What is the cheapest way to beat climate change?

Summary

This video discusses the urgency of achieving net-zero emissions to combat climate change, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach. It explores the concept of 'silver buckshot', suggesting that no single solution exists. The video highlights 'bike infrastructure' as a cost-effective solution according to Project Drawdown, but also acknowledges the complexity of evaluating climate solutions due to varying costs and benefits. It stresses the importance of implementing quick, impactful solutions like reducing methane leaks and deforestation, and mentions an upcoming update to Project Drawdown for more localized climate solution data.

Takeaways

• 🌍 The current carbon emission rate exceeds natural removal processes, leading to an imbalance that needs to be corrected to achieve Net Zero emissions.
• 🚀 'Silver Buckshot' refers to the multitude of approaches needed to combat climate change, as opposed to a single 'Silver Bullet' solution.
• 🏗️ The most cost-effective climate solution identified by Project Drawdown is bike infrastructure, which can reduce emissions and even save money by reducing the need for car infrastructure.
• 💸 Many climate solutions have negative costs, meaning the savings from implementing them outweigh the costs, making them economically beneficial.
• 🌳 Project Drawdown's upcoming update will provide more localized data on climate solutions, making the information more relevant to individuals' specific locations.
• 🔍 The concept of 'degrowth' is discussed as an alternative economic model that could contribute to reducing emissions, although it's not directly considered a solution by Project Drawdown.
• 🌿 Stopping deforestation is highlighted as an immediate and impactful solution, as it provides benefits from day one, unlike some other solutions that take years to show results.
• 💨 Methane leaks, especially from landfills, are identified as a quick and impactful solution to reduce emissions, emphasizing the need for immediate action.
• 🌡️ The urgency of the climate crisis is emphasized, with a focus on solutions that can be implemented quickly to prevent dangerous levels of warming.
• 🌐 The importance of considering both the financial cost and the social cost of carbon emissions is discussed, with the suggestion that many solutions provide broader benefits beyond just financial savings.

Q & A

What is the main goal of achieving Net Zero emissions?

The main goal of achieving Net Zero emissions is to balance the amount of carbon added to the Earth's atmosphere with the amount removed by natural processes, preventing an imbalance that leads to negative environmental impacts as outlined by the IPCC.

What does 'net negative emissions' mean in the context of climate change?

Net negative emissions refer to a state where more carbon dioxide (CO2) is being removed from the atmosphere than is being emitted, resulting in a decrease in atmospheric CO2 concentration.

Why is it important to reduce emissions from various sectors like energy, cement production, and agriculture?

It is important to reduce emissions from various sectors because each sector contributes differently to the overall carbon entering the atmosphere, and thus requires unique solutions for decarbonization. There is no single solution to address climate change effectively.

What is the significance of Project Drawdown and its role in climate solutions?

Project Drawdown is significant because it compiles and analyzes the top solutions to prevent climate change, focusing on what works best to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It aims to provide a resource to the world on the most effective climate solutions and how to implement them.

Why did the video mention 'silver buckshot' instead of a 'silver bullet' in addressing climate change?

The video mentioned 'silver buckshot' to emphasize that there is no single solution to climate change but rather a multitude of approaches that need to be implemented simultaneously, each contributing to the overall goal of reducing emissions.

What is the most cost-effective climate solution according to Project Drawdown's updated data?

According to Project Drawdown's updated data, the most cost-effective climate solution is bike infrastructure, which involves building new infrastructure for bikes or converting existing infrastructure, as it can reduce the need for car usage and is relatively inexpensive to implement.

What does it mean when the cost to implement a solution is 'negative'?

A 'negative' cost to implement a solution means that the operational savings from implementing the solution outweigh the initial cost of implementation, effectively meaning that it saves money in the long run.

Why is considering the social cost of carbon important when evaluating climate solutions?

Considering the social cost of carbon is important because it accounts for the broader impacts of emissions on future generations, including health, biodiversity, and environmental damage, which may not be fully captured in financial costs alone.

What is the concept of 'degrowth' and why was it mentioned in the video?

