Industry Analysis: Porter's Five Forces Model | Strategic Management | From A Business Professor

Business School 101
8 Oct 202120:46

Summary

TLDRIn this video, we explore Michael Porter's Five Forces model, a fundamental framework for understanding industry competition and profitability. The model analyzes the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitute products, and rivalry among existing competitors. By examining these forces, businesses can strategize to leverage opportunities and mitigate threats, ultimately aiming to gain and sustain a competitive advantage in their respective industries.

Takeaways

  • πŸ˜€ Michael Porter's Five Forces Model is a framework for analyzing the competitive landscape of an industry.
  • πŸ”’ The Threat of Entry refers to the potential for new competitors to enter the market, which can decrease industry profitability.
  • 🏭 Economies of Scale can act as a barrier to entry, benefiting incumbent firms by allowing them to spread costs over more units and negotiate better terms with suppliers.
  • 🌐 Network Effects can deter new entrants by increasing the value of a product or service as more people use it, as seen in social networks like LinkedIn.
  • πŸ’Ό High Customer Switching Costs can serve as a barrier to entry, as significant effort and resources are required to change suppliers, benefiting firms like Intuit Inc.
  • πŸ’° Capital Requirements can deter new entrants by necessitating substantial investments to compete in an industry, often linked to economies of scale.
  • πŸ›  Advantages Independent of Size can be a barrier for new entrants, as incumbent firms may possess proprietary technology, brand loyalty, or other unique advantages.
  • πŸ›οΈ The Power of Buyers influences industry profitability, with powerful buyers able to demand lower prices or higher quality, affecting firm revenue and costs.
  • πŸ›’ The Threat of Substitutes impacts industry competitiveness and profitability, as the availability of substitute products can increase competition.
  • 🏁 Rivalry Among Existing Competitors is influenced by factors like industry structure, growth, strategic commitments, and exit barriers, shaping the intensity of competition.

Q & A

  • What is the Five Forces Model developed by Michael Porter?

    -The Five Forces Model is a framework created by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter to analyze the competitive landscape of an industry and understand the profit potential. It consists of five forces: threat of entry, power of suppliers, power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors.

  • How does the threat of entry affect industry profit potential?

    -The threat of entry can depress industry profit potential by two major ways: first, by the potential of additional capacity coming into the industry, which may lead incumbent firms to lower prices to deter new entrants, and second, by forcing incumbent firms to spend more to retain their customers, which reduces profit potential if they can't raise prices.

  • What are some barriers to entry that can reduce the threat of new competitors?

    -Barriers to entry that can reduce the threat of new competitors include economies of scale, network effects, customer switching costs, capital requirements, and advantages independent of size.

  • How do network effects influence the threat of potential entry in an industry?

    -Network effects describe the positive impact that one user of a product or service has on the value of that product or service for other users. When network effects are present, the value of the product or service increases with the number of users, which can reduce the threat of potential entry.

  • What is the significance of customer switching costs as a barrier to entry?

    -Customer switching costs are one-time sunk costs incurred when moving from one supplier to another. High switching costs can be a significant barrier to entry because they make it difficult for new entrants to attract customers away from established firms.

  • How does the power of suppliers impact an industry's profit potential?

    -The power of suppliers can reduce an industry's profit potential by exerting pressures on firms to accept higher input costs or lower quality inputs. Suppliers are more powerful when their industry is more concentrated, they don't rely heavily on the industry for revenues, or when switching costs for buyers are high.

  • What factors contribute to the power of buyers in an industry?

    -The power of buyers is high when there are few buyers who purchase large quantities, the industry's products are standardized, buyers face low switching costs, and they can credibly threaten to backwardly integrate into the industry.

  • How does the threat of substitutes affect the competitive environment within an industry?

    -The threat of substitutes affects the competitive environment by making the industry more competitive and decreasing profit potential when close substitutes are available. Conversely, the lack of close substitutes can make an industry less competitive and increase profit potential.

  • What are the four competitive industry structures as described by Porter's Five Forces Model?

    -The four competitive industry structures are perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. Each structure is characterized by the number and size of competitors, the degree of product differentiation, the ease of entry, and the pricing power of firms.

  • How do exit barriers influence the intensity of rivalry among existing competitors?

    -Exit barriers are obstacles that prevent a company from leaving a market. High exit barriers can lead to excess capacity remaining in the industry, which reduces profit potential as firms struggle to compete. Low exit barriers allow underperforming firms to exit more easily, reducing competitive pressure.

