Youtube's Legal Team sent me a letter! 😃
Summary
TLDR视频脚本讨论了与YouTube和Google的法律团队之间的通信往来,涉及一个名为grj的应用程序,该程序允许用户下载YouTube内容,这违反了YouTube的服务条款。Futo公司代表grj应用回应称,他们尊重内容创作者的权利,并愿意与YouTube合作,但他们认为grj并未违反任何条款,因为它不使用YouTube API服务。视频还提出了一些关于在线平台的问题,如内容创作者被随意封禁、用户评论被删除以及付费用户反而得到更差体验的问题。Futo公司表示他们正在通过开发grj应用来解决这些问题,而不是仅仅抱怨。他们强调grj是开源的,不存储用户数据,并鼓励用户为有价值的内容付费。最后,Futo公司表明他们不会下架grj应用,并愿意为此进行法律斗争。
Takeaways
- 📜 收到YouTube法律团队的信件,指出Futo公司开发的grj应用程序允许下载YouTube内容,违反了YouTube的服务条款。
- 💡 Futo公司回应称,grj应用程序的开发不受YouTube API服务条款和开发者政策的控制,因为该应用程序并未使用YouTube API服务。
- 🚫 Futo公司拒绝停止提供grj应用程序,强调尊重内容创作者的权利,并愿意与YouTube合作以进一步维护创作者的利益。
- 🤔 Futo公司对YouTube平台的一些问题提出了批评,包括内容创作者被随意封禁、规则执行不公以及沟通不畅。
- 💥 Futo公司提到,他们正在开发解决方案来应对这些问题,而不是仅仅抱怨,比如通过grj应用程序聚合多个平台的内容,让用户在一个订阅源中查看所有内容。
- 📱 Futo公司强调grj应用程序是开源的,用户可以选择是否为应用程序付费,同时希望用户能够为觉得有价值的内容创作者捐款。
- 💰 Futo公司提到他们有足够的预算来聘请律师,并且有财力对抗YouTube的法律行动。
- 🛡️ Futo公司表明他们不会关闭grj应用程序,并打算继续为客户提供服务。
- 📉 讨论了内容创作者在平台上面临的风险,包括账户被随意删除,以及这对依赖平台作为生计的创作者的影响。
- 📝 Futo公司提到他们对YouTube平台的不满,包括评论被删除和内容下载问题,以及对付费内容服务的不满。
- 🏛️ Futo公司提到他们有能力通过法律途径来保护他们的应用程序和业务,并且在过去两年中已经在三个州通过了四项法律。
- 📈 Futo公司表达了对YouTube平台的不满,并表明他们愿意采取行动来维护自己的利益和用户的权利。
Q & A
视频中提到的grj应用是什么?
-grj应用是由Futo公司开发和分发的,它允许用户下载YouTube上的内容。这个应用旨在帮助内容创作者与他们的粉丝建立联系,即使在他们的YouTube账户被随意封禁的情况下。
为什么YouTube法律团队会联系Futo公司?
-YouTube法律团队认为Futo公司的grj应用违反了YouTube的服务条款,允许用户下载YouTube内容,这可能会侵犯YouTube创作者的权利。他们要求Futo公司停止提供违反条款的服务,并在7天内纠正。
Futo公司如何回应YouTube法律团队的指控?
-Futo公司回应称,他们在开发grj应用时并未使用YouTube API服务,因此不受YouTube的API服务条款和开发者政策的约束。他们认为没有违反任何条款,也没有理由停止提供grj应用。
Futo公司在视频中提到了哪些YouTube平台存在的问题?
-Futo公司指出YouTube平台存在用户被随意封禁、规则执行不公、不明确告知用户具体规则等问题。此外,还有用户评论被无故删除,以及付费用户反而体验更差等问题。
Futo公司提出的解决方案是什么?
