What Happened To The Education System? - Dr. Phil
Summary
TLDRIn this compelling dialogue, the conversation explores the challenges facing education and societal norms, highlighting issues like declining math and reading proficiency among students, the impact of COVID-19 on education, and the questionable effectiveness of certain teaching methodologies. It delves into the profound changes wrought by the internet and smartphones on society and personal identity, scrutinizing the role of social media in shaping perceptions and behaviors. The discussion further examines the effects of changing societal values on patriotism, the family unit, and the importance of critical thinking, amidst a backdrop of concerns over 'woke' culture and its implications for freedom of speech and thought.
Takeaways
- 🎓 Dr. Phil discusses the challenges facing American education, noting declining academic performance and the lack of effective teaching methods.
- 📚 The impact of COVID-19 on education is highlighted, with Dr. Phil expressing concern over the lasting developmental and educational gaps caused by school closures.
- 🔍 The conversation delves into the proliferation of ineffective teaching programs in schools, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence to support educational methods.
- 💡 Dr. Phil critiques the culture of victimhood and entitlement in academia, suggesting it undermines the merit-based achievements and erodes the value of hard work.
- 📱 The transformative effect of the internet and smartphones on society is explored, particularly regarding the shift in how young people view and engage with the world.
- 👨👩👧👦 An emphasis is placed on the importance of family and strong familial relationships as foundational to a healthy society.
- 🖼️ Dr. Phil discusses the negative effects of 'woke washing' and the revision of classic literature, arguing it distorts historical context and lessons.
- 🗣️ The conversation highlights the dangers of enforced speech and thought conformity, warning against the suppression of free expression in society.
- 👥 Dr. Phil stresses the significance of maintaining open and honest dialogues, advocating for understanding and factual discussions over ideological conformity.
- 🛡️ The importance of personal integrity and not staying silent to make others comfortable is underscored, encouraging individuals to speak up against societal pressures.
Q & A
What is the significance of maintaining strong family relationships according to the script?
-Strong family relationships are crucial because they serve as the backbone of society, offering support and a sense of belonging. When families are closely knit, individuals can approach their family members with any issue, fostering an environment where problems can be shared and solved together.
How does the script suggest addressing academic underperformance in schools?
-The script suggests that the adoption of ineffective teaching programs without empirical support has led to academic underperformance. It recommends reassessing these programs based on objective competency gains and emphasizes the need for a change in approach to improve education quality.
What impact did COVID-19 closures have on students' educational progress according to the discussion?
-COVID-19 closures created significant educational gaps due to the abrupt shift to remote learning and the interruption of traditional schooling. These gaps, combined with pre-existing challenges, have left many students academically behind, causing long-term effects that might impact their entire lives unless addressed.
How is the decline in patriotism and its consequences depicted in the script?
-The decline in patriotism is presented as a troubling trend, indicating a significant reduction in national pride and identity. This decline is concerning because it reflects a growing detachment and critical perspective towards the country, potentially undermining social cohesion and the collective commitment to national values.
What are the perceived dangers of 'woke washing' and rewriting historical content?
-The dangers of 'woke washing' and rewriting historical content include distorting historical facts and lessons, thereby preventing readers from learning from past mistakes and understanding the context of historical events. This can lead to a sanitized version of history that fails to convey the complexity and nuances of societal progress and regression.
According to the script, how does social media impact the mental health and self-esteem of young people?
-Social media impacts young people's mental health and self-esteem negatively by promoting unrealistic life standards through influencer culture. It encourages comparisons with fictional and embellished representations of life, leading to feelings of inadequacy, low self-esteem, and increased mental health issues.
What role does language and expression play in societal dynamics as discussed in the script?
-Language and expression are depicted as crucial components in societal dynamics, with changing terminologies reflecting broader social and cultural shifts. However, the enforcement of specific language and the silencing of dissenting voices can also lead to a lack of genuine dialogue and understanding among different societal groups.
What strategies are recommended for individuals to maintain their sense of identity and resilience amidst societal pressures?
-The script recommends individuals to 'be who they are on purpose,' emphasizing the importance of self-awareness, authenticity, and living according to one's values and beliefs. It also suggests making decisions based on rationality and results to navigate societal pressures effectively.
How does the script view the intersection of technology, particularly AI, and personal privacy and safety?
-The script views the intersection of technology and personal privacy as problematic, highlighting issues like 'sextortion' facilitated by AI and catfishing. This underscores the need for critical digital literacy, awareness of online dangers, and the importance of maintaining strong familial support systems as safeguards.
What is the script's stance on the evolution of academic standards and the potential consequences of lowering them?
-The script criticizes the lowering of academic standards, arguing that it undermines the quality of education and the preparation of students for real-world challenges. It advocates for maintaining high standards to ensure students are effectively equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to succeed.
Outlines
🔥 Challenges in Education and Media
This segment addresses the speaker's perception of being in a contentious environment due to his commonsensical approach that tends to challenge popular industry norms. It delves into the concerning state of education in Illinois, where a significant number of schools have students who failed to meet basic proficiency in math and reading, highlighting the systemic issues within the academic system. The speaker attributes these failures to ineffective teaching methodologies and a lack of accountability, emphasizing the dire consequences of educational neglect on the country's academic standing and the future prospects of its students.
🚧 COVID-19's Impact and Societal Shifts
The discussion transitions to the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' mental, emotional, and educational well-being, pointing out that the closure of schools exacerbated existing academic deficiencies. The speaker then shifts focus to broader societal changes driven by the advent of the internet and smartphones, likening this digital revolution to the Industrial Revolution in terms of its profound impact on human behavior. The segment critically examines how the internet, particularly social media, has altered youth behavior, leading to increased comparison, lowered self-esteem, and a detachment from real-life experiences.
👥 Social Media's Influence and Educational Ideologies
This part explores the negative ramifications of social media algorithms on young users, suggesting that these platforms deliberately engage users with upsetting content to increase engagement at the expense of their mental health. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes certain educational ideologies and methodologies promoted within schools, arguing that they lack empirical support and fail to improve student competencies. The narrative suggests a disconnect between the ideals taught in elite universities and the realities of educational outcomes, advocating for a reassessment of these educational paradigms.
📚 Language Policing and the Erosion of Critical Thinking
The speaker addresses the issue of language policing and its prevalence in academia and the corporate world, expressing concern over the suppression of critical thinking in favor of ideological conformity. The discussion highlights the absurdity of some inclusive language mandates and their potential to undermine the essence of effective communication and learning. The speaker warns against the dangers of victimhood culture, where social status is increasingly tied to perceived grievances rather than individual competence or achievements.
