GT CUT 3 vs AE 1! Which one should you get?

Lukas Simoner
31 Mar 202409:13

Summary

TLDRIn this video, the reviewer compares two popular basketball shoes: the Nike GT Cut 3 and the Anthony Edwards 1. The comparison covers key factors like price, weight, traction, cushioning, support, and materials. While the GT Cut 3 is praised for its lightweight feel and Zoom X cushioning, the AE1 stands out for its better price, superior traction on dusty courts, and more secure support system. Ultimately, the AE1 is deemed the better option for most players, especially those looking for a balance of performance and value, with the GT Cut 3 being a more premium choice at a higher price.

Takeaways

  • πŸ˜€ The Nike GT Cut 3 is priced significantly higher than the Anthony Edwards 1, with the AE1 being the better value option at around $120/€120.
  • πŸ˜€ The GT Cut 3 is much lighter than the AE1, weighing 427g compared to AE1's 642g, making the GT Cut 3 ideal for players seeking a lightweight shoe.
  • πŸ˜€ The AE1 offers superior traction, providing better grip on both clean and dusty courts compared to the GT Cut 3, which is still solid but not as aggressive.
  • πŸ˜€ The GT Cut 3 features ZoomX cushioning, providing a bouncy, low-to-the-ground feel with great impact protection, which is ideal for players who need agility.
  • πŸ˜€ The AE1 utilizes Boost cushioning, which is more comfortable and provides great impact protection but may feel slightly less responsive than ZoomX.
  • πŸ˜€ The AE1 has superior support thanks to its X-shaped shank plate and a great lacing system, providing a more secure fit than the GT Cut 3's plastic shank plate.
  • πŸ˜€ The materials of the GT Cut 3 are lightweight, breathable, and comfortable, offering a softer and more versatile fit compared to the AE1.
  • πŸ˜€ The AE1 features heavier, more containing materials, which offer more stability but may feel less breathable and comfortable compared to the GT Cut 3.
  • πŸ˜€ Overall, the AE1 is the better choice for most players due to its affordability, comfort, and better traction, making it a strong all-around performer.
  • πŸ˜€ The GT Cut 3 is great for players who prioritize a lightweight feel and dynamic cushioning, but its high price makes it less accessible for many.
  • πŸ˜€ The video encourages viewer engagement with a call to subscribe, like, comment, and suggest other shoes to compare, providing opportunities for further interaction and content creation.

Q & A

  • Which shoe is the reviewer comparing in the video?

    -The reviewer is comparing the Nike GT Cut 3 and the Anthony Edwards 1.

  • What is the price difference between the two shoes?

    -The Anthony Edwards 1 retails for €120 or $120, while the Nike GT Cut 3 is priced at €200 or $200, showing a significant price difference.

  • Which shoe is lighter according to the review?

    -The Nike GT Cut 3 is lighter, weighing 427 grams (15.5 ounces) in a size 14, compared to the Anthony Edwards 1, which weighs 642 grams (22.65 ounces) in a size 13.5.

  • How does the reviewer describe the traction of both shoes?

    -The reviewer notes that both shoes perform well in terms of traction, but the Anthony Edwards 1 provides a better stop on clean and dusty courts, earning it the advantage in this category.

  • Which shoe has better cushioning, according to the reviewer?

    -The reviewer gives the edge in cushioning to the Nike GT Cut 3, praising its Zoom X setup for being bouncy, providing good impact protection, and being low to the ground. The Anthony Edwards 1 has Boost cushioning, which is also comfortable but not as versatile as the GT Cut 3's setup.

  • How does the support compare between the two shoes?

    -The support in the Anthony Edwards 1 is better due to its X-shaped shank plate and lacing system that keeps the foot locked in place. The Nike GT Cut 3 has a plastic shank plate that offers adequate support but is less stiff, resulting in slightly lower torsional support during hard stops and lateral movements.

  • What materials are used in the Nike GT Cut 3?

    -The Nike GT Cut 3 uses lightweight and breathable materials, reinforced with Flywire-like cables for foot containment, and a padded tongue and heel for comfort. The overall feel is soft, lightweight, and comfortable with good breathability.

  • What are the materials used in the Anthony Edwards 1?

    -The Anthony Edwards 1 features a combination of materials, including a velcro-like material on the toe box, a plastic upper, and synthetic materials for the top. These materials are heavier, more containing, and less breathable than those of the Nike GT Cut 3.

  • What issue does the reviewer mention about the Anthony Edwards 1's laces?

    -The reviewer mentions that some people experience issues with the laces coming undone during games or practices. While the reviewer didn't have this problem personally, it's a point to watch out for.

  • Which shoe does the reviewer prefer overall?

    -Overall, the reviewer prefers the Anthony Edwards 1, citing its design, comfort, and performance during practice. However, they acknowledge that the Nike GT Cut 3 is also a great shoe, particularly for players willing to pay the higher price.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Nike GT Cut 3Anthony Edwards 1Basketball ShoesShoe ComparisonTraction TestCushioningSupportShoe ReviewPerformance Review2024 Releases