BAKI réponds à CÉDRIC DOUMBÉ (palmarès, critiques, son striking)

Summary

Baki responds to critics comparing him to Zebo, arguing he's better positioned in the rankings to fight for a title. Though Dombé's knockout was impressive, Baki feels their styles differ. Baki is confident, but not disrespectful towards Dombé. He believes trash talk should stay between fighters, not fans. Baki says he's never insulted Dombé, and as fellow Muslims they shouldn't fight outside the cage. While their clash isn't at Khabib-McGregor's level, Baki aims to justify his confidence with logic, not insults.

Takeaways

• 👊 The speaker discusses a potential fight and negotiation dynamics, emphasizing that financial demands were made public through a tweet.
• 🙏 Highlighting a philosophy of fighting for achievement rather than monetary gain, referencing a willingness to fight for no payment in the past.
• 💪 Points out the lack of UFC championship titles for Cédric Doumbé, questioning the value of a victory over him compared to actual champions.
• 💰 Critiques Doumbé's decision to join PFL for money, arguing that if one moves to PFL, it should also be for financial benefits.
• 💁‍♂️ Dismisses criticism of his own track record and expresses pride in his achievements, despite any detractors.
• 👍 Asserts his own undefeated record in MMA, contrasting it with Doumbé's kickboxing accomplishments and questioning their relevance in MMA.
• 👎 Discusses the difference in sports, acknowledging Doumbé's kickboxing success but questioning its transferability to MMA effectiveness.
• 🚴🏼‍♂️ Talks about the importance of being a well-rounded fighter, capable of competing in all aspects of MMA, not just striking or wrestling.
• 🔥 Addresses the hype surrounding Doumbé following a quick knockout, suggesting it has influenced public perception and criticism towards the speaker.
• 💬 Criticizes the influx of uninformed opinions in MMA due to Doumbé's popularity, emphasizing the need for respect and logical analysis over insults.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the discussion in the transcript?

The main focus is on the debate surrounding a potential fight between the speaker and another fighter, Cédric Doumbé, analyzing their respective accomplishments, perspectives on fighting for money versus honor, and the public's perception and commentary on their fighting styles and careers.

What stance does the speaker take on fighting for money in MMA?

The speaker believes that while fighting for honor and accomplishment is commendable, in a professional setting like MMA, fighters should also be logical about earning money, especially when deviating from their usual fighting organizations, like moving from UFC to PFL.

How does the speaker view Cédric Doumbé's accomplishments in kickboxing compared to MMA?

The speaker acknowledges Cédric Doumbé's accomplishments in kickboxing, including being an 11-time Glory champion. However, the speaker questions the relevance of these achievements in the context of MMA, implying that success in one sport does not necessarily translate to another.

What is the speaker's opinion on the public's perception of their fighting record compared to Cédric Doumbé?

The speaker feels that the public does not fully understand or appreciate their fighting record and abilities, especially when compared to Cédric Doumbé's record. They express a sense of frustration towards casual fans who judge fighters without a deep understanding of the sport.

How does the speaker justify their own confidence in their fighting abilities?

The speaker justifies their confidence by highlighting their undefeated record in nine fights, stressing the importance of self-belief in MMA, and distinguishing their approach from mere pretentiousness by backing it with logic and a clear understanding of their skills.

What is the speaker's stance on the role of striking in MMA and their own abilities in that aspect?

The speaker considers themselves more of a striker than a wrestler in MMA, despite using wrestling effectively in fights. They believe that many MMA fighters have poor striking skills, and they criticize the underestimation of their own striking abilities by fans and other fighters.

How does the speaker react to the public's comparison between them and Zebo?

The speaker does not understand the basis of comparing two different fighters with distinct fighting styles. They express that such comparisons are unfounded and highlight that they are ahead in the rankings, indicating a higher level of achievement in their career.

What is the speaker's perspective on the hype surrounding Domb and its impact on the public's view of the sport?

The speaker acknowledges that Domb's impressive performance, like a knockout in 9 seconds, rightfully generates hype. However, they express concern about the influx of uninformed fans and the negativity, such as undue criticism and insults, that come with the heightened attention.

What is the speaker's attitude towards their critics and how do they handle criticism?

The speaker appears to be dismissive of their critics, emphasizing the importance of self-confidence and their ability to ignore negativity. They express indifference to being perceived as pretentious and choose not to engage with or be affected by uninformed criticism.

How does the speaker describe their approach to fights and the importance of strategy in MMA?

The speaker emphasizes a strategic approach to fights, focusing on minimizing risks by leveraging their wrestling skills. They describe fighting as a game of analyzing patterns and making calculated decisions, stressing the unpredictability and risks involved in striking compared to the intentional nature of grappling and submissions.