🤯 The Dilution of Academic Standards
This segment delves into the troubling trend of diluting academic standards under the guise of inclusivity and fairness, using examples from education where the criteria for grading have shifted away from merit to factors such as effort or interest. The speaker strongly opposes this trend, arguing that it compromises the integrity of professional fields and undermines the value of hard-earned expertise. The narrative calls for a reevaluation of educational policies that prioritize equity of outcome over equity of opportunity.
🌐 The Misuse of Standardized Testing and Inclusive Language
The conversation turns to the controversy surrounding standardized testing, with the speaker advocating for the SAT as a tool to identify gifted students from underprivileged backgrounds. The critique extends to the overreach of inclusive language, pointing out the impracticality and sometimes absurdity of certain terminologies promoted in the name of inclusivity. The speaker suggests that these initiatives, while well-intentioned, may inadvertently obscure clarity and hinder effective communication.
🛡️ Corporate and Academic Virtue Signaling
This part criticizes the performative activism prevalent in corporations and academic institutions, where language and ideological conformity have taken precedence over substantive action and critical inquiry. The speaker shares personal experiences of navigating these pressures within the media industry, illustrating the challenges posed by enforced language standards and the expectation to publicly endorse prevailing social narratives. The discussion reflects on the broader implications of such practices on freedom of speech and intellectual diversity.
🔄 Societal Pushback Against Ideological Overreach
The speaker reflects on instances where public pushback against ideological overreach has manifested, such as consumer reactions to corporate campaigns perceived as intrusive or excessive. The narrative suggests a growing fatigue with forced endorsement of certain ideologies, advocating for a more balanced approach that respects individual beliefs and choices without demanding public conformity. The speaker hints at a potential shift in public sentiment, indicating a desire for a return to more authentic and less prescriptive social interactions.
🏛️ The Danger of Rewriting History and Presentism
The discussion addresses the contentious practice of altering historical texts and symbols to conform with contemporary values, a phenomenon referred to as 'woke washing' or 'presentism.' The speaker argues that such actions not only distort historical understanding but also fail to acknowledge the lessons that can be learned from the past. The narrative cautions against the erasure of historical context in favor of a sanitized version of history that aligns with current sensibilities.
🌍 The Polarization of Public Discourse
This segment examines the polarization and entrenchment of beliefs in public discourse, particularly on social media platforms. The speaker criticizes the adversarial nature of online interactions, which discourages genuine dialogue and the acknowledgment of opposing viewpoints. The narrative advocates for a more open and constructive approach to discussions, emphasizing the importance of admitting mistakes and considering alternative perspectives to foster a healthier and more informed public conversation.
🛠️ Strategies for Resilience and Empowerment
In this concluding part, the speaker offers principles for personal empowerment and resilience in the face of societal challenges. Key strategies include living authentically and with purpose, making decisions based on rationality and desired outcomes, and maintaining open and honest communication within families to strengthen relationships. The narrative underscores the importance of self-care and self-awareness as foundational to contributing positively to one's community and engaging in meaningful social interactions.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Academia
💡Mainstream Media
💡Social Media
💡Critical Thinking
💡Victimhood Culture
💡Equality of Outcome
💡Free Speech
💡Family Unit
💡Technology's Impact
💡Educational Standards
Highlights
Discussion on the impact of social media and technology on society since the industrial revolution.
Examination of academic achievement and the declining state of education in the US.
The influence of COVID-19 on educational gaps and its long-term effects on students.
Critique of certain teaching programs and methodologies in schools.
The concept of 'quality of input vs. quality of outcome' in education and society.
The critique of elite universities and the contradiction of promoting equality of outcome.
Discussion on the perceived attack on the American family unit and society.
The effects of social media algorithms on the mental health of young users.
The discussion on the manipulation of language and its implications on society.
Highlighting the challenges of maintaining free speech in corporate and academic environments.
Exploration of the consequences of a victimhood culture.
The importance of resilience and individual purpose in navigating societal challenges.
Critique of the current education system's inability to adapt and effectively teach students.
The importance of family communication and support in the digital age.
The potential risks and benefits of embracing technological advancements in society.
The discussion on the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking in a rapidly changing world.
Transcripts
it seems like you're throwing yourself
into the thick of it here you're pushing
back against a lot of ideas that are
very popular in your industry of
mainstream media does it feel like a bit
of a war
zone uh sometimes it does uh it seems
like um the more common sensical I get
the more I rattle people's cages but
that's okay I'm used to it I saw a study
recently of Illinois public schools in
2022 that found zero students p the
state math proficiency test at 53 Public
Schools almost all of whom are majority
black and at one school which is a prep
school designed to prepare students for
their Medical Careers the per student
spendings
$47,000 for reading it's only 30 schools
and only one out of 10 kids or less can
do math at a grade level in 930 schools
which is more than a quarter of all of
the schools in the state what do you
think's happening with
Academia well that's a complex question
that uh requires a complex answer but I
can tell you the result of it is as a
country we're certainly not leading uh
academically the way we have in the past
whether it's math science reading uh
whatever we're just simply not uh
leading the charge and I can add to what
you said by saying that
nationally uh over 30% of fifth grade
ERS can't read at the most basic level
uh 30% of eighth graders can't read at
the most basic level but what's
happening is they're continuing to get
passed on to the next grade and the next
grade and the next grade and that's
happening I guess because they get paid
for passing the kids moving on to the
next grade uh
but I mean if you're not reading on GR
on grade level at the third or fourth
grade your chance of dropping out before
you graduate goes up uh like four times
normal um and if if and there are some
groups that goes up six times normal so
if we can't at least get these kids
reading we're in a lot of trouble
educationally in this country and it
doesn't seem like anybody's got a good
plan to do anything about it because
it's being
acknowledged um kind of superficially
but nobody does anything about it well
kids are going to school unless there's
some secret attendance rate changes that
I've not seen kids are attending you
know from whatever it is 9:00 a.m. until
3:30 p.m. they are in classrooms with a
teacher and the teacher is saying things
to
them I don't understand what is
happening if basic reading and math
competence isn't being
met well a lot of these school systems
have adopted
programs of of teaching subject matters
that just simply didn't work and there
was no empirical data to suggest that it
would work but yet they spent millions
and millions of dollars on these
teaching programs that just simply don't
work uh but they've embraced them
they've spent money on them they put
time into them uh but they're not
yielding the results what what are these
what are these programs what are they
well they're programs that they buy
commercially somebody comes up and they
said okay we're going to you know we're
going to take this approach to teaching
