Untuk Kedua Kalinya, Anwar Usman Dinyatakan Melanggar Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi

Warta Kota Production

28 Mar 202401:23

Summary

TLDRAnwar Usman, a judge, has been found guilty for the second time of violating the ethical code and conduct by the Honor Council of the Constitutional Court. Chairperson Dewa Gde Palguna stated that Anwar Usman was proven to breach the code of ethics outlined in principles of propriety and decorum, specifically points 1 and 2. The council decided on a written reprimand as punishment. The decision was made during meetings on March 19th and 26th, 2024, and announced publicly on March 28th, 2024.

Takeaways

⚖️ Anwar Usman, a Constitutional Court Judge, has violated the code of ethics and conduct for the second time.
📜 The violation was confirmed by the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court.
👨‍⚖️ Dewa Gede Palguna, chairman of the council, stated that Anwar Usman violated ethical principles of propriety and politeness.
🔍 The violations fall under points 1 and 2 of the application of Sapta Karsa Utama.
❌ The council found the judge guilty of breaching the ethical code of conduct as stated in the principles of propriety and politeness.
📝 Anwar Usman was given a written reprimand for this violation.
👥 The decision was made in a council meeting by three members, with Dewa Gede Palguna serving as chairman and Ridwan Mansur as secretary.
📅 The council meetings regarding this decision took place on Tuesday, March 19, and Tuesday, March 26, 2024.
🗓️ The ruling was publicly announced during a plenary session on Thursday, March 28, 2024.
🔓 The session where the ruling was read was open to the public.

Q & A

Who is Anwar Usman in the context of the transcript?
-Anwar Usman is a Constitutional Court judge who has been found to violate the code of ethics and conduct for the second time.
What specific principles of the code of ethics did Anwar Usman violate?
-Anwar Usman violated the principles of propriety and courtesy, specifically points 1 and 2 of the Sapta Karsa Utama.
Who declared Anwar Usman guilty of violating the code of ethics?
-Anwar Usman was declared guilty by the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, led by Dewa Gede Palguna.
What was the sanction imposed on Anwar Usman?
-Anwar Usman was given a written reprimand as a sanction for his violation of the code of ethics and judicial conduct.
How many times has Anwar Usman been found to violate the code of ethics?
-Anwar Usman has been found to violate the code of ethics twice.
On what dates was the violation decision discussed and issued?
-The decision was discussed and issued during meetings on Tuesday, March 19, 2024, and Tuesday, March 26, 2024.
When was the decision announced in the plenary session?
-The decision was announced in the plenary session on Thursday, March 28, 2024.
Who were the members of the Honorary Council involved in the decision-making process?
-The Honorary Council consisted of Dewa Gede Palguna as chairman and member, Ridwan Mansur as secretary and member, along with an unnamed third member.
What was the nature of the session where the decision was announced?
-The decision was announced in an open plenary session of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court.
What is the significance of the Sapta Karsa Utama in this context?
-The Sapta Karsa Utama is the guiding ethical principle for Constitutional Court judges, and Anwar Usman was found to have violated points 1 and 2 related to propriety and courtesy.

Outlines

00:00

⚖️ Ethical Violations by Constitutional Judge Anwar Usman

Anwar Usman, a Constitutional Court judge, has been found guilty of violating the code of ethics and judicial conduct for the second time. The Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, led by chairman Dewa Gde Palguna, determined that Anwar Usman breached the ethical principles related to decency and propriety, specifically sections 1 and 2 of the Sapta Karsa Utama guidelines. As a result, the council issued a written reprimand against him. This decision was made during a meeting of the Honorary Council on March 19 and 26, 2024, and the judgment was publicly announced in an open plenary session on March 28, 2024.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Anwar Usman

Anwar Usman is the Constitutional Court Judge mentioned in the video, who has been accused of violating the code of ethics for judges. His role in the judiciary and his ethical conduct are central to the theme, as the script revolves around his repeated infractions.

💡Code of Ethics

The 'Code of Ethics' refers to the formal guidelines and principles that judges must adhere to, ensuring fairness, impartiality, and proper conduct in their judicial duties. Anwar Usman was found to have violated this code, specifically relating to decorum and propriety.

💡Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MKMK)

The MKMK, or the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, is the body responsible for maintaining the ethical standards of judges within Indonesia's Constitutional Court. In this case, the MKMK investigated and ruled on Anwar Usman's ethical violations, highlighting the oversight role of this body.

💡Principle of Decency and Politeness

This principle, mentioned as part of the ethical code, governs the expected personal and professional behavior of judges. Anwar Usman's violation of this principle suggests that his conduct was deemed inappropriate in a manner that breaches these ethical guidelines.

💡Sapta Karsa Utama

Sapta Karsa Utama is a set of core values or principles that judges are expected to follow, specifically mentioned in relation to the ethical guidelines for behavior. Anwar Usman’s actions violated parts of these values, leading to his reprimand.

💡Teguran tertulis (Written Reprimand)

The written reprimand is the formal disciplinary action imposed on Anwar Usman for his breach of the code of ethics. This sanction signifies a documented warning, indicating that while the violation was serious, it resulted in a non-penal punishment.

💡Rapat Majelis Kehormatan

The term refers to the meeting of the Honorary Council where they deliberate on ethical cases. In the video, it mentions the council's discussions on March 19 and March 26, 2024, to address the accusations against Anwar Usman and make a formal decision.

💡Pelapor

The 'Pelapor' or 'reporting party' in the script refers to the individual or entity who brought forth the complaint or ethical violation against Anwar Usman. This role is crucial in initiating the ethical review process by the MKMK.

💡Dewa Gede Palguna

Dewa Gede Palguna is the chairman of the Honorary Council mentioned in the script. His leadership in the ethical review process and announcement of the decision demonstrates his authority in addressing judicial misconduct.

💡Sidang pleno terbuka (Open plenary session)

The open plenary session refers to the public announcement of the decision by the MKMK, ensuring transparency in the judiciary. This session, held on March 28, 2024, is when the written reprimand was publicly delivered, emphasizing the court's commitment to openness.

Highlights

Anwar Usman, a judge of the Constitutional Court, is reported to have violated the code of ethics and conduct for the second time.

Anwar Usman was declared in violation by the Constitutional Court Honorary Council.

Dewa Gede Palguna, Chairman of the Honorary Council, stated that Anwar Usman was found to have violated the principles of propriety and politeness.

The code of ethics violation pertains to clauses 1 and 2 under the principles of propriety and politeness in the 'Sapta Karsa Utama'.

The Honorary Council imposed a written reprimand on Anwar Usman as a sanction.

The decision was made during a meeting of the Honorary Council attended by three members.

Dewa Gede Palguna chaired the Honorary Council meeting and also served as a member.

Ridwan Mansur acted as the secretary and member of the Honorary Council.

The decision was announced on Tuesday, March 19, 2024, and Tuesday, March 26, 2024.

The final statement was delivered publicly during a plenary session of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council.

The public session took place on Thursday, March 28, 2024.

This is the second instance of Anwar Usman being found in violation of the Constitutional Court's code of ethics.

The violation specifically concerns Anwar Usman's conduct, which was deemed inappropriate according to established standards.

The sanction aimed at upholding the principles of propriety and politeness expected from Constitutional Court judges.

The Honorary Council emphasized the importance of adherence to the ethical standards by judges to maintain the integrity of the court.