Technology, particularly digital platforms, can enhance government responsiveness by enabling citizens to report issues via apps and receive updates on the status of their complaints. This system is more efficient and scalable compared to direct, in-person complaint handling.

Why is it unusual for a leader like Gibran to criticize his own team publicly?

It is seen as unprofessional for a leader to publicly criticize their team, as it undermines the authority of the team members and creates an impression of disorganization. Leaders are expected to address issues internally rather than exposing weaknesses publicly.

What does the term 'illusion of work' refer to in the context of Indonesian politics?

The 'illusion of work' refers to the public perception that certain actions, such as political figures appearing to take immediate, visible action on issues (e.g., personally overseeing complaints), equate to meaningful governance. However, the actual work behind the scenes, like policy development or legislative duties, is often less visible to the public.

What does the criticism of Gibran's 'Lapor Mas Wapres' initiative suggest about the chain of command in Indonesian government?

The criticism suggests that there may be confusion or inefficiencies in the government’s chain of command. If the Vice President is handling complaints directly, it bypasses local leaders and other government structures, which can lead to a breakdown in the proper division of responsibilities and roles.

What could be the possible consequences of having a Vice President personally handle citizen complaints?

The possible consequences include overwhelming the Vice President with routine complaints, which could detract from his ability to focus on broader national issues. It could also create confusion about the responsibilities of local government officials, undermining their authority and reducing the efficiency of the overall governance system.