I Bought Aevy Tv's $600 Video Cohort And THIS Happened!

Summary

In this video, the speaker shares their experience with a $600 AVV cohort course aimed at enhancing video editing skills. They reflect on the course structure, which covers topics from basics to advanced animations, highlighting both valuable insights and notable drawbacks such as inconsistent teaching styles and poor streaming quality. The speaker emphasizes the strong placement opportunities for dedicated students while rating the course 2.5 stars. For those seeking alternatives, they provide several free resources to learn essential video editing skills, promising future content that addresses how to navigate the learning process effectively.

Takeaways

• 😀 The $600 investment in the AVV cohort was intended to enhance skills in video editing and animation.
• 📅 The course consisted of two classes per week, each lasting 2-3 hours, over nine weeks.
• 🎓 Initial weeks focused on fundamentals like Premiere Pro basics and sound design, which were beneficial for beginners.
• 🕒 The instructor's teaching style and the course's pacing felt slow, leading to frustration among more experienced learners.
• 🎨 The color grading module offered extensive content, but it was perceived as overly lengthy.
• 😴 Some modules, like editing short-form content, were considered boring and too basic for advanced users.
• ✨ Learning After Effects in Week 5 was engaging and helped build familiarity with complex tools.
• 🌍 The course included valuable content on storytelling, crucial for effective video editing.
• 💼 Placement opportunities were highlighted, showing good potential for students who actively engage with the material.
• 🔄 Alternative resources were provided, emphasizing that many lessons could be learned through free online content, often in much shorter timeframes.

Q & A

What was the speaker's initial expectation from the $600 video editing course?

The speaker expected to learn how to create animations but had some prior knowledge of video editing before enrolling in the course.

How is the course structured in terms of weekly classes?

The course consists of two classes per week, each lasting 2 to 3 hours.

What topics were covered in Week 1 of the course?

Week 1 focused on the basics of Premiere Pro, particularly how to make efficient rough cuts.

What feedback did the speaker provide about the sound design module in Week 2?

The speaker found the sound design module taught by Martin valuable, but it felt slow and laggy during the live class.

What did the speaker think about the color grading instruction in Week 3?

The speaker acknowledged the extensive information provided about color grading but felt that it was too long and could have been more concise.

How did the speaker rate the short-form content editing lessons in Week 4?

The speaker considered the short-form content editing lessons to be the most boring module and described it as basic.

What was the most enjoyable part of the course for the speaker?

The speaker found learning After Effects in Weeks 5 and 6 to be the most fun and engaging part of the course.

What were the speaker's thoughts on the placements offered through the course?

While the speaker did not join the course for placements, they noted that many students secured good placements, indicating a high success rate.

What were the main cons of the course as identified by the speaker?

The main cons included poor recording quality, lag during classes, slow pacing, and inconsistent teaching styles from multiple instructors.

What alternative resources did the speaker recommend for each week of the course?

The speaker provided various alternative resources, including specific YouTube videos and Adobe resources that cover topics like rough cuts, sound design, color grading, and After Effects in less time than the course.