The concept of 'degrowth' challenges the idea of continuous economic growth and suggests that reducing consumption and waste can lead to a more sustainable and efficient use of resources. It was mentioned in the video to highlight the need for systemic changes beyond immediate emission reduction strategies.

Why is it crucial to implement climate solutions quickly, according to the video?

It is crucial to implement climate solutions quickly because the nature of the climate crisis is cumulative, and the longer emissions continue, the more severe the impact on the climate. Reducing emissions sooner has a more significant effect on the long-term state of the atmosphere.

What is the role of methane leaks in climate change mitigation, as discussed in the video?

Methane leaks, especially from landfills, pipelines, and oil and gas infrastructure, play a significant role in climate change mitigation because methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Addressing these leaks can provide immediate reductions in emissions.

What is the significance of deforestation in global emissions, and why is it important to address it?

Deforestation is significant in global emissions, contributing to about 10-11% of them. Addressing deforestation is crucial because it not only reduces emissions but also has immediate benefits for biodiversity and climate change mitigation.

What updates is Project Drawdown planning to provide in the near future?

Project Drawdown is planning a massive update that will map climate solutions down to the satellite pixel level, providing tailored information for different regions. They also plan to shorten the time horizon to discuss climate solutions, focusing on the next 3 years instead of 30.

Outlines

00:00

🌱 Addressing Climate Imbalance

The paragraph discusses the urgent need to halt the increasing carbon emissions that are causing an imbalance in the Earth's atmosphere. The goal is to achieve Net Zero emissions, where the amount of carbon added to the atmosphere is equal to the amount removed. The speaker explains that reaching Net Zero is complex due to the diverse sources of greenhouse gas emissions, which include energy production, cement manufacturing, deforestation, and agriculture. The video aims to explore cost-effective solutions to reduce emissions, referencing Project Drawdown's compilation of the top 100 solutions to combat climate change.

05:00

🚴‍♂️ Bike Infrastructure as a Climate Solution

This section of the script highlights the findings from Project Drawdown, which suggest that investing in bike infrastructure is one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce carbon emissions. By building new bike lanes or converting existing infrastructure, people are encouraged to cycle instead of using cars, thereby reducing emissions. The script points out that many of the solutions listed by Project Drawdown have negative cost-to-draw-down ratios, meaning the operational savings over time outweigh the initial implementation costs. The speaker also mentions that while bike infrastructure is cost-effective, there are uncertainties and varying assumptions in estimating the impact of such solutions.

10:01

🌐 Broader Perspectives on Climate Solutions

The speaker expands on the concept of cost-effectiveness, arguing that it's not just about financial costs but also about the broader environmental and societal impacts. Solutions like stopping fossil fuel use can have significant health and ecological benefits, while actions like restoring wetlands can enhance biodiversity. The paragraph emphasizes that while financial costs are important, the social cost of carbon emissions, which includes impacts on future generations and ecosystems, should also be considered. The speaker discusses the difficulty of assigning a monetary value to such benefits but acknowledges efforts to do so, such as the social cost of carbon.

15:02

🏡 Immediate and Long-Term Climate Solutions

In this paragraph, the focus is on the practicality and time frame of implementing climate solutions. The speaker distinguishes between individual actions, like improving home insulation, and systemic solutions like bike infrastructure. The paragraph discusses the limitations of certain solutions based on what can realistically be achieved at a given scale and within a specific time frame. It also touches on the concept of 'degrowth,' which suggests reducing economic activity to lessen environmental impact. The speaker acknowledges the need for fundamental societal changes but emphasizes the urgency of implementing solutions that can have an immediate impact on emissions.

20:02

🌳 Prioritizing Quick and Effective Climate Actions

The final paragraph emphasizes the need to prioritize climate solutions that can be implemented quickly and have a significant impact. The speaker suggests that while restructuring the economy and society is necessary, it's also crucial to focus on solutions that can be put into action within the next few years. Examples given include plugging methane leaks, which have immediate benefits, and stopping deforestation, which provides front-loaded benefits. The speaker concludes by reiterating the importance of a multifaceted approach to climate change, acknowledging that all solutions are necessary but some are more immediately effective.

