It’s All Coming Out! “Thousands Left Disabled” After Covid Vaccines

Summary

The script discusses the UK's vaccine compensation scheme, revealing that 14,000 people have applied for payments due to adverse reactions, mostly related to the AstraZeneca vaccine. It criticizes the lack of media coverage and the government's push for vaccines, despite potential risks and the limited long-term data available. The speaker, Bev Turner, shares personal experiences of being silenced on social media for discussing vaccine risks and emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the need for transparency in vaccine discussions.

Takeaways

• 💉 In 2021-22, there was significant pressure to mandate an untested drug for the population, rushed through at an unprecedented speed.
• 🇬🇧 By 2024, the UK's vaccine compensation scheme had seen 14,000 applications, a stark increase not widely reported in mainstream media.
• 🚫 Many applicants were denied compensation, with some being told they were 'not disabled enough', highlighting a lack of support for those affected.
• 💰 The maximum compensation from the scheme is £120,000, which pales in comparison to the potential lifetime earnings of those severely affected.
• 🔍 The Daily Telegraph was the only media outlet to report on the number of applications after a freedom of information request.
• 📉 The vaccine was associated with a range of adverse effects, including heart attacks, blood clots, and facial paralysis, with the majority of claims related to the AstraZeneca jab.
• 📈 Historically, the vaccine damage payments scheme saw only 16,000 applications since 1979, with a surge to 14,000 related to COVID-19 vaccines alone.
• 🤔 There's a concerning lack of awareness and discussion about the long-term effects and the individuals affected by the vaccines.
• 🏥 The push for vaccines was based on the premise of protecting others, yet the necessity and efficacy of such measures, especially for young people, is questioned.
• 📊 By June 2021, there were 300,000 reported adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in the UK, a number that could significantly underestimate the true scale of issues.

Q & A

What was the approximate time frame during which the UK came close to mandating an untried drug to the population?

The time frame was roughly between 2021 and 2022.

Who stated that the drug was rushed through at the speed of science?

Fiser Executive, Janine Small, made this statement to the EU parliament in October 2022.

How many people have applied for the UK's vaccine compensation scheme as of 2024?

As of 2024, 14,000 people have applied for a payment through the UK's vaccine compensation scheme.

Which newspaper conducted a freedom of information request to find out the number of applications for the vaccine compensation scheme?

The Daily Telegraph conducted the freedom of information request.

What are some of the reported conditions by people who applied for the vaccine compensation scheme?

Some of the reported conditions include heart attacks, blood clots, inflammation of the spinal cord, excessive swelling of the vaccinated limb, and facial paralysis.

What percentage of the applications to the vaccine compensation scheme are related to the AstraZeneca jab?

Around 97% of the applications are related to the AstraZeneca jab.

Since its founding in 1979, how many applications has the vaccine damaged payments scheme received before the COVID-19 injections?

Before the COVID-19 injections, the scheme had received around 16,000 applications since 1979.

What is the maximum amount one can receive from the vaccine compensation scheme?

The maximum amount one can receive from the vaccine compensation scheme is £120,000.

How many claims have been rejected from the vaccine compensation scheme as mentioned in the script?

Half of the claims, which amounts to 5,000, have been rejected.

What was the known issue with the UK's Yellow Card reporting system by June 2021?

By June 2021, it was known that the Yellow Card reporting system was poorly administered and only registered between 1 to 10% of all injuries.

What was the criticism leveled at the speaker during the pandemic when they tried to discuss informed consent?

The criticism was that the speaker was not a doctor or an immunologist, implying that they were not qualified to discuss the issue.

What did the speaker mention as their primary ethical issue regarding medical privacy during the pandemic?

The speaker mentioned that medical privacy was one of their primary ethical issues, and they did not disclose whether they had taken the COVID-19 vaccine on any shows.

What is the speaker's concern regarding the potential for another pandemic and the response to it?

The speaker is concerned that the next pandemic may come along with a similar push for mass vaccination without proper long-term data, and that dissenting voices may be suppressed.