reading you know whether it's phonetics
here or it's another word structure here
or it's a it's a math approach here and
you have to look at this stuff uh to see
okay we have a competency level when we
start then you get to the other end and
you say all right let's check competency
and see how much they've gained in terms
of Competency on an objective test not
one administered by the vendor but on an
objective test how much competency have
they gained how much have they mastered
uh the subject matter and if it's if
it's not a substantial
increase then they need to do something
different and when you talk about
Illinois and they're using the state
test and it's not showing uh competency
with these kids you can't continue to do
the same thing and you know there are a
lot of these programs out there that
just simply aren't showing competency
from state to state um and they need to
change they need to do something
different now one of the things that I'm
concerned about is when covid
hit uh there were some really bad
decisions made that
created bad results mentally emotionally
developmentally socially
educationally um that those gaps have
not been closed some progress has been
made but not near enough to close that
Gap so if they weren't doing great to
begin with and then they shut the
schools down for two years and cre
create a gap and that Gap hasn't been
closed now you've got kids that are
going to really be frustrated in being
behind a curriculum and so they wind up
being
demotivated and I think it was a bad
decision to shut it down the way they
shut it down I said so at the time I say
so now and I think we're going to pay
the price for that this generation is
going to be behind uh for their entire
life life if something doesn't happen to
close the gap yeah you say that trends
that we're seeing aren't the result of
society's Natural Evolution but they've
been unquestioningly designed to
undermine our society in general and the
family unit in particular if that's
right who is designing
them
well it depends on which area you're
talking about uh let's talk about for
example
uh both un unintended consequences and
intended
consequences um I think for example if
we recognize that right now um we're
seeing a
generation that
is dealing with the internet the
technology of the smartphone the
technology of um you know iPads and
access to information that a generation
ago simply wasn't there now some of this
is by Design some of it is unintended
consequences um for example I started
the Dr Phil show in
2002 uh I started being on television uh
several years before that but when I
started the Dr Phil show the first text
message had never been sent there just
there weren't any text
messages it wasn't a thing they didn't
do that now think how much things have
changed since then because about
089 uh it's like big airplanes flew over
the United States and just dropped
smartphones on this society and I think
that was the biggest
change uh in in the human race since the
Industrial
Revolution think about what happened
with the Industrial Revolution up until
that point we were very much an
Agricultural Society right we farmed we
made we we grew the foods that we ate
and that was the cycle and so like 95%
of society uh was agricultural okay then
you move forward 25 years and maybe it's
dropped now but then when the Industrial
Revolution hit everything got mechanized
people moved into the City and a lot of
changes took place nothing has changed
the human race like that until the
Advent of the internet and the
smartphone and when that smartphone hit
and we're walking around with computers
in our hands what happened everybody
went from walking around like this to
walking around like this and young
people stopped living their lives and
started watching other people live their
lives and something happened when that
occurred they started comparing their
lives to the lives they were watching
lived out on the internet on social
media platforms and so they started
comparing themselves what they didn't
realize is the lives they were watching
were fiction they were fantasies these
influencers that we have and I I can't
tell you how many I've had on that say
yeah I'll post things up say okay I'm
going to wear this I'm going to wear
that I'm going to the NBA Allstar game
tonight and I'm doing this I'm doing
that they put all those clothes on they
take all those videos they post them all
up then they take those clothes off they
take them back to the store and get a
refund because they couldn't afford to
buy them to begin with they aren't going
to the NBA NBA Allstar game to be to
start with that's just all a fiction so
the kids sitting home watching like you
know who am I'm nothing I'm not going to
any All-Star game I don't have those
kind of clothes and so their self-esteem
takes a beating and they're comparing it
to somebody that's doing the same damn
thing they're doing which is sitting
home in a bean bag eating Cheetos
they're doing the same thing as the
other person is but they don't know that
because they're 16 so their self-esteem
takes a beating their self-worth takes a
beating and they don't have friends
because they're watching lives lived
instead of living their own you know the
average teenager has like one or less
really good friend because their lives
are being lived virtually okay so you
know that's maybe an unintended
consequence you said okay so who is it
that's got these conspiracies that are
after us well let's look at the social
media companies for example uh people
know that their kids spend too much time
on social media what they don't know is
that those are driven by algorithms and
those algorithms are feeding these
children
content that is designed to upset
them they're not giving them content
they want to see they're not giving them
content that uplifts them they're giving
them content that upsets them mentally
and emotionally why because that gets
them clicking more and the more they
click the longer they're on the longer
they're on the more ads they can run by
them the more ads they run by them the
more shared rev they have so there have
been studies done where they'll put a
13-year-old girl up because it meets the
requirements and they'll just put her
name up and within minutes she's getting
toxic content about losing weight or
doing this or doing that they'll put the
same profile up and in the description
they'll say weight loss and the amount
of toxic content that algorithm feeds
her goes up six times eight times 10
times as much she starts getting
feedback about 400 calorie diets she
starts getting anorexia sites she starts
getting all kinds of things fed at her
and she starts click click click because
it's making her anxious and
upset now that is by Design and there's
no consideration for the welfare of the
child who they know it creates anxiety
it creates depression and it gets the
kid hooked in and now they're addicted
to the content they're addicted to the
phone it pulls them away from their
family and the longer they're on there
the more susceptible they are to
Predators the more susceptible they are
to these other influences and you that's
eroding the overall fiber of the family
so all of these things
combined uh you've got people that they
start dating later they start driving
later they all of the things that we did
at a younger age when I was
15 uh years old
355 days and 23 hours I was down to DMV
waiting to get my driver's
license now they're not in any big hurry
because they're not really engaged in
the world that's not a good
thing yeah it seems like most of the
information that people get on the
internet at the moment is built not to
teach them about the world or tell them
anything that's true but to just be the
most viral mimetically absorbable
messaging that they can and what you see
with this is messages that are the most
viral are the ones that go the furthest
not the ones that are the most accurate
a good example of this would be uh
America is a bad country it's it's
uniquely cursed or toxic or or malign in
some way and you put a really
interesting study up about patriotism on
the decline and that's just falling
through the floor it's like a tiny a
tiny amount compared it's like half less
than half of what it was only a short
while ago yeah and that's shocking uh I
mean that's that's shocking and and
that's troubling to me because I love
this country I mean I really do is it
perfect of course not I mean we we've
got things we need to work on but I I
love this country and I love it enough