  • What strategic position should managers craft for their companies based on the Five Forces Model?

    -Managers should craft a strategic position that leverages weak forces into opportunities and mitigates strong forces, which are potential threats to the firm's ability to gain and sustain a competitive advantage.

Outlines

00:00

🏭 Understanding Industry Dynamics Through Porter's Five Forces

This paragraph introduces the concept of an industry and the Five Forces model developed by Michael Porter. The Five Forces model is a framework for analyzing the competitive landscape of an industry and the profitability of firms within it. The forces include the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of buyers, the threat of substitute products or services, and the intensity of competitive rivalry. The paragraph explains how these forces interact and influence industry attractiveness and profitability, and how incumbent firms can use the model to gain a competitive advantage.

05:01

πŸ› οΈ Analyzing Barriers to Entry and Their Impact on Industry Competition

This section delves into the first of Porter's Five Forces: the threat of entry. It discusses how potential new competitors can affect industry profit potential by increasing capacity and forcing incumbent firms to lower prices or increase spending to retain customers. The paragraph then outlines various barriers to entry that can protect incumbent firms from new competition, such as economies of scale, network effects, customer switching costs, capital requirements, and advantages independent of size. Each type of barrier is explained with examples, illustrating how they can be leveraged by existing firms to maintain their market position.

10:02

✈️ The Influence of Supplier Power on Industry Profitability

The second force, the power of suppliers, is explored in this paragraph. It explains how suppliers can impact an industry's profitability by raising input costs or reducing input quality. The bargaining power of suppliers is influenced by factors such as industry concentration, dependency on the industry, switching costs, product differentiation, availability of substitutes, and the threat of forward integration. The example of Boeing and Airbus as powerful suppliers to the airline industry is used to illustrate the concept, highlighting how their market position allows them to exert significant influence over the profitability of airlines.

15:03

πŸ’Ό Buyer Power and Its Effects on Industry Competition

This paragraph focuses on the third force: the power of buyers. It discusses how buyers can pressure producers to lower prices or increase product quality, affecting the industry's profit margins. The power of buyers is high when there are few buyers, the industry's products are standardized, buyers face low switching costs, and when buyers can credibly threaten to integrate backward. The example of Costco is provided to demonstrate the impact of buyer power, showing how its large-scale purchases and market influence can lead to significant pressure on suppliers to lower prices and improve quality.

20:04

🌐 The Threat of Substitutes and Its Role in Shaping Industry Competition

The fourth force, the threat of substitutes, is the subject of this paragraph. It describes how the availability of substitute products can increase competition within an industry and decrease its profit potential. Substitutes are products from other industries that offer similar benefits to consumers, making the industry more competitive. Examples of substitutes for various industries are given, such as smartphones for digital cameras, online shopping for brick-and-mortar stores, and the potential for self-driving vehicles to substitute human delivery drivers. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the threat of substitutes to maintain industry competitiveness.

πŸš€ Rivalry Among Competitors and Its Impact on Industry Profitability

This paragraph examines the fifth and final force: rivalry among existing competitors. It outlines how the intensity of this rivalry is influenced by factors such as industry structure, growth, strategic commitments, and exit barriers. The paragraph discusses the four main competitive industry structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly, providing examples for each. It also explains how industry growth can affect competition, with high growth leading to less rivalry and low growth intensifying it. The impact of strategic commitments and exit barriers on the intensity of rivalry is also discussed, with examples illustrating how these factors can lead to more or less intense competition.

πŸ” Crafting Strategy Based on Porter's Five Forces

The concluding paragraph summarizes the Five Forces model and its importance for managers in understanding industry profit potential and positioning their firms for competitive advantage. It emphasizes the need for managers to leverage weak forces as opportunities and mitigate strong forces as threats. The paragraph invites viewers to consider how the model can be applied to industries of their interest and encourages discussion and engagement through comments and subscriptions.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Five Forces Model

The Five Forces Model is a framework developed by Michael Porter to analyze the competitive landscape of an industry. It is central to the video's theme as it helps businesses understand the profit potential and strategize for competitive advantage. The model considers five key forces: threat of entry, power of suppliers, power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors. Each force is examined in detail throughout the script to illustrate how they influence industry dynamics.