📱 Data Privacy and the Role of Incognito

The last part of the script is a segue into a sponsorship message. The speaker discusses the importance of data privacy and how they have benefited from using Incognito, a service that helps protect personal information from data brokers. The speaker shares their positive experience with the service and encourages viewers to consider using it to safeguard their privacy. This section also includes a thank you to the video's sponsor and the speaker's patrons, highlighting the support from the community.

Keywords

💡Net Zero

Net Zero refers to a state where the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere is balanced by an equivalent amount being removed. In the context of the video, achieving Net Zero is a critical goal to prevent further climate change. The script mentions that to stop the imbalance of carbon in the atmosphere, we need to reach a point where we are not adding more to the atmosphere than is being removed.

💡Net Negative Emissions

Net Negative Emissions occur when more greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere than are emitted. The video script discusses moving beyond Net Zero to a state where CO2 concentration in the atmosphere actually falls, which is crucial for reversing the current trend of increasing emissions.

💡Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Greenhouse Gas Emissions are gases that trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, contributing to global warming. The video emphasizes reducing these emissions, particularly from energy production, as a key strategy in combating climate change.

💡Decarbonize

Decarbonize means reducing the amount of carbon emissions produced by a process or industry. The script uses this term to describe the need to find solutions that will remove carbon from the atmosphere or prevent its release, such as by using renewable energy sources.

💡Project Drawdown

Project Drawdown is a research organization focused on identifying and ranking solutions to climate change. The video script references their work, particularly their book compiling the top 100 solutions to prevent global warming, as a starting point for discussing cost-effective climate solutions.

💡Cost of Drawdown

The Cost of Drawdown refers to the financial cost of implementing solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The video discusses this concept extensively, highlighting that many solutions have a negative cost, meaning they save money over time compared to current practices.

💡Bike Infrastructure

Bike Infrastructure refers to the physical structures that support cycling, such as bike lanes and paths. The video identifies building bike infrastructure as one of the most cost-effective climate solutions because it reduces the need for car travel, which in turn lowers emissions.

💡Landfill Methane

Landfill Methane is a potent greenhouse gas released from decomposing waste in landfills. The script mentions capturing this methane and using it as a source of energy, which not only reduces emissions but also provides a cost-effective solution to climate change.

💡Social Cost of Carbon

The Social Cost of Carbon is an estimate of the economic damages caused by emitting one ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The video discusses this concept as a way to quantify the broader impacts of emissions beyond just financial costs.

💡Degrowth

Degrowth is an economic concept that advocates for reducing the scale of the economy to decrease its environmental impact. The video script touches on this idea, suggesting that focusing on growth may not always be sustainable and that we should consider other economic models.

💡Climate Realpolitik

Climate Realpolitik refers to the practical politics of addressing climate change, considering the constraints and opportunities of the current political and economic landscape. The video uses this term to discuss the need for immediate, actionable solutions that can be implemented quickly to have an impact on emissions.

Highlights

We are adding more carbon to the Earth's atmosphere than is being removed by natural processes.

The goal is to reach Net Zero emissions to prevent a climate crisis.

Different sectors require unique solutions for decarbonization.

Project Drawdown's book lists the top 100 climate solutions.

Bike infrastructure is identified as the most cost-effective solution for reducing emissions.

Many solutions have negative implementation costs, meaning they save money.

The financial cost of solutions should be weighed against operational savings.

There are non-financial costs to consider, such as health and biodiversity.

Some solutions have social costs associated with carbon emissions.

Project Drawdown does not account for the social cost of carbon in their estimates.

The most cost-effective solutions over their lifespan include improved insulation and electric cars.

Water distribution efficiency is a new climate solution that can save water and money.

The definition of 'cost' can change the answer to what is the most cost-effective solution.

Degrowth is a concept that suggests reducing economic activity to decrease climate impact.

Project Drawdown will update their solutions to be more localized and time-sensitive.

Incog is a service that helps protect personal data from unwanted calls and breaches.

