How to write the Review of Related Literature (part 2)

Summary

The video continues a series on how to write a Review of Related Literature (RRL). It recaps previous discussions about the SSAP method—Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation. The focus in this part is on the third and fourth elements: Analysis and Presentation. Analysis involves identifying research gaps, addressing controversies, and suggesting further studies. Presentation focuses on organizing references from general to specific, ensuring coherence and relevance. The speaker emphasizes the importance of presenting the literature in a structured, logical manner to support the research topic.

Takeaways

• 📚 The video is part of a series discussing how to write a review of related literature and studies (RRL).
• 📝 The first two elements of the review writing process, survey and synthesis, were covered in the previous video.
• 🔍 The current focus is on the third element: analysis, which is crucial for identifying gaps in the literature.
• 🧐 Analysis involves pinpointing limitations in existing studies that your research could address.
• 📊 If gaps can't be filled by your research, mention them as potential topics for future studies.
• ❓ Analysis also includes reviewing areas of controversy, where prior studies may have had inconclusive results.
• 📖 The final element is presentation, which involves organizing references and ideas coherently.
• 🗂️ Organization means moving from general information to specific details related to your research problem.
• ✍️ Good paragraph development in the presentation should progress from broad context to specific insights.
• 👍 The video ends by encouraging viewers to stay tuned for more research writing tips and to support the channel.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the discussion in the video?

The video discusses how to write a review of related literature and studies (RRL) in research, focusing on the steps and elements involved.

What are the four key elements in writing the review of related literature and studies?

The four key elements are Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation, which follow the acronym SSAP.

What was discussed in the previous part of the video?

The previous part of the video discussed the first two elements of the review process: Survey and Synthesis.

What is the third element in writing the review of related literature and what does it involve?

The third element is Analysis. It involves identifying gaps, limitations, or controversial areas in the previous studies and discussing how these gaps can be addressed in the current research.

How does analysis build on the previous element, synthesis?

After synthesizing the references, analysis focuses on identifying what has not been covered, highlighting gaps or limitations in the studies reviewed, and exploring areas for further investigation.

What should be done if the gaps identified in the analysis cannot be addressed in the current research?

If the gaps cannot be filled, the researcher should present these as areas for further studies, noting that they were not covered by the current or previous research.

What role do controversial areas play in the analysis?

Controversial areas, where the results of studies are inconclusive, provide opportunities for further investigation and can be explored in the analysis to address unresolved issues.

What is meant by 'presentation' in the review of related literature?

Presentation refers to the organization of references and ideas in the review. It involves structuring the literature from general to specific, ensuring coherence, and leading the reader toward the specific research problem.

How should the references be organized in the presentation stage?

References should be organized by starting with general information, including background and history, and gradually narrowing down to the specific focus of the research problem being addressed.

What is the purpose of paragraph development in the presentation?

Paragraph development helps in logically organizing ideas, starting from broad concepts and moving toward the specific research problem, ensuring a clear and coherent progression of information.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Overview of Review of Related Literature and Studies

In this introductory segment, the speaker welcomes viewers and recaps the discussion on how to write a Review of Related Literature (RRL). They introduce the process of writing an RRL using the acronym SSAP, which stands for Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation. Survey and Synthesis were covered in the previous video, and this part focuses on the third element—Analysis. The speaker emphasizes the importance of establishing continuity between the synthesis of references and the analysis that follows.

05:01

🔍 Explaining the Analysis Phase

The speaker delves into the Analysis stage, explaining how it involves identifying gaps and limitations in existing research. After synthesizing the literature, researchers must pinpoint areas that previous studies didn't address and determine how their research can fill these gaps. If certain gaps remain unfilled, these areas should be presented as subjects for further study. Another key point in the analysis is addressing controversies in past research, where inconclusive or conflicting results may require further investigation.

🗂 Organizing and Presenting References

This section focuses on the final element—Presentation. The speaker explains that organizing references is more than just arranging them in order; it requires a logical structure that reflects the flow of information. Writers should start with broad, general background information and progressively narrow down to specific aspects of their research topic. The idea is to build a coherent narrative that transitions smoothly from general context to the specific research problem being addressed.

👋 Conclusion and Call to Action

In the closing remarks, the speaker thanks the audience for following along and briefly summarizes the key points covered in this video. They encourage viewers to stay engaged for future discussions on research writing and remind them to subscribe and support the channel. The video ends with a friendly call to action.

Keywords

💡Review of Related Literature and Studies (RRL)

The Review of Related Literature and Studies (RRL) is a critical section of research that involves examining previous literature and studies relevant to the research topic. It helps the researcher identify gaps in existing knowledge, and this video focuses on teaching how to structure and write this section. The speaker emphasizes the step-by-step process of synthesizing and analyzing literature, connecting it to the ongoing research.

💡Survey

In the context of the video, 'survey' refers to the process of identifying, reading, and gathering relevant studies and literature. It is the first step in the methodology for writing the RRL. The speaker explains that surveying literature involves collecting a wide range of studies related to the research problem to build a foundation for the analysis.

💡Synthesis

Synthesis is the second step in the RRL writing process. It involves integrating the findings from various studies into a cohesive narrative that supports or challenges the research being conducted. In the video, the speaker explains that after gathering sources, researchers must synthesize the information, highlighting common findings or discrepancies in the existing literature.

💡Analysis

Analysis refers to the process of critically examining the synthesized literature to identify gaps, limitations, and areas for further investigation. The speaker emphasizes that analysis should highlight areas that were not covered in previous studies, and where the current research can fill those gaps or propose new areas for future research.