-Futo公司提出的解决方案是开发grj应用,该应用可以聚合多个平台的内容,让用户在一个应用内就能看到所有关注创作者的内容,即使他们被某些平台封禁。此外,该应用还允许用户跨平台验证身份,实现统一的订阅内容流。
Futo公司如何看待内容创作者的权利?
-Futo公司尊重内容创作者的权利,并且作为内容创作者自己,他们的口号是'跟随创作者,而非平台'。他们愿意与YouTube合作,以进一步维护创作者的权利和利益。
视频中提到的'borderline personality disorder'是指什么?
-在这里,'borderline personality disorder'(边缘型人格障碍)被用作比喻,指的是YouTube等平台的算法和管理模式似乎不稳定、不可预测,给内容创作者带来了不确定性和困扰。
Futo公司为什么不愿意删除他们收集的用户数据?
-Futo公司声称他们的grj应用是开源的,并且不会存储任何用户数据。他们欢迎任何人查看应用的源代码来验证这一点。他们希望用户如果觉得应用有价值,可以选择支付,但他们也理解并允许用户免费使用。
Futo公司如何看待与Google或YouTube的法律争议?
-Futo公司表示他们不是容易被吓倒的,他们已经准备好面对任何法律挑战。他们提到自己有财力聘请顶尖的法律团队,并且有信心在法律争议中占据优势。
Futo公司在视频中提到了哪些他们已经取得的成就?
-Futo公司提到他们在过去的两年里,已经用100万美元的资金在三个州通过了四项法律,这显示了他们在法律和政策方面的影响力和决心。
视频中提到的New Pipe或YouTube Van与grj应用有何不同?
-Futo公司认为grj应用与New Pipe或YouTube Van等其他应用不同之处在于,grj应用不仅关注于解决创作者被随意封禁的问题,而且背后有一个实际的预算和专业的团队支持,他们有能力进行长期的法律和技术开发投入。
Outlines
📜 法律信函与应用开发争议
第一段主要讲述了视频制作者收到了来自YouTube法律团队的信函,该信函指出他们注意到了名为grj的产品或服务,该服务似乎允许下载YouTube内容,这违反了YouTube的服务条款。信中要求立即停止提供违反条款的服务,并在7天内删除所有违规获取的内容和数据。视频制作者代表Futo公司回应称,grj应用的开发不受YouTube条款的控制,因此无需遵守API服务条款和开发者政策。他们强调尊重内容创作者的权利,并愿意与YouTube合作,但认为没有理由停止提供grj应用。
🚫 平台规则与内容创作者问题
第二段讨论了内容创作者在平台上面临的挑战,包括随意被封禁、规则执行不公以及缺乏透明度。视频制作者表达了对这些问题的不满,并介绍了他们开发的解决方案,即一个允许用户在单一订阅源中查看所有内容的应用程序。这个应用旨在解决创作者因平台随意封禁而失去生计的问题,并提供一个身份验证系统,让用户即使在创作者被平台删除后,也能继续查看他们的内容。
💸 付费内容与用户体验问题
第三段中,视频制作者分享了他对付费内容和软件的不满,特别是他个人对于YouTube Premium的不满。他讲述了一个实例,即他在长途驾驶中使用YouTube Premium下载内容,却发现无法离线播放。这让他感到愤怒,并决定不再为YouTube Premium付费。视频制作者强调,他愿意为有价值的内容和软件付费,但反对那种付费越多、体验越差的现象。他还提到了他们的应用程序是开源的,用户可以选择不付费使用,但他们希望用户如果觉得应用有价值,会考虑付费或捐赠给内容创作者。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡YouTube
💡grj
💡服务条款
💡API服务
💡内容创作者
💡开放源代码
💡数据存储
💡法律行动
💡用户身份验证
💡内容删除
💡多平台聚合
Highlights
YouTube法律团队向Futo公司发出警告,指出其产品grj允许下载YouTube内容,违反了YouTube的服务条款。
Futo公司回应称,grj应用的开发不受YouTube条款的控制,且未使用YouTube API服务。
Futo公司强调,他们尊重内容创作者的权利,并愿意与YouTube合作,以进一步维护创作者的权利和利益。
Futo公司指出,grj应用旨在帮助连接创作者和他们的粉丝,而不是违反YouTube的API服务条款和开发者政策。
Futo公司表达了对YouTube平台规则执行不公和缺乏透明度的担忧。
Futo公司提出了一个解决方案,即通过grj应用聚合多个平台,让用户在一个订阅源中查看所有内容,即使在其他平台上被删除。
Futo公司批评了YouTube平台在用户评论和内容管理方面的不一致性。
Futo公司创始人分享了个人对YouTube Premium服务不满的经历,尤其是下载内容在离线状态下无法使用的问题。
Futo公司强调,他们开发的grj应用是开源的,用户可以自由地使用,即使不支付费用。
Futo公司表示,他们不会删除任何客户数据,并邀请YouTube法律团队查看应用的源代码以证明其透明度。
Futo公司创始人表达了对当前数字内容和服务提供商的不满,认为付费用户往往得到更差的体验。
Futo公司透露,他们有足够的预算和资源来对抗可能的法律挑战,包括聘请昂贵的法律顾问。
Futo公司创始人提到,他已经在过去两年内用100万美元在三个州通过了四项法律。
Futo公司明确表示,他们不打算下架grj应用,并将继续为客户提供服务。
视频最后,Futo公司创始人鼓励观众思考grj应用与市场上其他类似应用的不同之处。
Futo公司强调,他们致力于解决创作者因平台随意封禁而面临的生计问题。
Futo公司创始人以幽默的语气结束了视频,表示他们不是在大学宿舍里创业的四个孩子。
Transcripts
hey everybody how's it going I hope
you're having a lovely day recently I
did a video on a letter that we received
from YouTube and Google about an
application that I hired a couple of
people to develop for the company that I
currently work for and I read their
letter as well as our response a few
months ago they have S sent another one
so I thought I would read it to you
along with our response our past
responses and just give a couple of
rants from my side this is from YouTube
or Google here it says the YouTube legal
team to whom it may concern we recently
became aware of your product or service
grj your client which is being offered
at gray J.A it appears your client
allows downloading of YouTube content as
you know you are required to comply with
the YouTube terms of service at all
times which are posted at youtube.com/
t/ terms compliance includes without
limitation not accessing modifying
selling or otherwise using the services
including any content and violation of
the YouTube terms of service we strive
to keep YouTube a safe responsible
community and to encourage respect for
the rights of millions of YouTube
creators this requires compliance with
the YouTube terms of service YouTube API
Services terms of service and developer
policies as applicable if applicable you
must also delete any content including
data that you may have gathered in
violation of our terms policies and
applicable laws please note that defined
terms used in this letter will have the