πŸ’‘Threat of Entry

The 'threat of entry' refers to the potential for new competitors to enter an industry, which can affect the profitability of existing firms. In the video, this concept is explained as a force that can reduce industry profit potential by inciting price wars or forcing incumbents to increase spending to retain customers. Examples include barriers to entry like economies of scale and network effects, which can deter new entrants and protect industry profits.

πŸ’‘Power of Suppliers

This term describes the influence that suppliers have over an industry, particularly in terms of pricing and quality of inputs. The video explains how powerful suppliers can reduce an industry's profit potential by demanding higher prices or lower quality, which increases production costs. An example given is the relationship between Boeing and Airbus as suppliers to the airline industry, where their concentrated industry gives them significant bargaining power.

πŸ’‘Power of Buyers

The 'power of buyers' indicates the ability of customers to negotiate for lower prices or higher quality, which can squeeze the profit margins of producers. The video discusses how this power is heightened when buyers are few, purchase in large quantities, or face low switching costs. Costco is used as an example of a buyer with significant power due to its large-scale purchases and ability to influence supplier pricing.

πŸ’‘Threat of Substitutes

The 'threat of substitutes' pertains to the risk that consumers may choose alternative products that offer similar benefits. The video explains how the availability of substitutes can intensify competition and reduce profitability within an industry. Examples provided include smartphones as substitutes for digital cameras and online shopping as a substitute for physical retail stores.

πŸ’‘Rivalry Among Existing Competitors

This concept refers to the competitive actions within an industry as firms vie for market share and profitability. The video outlines how the intensity of this rivalry is influenced by factors such as industry structure, growth, strategic commitments, and exit barriers. The competitive industry structures like perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly are discussed to illustrate different levels of rivalry.

πŸ’‘Economies of Scale

Economies of scale are cost advantages that arise when larger output allows firms to spread fixed costs over more units, achieve better terms with suppliers, and operate more efficiently. The video uses this concept to explain how incumbent firms can deter new entrants by benefiting from lower per-unit costs, thereby making it difficult for smaller or new firms to compete on price.

πŸ’‘Network Effects

Network effects occur when the value of a product or service increases with the number of users. The video explains how network effects can act as a barrier to entry by making it more difficult for new firms to compete with established players that have a large user base. LinkedIn is given as an example where the value of the platform increases as more professionals join.

πŸ’‘Customer Switching Costs

Customer switching costs are one-time costs incurred when a buyer moves from one supplier to another. The video discusses how high switching costs can act as a barrier to entry, as they make it costly for customers to change suppliers. Intuit Inc. and its bookkeeping software are used as an example where the time and effort required to learn new software create significant switching costs.

πŸ’‘Capital Requirements

Capital requirements refer to the financial investments needed to enter a new industry, including costs for setting up operations, machinery, and covering initial losses. The video explains that high capital requirements can deter new entrants, as they need substantial funds to compete. However, it also notes that capital is a fungible resource that can be acquired, suggesting that while it may act as a barrier, it is not as strong as other entry barriers.

πŸ’‘Advantages Independent of Size

These are cost and quality advantages that incumbent firms possess regardless of their size. The video discusses how these advantages can stem from factors like brand loyalty, proprietary technology, and preferential access to resources. These advantages can be difficult for new entrants to replicate, thus acting as a barrier to entry and protecting the incumbent's competitive position.

Highlights

An industry comprises companies offering similar products or services to meet specific customer needs.

Michael Porter's Five Forces Model is a tool for understanding industry profit potential and competitive advantage.

The Threat of Entry refers to the risk of new competitors entering the industry, which can reduce profit potential.

Barriers to entry, such as economies of scale, can protect incumbent firms from new competition.

Network effects can deter new entrants by increasing the value of a product with more users.

Customer switching costs can act as a barrier to entry, benefiting firms with unique products.

Capital requirements can deter new entrants, especially when related to economies of scale.

Advantages independent of size can create entry barriers based on brand loyalty and proprietary technology.

The power of suppliers can influence an industry's profitability through their bargaining power.

Suppliers with differentiated products and low availability of substitutes can exert significant power.

The power of buyers is high when they can demand lower prices or higher quality, affecting producers' margins.

Buyers with significant purchase power, such as Costco, can pressure suppliers to lower prices.

The threat of substitutes can decrease an industry's profit potential if consumers have alternative options.

Rivalry among existing competitors is influenced by industry structure, growth, strategic commitments, and exit barriers.