The video discusses the urgency of implementing climate solutions within a limited timeframe.

Methane leaks and deforestation are highlighted as areas needing immediate action.

Transcripts

thanks to incog for sponsoring this

video currently we are adding more

carbon to the Earth's atmosphere than is

being removed by natural processes if

that keeps going on for too long then we

will eventually have what the ipcc

refers to as a very bad time so we want

to stop that imbalance and get to Net

Zero where we're not adding more to the

atmosphere than is removed and

eventually get to net negative emissions

where CO2 concentration in the

atmosphere Falls I'm often asked how do

we get to Net Zero and the answer is

complicated you see this is when our

greenhouse gas emissions come from

largely energy but within that large

sector you've got emissions from stuff

as diverse as heating buildings flying

airplanes and making chemicals and away

from energy you've got lots of different

sources of emissions such as making

cement deforestation landfills and

agriculture among many other sectors

each section of this diagram sees carbon

enter the atmosphere in a different way

and so we'll need a different solution

to decarbonize

so there's no one Silver Bullet to fix

climate change there's silver Buckshot

lots of approaches all at once some more

important than others but which one

could give us the most bang for buck

what is the most coste effective climate

solution in other words where could we

plow a bunch of money in the short term

and get the maximum return of emissions

reduction I don't know but I do have a

place to start in 2017 project drawdown

published this book compiling the top

100 solutions to prevent

[Music]

