Квартиры в Испании VS недвижимость в США - наш опыт

Summary

In a recent video, the host shares their transition from investing in Spanish real estate to focusing on properties in the United States. Initially, they pooled resources to buy low-cost social housing in Spain, facing challenges with illegal occupants and complications from a fund. After assessing the risks and profitability, they pivoted to the U.S. market, particularly Pittsburgh, where they plan to rent homes through Airbnb. The video highlights the advantages of U.S. investments, including legal protections and better returns, culminating in a decisive shift away from Spain's increasingly problematic investment landscape.

Takeaways

• 🏡 Takeaway 1: The investment model involved purchasing cheap social housing in Spain, often occupied by squatters, to generate rental income.
• ⚖️ Takeaway 2: Evicting squatters in Spain is a complex and lengthy legal process, often taking several months to resolve.
• 💰 Takeaway 3: The investment strategy was built on acquiring properties at reduced prices due to squatters, then evicting them, renovating, and renting out the apartments.
• 🚨 Takeaway 4: Recent complications with the investment fund Solv led to significant challenges and financial uncertainty for the investors.
• 🔄 Takeaway 5: The decision to shift investments from Spain to the United States was driven by the need for a more stable and reliable market.
• 🇺🇸 Takeaway 6: The U.S. real estate market is perceived as a more attractive option due to clearer property rights and better protections for investors.
• 🏠 Takeaway 7: The chosen U.S. investment strategy focuses on buying homes in Pittsburgh to rent them out through platforms like Airbnb.
• 📈 Takeaway 8: The investment property in Pittsburgh is expected to generate stable rental income due to its proximity to universities and medical facilities.
• 🔍 Takeaway 9: Lessons learned include the importance of adapting investment strategies to changing market conditions and being vigilant about risks.
• 🧠 Takeaway 10: The speaker emphasizes that the previous model in Spain has become unviable, and they are now exploring new opportunities in the U.S. market.

Q & A

What investment model was initially used in Spain?

The initial investment model involved purchasing low-cost social housing, often dealing with illegal occupants, referred to as 'okupas', who had either stopped paying rent or occupied the property without permission.

What challenges are associated with evicting tenants in Spain?

Evicting tenants in Spain can be a lengthy legal process, often taking between six months to a year, especially if there are children involved or if the case is complicated.

Why did the channel decide to stop investing in Spain?

The decision to stop investing in Spain was driven by multiple challenges, including legal issues, complications with the investment company Solv, and a decrease in profitable housing opportunities.

What triggered the problems with the investment company Solv?

The problems with Solv arose due to internal corruption, leading to management changes and resulting in the channel's inability to complete the acquisition of four additional properties.

What is the new investment strategy in the United States?

The new investment strategy focuses on purchasing houses in the United States, specifically for rental purposes through platforms like Airbnb, capitalizing on more stable legal protections and a favorable market.

What location was chosen for the new investment, and why?

The investment was directed toward Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, due to its proximity to universities and hospitals, making it an attractive area for students and patients seeking temporary housing.

What are the expected returns from the new investment model in the U.S.?

The expected returns from the new investment model are estimated to be between 12% to 14% annually, which is considered a good yield in the current market.

What differences did the host notice between investing in Spain and the U.S.?

The host noted that the U.S. offers better investor protections, a more capitalist approach, and less bureaucracy compared to the complications faced in Spain, which contributed to their decision to shift investments.

How does the investment process in the U.S. compare to that in Spain?

In the U.S., the investment process appears to be more streamlined with fewer legal hurdles, making it easier to manage properties and generate income compared to the complicated legal landscape in Spain.

What is the overall sentiment towards future investments in Spain?

The overall sentiment is one of caution, with a strong indication that the channel will not pursue future investments in Spain due to the current risks and challenges faced in the market.