Competitive industry structures range from perfect competition to monopoly, affecting pricing power and profitability.

Industry growth can either reduce or intensify rivalry among competitors, depending on the market expansion.

Strategic commitments can lead to intense rivalry as firms are less likely to exit the industry.

High exit barriers can keep excess capacity in the market, reducing industry profit potential.

Managers should leverage weak forces and mitigate strong forces to gain and sustain competitive advantage.

Transcripts

play00:00

hello everyone welcome to business

play00:02

school 101.

play00:03

an industry is a group of incumbent

play00:05

companies facing more or less the same

play00:07

set of suppliers and buyers

play00:09

firms competing in the same industry

play00:11

tend to offer similar products or

play00:13

services to meet specific customer needs

play00:15

harvard business school professor

play00:17

michael porter developed a highly

play00:19

influential five forces model to help

play00:21

managers understand the profit potential

play00:24

of different industries and how they can

play00:26

position their respective firms to gain

play00:28

and sustain competitive advantage

play00:30

those forces are threat of entry

play00:33

power of suppliers

play00:35

power of buyers

play00:36

threats of substitutes

play00:38

and rivalry among existing competitors

play00:41

so let us analyze those five forces

play00:44

individually

play00:47

force number one the threat of entry

play00:50

the threat of entry describes the risk

play00:52

that potential competitors will enter

play00:54

the industry

play00:56

potential new entry depresses industry

play00:58

profit potential in two major ways

play01:01

first with the threat of additional

play01:03

capacity coming into an industry

play01:05

incumbent firms may lower prices to make

play01:07

entry appear less attractive to the

play01:08

potential new competitors which would in

play01:11

turn reduce the overall industry's

play01:13

profit potential especially in

play01:15

industries with slow or no overall

play01:17

growth in demand

play01:19

second the threat of entry by additional

play01:21

competitors may force incumbent firms to

play01:23

spend more to satisfy their existing

play01:25

customers this spending reduces an

play01:27

industry's profit potential especially

play01:30

if firms can't raise prices

play01:32

as we know the more profitable in

play01:34

industry the more attractive it is for

play01:36

new competitors to enter

play01:38

however there are a number of important

play01:40

barriers to entry that raise the cost

play01:42

for potential competitors and reduce the

play01:44

threat of entry

play01:46

entry barriers which are advantageous

play01:48

for incumbent firms are obstacles that

play01:50

determine how easily a firm can enter an

play01:52

industry

play01:53

incumbent firms can benefit from several

play01:55

important sources of entry barriers

play01:57

those barriers are economies of scale

play02:00

network effects customer switching costs

play02:04

capital requirements and advantages

play02:06

independent of size

play02:08

one economies of scale

play02:11

economies of scale are cost advantages

play02:13

that accrue to firms with larger output

play02:15

because they can spread fixed costs over

play02:17

more units employee technology more

play02:19

efficiently benefit from a more

play02:21

specialized division of labor and demand

play02:24

better terms from their suppliers

play02:27

these factors in turn drive down the

play02:29

cost per unit allowing large incumbent

play02:32

firms to enjoy a cost advantage over new

play02:34

entrants who cannot muster such scale

play02:37

two

play02:38

network effects

play02:40

network effects describe the positive

play02:42

effect that one user of a product or

play02:44

service has on the value of that product

play02:46

or service for other users

play02:48

when network effects are present the

play02:50

value of the product or service

play02:53

increases with the number of users

play02:55

the threat of potential entry is reduced

play02:58

when network effects are present

play03:00

social networks are the clearest example

play03:02

of this take linkedin

play03:04

which grew through memberships as

play03:06

linkedin started to get broader adoption

play03:08

the numbers grew exponentially as the

play03:10

utility of the product became stronger

play03:13

three

play03:14

customer switching costs

play03:16

switching costs are incurred by moving

play03:19

from one supplier to another

play03:21

changing vendors may require the buyer

play03:23

to alter product specifications retrain

play03:25

employees and modify existing processes

play03:29

switching costs are one-time sunk costs

play03:32

which can be quite significant and a

play03:34

formidable barrier to entry

play03:36

for example companies that create unique

play03:39

products that have few substitutes and

play03:41

require significant effort to perfect

play03:43