electricity doing so produces CO2 but

because methane is a more powerful

greenhouse gas and is no longer being

emitted the result is a net positive

it's basically a free source of natural

gas so while the draw down effect is

pretty modest 2 and a half gigatons by

2050 the cost to implement it is very

low in fact it's um wait what it's

negative wait a minute loads of these

cost to draw down ratios are negative it

cost negative money to implement these I

had question so using my friend Miriam

as an entry point check out her YouTube

channel she's great I gave project draw

down a call I'm uh John Foley I'm the

executive director of project drawdown

I'm a climate scientist and been working

in various aspects of climate change for

about 30 years at universities museums

and now that project drw down where we

try to be a resource to the world and

focusing on what the best climate

Solutions are and how we can move

forward with them the book is you know

was a signature first Cornerstone but it

was 2017 2018 when it came out and it's

it's quite obsolete now

right okay so I went through their

excellent website compiled all the most

upto-date data for cost and Emissions

reductions in another spreadsheet

calculated the cost of draw down ratio

sorted low to high and the new winner is

bike infrastructure by building new

infrastructure for bikes or converting

existing infrastructure you free people

up from having to use their cars and you

allow for greater Urban transport of

freight by bikes and ebikes actually

ties in quite nicely with last week's

video and you can do this really cheaply

in fact the cost is it's still negative

and what you need to do is look at the

cost of climate Solutions compared to

what you're already paying for cuz

you're not going to do both you're going

to do one or the other so if you look at

a net net cost curve um you find again

about 80% of climate Solutions end up

being cheaper over 30 years than what we

do today which is kind of amazing for

bike infrastructure and landfill methane

and most of the solutions considered by

project draw down the cost of

implementing those Solutions between now

and 2050 is lower than the cost of just

maintaining our current way of doing

things or if you want to look at it this

way the cost of implementation is more

than paid off by operational savings for

example there's an upfront cost

associated with building solar panels

but the electricity we get from those

panels is cheaper per kilowatt hour than

the electricity we get from coal or gas

upfront cost but savings between now and

2050 which are larger resulting in a net

negative implementation cost as long as

you can afford the initial investment if

you're interested the solutions with the

most negative implementation costs

between now and 2050 according to

project drawdown were BK infastructure

you're saving on constructing and

maintaining car infrastructure LED

lighting it's just more energy efficient

and recycled paper it's just cheaper

than regular paper Okay so that's the

answer right bike infrastructure is the

most cost-effective way to reduce carbon

emissions because it saves you the most

money for each ton of carbon you don't

emit into the atmosphere Fe wait a

minute how much longer is left in this

video oh yeah it's never that easy so

there are error bars associated with all

of these solutions for example there's

not much literature on cycling adoption

worldwide so it's difficult to predict

how that will evolve in the future and

any estimate of the cost of a given

solution is going to involve making

assumptions so comparing different

solutions can be a bit like comparing

apples and oranges depending on the

assumptions made though it is worth

saying that project draw down does try

to keep their assumptions consistent no

but that's not what the problem is the

problem is the question itself what is

the most coste effective solution well

there are two parts to this question

firstly what do we mean by cost so far

we've just considered the dollar value

cost of implementing a solution minus

the operational Savings of that solution

relative to business as usual but that's

just a financial ual cost and the way

that we do things at the moment

particularly relying on fossil fuels for

energy has other costs too for example

it's estimated that stopping the use of

fossil fuels would save 5 million lives

a year by reducing air pollution

stopping deforestation prevents the

irrevocable loss of biodiversity and

while it's easy to look at the positive

impact of not doing something anymore

there's also the positive impacts of

choosing to do something restoring

Wetlands draws down carbon but also

improves biodiversity not you investing

in bike infrastructure reduces emissions

but also improves People's Health and

and we have to look at the real cost

here not just in dollars but also in

lives in future generations and in

security and things that we can't always

put a dollar figure on though that's not

stopped some people from trying some

people assign a social cost to each ton

of carbon that we emit with estimates of

the total harm to Future Generations

ranging from4 to

$400 per ton with a 2022 nature paper

deciding on

$185 there's a fantastic carbon brief

breakdown on this I'll link it below

with all the other references suffice to

say it's difficult to assign a monetary

value to stuff like biodiversity and

Happiness Project draw down don't

account for a social cost of carbon in

their estimates they are purely

Financial which if anything makes their

estimated negative costs of implementing

many solutions even more startling like

those costs should be even more negative

if anything our our costs are very

conservative we're just looking at the

cost of I mean to put it in real terms

for your listener like the cost of

electricity that you pay your bill for

every month from coal versus solar no

environmental taxes no Health cost

nothing just the straight up cost of

making the electricity even there solar

kicks Coal's ass and Beyond this all of

the numbers we've talked about in this

video so far have been calculated up to

2050 but many of the solutions that

project draw down considers are going to

last much longer than that like land

restoration for example so they also

considered the net cost of implementing

a solution by 2050 and the lifetime

operational savings or in some cases