to acknowledge that there are problems
with it um but there are things that we
need we need to acknowledge them in
order to work on them uh but there are
things that you put on your to-do list
it's not things that you reject the
entire American experiment because it's
not perfect it's just things you put on
your to-do list things that you want to
do a better job of um but you I've said
that I think a lot of these Elite
universities right now are not teaching
critical thinking um you you've got a
lot of this ideology that is it sounds
to me a lot like socialism sounds to me
a lot like
Marxism um teaching that we're that
we're going to be successful when we
have a quality of
outcome that's insane
you're not going to you're never going
to have a quality of outcome because you
have different uh qualities of
input you have some people that work
hard you have some people that don't you
have some people that are smart and
talented you have some people that
aren't you have different levels of
input you're going to have different
quality of outcome and when you've got
universities that are teaching which
seems to me to be astoundingly
hypocritical you you've got Elite
universities that are charging hundreds
of thousands of dollars for an Elite
Education and then they're
teaching that there should be a quality
of outcome well if that's true why am I
paying you hundreds of thousands of
dollars for an Elite Education if we're
all supposed to come out the same then
what the hell I need to be paying you
all this for uh I can just go hang out
on a corner and we're all going to get
the same thing what do I need to be
paying you this for well the
universities definitely seem to be good
at teaching students to be victims or
that getting their feelings hurt by
words and being injured by something
that someone said to you should be a big
deal yeah and they're medicalizing those
feelings you know we used to get our
feelings hurt so okay sticks and stones
will break my bones words will never
hurt me but now they've medicalized that
so when they say okay this professor
asked me to write a paper that's
contrary to my value system and I'm
offended so I've now entered the
offended sweep stakes and I'm telling
you that that's mentally and emotionally
hurt me so it's like the intentional
infliction of emotional distress you go
file that complaint with the Dean's
office they've now got to deal with that
and so we've had more professors fired
in disciplined in the last several years
than we've had since the McCarthy era
because
the students have learned how to word
all of this in such a way that it has to
be dealt with because if a student um
commits suicide or hurts themselves in
some way and the university didn't deal
with it now they have a liability
problem so professors are getting caught
up in that now some of them are jerks uh
you know some professors do jerky things
and probably need to be but not as many
as we're seeing now yeah it's very
interesting what happens when the bar
stool gets flipped upside down so
typically in society what you want is
someone's reputation and their status to
be associated with their competence and
this is because people who are competent
are valuable because they can do things
and not the whole gamut of all of the
different things that people can do that
is constrained by your ability to do
something in reality you can't fake
being more competent than you are
because people will just say well show
me show me this degree of competence but
if status is afforded to the people who
are the biggest victims you can fake
there is a bottomless pit of how low you
can go with claiming victimhood well
this is the degree of psychological
distress that I've gone through this is
the amount of trauma that I've suffered
this is the amount of whatever it is two
things happen there first off it create
creates a very dangerous slippery slope
status game because people can continue
to just one up each other and make
claims that aren't ever checked in the
real world and the second thing is
people who actually do go through
difficult times they they're part of a
larger group of people most of whom are
made up of those that haven't actually
been through something that justifies it
you are lumping in together people
who've been through really difficult
times with people who just want to feel
special yeah and and it is a race I mean
you you you described it I mean people
are truly in a victimhood mindset and
it's kind of like well I can outdo you
because I have this status I'm
I I have this claim that I can make I
came from this this background or I have
this ethnicity or I have this in my uh
in in my family background or whatever
and if if you start considering this and
you start changing your yard
stick um you're in a lot of trouble
because I I can tell you if if we start
lowering standards and there are some
schools that grade someone on math for
example uh based on their willingness to
learn it their interest in learning it
what what does that even mean well I
I've had an interesting conversation
about that
recently um there was a professor that I
I I won't name I'll let him do that if
he wants to uh but he was talking about
teaching black students and he is black
uh Standard English and he caught all
kinds of hell for it because they said
he was being
oppressive and he said no no I'm not
wanting to replace the way they
communicate I'm wanting to add to
it you know they can talk in the way
that they are are in their neighborhoods
and in the way they've been brought up I
just want to add a layer on that because
if they go out into the world and they
try to compete for jobs they're going to
need to speak the language of where they
go and he caught hell for that and then
they were talking about relative math
scoring and they were saying you you
have to grade them on their interest in
learning it if if they don't care about
it then you can't grade them on the same
standard is someone that's interested in
it um well that is absurd to me and I
look I don't want to get on an
airliner and be flown by a pilot where
they lowered the standard because they
didn't have the background to master the
skill set I don't want to have brain
surgery by someone
who they lowered the standard for
anatomy and physiology courses because
they didn't get the proper background to
prepare them for it and they just fired
an NYU Professor after 20 or 30 years
because the students were whining that
the course was too hard I don't want to
be operated on by these this was a
Premed course I don't want to be
operated on by someone who complained
that the course was too hard so they
fired the professor and brought in some
hack that didn't require them to know
everything they needed to know about
brain structure so now uh they're a
resident and they're going to do brain
surgery on me no thank
you uh I don't want to do I don't want
somebody fighting a fire at my house
that they lowered the standard on
firefighting techniques because they
didn't have all the opportunities as a
child I'm sorry that's just not how you
get by In This World the problem is that
Academia and the qualifications and
the standards that people are brought to
in
Academia are malleable they can continue
to be moved the a the B the C all of
this stuff can be positioned around to
retrofit the desire the motivation the
skill set
the ability of the school the problem is
when you get into the real world that
bridge either stays up or it doesn't and
that plane either stays in the sky or it
doesn't and that brain surgery is either
a success or It Isn't So yeah you can
continue to manipulate the standards to
which students are being held up until
the point at which they get into the
real world and as you say you end up
with some pretty some pretty squarely
outcomes yeah and the problem with that
is these kids are being
taught that it is relative it's not
relative you get out into the
competitive world it's like you know I
grew up in athletics it didn't matter
who your parents were it didn't matter
what neighborhood you came from they
were interested in who could jump
highest who could run fastest and who
could knock somebody on their ass that's
what they were interested in they didn't
care about anything else it didn't it
didn't matter um that's what and that's
why that's what I loved about Athletics
it it didn't matter how much money you
had or who your parents were it just
mattered who could get the job done on a
given day and that was a real equalizer
for me because we were really poor and
when I stepped onto that field it did