their use enjoy significant switching

play03:46

costs

play03:47

consider intuit inc which offers its

play03:50

customers various bookkeeping software

play03:52

solutions such as turbotax quickbooks

play03:55

and mint

play03:56

because learning to use intuits

play03:58

applications take significant time

play04:00

effort and training costs

play04:03

fewer users are willing to switch away

play04:04

from intuit

play04:06

4. capital requirements

play04:09

capital requirements describe the price

play04:11

of the entry ticket into a new industry

play04:14

how much capital is required to compete

play04:16

in this industry and which companies are

play04:18

willing and able to make such

play04:19

investments

play04:21

frequently related to economies of scale

play04:23

capital requirements may encompass

play04:25

investments to set up plans with

play04:27

dedicated machinery run a production

play04:29

process and cover startup losses

play04:32

however please keep in mind that capital

play04:35

unlike proprietary technology and

play04:37

industry-specific know-how is a fungible

play04:39

resource that can be relatively easily

play04:41

acquired in the face of attractive

play04:43

returns

play04:45

five advantages independent of size

play04:48

incumbent firms often possess cost and

play04:51

quality advantages that are independent

play04:53

of size

play04:54

these advantages can be based on brand

play04:56

loyalty proprietary technology

play04:59

preferential access to raw materials and

play05:01

distribution channels favorable

play05:03

geographic locations and cumulative

play05:05

learning and experience effects

play05:08

in addition incumbent firms often

play05:10

benefit from cumulative learning and

play05:12

experience effects accrued over long

play05:14

periods of time

play05:16

attempting to obtain such deep knowledge

play05:18

within a shorter time frame is often

play05:20

costly if not impossible which in turn

play05:23

constitutes a formidable barrier to

play05:25

entry

play05:28

the second force in porter's model is

play05:30

the power of suppliers the bargaining

play05:32

power of suppliers captures pressures

play05:34

that industry suppliers can exert on an

play05:37

industry's profit potential

play05:39

this force reduces a firm's ability to

play05:41

obtain superior performance because

play05:43

powerful suppliers can raise the cost of

play05:45

production by demanding higher prices

play05:48

for their inputs or by reducing their

play05:50

quality of the input factor or service

play05:52

level delivered

play05:53

to compete effectively companies

play05:55

generally need a wide variety of inputs

play05:57

into the production process including

play06:00

raw materials and components

play06:02

labor and services

play06:04

the relative bargaining power of

play06:05

suppliers is high under following

play06:07

scenarios

play06:09

one the suppliers industry is more

play06:11

concentrated than the industry it sells

play06:13

to

play06:14

two suppliers do not depend heavily on

play06:17

the industry for a large portion of

play06:18

their revenues three incumbent firms

play06:22

face significant switching costs when

play06:23

changing suppliers

play06:25

four suppliers offer products that are

play06:28

differentiated

play06:29

five there are no readily available

play06:31

substitutes for the products or services

play06:33

that the suppliers offer

play06:35

and six suppliers can credibly threaten

play06:38

to forward integrate into the industry

play06:41

let's take a closer look at one

play06:42

important supply group to the airline

play06:44

industry

play06:45

boeing and airbus the makers of large

play06:48

commercial jets

play06:50

the reason airframe manufacturers are

play06:52

powerful suppliers to airlines is

play06:54

because their industry is much more

play06:56

concentrated than the industry it sells

play06:58

to

play06:59

compared to two airframe suppliers there

play07:01

are hundreds of commercial airlines

play07:03

around the world

play07:04

in addition the airlines face

play07:06

non-trivial switching costs when

play07:08

changing suppliers because pilots and

play07:10

crew would need to be retrained to fly a

play07:12

new type of aircraft maintenance

play07:14

capabilities would need to be expanded

play07:16

and some routes may need to even be

play07:18

reconfigured due to differences in

play07:20

aircraft range and passenger capacity

play07:24

moreover while some of the aircraft can

play07:26

be used as substitutes boeing and airbus

play07:28

offer differentiated products

play07:31

thus the supplier power of commercial

play07:33

aircraft manufacturers is quite

play07:35

significant

play07:36

this puts boeing and airbus in a strong

play07:38

position to extract profits from the

play07:40

airline industry thus reducing the

play07:42

profit potential of the airline

play07:44

themselves

play07:47

force 3 the power of buyers

play07:50

the bargaining power of buyers is the

play07:52

flip side of the bargaining power of

