The Biggest Problem With ChatGPT | Tsoding
Summary
TLDRThe speaker expresses frustration with LMS (Large Language Models) for their propensity to generate inaccurate or fabricated information, which they find anxiety-inducing and impractical for serious tasks. They compare the current reliance on LMS to the simpler, more efficient use of Google for straightforward queries a decade ago, suggesting a degradation in tool quality. The speaker criticizes the overreliance on complex tools for trivial tasks and questions the value of such technology when it introduces more uncertainty and verification work.
Takeaways
- 🤖 The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with LMS (Learning Management Systems) due to their propensity to generate incorrect or fabricated information.
- 🚫 The speaker finds LMS unusable for anything beyond trivial tasks because of the time-consuming verification process required to ensure accuracy.
- 😓 There is a sense of anxiety conveyed about the reliability of information provided by LMS, as the speaker questions the veracity of the content.
- 💻 The speaker criticizes the reliance on LMS for tasks that were once efficiently handled by simpler tools like Google searches.
- 📉 The speaker laments a perceived degradation in the quality of tools over the past decade, suggesting that what was easily managed with basic search engines now requires complex systems.
- 😡 There is a strong opinion against the idea of accepting LMS-generated inaccuracies as a norm, indicating a value for precision and integrity in work.
- 🤔 The speaker questions the convenience of LMS, arguing that they create more work and uncertainty rather than simplifying tasks.
- 🧐 The speaker reflects on the necessity of critical thinking and verification in the digital age, where information can be easily manipulated.
- 🔍 The speaker highlights the importance of skill in discerning reliable information sources, suggesting that the value of tools like Google has diminished over time.
- 💬 There is a call for a return to more reliable and efficient methods of information retrieval, indicating a preference for quality over convenience.
Q & A
What is the main concern expressed about using LMS for tutorials?
-The main concern is the potential for LMS to 'hallucinate' or generate incorrect or non-existent information, which can lead to anxiety and the need to spend more time verifying the content than learning from it.
Why is the speaker suggesting that LMS is nonusable for certain tasks?
-The speaker finds LMS nonusable because the risk of receiving incorrect information outweighs the benefits, especially for tasks that require accuracy and verification.
What does the speaker imply about the convenience of using LMS?
-The speaker questions the convenience of LMS due to the need to constantly verify the information it provides, which can be more cumbersome than finding the information through traditional means.
What is the speaker's opinion on the quality of tools and their evolution over time?
-The speaker believes that the quality of tools, specifically referencing Google, has degraded over time to the point where complex systems like LMS are now necessary for tasks that were once simple.
What does the speaker suggest about the relationship between the quality of work and the use of LMS?
-The speaker implies that a lack of concern for the quality of work could lead to an acceptance of LMS adding incorrect information, suggesting a correlation between work ethic and reliance on LMS.
How does the speaker view the current state of LMS in comparison to Google's capabilities 10 years ago?
-The speaker views the current state of LMS as a regression in quality, comparing it unfavorably to the capabilities of Google a decade ago and suggesting that the need for LMS indicates a decline in the effectiveness of simpler tools.
What does the speaker mean when they mention 'trivial things' in the context of LMS?
-The speaker refers to 'trivial things' as basic information that should be easily accessible and verifiable without the need for complex systems like LMS, implying that LMS's use for such tasks is overkill.
What is the speaker's stance on the necessity of LMS for trivial tasks?
-The speaker is critical of the use of LMS for trivial tasks, arguing that it is an inefficient use of resources and indicative of a decline in the quality of simpler tools like search engines.
How does the speaker feel about the current reliance on complex systems for tasks that were once simple?
-The speaker expresses frustration and disbelief at the current reliance on complex systems like LMS for tasks that were once simple and could be handled by basic search engines.
What does the speaker suggest is the 'real problem' with the use of LMS?
-The 'real problem' the speaker identifies is the complacency and lack of concern for the quality of work, which leads to an acceptance of LMS's potential inaccuracies.
Outlines
🤔 Concerns Over AI's Unreliable Outputs
The speaker expresses skepticism towards using AI, specifically LMS, for creating tutorials due to its tendency to generate unreliable or incorrect information. They mention that the AI's ability to 'hallucinate' content can lead to significant anxiety, as verifying the AI's output becomes more time-consuming than solving the problem independently. The speaker criticizes the reliance on AI for tasks that were once easily managed with simple search engines like Google, suggesting a decline in the quality of tools over the past decade. They also question the value of AI's contributions to work, implying that it may lead to a lack of care for the accuracy and quality of work.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡LMS
💡Hallucinate
💡Trivial
💡Verify
💡Anxiety
💡Convenient
💡Out come
💡Degraded
💡Insanity
Highlights
Use of LMS for rewarding well-worded tutorials
Hallucination of content on top of LMS
LMS's ability to spontaneously generate content
Nonusability of LMS for complex tasks due to verification time
Anxiety caused by the need to verify LMS-generated content
Concerns about the reliability of LMS in specific contexts
Comparison of LMS with Google's capabilities from 10 years ago
Degradation in quality of tools over time
The necessity of a powerful computing cluster for current LMS use cases
The insanity of relying on complex systems for simple tasks
The impact of LMS on work quality and attitude towards outcomes
The problem of not caring about the quality of work due to LMS
The real problem identified as the reliance on LMS for trivial tasks
The decline in the quality of tools compared to 10 years ago
The need for a return to simpler, more reliable tools
The importance of skill over reliance on technology
The degradation of Google's tool over time
Transcripts
one thing ionically use LMS for the
rewarding abely worded tutorials and
also hallucinated some [ __ ] on top
of it yeah very cool use case like the
fact that they can out of the blue
completely hallucinate like some sort of
[ __ ] makes llms nonusable for me
honestly like pretty much nonusable
unless it's something super trivial like
super super trivial because I will spend
more time verifying the [ __ ] that they
sped out than actually figuring out
myself like I can't use that it's just
like uh the whole experience gives me a
huge anxiety like how the [ __ ] know
if it like in that specific little place
it didn't actually lie or like put some
sort of a thing that doesn't exist like
how do I know I have to like go through
everything now like how is that even how
people find these kind of things
convenient to use they're unusable
because of that or you don't give a [ __ ]
is that how you Trea in your work you
don't give a [ __ ] about the out come you
work so so much that you are okay of
llms adding [ __ ] to it like you're
that okay with
that this is the real problem honestly
this is the real problem why you don't
care about your work that much man that
is bad it is usable to remember like
when you looked up answer code again I'm
telling you trivial things the things
that Google like was completely
sufficient 10 years ago like you realize
that this is a use case of Google 10
years ago like just think about it like
think how much we degraded in quality
like the tools how much degraded in
quality that this is a use case of a
Google 10 [ __ ] years ago it's not
about no dude you don't [ __ ]
understand it's not even about skill of
Googling this is not what the [ __ ] I'm
talking about it's about [ __ ] Google
it's not about the skill the Google as a
tool degraded so [ __ ] much that for
its use case that we had 10 years ago
you need a [ __ ] cluster of
gpus think about that this is
insanity it's not about
skills it's about tools
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)