How Did Dario & Ilya Know LLMs Could Lead to AGI?
Summary
TLDR在这段视频中,讲述者分享了与Ilia的一次对话,讨论了人工智能模型的学习本质。他们强调了模型仅仅通过大量数据和正确的训练方法就能不断进步。讲述者通过观察不同领域的AI应用,如语音识别和游戏,得出了模型性能提升的普遍规律。他提出了影响AI进步的七个关键因素,包括参数数量、模型规模、数据量和质量、损失函数等,并强调了架构的对称性对于模型性能的重要性。最终,他通过GPT-1的例子说明了语言模型的潜力,以及通过自监督学习如何让模型理解和处理复杂的语言结构。
Takeaways
- 🤖 AI模型的核心目标是学习和适应,它们通过吸收数据和经验来提升性能。
- 🚀 为AI模型提供充足的数据和运算空间是关键,避免在训练过程中设置不必要的限制。
- 📈 模型性能的提升不仅仅依赖于参数的数量,还包括模型的规模、数据的质量和损失函数的选择。
- 🔄 对称性在架构设计中很重要,正确的对称性可以提高模型的效率和性能。
- 🌀 LSTMs等模型存在结构性弱点,无法有效处理长期依赖问题。
- 🔄 Transformer架构通过解决长期依赖问题,推动了AI算法的进步。
- 📊 通过自监督学习,如下一个词预测,可以丰富模型的结构和理解能力。
- 🧠 语言模型不仅能预测文本,还能通过微调解决其他任务,显示出通用智能的潜力。
- 🎯 GPT-1的成功展示了语言模型的潜力,证明了通过适当的调整可以处理多种任务。
- 🛠️ AI的发展不仅仅是增加计算能力,更重要的是移除旧架构中的人为障碍。
- 🌐 语言作为数据输入的方式,为AI的发展提供了广阔的可能性和方向。
Q & A
Ilia 提到了模型想要学习的本质,他具体是怎么表述的?
-Ilia 表示,模型本质上只是想要学习,我们需要理解这一点。他强调了为模型提供良好的数据和足够的操作空间,避免在数值上对它们进行不良的条件设定,这样模型就能够顺利地进行学习。
在早期,人们对于模型能否从特定任务泛化到一般智能的看法如何?
-在早期,许多人对于模型能否从特定任务如语音识别或受限的游戏泛化到一般智能持怀疑态度。然而,Ilia 和其他人通过观察模型在多个领域的一致性表现,逐渐相信模型能够泛化到更广泛的智能任务。
为什么在 2014 到 2017 年间,作者尝试将模型应用于多种任务?
-作者在 2014 到 2017 年间尝试将模型应用于多种任务,是因为他观察到模型在不同任务上展现出一致的模式。他想要验证模型是否能够以一致的方式在各种任务上变得更好,而不仅仅是在语音识别上。
作者提到了哪些因素对于模型的性能至关重要?
-作者提到了七个因素对模型性能至关重要:模型的参数数量、模型的规模(计算量)、数据的数量、数据的质量、损失函数的选择、架构的对称性以及模型结构的能力,比如是否能够处理足够远的历史信息。
Transformers 模型在作者的思考中扮演了什么角色?
-Transformers 模型在作者的思考中代表了一种能够更自由流动计算的结构,它解决了 RNN 和 LSTM 由于其结构限制而无法有效处理远距离依赖的问题。Transformers 的出现与作者关于去除旧有架构中人工障碍的观点相吻合。
作者如何看待语言模型和其在 AI 算法进步中的作用?
-作者认为语言模型不仅仅是一个狭窄的工具,而是通往各种智能任务的半途。通过大规模的预训练和微调,语言模型可以解决逻辑推理、翻译等多种任务,显示出其在 AI 算法进步中的重要作用。
为什么作者认为下一个词预测(next word prediction)对于模型学习至关重要?
-作者认为下一个词预测是一种自监督学习的方式,它能够让模型学习到丰富的结构信息。通过预测故事中的下一个词,模型需要理解和解决类似发展心理学测试中的问题,这促使模型在服务预测任务的过程中发展出更深层次的理解能力。
GPT-1 的研究对作者有什么影响?
-GPT-1 的研究让作者确信,通过大规模的语言模型预训练和微调,可以实现对多种任务的有效处理。这不仅证明了语言模型在预测任务上的能力,也展示了其在其他智能任务上的潜力,从而加深了作者对模型泛化能力的信念。
作者提到的“计算想要自由”这一观点是什么意思?
