I was Wrong About ChatGPT's New o1 Model
Summary
TLDRIn this video, the creator tests the new GPT-1 model's capabilities by comparing it with a custom GPT model using Chain of Thought prompting. They conduct an IQ and math test, aiming to evaluate the model's logical reasoning and mathematical prowess. The custom GPT, despite not being specialized for math, performs surprisingly well, closely matching the GPT-1's results. The video suggests that while GPT-1 shows improvement, it isn't the significant leap in performance that was initially anticipated, leading to a tie between the two models in the tests conducted.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The video compares the new GPT-1 model's performance with a custom GPT model using the Chain of Thought prompting technique.
- 🆕 The GPT-1 model is claimed to excel in logic and reasoning tasks, particularly in math, due to its fine-tuning for step-by-step problem-solving.
- 📝 The video creator built a custom GPT model with specific instructions to mimic the Chain of Thought prompting, making it publicly available for others to use.
- ⚖️ A series of IQ and math questions were used to test and compare the performance of the GPT-1 model against the custom GPT model.
- 🤖 Both models were presented with the same questions to ensure a fair comparison, with the video showcasing their step-by-step thought processes.
- 📉 The custom GPT model, despite not being specialized for math, performed surprisingly well, coming close to the GPT-1 model's performance.
- 📊 The video revealed that the GPT-1 model did not show a significant leap in performance over the custom model in the math and logic tests conducted.
- 🔗 The video description includes a link to the custom GPT model for viewers to try it out and compare the models themselves.
- 🤔 The video creator expresses initial skepticism about the GPT-1 model's advertised improvements, suggesting it may not be as groundbreaking as first impressions suggested.
- ⏱️ The GPT-1 model took longer to process some questions, indicating a more in-depth analysis but not always leading to correct answers.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video?
-The main focus of the video is to compare the performance of the new GPT-3 model (referred to as '01 preview') with a custom GPT model using Chain of Thought prompting on IQ and math problems.
What is the Chain of Thought prompting technique?
-The Chain of Thought prompting technique is a method where the AI is instructed to think step-by-step, understand the problem, break down the reasoning process, explain each step, and review the thought process for errors before providing an answer.
How does the video creator plan to test the AI models?
-The video creator plans to test the AI models by giving them five IQ-related questions to assess logic and reasoning, and five math questions to evaluate their performance in problem-solving, as math is where the new model claims to excel.
What is the purpose of creating a custom GPT model in the video?
-The purpose of creating a custom GPT model is to replicate the Chain of Thought prompting technique and to compare its performance with the new GPT-3 model, providing a baseline for comparison.
How does the video creator ensure a fair comparison between the models?
-The video creator ensures a fair comparison by using the same set of questions for both the custom GPT model and the new GPT-3 model, and by presenting the questions in the same format to both models.
What was the outcome of the IQ test in the video?
-The outcome of the IQ test was a tie between the custom GPT model and the new GPT-3 model, as both made the same mistake on one question and answered the rest correctly.
What was the performance of the new GPT-3 model on math questions according to the video?
-The new GPT-3 model performed well on math questions but not as exceptionally as the benchmarks suggested, with the video creator concluding that it was not a significant improvement over the custom GPT model with Chain of Thought prompting.
What was the video creator's initial impression of the new GPT-3 model?
-The video creator's initial impression of the new GPT-3 model was that it might be a significant improvement over previous models, especially in math and logic, but after deeper testing, they found it to be not as groundbreaking as initially thought.
What is the video creator's conclusion about the new GPT-3 model after the tests?
-The video creator's conclusion is that the new GPT-3 model, while performing well, does not show a giant leap in performance over the custom GPT model with Chain of Thought prompting, and they would call it a tie in their tests.
How does the video creator plan to share the custom GPT model?
-The video creator plans to make the custom GPT model publicly available and will provide a link to it in the video description for viewers to use and test.
Outlines
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードMindmap
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードKeywords
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードHighlights
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードTranscripts
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレード関連動画をさらに表示
New ChatGPT o1 VS GPT-4o VS Claude 3.5 Sonnet - The Ultimate Test
Claude 3 Opus contro ChatGPT 4: chi è il migliore?
The new GPT o1 is now able to reason
Create a Custom GPT in 3 EASY Steps | How to Build a ChatGPT Chatbot in MINUTES (No Coding!)
How To Use GPT-4o (GPT4o Tutorial) Complete Guide With Tips and Tricks
GPT-4o VS Claude 3.5 Sonnet - Which AI is #1?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)