play07:53

suppliers

play07:55

buyers are the customers of an industry

play07:57

the power of buyers concerns the

play08:00

pressure in industries customers can put

play08:02

on the producers margins and the

play08:04

industry by demanding a lower price or

play08:06

higher product quality

play08:08

when buyers successfully obtain price

play08:10

discounts it reduces a firm's revenue

play08:12

when buyers demand higher quality and

play08:14

more service it generally raises

play08:16

production costs

play08:17

the power of buyers is high when there

play08:20

are few buyers and each buyer purchases

play08:22

large quantities relative to the size of

play08:24

a single seller

play08:26

the industry's products are standardized

play08:28

or undifferentiated commodities

play08:31

buyers face low or no switching costs

play08:34

and buyers can credibly threaten to

play08:36

backwardly integrate into the industry

play08:40

in addition

play08:41

companies need to be aware of situations

play08:43

when buyers are especially price

play08:45

sensitive

play08:46

this is the case when

play08:48

one the buyer's purchase represents a

play08:50

significant fraction of its cost

play08:52

structure or procurement budget

play08:55

two buyers earn low profits or are

play08:58

strapped for cash

play09:00

three the quality or cost of the buyer's

play09:03

products and services is not affected

play09:05

much by the quality or cost of their

play09:07

inputs

play09:08

the retail giant costco provides a

play09:11

potent example of tremendous buyer power

play09:14

costco is not only one of the largest

play09:16

retailers worldwide but it is also one

play09:19

of the world's fortune 500 companies

play09:21

costco is one of the few large big box

play09:24

global retail chains and frequently

play09:26

purchases large quantities from its

play09:28

suppliers

play09:30

costco leverages its buyer power by

play09:32

exerting tremendous pressure on its

play09:34

supplier to lower prices and to increase

play09:37

quality or risk losing access to shelf

play09:39

space at their worldwide stores

play09:43

force 4 the threat of substitutes

play09:46

porter's threat of substitutes

play09:48

definition is the availability of a

play09:50

product that the consumer can purchase

play09:52

instead of the industry's product

play09:54

a substitute product is a product from

play09:56

another industry that offers similar

play09:58

benefits to the consumer as the product

play10:00

produced by the firms within the

play10:02

industry

play10:03

the threat of substitution in an

play10:05

industry affects the competitive

play10:06

environment for the firms in that

play10:08

industry and influences those firms

play10:11

ability to achieve profitability

play10:13

the availability of close substitute

play10:15

products can make an industry more

play10:17

competitive

play10:18

and decrease profit potential for the

play10:20

firms in the industry

play10:22

on the other hand the lack of close

play10:24

substitute products makes an industry

play10:26

less competitive and increases profit

play10:29

potential for the firms in the industry

play10:31

here are some examples of substitutes

play10:33

for digital cameras substitutes are

play10:36

smartphones

play10:37

for traditional brick and mortar stores

play10:40

substitutes are online shopping websites

play10:43

for human delivery drivers

play10:45

substitutes could be advanced

play10:47

self-driving vehicles in the future

play10:51

force 5

play10:52

rivalry among existing competitors

play10:55

rivalry among existing competitors

play10:57

describes the intensity with which

play10:59

companies within the same industry

play11:01

jockey for market share and

play11:03

profitability

play11:04

the intensity of rivalry among existing

play11:07

competitors is determined largely by the

play11:09

following four factors

play11:11

competitive industry structure

play11:13

industry growth

play11:15

strategic commitments and exit barriers

play11:19

factor one competitive industry

play11:21

structure

play11:23

the competitive industry structure

play11:24

refers to elements and features common

play11:27

to all industries

play11:28

the structure of an industry is largely

play11:31

captured by the number and size of its

play11:33

competitors

play11:34

the firm's degree of pricing power

play11:37

the type of product or service and the

play11:39

height of entry

play11:40

barriers the four main competitive

play11:43

industry structures are

play11:45

perfect competition

play11:47

monopolistic competition

play11:50

oligopoly

play11:52

monopoly

play11:54

let us discuss these separately

play11:56

first perfect competition

play11:59

a perfect competitive industry is

play12:01

fragmented and has many small firms a

play12:04

commodity product ease of entry and

play12:06

little or no ability for each individual

play12:09

firm to raise its prices

play12:12

the firms competing in this type of

play12:14

industry are approximately similar in

