La LOI IMM1GRATION complètement CENSURÉE par le Conseil Constitutionnel ! Ce qu'il faut en penser...

Summary

In this video, Lubris delves into the recent ruling by the Constitutional Council on the controversial immigration law, which has been largely deemed unconstitutional or irrelevant by the council. The law, celebrated by the right and far-right, faced significant pushback for its restrictive measures on immigration, leading to the rejection of many of its provisions. Lubris critiques the council's decisions, arguing they prevent any stringent immigration control, and suggests that revising the Constitution through a referendum may be the only way forward. He also discusses the political fallout, emphasizing the law's failure to address immigration concerns effectively and calling for more radical measures to protect national sovereignty and identity.

Takeaways

• 😕 The French Constitutional Council ruled on a controversial immigration law.
• 📜 Many provisions of the law were rejected for procedural reasons.
• 🏛️ There were disagreements between left and right political factions.
• 🇪🇺 European laws and courts impacted the decision.
• 🚫 Certain restrictions on immigration were deemed unconstitutional.
• 👪 Provisions about family reunification were rejected.
• 💰 Financial guarantees for foreign students were struck down.
• ⚖️ The ruling raises questions about French sovereignty.
• 🗳️ Some call for a referendum to revise the constitution.
• 😔 The speaker expresses disappointment with the outcome.

Q & A

What was the main topic discussed in the video?

The main topic discussed was the significant censorship of the immigration law by the Constitutional Council in France, which declared most measures of the immigration law unconstitutional or as legislative riders.

What was the outcome of the immigration law in the Constitutional Council?

The Constitutional Council declared that most of the measures of the immigration law were either unconstitutional or considered as legislative riders, leading to their rejection.

How did the news channels mentioned in the video (BFM TV, C news, etc.) contribute to the discussion?

The news channels provided summaries and commentaries on the Constitutional Council's decision on the immigration law, highlighting the controversy and the political reactions to the censure.

What are 'legislative riders' as mentioned in the video?

Legislative riders are provisions added to a bill that are not related to the bill's main topic. In the context of the video, many measures were rejected by the Constitutional Council because they were considered as legislative riders unrelated to the core subject of the immigration law.

What was the reaction of right-wing politicians to the Constitutional Council's decision?

Right-wing politicians were expected to be disappointed by the decision and argue that the rejection of the measures proved the need to revise the Constitution, as the measures they supported were censored.

What specific immigration measures were rejected by the Constitutional Council?

Measures such as restricting the right of soil, measures limiting family reunification, caution for foreign students, and the offense of irregular stay for foreigners were among those rejected by the Council.

How did the presenter describe the initial immigration law proposed by the government?

The presenter described the initial immigration law proposed by the government as pro-immigration, suggesting it aimed to regularize undocumented workers rather than restrict immigration.

What was the presenter's perspective on the role of the Constitutional Council in this decision?

The presenter criticized the Constitutional Council for acting like 'leftist judges,' suggesting that their decision was more politically motivated rather than based on legal grounds, and for drastically reducing the scope of the immigration law.

What does the presenter suggest as a solution to the situation?

The presenter suggests that the only solutions are either a revolution or referendums to change the Constitution, emphasizing the need for constitutional amendments to enforce stricter immigration policies.

What is the presenter's final message to the audience?

The presenter encourages viewers to support his channel by liking, commenting, following on Twitter, and joining his Patreon for exclusive content, emphasizing the importance of supporting a patriot's voice on the internet.