matter anymore uh everybody was the same
you all started out the same and that
was a great equalizer and I and I think
that's great and these kids who don't
have they don't show up having had the
same experiences to get them ready uh
for admission to that
school uh if you're going to fix that
problem you need to go back at the
beginning and fix that from prek forward
uh they might be in a neighborhood where
the tax base is really low so they don't
get good schools they don't get good
resources they don't good get good
teachers that's where you need to fix
that you don't lower the standards when
they get there you go help those kids
from the beginning so when they show up
they are competitive you know all these
schools have dropped the SAT now because
they say it's racially biased the
research says that's not true the
research says that at is an opportunity
for those gifted kids in the Inner City
Independent of their grades to show that
they in fact are gifted and it's the one
thing that can lift them out of that and
put them into that school because it
shows their native intelligence but the
schools won't reimplement it because
they will be judged if they do and
they're more interested in virtue
signaling than they are actually helping
those underprivileged kids
that's the one thing that can poal them
right back into that school even if they
don't have the grades they have the
native intelligence the the motivation
and the learning ability uh but they
won't use the SAT because they're virtue
signaling and it's on the no good list
well it tells you everything you need to
know that the SATs have been stopped but
legacy admissions haven't right and
research is very clear the SAT helps
those underprivileged kids because it
identifies those that have the brain
power to jump up to that level what's
the problem with inclusive
language well it's gotten to the point
of being
ridiculous um that
it there's um there there are some of
these you you you can't um they're
trying
to so hard to not offend the victim
class
so we can't say women anymore we've got
to
say bodies with vaginas you can't say
hip hip hoay
anymore uh because it could offend
people with a hip injury you're kidding
that's not that's not a thing that's not
a thing it is a thing that's not a thing
you can't have an admissions office at
some universities now you have to call
it office of enrollment
management why because if you say
admissions office that suggests
somebody's going to be rejected so it's
now has to be
called uh office of enrollment
management you can't now say you you
can't now say
rapist or
murder suspect supect or convicted
murderer you have to say justice
involved person so you weren't raped you
were involved with a Justice involved
person Injustice involved person perhaps
Justice this is wild you can't say you
can't say minority anymore you have to
say historically
excluded I imagine the research for this
book must have just been thrilling going
through oh oh my God uh bodies with
vaginas birthing people um here's a good
one for you okay here's a good one for
you
nibbling like the edge of a biscuit no
nibbling is a gender neutral term for
your nieces and
nephews
it's it sounds like sibling but it's
nibbling um and lunch and learn you used
to Brown Bag can't Brown Bag anymore
it's lunch and
learn I don't even know what that is but
no M no matter what it is that how just
how widespread is this because we I've
seen these articles I've seen these
pieces about the insane new word that we
we they're menstruating people or the
the humans with smaller feet or whatever
it is that you need to kind of repurpose
but just how widespread is this are the
isolated incidents what how big of a
problem is it well
um it's pretty widespread in
universities and Fortune 500
corporations you know that's the problem
uh Chris you get
into um you know I'm I spent 21 years on
the air at CBS and I'm still involved
with CBS I have uh
a prime time show on Thursday nights at
9 o' um so help me Todd we've got
another one in pre-production now um for
their Paramount plus we've got um uh
other dramas and and all that we work on
with them and um they air a lot of my
library
episodes uh still so I'm I'm still in
business with them but uh you
they have language police I mean it's
words you can't say words you need to
say um they sign their letters with
pronouns
um
it's the things that you you you can no
longer say America is the land of
opportunity you can no longer say the
most qualified person should get the job
because because those trigger people
that might not be the most qualified so
you can't upset them uh and this is
pretty rampant in major corporations and
universities U just like trigger
warnings and you know you you asked me
earlier you said well you know who is it
that's pushing this well I'm telling you
who's pushing it it's it's it's it's
virtue signaling corporations and
univers
ities um and they're the ones that are
shaping um the minds of our young people
and hiring them with expectations I I I
I know a university Professor that got a
90-day suspension I believe without pay
uh because he was talking to a student
that came up with a or was discussing a
project and the the project design and
he said no that's kind of lame I don't
think we should do
that the fact that he used the word lame
got suspended for 90
days it makes me so uncomfortable
because I again I've read these news
articles online but it almost feels like
fiction it feels like some crazy outlier
event that's not a big deal and I don't
know anybody that's been a part of this
and yet you've been exposed to them
you've had conversations with them
you've seen it firsthand in your own
industry and I guess you know my two
worlds have been promoting nightclubs
and doing a podcast they may be the two
final frontiers of free speech because
no one on the front door of a nightclub
or on a podcast really cares all that
much about trigger warnings so to me it
hasn't entered my sphere it almost seems
like a fantasy and yet you're saying
that it's happening in the real world
well I think it's something like 80% of
the universities have in engaged in
trigger warnings but you're not involved
in it because you're
entrepreneurial uh you work for you and
you don't hold yourself to that
ridiculous yard stick that ridiculous
standard um and when you're
entrepreneurial you're focused on
results not virtue signaling and that's
a that's a great place to be Chris uh I
know I've been entrepreneurial all my
life so um but if you're in a if you're
in a
corporation um and you got a bunch of
board members and all that are really
interested in signaling that they're
really dialed
in it it starts spreading and the
universities are teaching this to our
kids so a question I've always had is
how much of what we're seeing internally
is coordination it's part of some grand
plan to try and take down America
America or to undo the will of the
people or to confuse them or to make
them feel like victims or narcissists or
whatever it might be how much of it is
that and how much of it is just
cowardice from people who don't want to
lose their job just normal job anxiety
oh well this is the new meta this is the
new meme that everybody needs to follow
this is toxic Compassion or performative
empathy and this is what I need to do in
order to be able to keep my job I don't
want to lose my job so I'll just comply
how much of it is coordination do you
think and how much of it is job anxiety
well I I think these these Fringe
activists uh are very coordinated I
think they use bot armies I think they U
scare people and threaten people and I
think a lot of people are like hey it's
a lot easier to just don't say anything
it's a lot easier to just keep my mouth
shut keep my head down and go on but I
tell you what I think that um that
pendulum is starting to swing back the
other way and if you wonder if people
are really buying into all of this you
can look and see how they vote when they
can vote silently like with their wallet
uh you saw what happened at Target when
they had the tuck
friendly um
clothing for children I mean up right
there for children to walk by you saw
what happened with Bud Light uh when
they push the CH
transgender and I think most
people um are like hey Live and Let Live
if this person is transgender and that's
what they want to
do who am I to say what they should or
shouldn't do but when you start pushing
the agenda and say it's not enough that
you're okay with what I do I need you to
stand up and
announce that you endorse this it's not
enough that you just Live and Let Live