-作者的这一观点意味着,如果我们能够去除对模型计算的人工限制,比如不合适的架构设计或者数据获取的困难,模型就能够更有效地学习和解决问题。这种自由流动的计算是实现更高级智能的关键。
在作者看来,模型学习的核心障碍是什么?
-作者认为模型学习的核心障碍在于人们没有意识到模型的计算过程被各种因素所阻碍。这些阻碍可能来自于对模型的不当设计、数据的不足或者对模型潜力的误解。要实现有效的学习,就需要解放这些被束缚的计算能力。
作者对于未来 AI 模型的发展方向有何预见?
-作者预见未来的 AI 模型将继续沿着解放计算能力、去除旧有架构障碍的方向发展。通过这种方式,模型将能够更好地学习和解决更广泛的任务,从而实现更高层次的智能。
Outlines
🤖 人工智能学习的本质
这段对话讨论了人工智能模型学习的本质。Ilia认为,模型的目标是学习,它们会努力克服障碍。提供好的数据和足够的操作空间,避免错误的条件限制,模型就能成功学习。对话者通过观察不同领域的AI发展,如语音识别和电子游戏,发现相同的模式。他们认为,尽管许多人意识到这些技术在特定任务上的强大能力,但很少有人能像Ilia和对话者那样,将其推广到更广泛的通用智能。对话者提出了七个影响AI学习的关键因素,包括模型参数的数量、计算规模、数据量和质量以及损失函数的选择。此外,还讨论了架构的对称性对模型效率的影响。
📈 语言模型的发展与应用
这段对话强调了语言模型在人工智能发展中的重要性。对话者提到,通过自监督学习进行下一词预测的方法,可以利用丰富的结构信息。他们认为,这种方法不仅能让模型理解故事,还能解决理论心智问题和数学问题。对话者认为,通过扩大模型规模,可以解决更多问题。Alec Radford在GPT-1上的研究表明,语言模型不仅能预测事物,还能经过微调后处理其他任务。这证明了语言模型的潜力,它可以成为通往各种AI应用的桥梁。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡模型学习
💡障碍移除
💡数据量
💡参数数量
💡损失函数
💡对称性
💡Transformers
💡自监督学习
💡语言模型
💡计算自由
💡GPT-1
Highlights
模型本质上只是想要学习
清除模型学习路径上的障碍
提供好的数据和足够的操作空间
避免在数值上对模型进行不良的条件限制
模型会持续学习和进步
早期对模型的普遍智能的预见
从2014到2017年间对多种事物的尝试
在DOTA和机器人学中观察到相同的模式
人们对问题解决的专注导致视野狭窄
对模型发展方向的独特见解
七个关键因素影响模型的学习
参数数量、模型规模、数据量和数据质量的重要性
损失函数的选择对模型学习的影响
对称性在架构设计中的作用
Transformers架构的出现与思考
通过语言模型进行自监督学习的概念
语言模型的丰富结构和预测下一个词的挑战
GPT-1的创新和对其他任务的微调能力
语言模型作为通向各种任务的桥梁
模型学习的进步不在于增加计算能力,而是消除旧架构的束缚
Transcripts
just before open AI started I met Ilia
who you who who you interviewed one of
the first things he said to me was look
the models they just want to learn you
have to understand this the models they
just want to learn and it was a bit like
a Zen Coen like I kind of like I
listened to this and and I became
enlightened um the models just want to
learn you get the obstacles out of their
way right you give them you give them
good data you you give them enough space
to operate in you don't do something
stupid like condition them badly
numerically um and and they want to
learn they'll do it they'll do it there
were many people who were aware back at
that time probably weren't working on it
directly but we're aware that these
things are really good at speech
recognition or at playing these
constrained V games very few
extrapolated from there like you and
Ilia did to something that is generally
intelligent what what was different
about the way you were thinking about it
versus how others think that you went
from like it's getting better at speech
in this consistent way it will get
better at every everything in this
consistent way yeah so I I genuinely
don't know I mean at first when I saw it
for speech I assumed this was just true
for speech or for this narrow class of
models I I think it was just over the
period between 2014 and 2017 I tried it
for a lot of things and saw the same
thing over and over again I watched the
same being true with DOTA I watched the
same being true with robotics which many
people thought of as a counter example
but I just thought well it's hard to get
data for robotics but if we operate
Within if we look within the data that
we have we see the same patterns and so
I don't I don't know I think people were
very focused on solving the problem in
front of them why one person thinks one
way another person thinks it's very it's
very hard to explain I think people just
see it through a different lens you know
are looking like vertically instead of
horizontally they're not thinking about
the scaling they're thinking about how
do I solve my problem and well for
robotics there's not enough data and so
you
know and so you know that can easily
abstract to well scaling doesn't work
because we don't have the data and and
so I don't I I I don't know I just for
some reason and it may just it may just
have been random chance was obsessed
with that particular direction this Big
Blob of compute document which I still
have not made public I probably should
for like historical reasons I I don't
think it would tell anyone anything they
don't know now but uh when when I wrote
it I I actually said look there are
seven factors that and you know I wasn't
I wasn't like these are the factors but
I was just like let me give some sense
of the kind of things that matter and
what don't and so number of parameters
scale of the model like you know the
compute and compute matters quantity of
data matters quality of data matters
loss function matters so like you know
are you doing RL or are you doing next
word prediction if your loss function
isn't rich or doesn't incentivize the
right thing you won't you won't get
anything um so those were the key four
ones uh which I think are the core
hypothesis but then I said three more
things one was symmetries which is is
basically like if your architecture
