Emile Durkheim’s Sociological Theory: Key Concepts
Summary
TLDREmile Durkheim's sociological theory emphasizes social cohesion, achieved through shared values and norms. He differentiates between mechanical solidarity in small-scale societies, based on collective conscience and religion, and organic solidarity in advanced societies, where division of labor and interdependence play a key role. Durkheim also discusses the importance of law in maintaining social cohesion, with penal law in less advanced societies and restitutive law in modern ones, and the state's role in ensuring justice and unity.
Takeaways
- 🧩 Durkheim's sociological theory focuses on social cohesion and solidarity as foundational for societal stability.
- 🌐 Social cohesion arises from shared institutionalized values, which prevent social pathologies like alienation and conflict.
- 🔄 Collective conscience, including shared beliefs and sentiments, is vital for social cohesion, especially in small-scale societies.
- 🕍 Religion plays a central role in Durkheim's theory as it imposes uniformity of beliefs and actions, fostering mechanical solidarity.
- 🔗 Mechanical solidarity is characterized by similarity among individuals and is predominant in societies with little division of labor.
- 🌱 As societies advance, they shift from mechanical to organic solidarity, where individuals are more specialized and interdependent.
- 🔄 Organic solidarity is based on occupation and social interactions that are more contract-based rather than kinship.
- 🌟 Durkheim sees modernization not as a threat but as a transition to a new form of solidarity through the division of labor.
- 📚 Law is essential for social cohesion, with penal law being repressive and restitutive law compensatory, reflecting societal advancement.
- 🏛 The state plays a crucial role in maintaining social cohesion, especially in advanced societies, through justice, unity, and policy-making.
Q & A
What is the core idea of Emile Durkheim's sociological theory?
-The core idea of Emile Durkheim's sociological theory is social cohesion, which he believed comes from a core set of institutionalized values that are held in common.
How does Durkheim define social cohesion?
-Durkheim defines social cohesion as a state where there is a lack of norms of behavior, feelings of alienation, and social conflict, which are seen as social pathologies.
What are the key concepts in Durkheim's sociological theory?
-The key concepts in Durkheim's sociological theory include collective conscience, religion, mechanical solidarity, and the division of labor leading to organic solidarity.
What is collective conscience according to Durkheim?
-Collective conscience, as defined by Durkheim, refers to the shared beliefs and sentiments common to members of a society, which creates a common condition of existence.
How does religion contribute to social cohesion in Durkheim's view?
-Religion is considered the main form of collective conscience by Durkheim, imposing uniformity of beliefs and actions and bringing people into solidarity through ceremonies.
What is mechanical solidarity and how is it related to small-scale societies?
-Mechanical solidarity is the type of solidarity found in small-scale societies where members share the same basic beliefs and engage in similar social and economic activities, such as hunting and gathering.
How does Durkheim describe the shift from mechanical to organic solidarity in advanced societies?
-In advanced societies, Durkheim describes a shift from mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity, where individuals are more specialized and interdependent, with social interactions based on contracts rather than kinship.
What is the role of the division of labor in Durkheim's theory of organic solidarity?
-The division of labor in advanced societies leads to organic solidarity, as individuals become more reliant on each other for their specialized economic functions, making society more integrated.
What are the two kinds of law Durkheim identifies and their functions?
-Durkheim identifies penal and restitutive laws. Penal law, based on repressive sanctions, maintains collective sentiments and social cohesion in less advanced societies. Restitutive law, based on restitutive sanctions, predominates in advanced societies and aims to restore normalcy and secure compensation for damages.
How does Durkheim view the role of the state in maintaining social cohesion?
-Durkheim sees the state as crucial in maintaining social cohesion in advanced societies through ensuring justice, preserving social unity out of diversity, and interacting with society to ensure conscious direction rather than being governed by tradition.
What is the paradox of modern society according to Durkheim's theory of organic solidarity?
-The paradox of modern society, as per Durkheim's theory of organic solidarity, is that members of society become both more individuated and more dependent on society at the same time, due to the division of labor and specialized social roles.