meanings assigned to them and the
applicable terms and policies please
immediately correct and cease offering
your client that violates our terms and
policies within seven days in bold print
that Blackberry is not afraid of from
the date of this letter if you are
accessing or using the YouTube API
services please please provide all the
API project IDs for your client by
responding to this letter sincerely the
YouTube legal team to at May Concern I
write on behalf of Futo which develops
and distributes the grj app I am
responding to your April 17th 2024 email
to the grj support email address gray
jutooru below I would first refer you to
our response to the YouTube legal team
similar letter of January 25th 2024 I
have attached it here for ease of
reference Futo received no reply to our
response your latest message was also
not as I then requested directed to this
email address it being sent elsewhere
delayed this response as we noted in
that February 1st 2024 response Futo
respects the right of content creators
and welcomes the opportunity to
cooperate with YouTube and furthering
the rights and interest of creators then
as now however Futo has no reason to
cease offering grit as with the YouTube
API Services terms of service and
developer policies our developing this
software is not controlled by the
YouTube terms of service I again hope
this clarification ends the matter and
again request any further correspondence
to be directed to this address for the
quickest turnaround in response to go
over the last response to this which I
think was not read but probably thrown
into a shredder by an intern uh I write
on behalf of Futo which operates the
Futo Tech YouTube account and
distributes the gyj app I'm responding
to your January 25th 2024 email your
email alleges that gry J violates the
YouTube ABI Services terms of service
and developer policies it claims these
supposed violations undermine the rights
of millions of YouTube creators and ask
fudo to cooperate with us by correcting
and ceasing to offer grj Futo respects
the rights of content creators we are
content creators ourselves as is
BlackBerry Gray's slogan is follow
creators not platforms fudo welcomes the
opportunity to cooperate with YouTube in
furthering the rights and interests of
content creators that said fudo has
nothing to correct and no reason to
cease offering grj which exists to help
connect those same creators to their
fans Futo never agreed to the API terms
of service or developer policies in its
development of gr as the name suggests
the API terms of service only apply and
I quote when accessing or using the
YouTube API Services the developer
policy similarly apply quote when
accessing or using YouTube API services
in your service product or application
YouTube API Services is defined by a
bunch of mumbo jumbo there fudo has not
used any of these tools during its
development of gry J as gray J does not
use the YouTube API services and is not
subject to the API terms of service and
developer policies neither gry JN users
nor Futo can violate them I hope this
clarification ends this matter but I'm
happy to discuss the issue further if
you'd
like there are several problems with
this platform that I've talked about in
several of my videos and instead of just
complain about these problems what we've
tried to do is actually come up with
solutions for them one of them is the
fact that people get banned willy-nilly
and there is not really an uh an even or
Fair enforcement of the rules and in
many cases they don't even tell you
exactly what the rules are for the type
of content that you're allowed to post
the very type of content that the
algorithm recommends over other content
winds up being content that breaks the
rules being a you YouTube or hwit
content creator is the closest you'll
ever get to understanding what it will
be like in the future to be managed by
an artificial intelligence that has