💡Gaps

Gaps in research are areas or topics that have not been thoroughly covered by previous studies. The speaker mentions that one of the goals of analysis is to identify these gaps, which allows the researcher to position their work as contributing something new to the field. Identifying gaps is essential to justifying the relevance of the current study.

💡Limitations

Limitations refer to the shortcomings or constraints of previous studies that the current research may address. The speaker highlights that in the analysis phase, recognizing the limitations of prior research is crucial for presenting how the new study can offer better insight or overcome these shortcomings.

💡Further Studies

Further studies refer to areas identified during the analysis that require more investigation. If a gap or limitation cannot be fully addressed by the current research, the speaker advises researchers to suggest these areas as topics for future studies. This recommendation enhances the contribution of the research to the field.

💡Controversy

Controversy in the context of research refers to areas of disagreement or inconclusive results in previous studies. The speaker notes that part of the analysis should involve reviewing controversial findings to determine whether the new research can provide clarity or contribute to ongoing debates in the field.

💡Presentation

Presentation involves organizing the references and findings in a logical and coherent manner. The speaker explains that good presentation means structuring the RRL from general to specific, starting with broad topics and narrowing down to the specific research question. This helps create a flow that makes the literature review easier to understand and follow.

💡Organization

Organization in writing the RRL refers to how references and ideas are arranged in a way that supports the research narrative. The speaker emphasizes the importance of starting with general information and gradually focusing on specific studies related to the research topic, ensuring that the references build a coherent argument that leads to the research problem.

Highlights

Introduction to the series on writing a review of related literature and studies.

Recap of the first video that discussed the initial steps of writing a review: Survey and Synthesis.

Third element discussed in this video is Analysis, following Synthesis.

Analysis includes identifying gaps and limitations in the existing literature.

During the analysis stage, researchers highlight areas not covered by previous references.

If gaps cannot be addressed in your research, suggest areas for further studies.

Reviewing areas of controversy in previous studies is a key part of the analysis.

Controversial or inconclusive study results can be explored further.

Final element in writing the review: Presentation.

Presentation involves organizing references in a coherent structure, not just by literal organization.

References should be arranged from general information to more specific details relevant to your study.

Organizing ideas involves developing paragraphs that move from general background to specific research problems.

The organization of references should reflect logical paragraph development and coherence.

The goal of the presentation is to establish relevance and continuity in the discussion.

Conclusion of the video, encouraging viewers to continue following the series on research writing.

Transcripts

you

hello welcome back so right now we are

in a series of discussion regarding how

to write your review of related

literature and studies so I hope you'll

continue to join us in this fight - on

how to write the review of related

literature and studies that's like ok so

to recap our discussion during our

previous video on how to write RRL

or reveal related literature and studies

we were able to establish a procedure

using the acronyms SS ap so the first

two elements were discussed earlier in

the first part of the video and as ap

refers to survey synthesis analysis and

presentation so survey and synthesis

were discussed on part 1 of our video

and this is the continuation of that

series okay so the third element in our

discussion of writing the review of

related literature and study is analysis

so we have to establish the relevance

between the second element and the third

element and try to develop a continuity

on the discussion so the second element

is synthesis after synthesizing the

references whether it be literature or

studies - the research that you are

conducting the third element which is

analysis would fall under the following

criteria

so when you say analysis we try to

discuss the following so when we say

analysis this includes the

identification of gaps or the

limitations of your study so relating

this with the previous element which is

synthesis after going through the

process of synthesizing citing and

reflecting all of the references that

you were able to go through in the

analysis stage you now try to present an

idea wherein you establish areas that

were not covered by the previous

references that you gone through so

maybe you identify something that was

not included in the study of this

particular person and you will be able

to fill that particular gap or

limitation of that study so that's what

you call identifying the gaps

identifying the gaps and assuring that

in your study this particular gap would

be addressed okay so in cases where

these gaps cannot be filled in with the

research that you are currently writing

then part of the analysis would be the

discussion or the presentation of

further studies so you would just stay

in this part of your research that this

particular area that was not covered by

your research and the research of other

references could be the subject of

further studies and another area that

you

look into on the point of analysis would

be reviewing areas of controversy so

there were studies that were conducted

but the results of that particular study

was not conclusive

therefore cotton encode controversy by

the use of the term arose and therefore

you can further investigate on that

particular controversy that was not

[Music]

answered by that particular research ok

so the last element in writing the RR L

will be the presentation so under this

element we have to establish as writers

the organization of your references so

organization does not just refer to how

you arrange the references so it should

be in a way that it reflects the doctype

method of writing so you start from

general information the background you

can also include a bit of history and

then after that you try to develop the

coherence and relevance of your

discussion by citing another reference

that would slim down the discussion so

from general to a more specific area it

may be from another country going to

your continent discussing the the

background the effect of the problem

that you are writing in your research

and then moving on towards the more

specific area of your study so it is a

paragraph development wherein you start

from a general idea or information and

then move on to a more specific up to

the point where you reach the specific

research problem that you are trying to

present this is what we mean by

organization not the literal

organization of your references but the

organization of your ideas hello

so again thank you for joining me on

this short second part of the discussion

on how to write your review related

literature and studies I hope you were

able to get the basic idea on how to

write and what to write in this part of

your research and I hope you continue to

join me and follow me on the other parts

of research writing so please don't

forget to subscribe click here and

support the channel thank you

[Music]