Apa Itu Kriteria Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran?

Summary

The video discusses the importance of achievement criteria in education, explaining how these criteria help assess student competencies effectively. It contrasts these criteria with minimal completeness standards, emphasizing the need for descriptive evaluations over mere numerical indicators. By utilizing various assessment methods, teachers can tailor feedback to individual student progress, ensuring a more personalized learning experience. The video encourages educators to explore different assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes, providing a clear framework for measuring student achievement and fostering growth.

Takeaways

• 😀 Criteria for achievement in learning are a set of indicators that show how far students have achieved the targeted competencies.
• 😀 These criteria help educators reflect on the learning process and analyze students' competency levels.
• 😀 Criteria for achievement are more descriptive than KKM (minimum completeness criteria), which are just numerical indicators without explanations.
• 😀 It is recommended for teachers to avoid relying solely on absolute numbers (like 75, 80, 90) when determining criteria for achievement, and instead use descriptions or value ranges (e.g., 70-80, 81-90).
• 😀 Assessment tools such as rubrics, checklists, and observation sheets already incorporate indicators that can be used to measure students' achievement in learning objectives.
• 😀 Rubrics provide concrete descriptions for each performance level, helping to assess specific skills or competencies.
• 😀 The criteria for achievement provide more personalized feedback for students, detailing their progress and areas for improvement, which is more individualized than KKM.
• 😀 KKM tends to generalize student abilities based on identical scores, without accounting for differences in performance or development.
• 😀 Using criteria for achievement helps create more meaningful and comprehensive reports on student learning progress.
• 😀 Teachers are encouraged to explore other resources, such as videos, to further understand and apply criteria for achievement in their teaching practice.

Q & A

What is the purpose of understanding the criteria for achieving learning objectives?

The purpose is to reflect on the learning process and analyze the level of competency that students have achieved in relation to the learning objectives, helping educators improve the learning process and provide appropriate follow-up for students.

How does the criteria for achieving learning objectives differ from the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM)?

The criteria for achieving learning objectives include concrete descriptions of the skills and competencies that students need to master, whereas KKM is a numerical indicator without any explanation or detailed description of differences within the numbers.

Why is it not recommended for teachers to rely solely on absolute numbers like 75, 80, or 90 when determining learning objectives?

It is recommended to use descriptive criteria because they offer a clearer understanding of the competencies and progress of students, while absolute numbers alone may not provide enough context for individual student achievement.

What role do assessment instruments play in determining the criteria for achieving learning objectives?

Assessment instruments help in choosing the appropriate measures to assess whether students have reached the learning objectives. The criteria for achieving learning objectives should be taken into consideration when designing these instruments to ensure they align with the objectives.

What is the benefit of providing a range of values (e.g., 70-80, 81-90) rather than a single number in assessments?

Providing a range of values, along with descriptions for each interval, allows for a more nuanced evaluation of student performance, rather than grouping students into categories based on a single number, which may overlook individual progress and differences.

How does the rubric help in measuring student achievement?

The rubric provides clear descriptions for each level of achievement, allowing teachers to measure specific competencies and skills, such as the ability to perform measurements and the quality of the results, offering a more detailed and individualized assessment of student progress.

What is the advantage of using criteria for achieving learning objectives in student reports?

Using criteria for achieving learning objectives in student reports provides a personalized and detailed account of each student's progress and development, allowing for a more accurate reflection of their abilities compared to the standardization of KKM, which treats students with the same score as having the same level of achievement.

How do assessment methods contribute to determining the criteria for achieving learning objectives?

Assessment methods, such as checklists, observation sheets, rubrics, and portfolios, help teachers set clear indicators or criteria to measure how well students have achieved the learning objectives during different stages of the learning process.

Why is it important to understand the differences between KKM and criteria for achieving learning objectives?

Understanding the differences is important because KKM only provides a numerical value, which may not reflect the complexity of student progress, while the criteria for achieving learning objectives give a more thorough analysis of each student's competencies and learning progress.

How can teachers further explore the topic of criteria for achieving learning objectives?

Teachers can deepen their understanding by watching additional videos on the topic, allowing them to explore various perspectives and gain further insights into the application of these criteria in the classroom.