borderline personality disorder when you
take a look at this or this or any
number of other cases these platforms
have deleted people willy-nilly and if
we are used to using applications that
only service one platform then the user
is just going to stop viewing that
content because of the friction to
installing another application and
installing another application
installing another application and
following everybody within two or four
or six applications by aggregating
platform to one application and more
importantly giving users this Harbor
application that allows them to verify
their identity across platforms so you
can see everybody's content within one
subscription feed so even if they get
deleted from these two platforms you can
still see the content they posted the
third one in one subscription feed we
are solving this problem where creators
have to worry about whether their
accounts will be the leader willy-nilly
whether it's these two creators or my
good friend Eli the computer guy who had
his channel deleted in the middle of a
live stream for reasons that they
couldn't even tell them this is a
serious issue people have their
livelihoods threatened completely when
they decide to go all in on content
creation which is one of the reasons
that I don't I rely on my business I
rely on work I rely on other things
because I don't want my income to be
determined by an AI that has borderline
personality disorder second one common
systems to be clear got a lot of work to
do on this got a lot of work to do on
this how many times have you posted a
comment and not seen it a lot of you
will email me and curse me out about the
fact that I deleted your comment but as
I've gone over and many instances this
platform deletes my own comments on my
own videos now it's one thing if I
cursed or included a link I could just
post something innocuous no insults no
curse no link it gets deleted it's
insane 12 years into this platform and
communication is even worse now than it
was in the beginning now again is this
application perfect got a long way to go
there but we're trying to fix the
problems rather than simply complain
about them another one and this was the
moment I I'll be honest with you this is
the moment where my brain kind of
exploded and again just to preface this
I have been a person that literally
before he finished puberty was paying
full price for his software this is $80
in01 $80 in 2001 with inflation is
probably 160 now but when you account
for the fact like childhood inflation
like I might I was making money by
washing bicycles and reiling and
greasing the chain for $1 you this might
as well be $10,000 for for a 12-year-old
so I have always paid for my content I
paid for my software I pay for things
that I find valuable whether using the
add to cart button or a direct donation
at the same time you cannot ignore the
fact that over the past 20 years we have
been doing this thing where the more you
are willing to pay for Content the
shittier your experience the more you're
willing to pay for software the more
you're opening yourself up to abuse it
is similar to being in a relationship
with somebody that is avoidant in
attachment style or emotionally
unavailable literally the more that you
give of yourself the shittier you will
be
treated and when you look at it in this
particular video I have a very strange
example I'll admit very weird example on
this video why I will never pay for
YouTube premium again in this video
titled why I will never pay for YouTube
premium again I'm going over I know a
very strange use case I like to stream
my long-distance drives if I'm driving
from New Hampshire to Texas or New
Hampshire to Florida I kind of like to
live stream the entire drive just so
that people could watch and you know
maybe listen what I have on the radio as
I go and one of the things that happens
if you're doing a YouTube live stream is
that it's very very buggy if you want to