Outlines
🌟 Durkheim's Sociological Theory on Social Cohesion
Emile Durkheim's sociological theory is centered around the concept of social cohesion, which he sees as essential for societal health. As a functionalist, Durkheim believed that social cohesion stems from shared core values. He identified social pathologies such as anomie, alienation, and social conflict as threats to cohesion. Durkheim's key concepts include collective conscience, religion, and mechanical solidarity, which are crucial in small-scale societies. Collective conscience refers to shared beliefs and values that create a common condition of existence, with religion being the main form of this conscience. Mechanical solidarity is characterized by similarity among individuals and is based on shared religious beliefs and similar social and economic activities. Durkheim observed a shift from mechanical to organic solidarity in advanced societies, where individuals are more specialized and interdependent due to the division of labor. Organic solidarity is based on occupation and contractual relationships rather than kinship.
📚 Durkheim on Law, State, and Social Cohesion
In Durkheim's view, law is vital for social cohesion, particularly in modern societies where social bonds resemble contracts. He distinguished between penal and restitutive law. Penal law, rooted in religion and repressive sanctions, is more common in less advanced societies and aims to preserve collective sentiments and social cohesion. Restitutive law, on the other hand, is based on restitutive sanctions and is prevalent in advanced societies, focusing on returning things to normal and compensating for damages rather than punishment. Durkheim emphasized the state's role in maintaining social cohesion, especially in complex societies with a high division of labor. The state ensures justice, offers protection, preserves social unity amidst diversity, and interacts with society to ensure conscious direction rather than being governed by tradition. Durkheim saw the state as a regulator that can promote and maintain social cohesion through its policy-making and law enforcement functions.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Social Cohesion
💡Collective Conscience
💡Religion
💡Mechanical Solidarity
💡Division of Labour
💡Organic Solidarity
💡Social Pathologies
💡Law
💡State
💡Anomie
💡Alienation
Highlights
Emile Durkheim's sociological theory focuses on social cohesion and solidarity.
Social cohesion arises from shared core institutionalized values.
Anomie, alienation, and social conflict are seen as social pathologies.
Collective conscience and religion are key to social cohesion.
Religion is the main form of collective conscience, imposing uniformity of beliefs and actions.
Collective conscience is a determinate system with a life of its own.
Mechanical solidarity is found in small-scale societies with shared beliefs and activities.
Advanced societies move away from mechanical solidarity to a new type of solidarity.
Division of labor is crucial for the new type of solidarity in modern societies.
Organic solidarity is based on occupation rather than kinship, with social interactions based on contracts.
The shift from mechanical to organic solidarity leads to system integration.
In system integration, individuals are integrated through their roles in society.
The division of labor makes individuals more reliant on each other in advanced societies.
Law is necessary for social cohesion in modern societies, reproducing the principal form of social solidarity.
Durkheim distinguishes between penal and restitutive law, with penal law predominant in less advanced societies.
Restitutive law is based on contracts and aims to secure compensation for damage.
The state plays a crucial role in maintaining social cohesion through regulative powers.
The state ensures justice, offers protection, preserves social unity, and interacts with society for conscious direction.
Transcripts
emile durkheim sociological theory key
concepts
at the core of emil durkheim's
sociological theory is the idea of
social cohesion
as a functionalist sociologist durkheim
is concerned about social cohesion or
social solidarity
according to durkheim social cohesion
comes from a core institutionalized
values that are held in common
thus anami that is the lack of norms of
behavior feelings of alienation and
social conflict which are some of the
central concepts in emil durkheim
sociological theory are seen as social
pathologies
let me briefly discuss the key concepts
of durkheim sociological theory
i will begin with the concepts of
collective conscience religion and
mechanical solidarity
according to durkheim collective
conscience and religion are crucial to
social cohesion
this is because first collective
conscience understood as beliefs and
sentiments that are shared in common by
members of a society creates common
condition of existence and religion is
the main form of collective conscience
which
according to durkheim imposes a
uniformity of beliefs and actions
however it is important to note that
durkheim argues that collective
conscience expressed in religious
beliefs and reinforced by ceremony which
eventually brings people in solidarity
is true only to small-scale societies
for example tribal societies
durkheim calls the kind of solidarity
that we can find in small-scale
societies mechanical
as we may already know for durkheim
mechanical solidarity implies the
similarity of individuals living in a
society
in other words in a society held
together by mechanical solidarity
members share the same basic beliefs
about the world and about life which are
essentially based on religion and engage
in the same basic social and economic
activities
such as hunting and gathering
these basic beliefs and values
constitute what durkheim calls
collective conscience
for durkheim collective conscience which
is understood as the totality of beliefs
and values is a determinate system with
a life of its own
because collective conscience is
understood more as norms of society this
system causes the individuals to
cooperate with each other or abide by