you got to stand up and tell everybody
that you endorse what I'm
doing then they're they're pushing to
the point that people are going to say
enough is enough and too much is too
much you don't get to tell me what I'm
supposed to do I I don't I don't need
you to endorse what I'm doing and don't
demand that I endorse what you're doing
and I think that a lot of these
activists do not speak for who they say
they represent
present because I've had a lot of people
in these groups that say they're not
talking for me this sounds perilously
close to what Jordan Peterson was
warning everybody about six seven eight
years ago
even well it it is in that he was saying
that the Canadian government is
requiring that you use this language and
he was saying I will not be compelled by
the government to say what you're going
to tell me I'm I should say and that's
not happening here and it's even worse I
think because we do have freedom of
speech with the First Amendment we're
muzzling each other th I mean this I
feel like I'm mean George Orwell's 1984
sometimes when I'm seeing us requiring
each other to use certain language and
certain words we're doing it to each
other it's not the government coming in
and stepping on our rights it's we're
we're musling each other we're requiring
each other to do certain things rather
than allowing people to do what they
want to do what about the dangers of of
rewriting as
well well you know
they I've heard that referred to is woke
washing and I've seen some of the books
like Huckleberry Finn who have which
have been
Rewritten um and um it changes the
meaning of the books so much that it it
they they changed the book so much that
the meaning of the book has changed and
the whole my reading of the book was
that it was a commentary on racism at
the time I mean even when it was written
it was it would certainly be a a a
criticism of of racism by today's
standards it was a criticism of it at
the
time and but they're going to take that
out how are how is a reader a child
that's reading that book a teen that's
reading that book going to learn the
lesson in the book if you take it
out I I I don't understand that I I I I
don't get that um it it doesn't make
sense to me and I I see them uh tearing
down statues and changing the names on
some of the schools because these people
owned slaves well you have to now say
enslaved person um 250 years ago well
you know what that's something that I
refer to in the book is presentism not
my term I I learned it from someone else
um and that very simply is taking
today's
standards mores and
folkways and applying it
to something that happened 250 years ago
as though 250 years ago they were
supposed to say two centuries in the
future this is going to be different so
I need to forell the Future and hold
myself to that standard was that
abominable Behavior yes of course it was
abominable Behavior was it was it our
proudest moment in American history of
course it was it was terrible the way
these people were treated and and abused
and sold it was it was horrible do we
want to hide that from
our our our children growing up now and
learning the history of America you
can't hide that how are they going to
learn that is the lesson right that that
is the lesson I mean the
they're they're tearing down statues of
of people that crafted the Declaration
of
Independence they they're tearing down
Lincoln who wrote
the uh U it it's more than I can take
sometimes um but presentism is like
let's say there's a street in your
neighborhood and the speed limit is is
20 so you drive through through their 20
for days and days and days for months
and months and months and then they come
along and say well we're going to change
it to 10 well you think there's a lot of
kids have moved in neighborhood we're
going to change it to 10 so they come
and give you a retroactive ticket for
driving 10 over you well wait a minute
the speed limit was 10 at the time was
20 at the time well it's 10 now so we're
giving you retroactive tickets cuz you
were driving 20 but it was 20 when I was
doing 20 I know but it's 10 now you
should have known we were going to
change it to 10 so we're ticketing you
for driving 20 when it was 20 that's
what they're doing now it's like we're
going to criticize you and tear down
your statue because you were doing what
was acceptable at the time because it is
not acceptable
now
I yeah judging judging the people of
Yesterday by the standards of today
especially when the standards are moving
unbeliev believably quickly is never
going to be a good idea no one is able
to live up to in fact very few people
are able to live up to the standards of
today from today you know there's even I
have seen a lot of conversations online
that people from the trans Community the
LGBT community talking about some of the
different ways that it can be confusing
to understand pronouns or it can be I
understand that it's challenging too I
get it wrong as well it's said look if
you person who is supposed to be the
Arbiter of truth right now gets it wrong
there's no surprise that people would
have gotten this wrong previously the
thing that's interesting are the trend
that I
think seems new genuinely novel and new
is how cemented people are in their
beliefs how much less open they seem to
be about changing their mind that if
they have a belief that is intrinsic to
their sense of self they hold on to it
tightly they do not want to change it if
they do that's admitting failure and let
like destru C and they can't deal with
it how much truth do you think there is
in saying that people are less
openminded now than they were before Oh
I think they're very entrenched I think
it's confirmation bias they look for
what they look for what reinforces their
existing
belief and they are really closed off to
new
information um and and you you said it
very well when you said it's it's
changing so fast it's hard to keep up
with it now um if I'm doing a show that
uh has to do with the
lgbtq uh Community um I have
researchers that check the
glossery for what is preferred or
acceptable now even if I did it a month
ago because it may have changed and look
I I want to be respect respectful I mean
if if this is if this is the language
system they have I I I want to be
respectful in describing it I I even
said in the book I was I said I'm going
to try and describe this the way I
think they look at this now and I'm not
setting up a paper tiger I'm I'm going
to try and give you as real an
explanation of how I think they descri
cribe sex versus gender Now versus what
they did before and if I'm wrong go to
this website and check it to get it
because I'm not I'm not trying to say
this
wrong but in this day and time what they
try to do is catch we used to say catch
somebody red-handed now we say catch
somebody with the wrong word in their
mouth it's not it's not what they really
feel it's just catch a misspeaking
and jump on that bandwagon and they they
really get they really alienate a lot of
real allies if they catch somebody
saying something the wrong way uh it
might be somebody that's actually a huge
supporter that just out of ignorance
said something the wrong way or
misspoke um and I I think it is hard to
keep up sometimes uh with what's
acceptable terminology I mean I try to
do it just out of respect and maybe I
get it wrong sometimes maybe I don't I
don't know I try well I suppose again
the problem here is that if there is
status associated with being a victim
there is an incentive for somebody to
find victimhood even where there isn't
any and I guess the other side is
that people know that most people are
trying their best most of the time I
think I I fundamentally believe that
most people are good the issue is I
don't think the people that are
enforcing these rules are particularly
good so they use their own theory of
mind which is deep down I don't think
I'm a good person deep down I know that
the things that I say publicly and the
things that I believe privately are the
same thing they understand that they're
playing this game they understand that
it's narcissistic and manipulative and
aggressive and malign and all the rest
of it and they then Port that same
theory of Mind onto everybody else that
means that when when someone messes up
out of good faith they don't see it in
good faith oh here's the The Smoking Gun
that tells us that Dr Phil is the racist
transphobic bigot homophobic Zionist
whatever that we always knew that he was
and this is proof of it it's like is it
that or is it just that language is