profit of a solution the solutions with

the largest savings over their lifespan

then are utility scale solar PV improved

insulation electric cars bamboo

production and distributed solar PV if

you're not accounting for the social

cost of carbon if you do at $185 per ton

then the top five become utility scale

solar PV onshore wind turbines improved

insulation distributed solar PV and

plant-based diets because most of those

Solutions can each draw down more than

100 gatons of carbon between now and

2050 which uh changes the rankings a bit

but coming back to the question of this

video the most cost effective climate

Solutions over their entire lifespan are

improved insulation electric trains

electric cars water distribution

efficiency and bike infrastructure

whether you're accounting for the social

cost of carbon or not editing Simon here

I just wanted to briefly explain what

water distribution efficiency is because

this was a climate solution that was new

to me all this refers to is reducing

leaks from pipes and installing pressure

sensors so you're not needlessly using

electricity to pump water places because

the pressure is already high enough and

the carbon draw down of this is pretty

small but it can save hundreds of

millions of cubic meters of water over

the next like couple of decades from

being lost and save almost 1 and5

trillion dollar from being spent

needlessly kind of kind of blew my mind

why aren't we doing this already why so

depending on your definition of cost and

the time scale that you're considering

it over you get very different answers

to this question but what about the

second part to this what do we mean by a

solution as an individual the climate

solution with the largest emission

reduction potential for an a given

initial outlay is almost certainly

improving the insulation of your house

massive net negative cost over several

decades though your mileage will

obviously vary whereas if you're looking

for a cost effective systematic solution

to be delivered by a government then

you're looking at bike infrastructure or

water distribution efficiency the point

being there are limitations on which

climate Solutions can be implemented

based on practical considerations what

can you actually get done at the given

scale you're considering there are

several other climate solutions that I

haven't considered so far and project

draw down Haven considered for this

exact reason such as Thanos snapping the

planet solar radiation management

packing it all in and colonizing Mars

but there is one other solution that

isn't considered by project draw down

that comes up in my comments quite

frequently and I thought this might be a

good opportunity to finally address it

here's the basic idea if everything we

do has an impact on the climate small or

large then surely the best way to reduce

our impact is just to do less stop

focusing on growing GDP and accepting

the fact that maybe economies shouldn't

just grow forever and actually maybe get

smaller over time this is the idea of

degrowth and I'll be

honest I'm not really the person to talk

about this look I'm not an economist I a

physical scientist sure I've read donor

economics but I'm not the person to make

a Nuance video about degrowth I will say

that I do agree with a lot of its ideas

though I am aware that there are

seemingly questions that it struggles to

answer just look at that Wiki I asked

John why it wasn't considered as a

climate Solution by project draw down I

think the word degrowth is like the

worst ter term on Earth instead can we

talk about better and quality and

efficiency because I think the degrowth

community has a point and of course

people can agree with it to a certain

extent having heat pouring out of your

windows and out of your attic while

you're paying bills that's dumb uh we

can make homes much more energy

efficient improve your quality of life

improve your um comfort and reduce your

bills if that's called degrowth fine I

call it efficiency same thing with food

waste we're throwing a third of all the

planet's food away between the farm and

our Forks if we could get rid of that if

they want to call it degrowth fine I

call it efficiency I think my term will

be much more appealing to people okay so

you can still live you know eat a

healthy meal and have nice dinners and

whatever it's not asking people a term

that is kind of implicitly sounds like

sacrifice the reason I bring degrowth up

is because it casts into relief what to

me is the defining characteristic of a

climate solution as I said a minute ago

what can you actually Implement and and

in what time frame I firmly believe that

we need widespread economic and social

restructuring in order to bring our

societies back within planetary

boundaries and make people's lives

better no arguments there but is that

concept the most cost- effective way to

reduce our

emissions I don't think so because much

as it is the fundamental change we need

in the long Arc of History it's also not

a solution that I can see being meaning

Yul implemented from the perspective of

emissions in the next 10 to 20 years

because that's the thing we don't have

long to implement these changes and

bring our emissions down the nature of

the climate crisis is cumulative once

you put extra carbon in the atmosphere

it doesn't go away quickly so the longer

emissions continue the more carbon

builds up and the more warming we

experience it's pretty much linear and

at the current rate of emissions we have

about 10 20 years tops to avoid

dangerous levels of warming the flip

side to this is the sooner you reduce

emissions the larger the impact you have

on the long-term state of the atmosphere

the faster you can Implement a solution

the greater the time integrated effect

it has in other words the more effective

it is that's not to say that we

shouldn't attempt to implement solutions

that take longer like building new

infrastructure or researching new

nuclear fusion or restructuring our

financial institutions just that I think

we should prioritize those solutions

that we can Implement quickly in a

considered manner more speed less haste

I guess what I'm getting at here is

climate real politic given the immensely

flawed game that we find ourselves

playing that we are forced to play and

The Limited hand that we hold and the

very limited time that we have to make a

decision how can we play our hand what