listen to something so sometimes I may
want to listen to an audio book or a
podcast or something I downloaded
because I'm on the road it's very buggy
to use the same phone that I'm using for
a live stream to also play audio content
so what I would do is I would get an old
phone that doesn't have a SIM card I
would connect to Wi-Fi at home I'd log
into my YouTube account I hit the
download button and a few days later I
would go into my car and want to listen
to that and what happened here is it
would say this downloaded content is not
available you must connect to the
Internet so I literally had to drive to
a rest stop enable hotspot on my phone
connect this phone to that one so that I
could play content that I
downloaded yes a strange use case but
something went off in my head that day
something exploded where I became sick
and tired of accepting that the more
that I give the less I receive whether
we are talking about uh Netflix where I
get lower resolution if I pay you full
price for 4K than I do on pirating
whether we are talking about Sony
claiming that what you're doing is
purchasing buying and then on the page
21 of their end user license agreement
saying you don't actually own it or
whether we're talking about the
inability to read a book because you
have traveled from one section of the
world to another we live in a world
nowadays where the more you are willing
to pay the more you are willing to give
the less you will get back in return and
whether it is in my personal life
whether it is in purchasing content or
software or my business life I have no
tolerance anymore I'm done with this
concept of the more that I give the
shittier I
get the section of this letter that says
we should delete any sort of customer
data that we have stored you are welcome
to view the source code of the
application to see that we do not store
any of our customers data whether you
have paid for the application or whether
you are simply utilizing our um it's
open source so you like you literally
have the ability to have an infinite
trial so to speak if you do not wish to
pay for the application but we hope that
people pay for the application if they
find it valuable and at the end of the
day we also hope that users donate to
the content creators whose content they
find valuable I'm curious what you all
think the difference between this and
new pipe or YouTube van or anything else
is twofold a the primary problem we are
looking to solve is that creators get
kicked off of platforms willy-nilly when
their livelihoods are at stake and B
There's an actual budget here like I
could hire Quint em manual for this if I
wanted this is not four kids in a
college dorm room and I don't think that
Google or YouTube understand that
spending half a million dollars as a
retainer to Quinn Emanuel is actually an
option here and I think that that would
be a lot of fun as I said while ending
my last video I have gotten four laws
passed in three states over the past two
years with $1 million you want to play a
game we can play games but I guarantee
you I'm the one that's going to be
having fun we are not four kids in a
college dorm room and if you think we
are you are very very mistaken we are
not taking down this application we have
no intentions to take down this
application and we intend to continue
serving our customers with this open
source application that's it for today
and as always I hope you learn something
and that's not only directed at my
audience this time I'll see you in the
next video bye now
関連動画をさらに表示
New apk without Activation for play games with keyboard and mouse in mobile like Computer |free fire
Save and persist data with UserDefaults | Todo List #4
Cloudflare Can't Stop Lying
The Internet is starting to Break - Here's Why.
You Need to Read the Terms of Service for OpenAI and ChatGPT
THIS Happened AFTER a BAD REVIEW?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)