imprecise no I think some of it's even
worse I think some of it is larous
because if they can catch someone like
me using a wrong word or saying
something that they can say okay this
runs a foul of the the current ideology
then that's like gold because if they
can jump on my
coattail uh if they catch Joe Blow
saying it wrong that's not much good
they catch me saying it wrong you're
gonna get a lot of headlines how nervous
does this make you feel you know you've
spoken about this I asked you right at
the top you're in the mid midst of it
right you are patient zero for
mainstream media there is a lot of it
around you lots of plays lots of
notoriety associated with it what's that
like what's personally what's that like
for you on a daily basis to be walking
on EG eggshells well I don't walk on
eggshells I you know I've said before
there's good news and bad news uh when
you're dealing with me
um the good news is if if I'm involved
in something it's likely to get a lot of
attention the bad news is if I'm
involved in something it's likely to get
a lot of attention so that that's why I
mean really if if they can get if they
can get me in a headline
um then they get a lot of mileage out of
it so it can be you know Dr Phil's
Gardener has a wreck I mean my Gardener
can have a wreck 30 miles from my house
and it won't be uh Bob Jenkins has a
wreck it'll be Dr Phil's Garder has a
wreck I could have been in Europe at the
time but it'll the headline will be and
I swear I could I could stop on Sunset
to get a kitten out of traffic and it
the headline will be Dr Phil arrogantly
blocks traffic on Sunset uh because they
just get mileage out of it so I've
learned a long time ago that you you
can't make everybody happy so you might
as well do what you truly believe and as
long as I know in my heart who who I am
and what my intentions
are somebody prostituting that just
doesn't bother me I don't I don't think
there's anything particularly new about
that I think yes may maybe this has been
amped up a little bit but the news has
always been in the clickbait business
they've just got better at it it's a
case they have it's a case of headlines
whatever the most aggressive fear
stoking limic hijacking wordage that
they can come up with that's what
they're going to go for and that's the
way that that's the way that it's always
been and I don't know what to I'll I'll
butcher the saying but it is the true
the uh a lie travels around the world
while the truth is still lacing up its
shoes it's something like that yeah um
and there's actually been a study about
that I think MIT did it uh and it it
actually measured this and a lie travels
six times faster than the truth and the
reason for that is a lot is simple and
quick and black and white and the truth
is never that clean it's never that
quick it's more complicated so a lie is
good clickbait it's a clean headline and
so it travels real quick have you heard
of brandolini's law it's also called the
asymmetry principle it says it
says that it takes far less energy to
produce than to refute it
therefore the world is filled with
unrefuted yeah I believe it
what about I believe it talk to me about
family I know this is something that's
very important to you is there actually
an attack on family at the moment you
know I I I think there is and I'm so
sensitive to it because I think family
is the backbone of America I I think the
family unit is is the backbone of
America and if families are strong and
by strong I mean there are good family
relationships ship kids have a good
relationship with their parents they
stay in contact they they have I mean
while they're together they have meals
together they communicate together um I
I'll give you a tragic example of this
which will speak volumes um there's
something going around right now called
sextortion and most people won't know
what that mean you probably do no no
even me the terminally online guy
doesn't know what this is well this and
AI has you know I told you I'm going to
have to start dealing with AI as things
evolve what's happening is these these
people are generating images some of
them they may have stolen from somewhere
and some of them they
generate uh
completely made up and they get online
and start talking to a young
man and they send him this image of a
girl they talk to him like they're a 14
or 15 year old girl oh it's like it's
like AI catfishing yes exactly they send
him a picture they start talking to him
and say you know I like you so much I
want to send you a picture so they send
him a nude photo and it's like I I've
shown you mine you show me yours i' I've
shown you my body you show me yours and
he's like well I'm not going to blow
this so he does he he sends her one back
the second they get it they write back
and say I am not a 14-year-old girl and
I now have a naked picture of you and
I'm going to send it to your parents all
the people in your contact list your
pastor I've got your school year book
I'm going to send this to everybody and
humiliate you if you don't send me
$110,000 right now and I did three or
four stories about that last week and
one of of
them uh killed himself in an hour and 40
minutes he panicked and thought Oh my
God I'm I I'm going to humiliate my
parents and myself he killed himself
almost immediately another one killed
himself in a matter of a few days uh
they it was just horrible I mean just
absolutely horrible why because there
was a time when families were so tight
that if something happened to one of
them it happened to all of them and you
would go to your family W with anything
and you it was all together and now
there's we the relationships are so
distant they don't feel it anymore and
these kids felt alone they felt they
couldn't do it and then we had a few
examples there who did go to their
parents and say hey I screwed up big
time uh here's what happened and so they
parents said well
that don't even talk to him anymore just
cut them off and and of course the
answer to that if you get caught in that
trap is it was an AI generated picture
all you got to do is say that's not me I
wish that was me please send it to
everybody I don't care and hang up and I
mean you you're out of it but uh kids
don't think that way and they panic and
that's because they don't have that
relationship with their parents with
their family I always tell parents talk
to your kids about things that don't
matter so that line is open when it
comes time to talk about things that do
you got to do that you got to have it
where you can talk about
anything does this suggest that family
is under attack though is this not just
a a natural consequence Downstream of
there's more things to distract people
they can watch Netflix or play video
games or or go on social media how much
of this is an
actual purposeful
attack there are six billion views of
the hashtags toxic parent toxic family
toxic
mother on social media platforms right
now six billion
views of them pedaling
no contact toxic parent toxic
family yeah it's under attack people are
out there selling that sort of mentality
and these are people that don't know
come here from go sium about family
Dynamics or how to heal a family or
anything about keeping a relationship
open or what the consequences are if you
cut off your family and if you
do and it's two years later and you're
now alone and lost and
depressed let me ask you where those
people will be then you w't be able to
find them in two weeks with a flashlight
because they're gone they don't know
squat about nothing they're just on
there spewing out blah blah blah blah
blah give me some white pills then what
are the what are the pr principles that
people can use to rely on to be more
resilient there's a lot of bad outcomes
at the moment that we've gone through
what are the ways that people can fight
back well that's because you ask
questions about problems that's why
we've gone through bad outcomes ask me
something
happy like the one you just ask of
course um uh number one be who you are
on
purpose um that yeah I I talk in the
book about 10 principles of a healthy
society and number one is be who you are
on purpose look you don't want to be
reactive to society don't just get up
and whatever comes your way on the
Internet or at work or your friends
don't be a
sheep be who you are on purpose and that
means you got a star in your own life
and I don't care you know people say
well that's easy for you to say Dr Phil
you've had your own TV show for 25 years
so yeah it's easy to start in your own
life I don't care if you're a plumber or
a teacher or an architect or an