play12:16

size and resources

play12:18

consumers make purchasing decisions

play12:20

solely on price because the commodity

play12:22

product offerings are more or less

play12:25

identical

play12:26

the resulting performance of the

play12:28

industry shows low profitability

play12:30

although perfect competition is a rare

play12:32

industry structure in its pure form

play12:34

markets for commodities such as natural

play12:37

gas copper and iron tend to approach

play12:40

this structure

play12:42

second monopolistic competition

play12:45

a monopolistically competitive industry

play12:47

has many firms a differentiated product

play12:50

some obstacles to entry and the ability

play12:52

to raise prices for a relatively unique

play12:55

product while retaining customers

play12:58

the key to understanding this industry

play13:00

structure is that the firms now offer

play13:02

products or services with unique

play13:03

features

play13:04

the global smartphone industry provides

play13:06

one example of monopolistic competition

play13:09

many firms compete in this industry and

play13:12

even the largest of them such as samsung

play13:14

apple xiaomi huawei or vivo have less

play13:18

than 20 percent market share

play13:20

moreover

play13:21

while products between competitors tend

play13:23

to be similar they are by no means

play13:25

identical

play13:27

as a consequence firms selling a product

play13:29

with unique features tend to have some

play13:31

ability to raise prices

play13:33

when a firm is able to differentiate its

play13:35

product or service offerings it carves

play13:38

out a niche in the market in which it

play13:39

has some degree of monopolistic power

play13:42

over pricing

play13:43

thus the name monopolistic competition

play13:47

firms frequently communicate the degree

play13:49

of product differentiation through

play13:50

advertising

play13:53

third oligopoly

play13:55

an oligopolistic industry is

play13:57

consolidated with a few large firms

play14:00

differentiated products high barriers to

play14:02

entry and some degree of pricing power

play14:05

the degree of pricing power depends just

play14:08

as in monopolistic competition on the

play14:10

degree of product differentiation

play14:12

a key feature of an oligopoly is that

play14:14

the competing firms are interdependent

play14:17

with only a few competitors in the mix

play14:19

the actions of one firm influence the

play14:21

behaviors of the other

play14:23

therefore each competitor in an

play14:25

oligopoly must consider the strategic

play14:27

actions of the other competitors this

play14:30

type of industry structure is often

play14:31

analyzed using game theory which

play14:34

attempts to predict strategic behaviors

play14:35

by assuming that the moves and reactions

play14:37

of competitors can be anticipated

play14:40

due to their strategic interdependence

play14:42

companies and oligopolies have an

play14:44

incentive to coordinate their strategic

play14:46

actions to maximize joint performance

play14:49

examples of oligopolies include the soft

play14:51

drink industry coca-cola versus pepsi

play14:54

airframe manufacturing business

play14:56

boeing versus airbus

play14:58

home improvement retailing the home

play15:00

depot versus lowe's

play15:02

operating systems for smartphones

play15:04

apple ios and google android and

play15:07

detergents

play15:08

png versus unilever

play15:12

fourth monopoly

play15:14

an industry is a monopoly when there is

play15:16

only one firm supplying the market

play15:18

the firm may offer a unique product and

play15:21

the challenges to moving into the

play15:23

industry tend to be high

play15:25

the monopolist has considerable pricing

play15:27

power as a consequence

play15:29

firm and thus industry profit tends to

play15:32

be high

play15:33

a classic example of a monopoly based on

play15:35

resource control is d beers

play15:38

d beers consolidated mines were founded

play15:41

in 1888 in south africa as an

play15:44

amalgamation of a number of individual

play15:46

diamond mining operations

play15:48

d beers had a monopoly over the

play15:51

production of diamonds for most of the

play15:53

20th century

play15:54

and it used its dominant position to

play15:56

manipulate the international diamond

play15:57

market it convinced independent

play15:59

producers to join its single-channel

play16:02

monopoly

play16:03

d-beers also purchased and stockpiled

play16:05

diamonds produced by other manufacturers

play16:08

in order to control prices through

play16:09

supply

play16:11

the de beers model changed at the turn

play16:14

of the 21st century when diamond

play16:16

producers from russia canada and

play16:18

australia started to distribute diamonds

play16:21

outside of the beer's channel

play16:23

the sale of diamonds also suffered from

play16:25

rising awareness about blood diamonds de

play16:27

beers market share fell from as high as

play16:30

90 percent in the 1980s to less than 40

play16:33

percent in 2012.

