Keputusan bersama

Summary

The video explains the concept of decisions, highlighting the differences between personal and collective decisions. Personal decisions are individual choices, while collective decisions involve group consensus and are binding. Collective decisions can be formal (written) or informal (oral), like laws or local agreements. Decision-making methods include discussion for consensus or voting when consensus isn't reached. Voting can be open or secret, and a decision is considered valid if approved by at least two-thirds of participants plus one. Emphasizing responsibility, the video encourages executing decisions with sincerity, while also addressing potential internal and external challenges in implementing collective decisions.

Takeaways

• 📚 Decision-making involves careful thought, research, and consideration.
• 👤 There are two types of decisions: personal decisions (individual) and collective decisions (group).
• 📝 Personal decisions are individual choices that only affect oneself, like deciding whether to do homework or play.
• 👥 Collective decisions are made through agreement and cannot be contested once finalized.
• 📄 There are two forms of collective decisions: written (like laws and regulations) and verbal (like village leader decisions).
• 🗣️ Collective decisions can be reached through discussion (musyawarah) or voting.
• 🤝 In discussions, it's important to respect others' opinions and follow proper procedures.
• 🗳️ Voting is used when no consensus is reached, and decisions are based on majority votes.
• ✔️ A decision is considered valid if 2/3 of the group agrees, plus one more person.
• ⚠️ Challenges to collective decisions may arise internally (selfishness) or externally (interference from others), but responsibility and adherence are crucial.

Q & A

What is a joint decision according to the script?

A joint decision is a decision made based on mature consideration, thought, and research, and it is binding and cannot be disputed.

How many types of decisions are mentioned in the script?

The script mentions two types of decisions: personal decisions and joint decisions.

What is a personal decision as described in the script?

A personal decision is an individual decision that is for oneself, such as deciding whether to do homework or play, and the responsibility for the decision taken is one's own.

What are the two forms of joint decisions mentioned in the script?

The two forms of joint decisions mentioned are written joint decisions and oral joint decisions.

Can you provide an example of a written joint decision from the script?

An example of a written joint decision is the Constitution of 1945, government regulations, and regional regulations.

What is an example of an oral joint decision as stated in the script?

An example of an oral joint decision is a village head's decision to manage irrigation or a neighborhood head's decision to schedule night patrols.

How can joint decisions be made as per the script?

Joint decisions can be made through consultation and voting. Consultation is done to reach an agreement, and it can be conducted in various settings such as family, school, community, or even at the national level.

What is the minimum agreement required for a decision to be considered valid during voting as described in the script?

A decision is considered valid if it is approved by two-thirds of the meeting members plus one additional person.

What are the two types of voting mentioned in the script?

The two types of voting mentioned are open voting, where members openly express their agreement or disagreement, and closed voting, where members write their choices on paper, which are then collected and counted.

What should one do after a joint decision has been reached according to the script?

After a joint decision has been reached, one should implement the decision with sincerity, obedience, and full responsibility.

What are some obstacles that can hinder the implementation of joint decisions as mentioned in the script?

Obstacles can come from within, such as wanting to win at all costs, or from outside, like other parties trying to undermine the decision. This can lead to consequences such as being belittled, sanctioned, or losing trust from others.