accountant or whatever star in your own
life you've got people in your life
you've got children you've got friends
You' got parents you've got a church
you've got a team you play on what star
in your own life and that that means
you've got to decide what's important to
you and that I'm not telling you about
being selfish it's not selfish to take
care of yourself because you can't give
away what you don't have if you don't
take care of yourself if you don't love
yourself if you don't nurture yourself
you can't love and nurture other people
so if you let yourself get emotionally
bankrupt then you have nothing to give
to other people so be who you are on
purpose don't let the internet program
you don't let some IDE ology program you
choose who you want to be and what you
think is
important that is that to me is is so
critical and I I think you you pair that
up with the thought that make all choose
all behaviors based on
results and all thoughts based on
rationality and rationality means is
this thought based on
fact is it does it get me what I want
does it protect and prolong my life I
mean there there are just simple tests
that you can ask
yourself is is this really something
that that makes sense easy questions you
can ask yourself when you're thinking
something is this is this factual have I
verified this or is this something I'm
telling
myself um does it get me what I want
does it protect and prolong my life
these are things that you that that you
can ask yourself so choose your
behaviors based on people always teasing
me about saying how's that working for
you that's a pretty damn good question
to be asking you if you're doing
something how how's it working for you
if it ain't working change what you're
doing I love the I love the idea of
focusing on solving problems rather than
winning arguments I see so much so much
of the discourse online is all about
winning arguments rather than solving
problems here's a really interesting
example something I noticed on Twitter
which
is very rarely do you ever see someone
ConEd a point and say oh actually that's
that's really interesting that you said
that I'd never seen that that I didn't I
didn't see that before and there's two
two reasons first one being that
admitting defeat online is tantamount to
destruction it's embarrassing it's lame
you're supposed to have this perfectly
robust walled off Fortress of whatever
your philosophical worldview is and the
second one is that most of the rhetoric
is so adversarial and mean and cutting
and sardonic that who entering into that
type of an exchange wants to admit that
they're wrong it's so you've just taken
the piss out of me for a full thread of
of tweets I'm not going to say oh yeah
good one Dr Phil thanks for really
resetting my worldview I'm going to say
no you just called me a name before so
I'm going to call you a name and I'm not
going to believe what you say yeah and
and I'll I'll challenge you to look at
my threads and responses because I'll
have people call me everything but
decent and uh they get some good ones on
there and those are usually the ones I
respond to if if I respond and I don't
sit and typ of myself I have somebody I
tell I say all right write this down
because I type
like uh so I have my guy and I'll say
all right take this down um and I tell
them first off hey thank you for caring
enough to share your thoughts because it
took time for you to respond and um I
disagree with a lot of what you said but
I I hear you and I I I hope you'll
consider
this and fact check me and if if there
are some things I said that are not
factual then come back to me with it and
let's let's talk about that uh because I
had somebody the other day said oh I I
thought you were really into facts and
now I see you saying this I mean like
I'll never I'll never follow you again
and I said well hey thanks for saying
that you didn't have to respond at all
you could have just cut me off but
please fact check me and send me what it
is that I'm wrong about and if I am I'll
correct it and and tell you and let's
keep this dialogue
open and um he hasn't responded
yet
um because when I when when I'm doing
something on a show um I'll figure out
what I'm going to say and
do and I have what we call a brain room
and these are college professors I've
hired from around the country and
they're all over the political spectrum
and I'll have them research something
and they'll send all of that to me and
then I'll work out the points I'm going
to make
and and I'll send that back to them and
say is this
supportable and they'll say well yes no
or maybe and I'll get down to what
there's absolute empirical support
for and then when I do the actual show I
send the transcript to them to
check and make sure I didn't conflate
two things that weren't meant to be or
whatever and if I've said something that
is not what was intended or is not
supportable it comes out so they check
it before I do it and then I check the
they check the points I intend to make
and then they check the transcript
afterwards and then it goes to air so I
triple check things with a research room
before I ever say it and that book has
been scrubbed top side and bottom let me
tell you because I want to let me tell
you I want to be the place that deals
with facts
I I and if it's an opinion I say so I
say all right now I'm there aren't this
isn't one that lends itself to facts
this is just opinion so I'm going to
give you mine take it for what you will
I identify it if it's that way otherwise
I I give them the empirical data what do
you mean when you say do not stay silent
just so others can remain
comfortable what you said earlier about
I wonder how many people are just kind
of biting their tongue because they
don't want to take the Heat and I say I
don't think we can do that I think we
it's time we got to speak
up Dr Phil ladies and gentlemen I really
appreciate you coming on I very much
respect the fact that you're going
through all of these hurdles in an
effort to try and be balanced I think
it's
uh in some ways sad that you need to do
that just to protect yourself from being
caught out in the wrong the wrong uh
statement and also given the fact that
you reach millions and millions and
millions of people it's also important
because if we're struggling with
information and the quality of
information then the people who reach
the most people should be trying to
communicate it in the most accurate way
possible so yeah it's a a very
impressive way to live out your
philosophy well you know I think if
people are going to honor me with their
time I I owe it to them to do my
homework and U so I you know I'm gonna
I'm going to do the best I can and I
won't always get it right and when I do
I'll correct it and hopefully catch it
before it goes out and if not I'll I'll
say so so uh I I really enjoyed this
conversation you asked some U uh
challenging questions Chris so I I
really appreciate it I appreciate you
too thank you Dr you have to you have to
come up and see us sometime and um I'll
be down your way pretty soon I've got
some I got a lot of friends down there
Ron White and Joe Rogan and some other
guys down there that I hang with so uh
come through we'll do barbecue we can
play pickle ball we can do all of the
Austin things all right good deal if you
enjoyed that episode you will love a
selection of the best clips from the
podcast of for the last couple of months
and it's available right here go on give
him a watch
関連する他のビデオを見る
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ljtsrif-ZdM/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGGUgVShHMA8=&rs=AOn4CLDTgtPVoc49EjpI4nrAgW88xXyj-w)
Randall Collins (University of Pennsylvania): Sexual Revolution and the Future of the Family
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KEU7p8KlSVY/hq720.jpg)
Is Being Fat a Choice? | Middle Ground
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RCIWernL99c/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGH8gSiglMA8=&rs=AOn4CLCmX6hSKg-Ji1KTiWz_5xClz22rLg)
Top 3 Mistakes Men Make With Women: What Never to Do
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3trbFXj7d2o/hq720.jpg?v=662a831d)
GEF Madrid 2024: Panel: Students's view of the Future on Education
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jCmELIa7FN8/hq720.jpg)
Persuasion #1 - Attitude, comportement, communication persuasive - Psycho Sociale
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ke8oFS8-fBk/hq720.jpg)
You have no free will at all | Stanford professor Robert Sapolsky
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)