Ex momoland Daisy talking about her relationship incident with yunhyeong (iKon)

Summary

The speaker recounts a stressful incident from their past, detailing the pressure and manipulation they faced at 19 years old by a company representative named 'John'. They describe being coerced into confirming a rumor without concrete evidence, which was against their initial decision. The speaker clarifies the situation, dispels misconceptions about their character, and refutes claims that the incident led to their dismissal, urging against baseless speculations.

Takeaways

• 😕 The speaker was in Japan and received a call about an article causing controversy upon landing at the airport.
• 📞 They were immediately called for a meeting by their company, which took place in an unfamiliar office.
• 🤔 The speaker was confused and shaken, especially considering their young age at the time, which they mention as 19.
• 👤 A higher-up, referred to as 'John,' started discussing the situation with the speaker, asking for their input on handling the article.
• 🙅‍♂️ The speaker initially wanted to deny the allegations, as there was no evidence to support the claims in the article.
• 🎲 John started playing mind games, suggesting hypothetical scenarios involving photos and evidence that did not exist.
• 📵 John's tactics made the speaker feel pressured, especially since they were young and possibly less experienced in such situations.
• 📞 John made a phone call in front of the speaker, supposedly with a representative of the opposing party, but the authenticity of the call is questioned.
• 🚫 The speaker felt coerced into confirming the allegations, which was not their initial or final decision.
• 🤔 The speaker believes they were manipulated into a decision that was not in their best interest.
• 😔 The speaker acknowledges the public's reaction to the news, but clarifies that they knew about the situation before it was public.
• 🙅‍♀️ The speaker refutes claims that the incident was the reason for their eventual dismissal, suggesting that there is more to the story.
• 🤷‍♀️ The speaker expresses frustration with people making assumptions and spreading misinformation about the situation.

Q & A

What was the speaker's initial reaction to the situation described in the script?

The speaker was flabbergasted and confused, as they had just gotten off a plane and were not aware of the situation unfolding due to lack of internet access during the flight.

Why did the speaker feel the need to address the situation in the video?

The speaker felt compelled to address the situation because there were lies and misinformation being spread, which they wanted to correct with a play-by-play recap of the actual events.

What was the role of the person referred to as 'John' in the script?

John was a higher-up in the company who was involved in the decision-making process regarding the situation. He used mind games to influence the speaker's response to the allegations.

How did the speaker describe the article that was the center of the controversy?

The speaker described the article as baseless, with no evidence such as photos or credible sources, and suggested that it seemed to be fabricated out of thin air.

What was the speaker's initial suggestion to John about how to handle the situation?

The speaker initially suggested to deny the allegations, as there was no evidence to support the claims made in the article.

Why did the speaker feel pressured to confirm the allegations instead of denying them?

The speaker felt pressured due to John's mind games, which included hypothetical scenarios about potential photos and evidence that could harm the speaker's image, especially as a young female.

How did the speaker describe their emotional state during the meeting with John?

The speaker described feeling stressed out and affected by John's mind games, which led to them being less confident in their initial decision to deny the allegations.

What was the speaker's perception of John's phone call with the representative of the opposite party?

The speaker questioned the authenticity of the phone call, suspecting it might have been staged to manipulate their decision, as there was no consensus reached during the call.

What was the final decision made by the speaker regarding the situation, and how did they feel about it?

The final decision was to confirm the allegations, which the speaker felt was coerced and not their genuine choice. They expressed feeling embarrassed and misrepresented by the outcome.

Did the speaker believe that the situation was the reason for their eventual firing?

The speaker implied that the situation was not the reason for their firing, suggesting that with deductive reasoning, it would not logically make sense as the cause.

How does the speaker want the audience to understand their perspective on the situation?

The speaker wants the audience to understand that they were not a naive or delusional person, and that they were going through other issues at the time, making the situation less significant in comparison.