Holy SMOKES! AstraZeneca JUST admitted the truth about its COVID vaccine | Redacted w Natali Morris

Summary

The video discusses AstraZeneca's admission that its COVID-19 vaccine can cause rare blood clotting, a revelation that came out due to a lawsuit rather than ethical disclosure. It criticizes the lack of transparency and the government's promotion of vaccines without fully informing the public of risks. The script also highlights the financial burden on taxpayers due to indemnity deals and the emotional toll on families affected by vaccine complications, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in vaccine safety.

Takeaways

• 🚨 AstraZeneca was compelled to acknowledge that their COVID-19 vaccine could potentially cause blood clotting, a condition known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which can be fatal.
• 💡 The admission was not made out of goodwill but due to legal pressure from lawsuits, highlighting a lack of proactive transparency.
• 🏥 Despite knowing about the risks as early as March 2021, the vaccine was not withdrawn from the market until May, raising questions about the delay.
• 🤔 The script challenges the notion that all COVID-19 vaccines were safe and effective, suggesting that risks were not fully disclosed to the public.
• 💸 AstraZeneca's profits have skyrocketed since the pandemic, with revenues exceeding £10 billion in the first quarter of 2021 alone.
• 🏛️ Taxpayers are potentially on the hook for settlements due to an indemnity deal between AstraZeneca and the government, which could be seen as a transfer of risk.
• 📉 The script points out that the vaccine was not pulled despite early knowledge of severe reactions, suggesting a conflict between public health and corporate interests.
• 📉 The UK government's archived information on side effects, including rare but serious conditions like facial paralysis, raises concerns about the accuracy of public health communication.
• 🕊️ The script features personal stories of individuals who suffered severe adverse reactions or lost loved ones after vaccination, humanizing the statistical risks.
• 📉 The script criticizes the lack of accountability and the shifting of responsibility from the pharmaceutical company to taxpayers through indemnity agreements.

Q & A

What issue was AstraZeneca forced to admit regarding their COVID-19 vaccine?

AstraZeneca was forced to admit that their COVID-19 vaccine can cause blood clotting, a condition known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which can be lethal.

Why did AstraZeneca disclose the potential side effect of blood clotting?

AstraZeneca disclosed the potential side effect of blood clotting not out of goodwill but because they were forced to do so in a lawsuit in court.

When did AstraZeneca and the UK reportedly become aware of the risk of TTS from the vaccine?

AstraZeneca and the UK reportedly knew about the risk of TTS at least since March of 2021.

What is the implication of the term 'acceptable safety profile' as used by AstraZeneca in their statement?

The term 'acceptable safety profile' implies that the vaccine's safety, including the risk of rare but serious side effects like TTS, is within a range that the company and possibly regulatory bodies consider reasonable given the context of the pandemic.

How did the UK government's stance on the AstraZeneca vaccine affect public trust and informed consent?

The UK government's stance on the AstraZeneca vaccine, including not disclosing known risks in a timely manner, affected public trust and the ability to give informed consent, as people were not fully aware of the potential side effects.

What financial responsibility might taxpayers face due to the AstraZeneca vaccine?

Taxpayers might face the financial responsibility of paying for settlements of people who were severely harmed or died after taking the AstraZeneca vaccine, due to an indemnity deal between AstraZeneca and the government.

What was the reported reaction of the UK government to the vaccine's side effects?

The UK government acknowledged the side effects and classified certain reactions as 'very rare', but did not pull the vaccine from the market immediately, which led to public concern and legal action.

How did the vaccine's side effects impact individuals like Mel Stewart and Lisa Shaw?

Mel Stewart reportedly suffered a debilitating stroke after vaccination, and Lisa Shaw died after complications from the vaccine, highlighting the severe consequences for some individuals.

What challenges did the family of Dr. Steven Wright face after his death following vaccination?

The family of Dr. Steven Wright faced an uphill battle in bringing a lawsuit, experiencing discouragement and bureaucratic barriers, highlighting the difficulties faced by those seeking accountability.

What are the broader implications of the vaccine's side effects and the government's response on public health policy?

The vaccine's side effects and the government's response raise questions about transparency, the balance between public health and individual risk, and the ethical considerations in vaccine distribution and communication of risks.