doesn't take into account the right
kinds of symmetries it doesn't work um
or it's it's very inefficient so for
example convolutional neural networks
take into account translational symmetry
lstms take into account time Symmetry
and but a weakness of lstms is that they
can't attend over the whole context so
there's kind of this structural weakness
like if a model isn't structurally
capable of like absorbing and man in
things that happened in a far enough
distant past then it's just like it's
kind of like you know like the compute
doesn't flow like the spice doesn't flow
it's like you can't like like the The
Blob has to be unencumbered right it
kind of it's not it's not going to work
if if you artificially close things off
and I think rnn's and lstms artificially
close things off because they they close
you off to the distant past um and so
again things need to flow freely if they
don't it doesn't work if you set things
up in kind of a way that's that's set up
to fail or that doesn't allow the
compute to work in an uninhibited way
then then it won't work and so
Transformers were kind of within that
even though I can't remember if the
Transformer paper had been published it
was around the same time as I wrote that
document it might have been just before
it might have been just after it sounds
like from that view the way to think
about these Al algorithmic progresses is
not as increasing the power of The Blob
of compute but simply getting rid of the
artificial hindrances that older
iectures have is that is that a faira
that's that's a little that yeah that's
that's a little how I think about it you
know again if you go back to like il's
like the models want to learn like like
the compute wants to be free and like
you know it's being blocked in various
ways where you like don't understand
that it's being blocked and so you need
to like free it up right right I I love
the the gradiance changing that to spice
okay um when did it become obvious to
you that language is the means to just
feed a bunch of data into these things
that or was was it just you ran out of
other things like robotics there's not
enough data this other thing there's not
enough data yeah I mean I think this
whole idea of like the next word
prediction that you could do
self-supervised learning you know that
together with the idea that it's like
wow for predicting the next word there's
so much richness in structure there
right you know it might say 2 plus two
equals and you have to know the answer
is four and you know it might be telling
the story about a character and then
basically it's it's posing to the model
you know the the equivalent of these
developmental tests that get posed to
Children you know Mary into the room and
you know puts an item in there and then
you know Chuck walks into the room and
removes the item and Mar Mary doesn't
see it what does Mary think Happ you
know so like so the models are going to
have to to get this right in the service
of predicting the next word they're
going to have to solve you know solve
all these theory of Mind problem solve
all these math problems and so I you
know I I my thinking was just well you
know you scale it up as much as you can
you you you know there's there's kind of
No Limit to it and I think I kind of had
abstractly that view but but the thing
of course that like really solidified
and convinced me was the work that Alec
Radford did on
gpt1 um which was not only could you get
this this language model that could
predict things very well but also you
could fine-tune it you needed to
fine-tune it in those days to do all
these other tasks and so I was like wow
you know this isn't just some narrow
thing where you get the language model
right it's sort of halfway to everywhere
right it's like you know you get the
language model right and then with a
little move in this direction it can you
know it can solve this this you know
logical dreference test or whatever and
you know with this this other thing you
know it can it can solve translation or
something and then you're like wow I
think there's there's really something
to do and and of course we can can
really scale it
Browse More Related Video
A little guide to building Large Language Models in 2024
【人工智能】万字通俗讲解大语言模型内部运行原理 | LLM | 词向量 | Transformer | 注意力机制 | 前馈网络 | 反向传播 | 心智理论
Field-scale Actual ET Estimation using SSEBop | Gabriel Senay, Ph.D., P.E.
Augmentation of Data Governance with ChatGPT and Large LLMs
Stream of Search (SoS): Learning to Search in Language
Networking for GenAI Training and Inference Clusters | Jongsoo Park & Petr Lapukhov
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)