can we actually do should we restructure

the game yes absolutely but right now

the cost of not playing our hand is too

high I am not proposing that we should

abandon our ideals or sh our

responsibility for building a fairer

more sustainable world I think we should

do that and we should make that part of

our response to the climate crisis in

this narrow window of opportunity that

we have but I also think the other parts

of our response are more actionable and

will have a larger positive impact on

the environment in the relevant time

frame so let's reframe this question

really we want to know which climate

Solutions are achievable that we can

actually Implement in the next couple of

years that are quick to implement to

maximize our returns and are cheap to

implement to limit our outlay

unfortunately there are plenty of

climate solutions that check all three

boxes methane leaks especially in land

pills you know gas infrastructure and

pipelines and refineries and fugitive

flaring emissions those are stupid you

know they don't benefit anybody let's

just plug those leaks and as you know

methane's a disproportionately fast part

of the climate system it it only lives

in the atmosphere a decade or two but it

does a hell of a lot of warming in that

short amount of time so it's that's kind

of the emergency break we hit now in

real time to start bending the curve on

emissions and maybe even temperature

increasing another one is D4 forestation

uh it's always overlooked but

deforestation now emits about 10 to

11% of global emissions that's more than

the whole US economy right now the US

economy is about 10% and falling

deforestation's around 11% and lately

it's been rising again and the benefits

of stopping deforestation are all front

loaded to day one you get all the

benefit today compared to replacing a

coal power plant with a solar panel it

takes years and years and years to

accumulate that kind of total benefit of

that intervention so yeah there are a

lot of things we could do in the near

term that are big fast and cheap and I

like big fast and cheap when it comes to

climate Solutions though to repeat

something I said at the start of the

video all of the solutions talked about

in this video are going to be necessary

we've picked out the ones which are most

cost effective sure but we need to

decarbonize this whole diagram if you

would like more information about how we

can do that then I am delighted to say

and apparently this is an exclusive

scoop that project draw down will be

getting a massive update in the not too

distant future we're going to map

climate Solutions down to the satellite

pixel basically everywhere in the world

so the information isn't just the

average for the world but it would

actually be tailored to where you live

like how would solar work in England

versus you know Florida versus Bay or

something we'll be launching about a

year from now or quarter one of 2025

we're also going to shorten the time

Horizon to talk about climate Solutions

in like not just 30 years out to the

Future which is kind of hard for most

people to visualize

but really give people tools to look

well how about in the next 3 years not

just the next 30 and really kind of roll

them out a little bit at a time we're

working very very hard on that right now

and it's a it's a Quantum Leap and uh

the amount of data and uh work to kind

of pull that together and no one's ever

done it um so this is going to be very

very exciting and if instead of wanting

more you want less information online

then I also have you covered I really

despise getting cold cooled and and the

way that it works is is these companies

were able to get my number through data

Brokers these businesses that collate

people's personal information online

often without you even realizing it and

then selling it to these other companies

who can then call you fortunately in the

last couple of months I've noticed a

significant decrease in the number of

cold calls I receive and that's because

a couple of months ago I signed up to

incog who kindly sponsored this video

incog is a service that contacts these

data Brokers and requests your

information to be deleted from their

records they deal with any follow-up

respondents and will periodically check

in to make sure your data isn't being

stored that's of course all stuff that I

could do myself but a I wouldn't know

where to find those data Brokers and B

it would take a lot of time to get

through all of them signing up to enog

took literally 5 minutes and according

to them over 58 different data removal

requests I've saved myself 39 hours of

boring admin work and quite apart from

limiting the number of Co calls I now

receive I've also protected myself from

breaches of my personal data something

that's increased in frequency by more

than 40% in the past 3 years perhaps I'm

hyper aware of this because I'm a known

person online but I really value keeping

my private

information private and if you do too I

think you should sign up to incog

because I've had a fantastic experience

with them nothing but positives and I've

already seen the impact protect your

personal data at incognit

docomo Clark which will be linked down

there in the description and if you go

there you'll get a 60% discount on an

annual plan that link again was in

cog.org

for doing all the leg work for me and

for sponsoring this video thank you so

much for watching the video and thank

you so much to John for taking the time

out of his very busy schedule to talk to

me if you haven't checked out project

draw down please do it's a mine of

valuable information I must also say an

enormous thank you to my patrons over on

patreon.com Simon Ox Fizz the names

you're seeing on screen right now are my

executive producer patrons and higher

tiers all patrons get early access to my

videos and exclusive content every month

including behind the scenes Vlog and

producer patrons and higher tiers get to

vote on a video topic a month this video

was actually one that they chose so if

you like the sound of all of that if

you'd like to help me make more videos

please consider supporting me over on

patreon if you enjoyed the video please

do share it with others who you think

May benefit from it and if you'd like

something to watch next here's two I

prepared earlier that just leaves me to

say thank you again for watching and

I'll see you in the next one