the laws of the society
but it must be remembered that
collective conscience is not a social
structure but is a form of solidarity
found in small-scale societies
now as we can see advanced societies
moved away from this type of solidarity
which results in the weakening of the
hold of collective conscience
however for durkheim the paradox of
modern societies is that as they become
more individualized so they become more
integrated
thus durkheim did not view modernization
as the cause of the disintegration of
the old society
as a matter of fact as already hinted
about modernization has ushered in a new
type of solidarity
and for durkheim this is made possible
through the concept of the division of
labour
on division of labour and organic
solidarity
as already hinted above the organization
of society into tribes corresponds to
what durkheim calls the segmental
structure of mechanical solidarity
here a society is made of small groups
or segments organized into tribes with
close proximity to one another and where
the division of labor is along domestic
lines
as we can see there is little division
of labor in a society held together by
mechanical solidarity
now as societies become more advanced
the segments turned into organs with
more specialized functions
also advanced societies are now
characterized by industrialization and
increased division of labor
these highly complex and organized
societies therefore as durkheim would
have us believe are no longer held
together by mechanical solidarity but by
organic solidarity
the collective conscience may have
remained but become less and less
important as the type of solidarity that
hold these societies together now comes
from occupation rather than kinship
and social interactions are now based on
contracts
with this durkheim argues that organic
solidarity bases itself on a more
specialized form of social interactions
with the individuals linked more to each
other rather than to society as a whole
as we can see the shift from mechanical
solidarity to organic solidarity has led
to the idea of system integration in
contra distinction to social integration
in social integration individuals or
groups come together or integrated into
the mainstream society
and they are integrated because they
share common beliefs and values
in system integration the society has
become more advanced and complex and the
division of labor has become high
organized through the markets the state
and so on
in system integration individuals are
integrated through the roles that they
played in the society
indeed it is here that the notion of the
division of labor comes in
in fact according to durkheim the
division of labour in advanced societies
makes individuals more reliant on each
other and in particular on the economic
functions that different people perform
this is indeed the paradox of the modern
society held together by organic
solidarity
as ian craig rightly puts it
the paradox of organic solidarity based
on the division of labor is that members
of society become both more individuated
and more dependent on society at the
same time
more individuated because in modern
societies people fulfill many different
social roles behave differently in those
roles and work with different
specialized bodies of knowledge
beliefs and knowledge shared by the
whole community are no longer sufficient
to enable each individual to fulfill his
or her task we become more dependent on
everybody else fulfilling their tasks
vitally dependent
if i were a member of a hunter-gatherer
society
i could go off by myself for long
periods of time looking for food finding
my own shelter and so on
in contemporary society i am dependent
on other people many of whom live on the
other side of the world to grow my food
make my clothes
supply me with warmth and light print
the books that i read service the word
processor i write on and so on
i could have or done none of these
things without society
on law state and social cohesion
because social bonds become more like
contracts in modern societies law
therefore is necessary according to
durkheim
for durkheim law is important for social
cohesion because law reproduces the
principal form of social solidarity
two kinds of law for durkheim penal and
restitutive
according to durkheim penal law is based
on repressive sanctions which
predominates in less advanced
societies the origin of penal law is
religion and it serves to maintain
collective sentiments in order to
preserve social cohesion
thus as durkheim argues punishment's
true function is to maintain social
cohesion intact while maintaining all
its vitality in the collective
conscience
restitutive law on the other hand is
based on restitutive sanctions which
predominates in modern or more advanced
societies the origin of restitutive law
according to durkheim are contracts
which bind people together in solidarity
and for durkheim the true function of
contractual laws is not to inflict harm
in order to maintain social cohesion but
to return things to their normal state
and to re-establish what has been
disturbed
as we can see organic societies are
restitutive rather than repressive and
aim not so much to punish but to secure
compensation for damage
now in terms of crises which threaten
social cohesion durkheim emphasizes the
role of the state in maintaining social
cohesion through its regulative powers
thus for durkheim it is the state that
can ultimately promote and maintain
social cohesion especially in more
advanced societies
durkheim provided three important
reasons why it is the state that can
promote and maintain social cohesion in
more advanced societies
first the state ensures justice and
offers protection to the individual
second the state preserves social unity
out of diversity especially of the
function brought about by increasing
division of labor
and third the state whose primary
concern is policy making law and
government interacts with the rest of
society ensuring that society becomes
more consciously directed
as opposed to being the product of
unthinking custom and tradition
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)