Comparativa de protocolos GNSS para radio UHF: Trimtalk vs South vs Farlink - Parte 1
Summary
TLDRIn this video, Jesús Muñoz tests a GNCs mode Robert receiver with three heads in various radio protocols and settings. Conducted in both urban and field environments, the tests compare the performance of South protocol, Swing tag, and Fan Link protocols at different distances. The results showcase the receiver's precision and reliability, with the latest protocol, Fan Link, demonstrating impressive range and accuracy even at 4.5 kilometers. The video also explores the impact of antenna positioning on signal efficiency.
Takeaways
- 📡 The video discusses testing different radio protocols and antenna setups on a drone receiver.
- 🔍 Three different configurations are tested: South protocol with 19,000 mA, Swing tag with 9.2 mA, and Fan Link protocol with 2 mA.
- 🏙️ The tests are conducted in an urban environment, which is noted for its potential interference from electronic devices and antennas.
- 📍 The video highlights the importance of testing in real-world conditions, such as cityscapes, to evaluate the true performance of the equipment.
- 🚗 The drone receiver is securely mounted on a vehicle for testing, emphasizing the need for stability during data collection.
- 📊 Data is collected at various distances to evaluate the performance of the different radio protocols and antenna configurations.
- 📉 The video shows a comparison of signal strength and precision at different distances, with some protocols performing better at certain ranges.
- 📲 The testing includes a switch between internal and external radio configurations to determine their effectiveness.
- 🏞️ The video also considers the impact of the environment, such as open fields and urban settings, on the drone's radio performance.
- 🔋 There's a mention of a battery discharge incident affecting the competition, highlighting the practical challenges of drone operation.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video script?
-The main focus of the video script is to test different radio protocols and receiver setups, specifically using a gncs mode Robert with three heads, to determine their performance and differences in various conditions.
What are the three head setups being tested in the video?
-The three head setups being tested are configured with different protocols and power settings: one with South protocol at maximum internal radio power, another with Swing tag protocol at high power, and the third with Fan Link protocol at lower power settings.
What is the significance of testing the receivers in a field versus in a city?
-Testing in a field versus a city is significant because cities generally have more electronic interference from domestic appliances and antennas, which can affect the performance of radio equipment.
What is the purpose of the first test mentioned in the script?
-The purpose of the first test is to compare the performance of the three different radio setups (South, Swing tag, and Fan Link protocols) within a city environment to see how well they maintain a signal.
What does the term 'p1' refer to in the context of the tests?
-In the context of the tests, 'p1' refers to the first test point or the initial measurement point used to evaluate the performance of the radio setups.
How is the performance of the radio setups measured during the tests?
-The performance of the radio setups is measured by checking the stability of the signal, the number of satellites connected, and the precision in millimeters and centimeters at various distances.
What is the significance of the 'Fan Link' protocol mentioned in the script?
-The 'Fan Link' protocol is significant because it is a newer protocol that promises better performance, especially in field operation, and the test aims to verify its effectiveness.
What is the purpose of securing the receiver on the vehicle during the tests?
-Securing the receiver on the vehicle is to ensure it does not move much and maintains a stable position for accurate measurements and consistent data collection during the tests.
What does the term 'rms' refer to in the script?
-The term 'rms' likely refers to 'root mean square,' a method of measuring the magnitude of a varying quantity, which could be used to analyze the data from the radio tests.
What is the outcome of the tests at 1000 meters mentioned in the script?
-At 1000 meters, the test shows that the 'Fan Link' protocol on the third channel (k-30 farling) maintains a very precise and stable connection with only minor deviations in measurements.
What is the conclusion of the tests at 2000 meters and beyond?
-The conclusion of the tests at 2000 meters and beyond is that the 'Fan Link' protocol continues to perform remarkably well, maintaining a stable connection and precise measurements even at such distances, which is impressive for an internal radio.
Outlines
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードMindmap
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードKeywords
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードHighlights
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードTranscripts
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレード関連動画をさらに表示
RTX4070 Ti SUPER는 사실상 하이엔드 그래픽카드다
Fundamentals of MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks|JIVISHA MAHESHWARI
Radio Wave Properties: Electric and Magnetic Dipole Antennae
NS3 Coding | How to make Point to point Topology with TCP | Very Basic | Beginner Friendly Tutorial
Internet Protocol
What is the Difference between Profibus and Profinet?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)