play16:36

the second factor affecting the

play16:38

intensity of rivalry among existing

play16:40

competitors is industry growth industry

play16:43

growth directly affects the intensity of

play16:46

rivalry among competitors

play16:48

in periods of high growth

play16:50

consumer demand rises and price

play16:52

competition among firms frequently

play16:54

decreases

play16:56

because the pie is expanding rivals are

play16:59

focused on capturing part of that larger

play17:01

pie rather than taking market share and

play17:03

profitability away from one another

play17:06

in contrast

play17:07

rivalry among competitors becomes fierce

play17:10

during slow or even negative industry

play17:12

growth

play17:13

price discounts frequent new product

play17:16

releases with minor modifications

play17:18

intense promotional campaigns and fast

play17:20

retaliation by rivals are all tactics

play17:23

indicative of an industry with slow or

play17:25

negative growth

play17:26

competition is fierce because rivals can

play17:28

gain only at the expense of others

play17:31

therefore companies are focused on

play17:32

taking business away from one another

play17:37

the third factor affecting the intensity

play17:39

of rivalry among existing competitors is

play17:41

strategic commitments

play17:43

if firms make strategic commitments to

play17:45

compete in an industry rivalry among

play17:48

competitors is likely to be more intense

play17:50

we define strategic commitments as firm

play17:53

actions that are costly long-term

play17:55

oriented and difficult to reverse

play17:58

strategic commitments to a specific

play18:00

industry can stem from large fixed cost

play18:03

requirements but also from non-economic

play18:05

considerations

play18:07

for example airbus was created by a

play18:09

number of european governments through

play18:11

direct subsidies to provide

play18:13

countervailing power to boeing

play18:15

the european union in turn claims that

play18:18

boeing is subsidized by the us

play18:19

government indirectly via defense

play18:22

contracts

play18:23

given these political considerations and

play18:25

large-scale strategic commitments

play18:27

neither airbus or boeing is likely to

play18:30

exit the aircraft manufacturing industry

play18:32

even if industry profit potential falls

play18:34

to zero

play18:37

the last factor affecting the intensity

play18:39

of rivalry among existing competitors is

play18:42

exit barriers barriers to exit are

play18:44

obstacles or impediments that prevent a

play18:47

company from exiting a market in which

play18:49

it is considering cessation of

play18:51

operations or from which it wishes to

play18:53

separate

play18:55

typical barriers to exit include highly

play18:57

specialized assets which may be

play18:59

difficult to sell or relocate and high

play19:01

exit costs such as asset write-offs and

play19:04

closure costs

play19:05

a common barrier to exit can also be the

play19:08

loss of customer goodwill an industry

play19:10

with low exit barriers is more

play19:12

attractive because it allows

play19:14

underperforming firms to exit more

play19:16

easily

play19:17

such exits reduce competitive pressure

play19:19

on the remaining firms because excess

play19:22

capacity is removed in contrast an

play19:25

industry with high exit barriers reduces

play19:27

its profit potential because excess

play19:29

capacity still remains

play19:33

okay let's wrap up today's topic

play19:36

harvard business school professor

play19:38

michael porter developed the highly

play19:40

influential five forces model to help

play19:42

managers understand the profit potential

play19:44

of different industries and how they can

play19:46

position their respective firms to gain

play19:48

and sustain competitive advantage

play19:51

these five forces are threat of entry

play19:54

power of suppliers power of buyers

play19:56

threat of substitutes and rivalry among

play19:59

existing firms

play20:01

generally the stronger those forces the

play20:03

lower the firm's ability to gain and

play20:05

sustain a competitive advantage

play20:07

conversely the weaker those forces the

play20:10

greater the firm's ability to gain and

play20:12

sustain competitive advantage

play20:14

therefore managers need to craft a

play20:16

strategic position for the company that

play20:18

leverages weak forces into opportunities

play20:20

and mitigates strong forces because they

play20:23

are potential threats to the firm's

play20:24

ability to gain and sustain a

play20:26

competitive advantage

play20:28

so what do you think about porter's five

play20:30

forces model

play20:31

can you apply this model to an industry

play20:33

you are interested in

play20:35

please leave your thoughts in a comment

play20:36

below if you liked this video please

play20:39

make sure to give it a thumbs up and

play20:40

subscribe to the channel

play20:42

thanks for watching and i will see you

play20:43

next time

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Business StrategyCompetitive AdvantageIndustry AnalysisEconomic ModelSupplier PowerBuyer PowerMarket EntrySubstitutes ThreatRivalry IntensityProfit PotentialBusiness School