"Socialism always fails" is a stupid argument

Summary

This video script challenges the notion that socialism has never been successful, offering a nuanced definition of socialism and capitalism. It argues that socialist countries, despite facing significant challenges, have often outperformed capitalist ones in terms of quality of life and economic development. The script also critiques the double standards applied when evaluating the success of socialist versus capitalist nations, highlighting the resilience and achievements of the USSR and China under socialism.

Takeaways

• 📚 The script discusses the definitions of socialism and capitalism, emphasizing the private ownership of the means of production in the latter and the collective ownership in the former.
• 🌐 It challenges the notion that socialism has never been successful, highlighting the complexity of defining 'success' in terms of longevity, quality of life, military strength, and economic performance.
• 💡 The video argues that socialist countries often provide a higher quality of life for their citizens at the same level of economic development compared to capitalist countries.
• ⏳ The USSR is presented as an example of a socialist state that achieved significant development despite facing numerous challenges, including sanctions, isolation, and war.
• 🚀 The script mentions the USSR's accomplishments in space exploration as a testament to its economic and technological progress despite starting from a peasant economy.
• 💪 The argument is made that military strength is not a valid measure of success, with the USSR's military capability being a point of concern for the US, yet used less aggressively.
• 📈 The People's Republic of China is highlighted as a rapidly rising superpower that owes its development to socialist policies and is expected to surpass the US in the near future.
• 🌏 The script points out the hypocrisy in the West's support for capitalist countries that fail to develop, despite blaming socialism for the underdevelopment of resource-rich countries.
• 🤔 It questions the criteria used to label a country as a failure, noting that many capitalist countries have failed by these standards without being considered as such.
• 🏥 The video argues that socialist systems have provided better healthcare outcomes and more equitable access to healthcare and cultural facilities.
• 🏛️ The script criticizes capitalism for its inherent instability and the prioritization of profit over people's health and the environment, suggesting this is a definition of failure.

Q & A

What is the fundamental difference between capitalism and socialism as described in the script?

Capitalism is characterized by private ownership of the means of production, market mechanisms as a major determining force in the economy, and wage labor, exemplified by the United States. Socialism, on the other hand, involves heavy restriction or abolition of private property, with production collectively and democratically owned by society through cooperatives and the state, and market mechanisms being subordinate to or entirely suppressed by a national economic plan, as seen in countries like Cuba and the former USSR.

How does the script define success in the context of economic systems?

Success is defined in various ways, including longevity, quality of life, military strength, economic performance, political and diplomatic influence, and reductions of total human suffering. The script argues that the criteria for success are often applied unevenly, with capitalist countries benefiting from historical advantages and colonial extraction, while socialist countries are often starting from a disadvantaged position.

What challenges did the USSR face that the script suggests were not fairly considered in discussions about its success?

The USSR faced numerous challenges, including starting from an underdeveloped position, being diplomatically isolated, experiencing civil war, multiple invasions, and suffering greatly during World War II. It also faced continuous attempts at destabilization from the U.S. and NATO. The script argues that these factors are often overlooked or not given enough weight when assessing the USSR's success.

How does the script address the argument that socialism has never been successful?

The script challenges this argument by pointing out the achievements of socialist countries like the USSR and China, which have risen to significant power and development despite starting from poor conditions and facing external pressures. It also highlights the higher quality of life provided by socialist systems at similar levels of economic development compared to capitalist ones.

What is the script's stance on the comparison of military strength between the USSR and the United States?

The script argues that the USSR's military strength, while powerful, was not used as liberally as America's and was more about maintaining parity with the United States, which it characterizes as a warmonger. It also mentions that the USSR often pleaded with the U.S. to stop the arms race.

How does the script discuss the economic performance of the USSR?

The script acknowledges the USSR's rapid development from a peasant backwater to a space-faring superpower within decades. It emphasizes that the USSR's economic performance was impressive given the challenges it faced, and it compares this to the U.S., which had a head start and different starting conditions.

What role does the script suggest that the United States played in the development of other countries?

The script suggests that the United States has often played a role in keeping other countries poor through mechanisms that enrich the imperial core, such as Western Europe and North America, while also benefiting the wealthy sectors of those countries at the expense of the third world.

How does the script characterize the People's Republic of China's rise to power?

The script characterizes China's rise as a result of Mao-era policies and accomplishments, suggesting that without these socialist foundations, China would not have achieved its current level of development. It also predicts that China is expected to surpass the United States in economic power within a few years.

What is the script's view on the concept of 'failure' in the context of economic systems?

The script argues that the concept of failure is often applied inconsistently, with capitalist countries being spared from the label despite facing economic collapses and political changes. It suggests that socialism has been unfairly scrutinized and that capitalist systems, like the U.S., can fail in providing a dignified existence for their citizens despite their wealth and power.

How does the script discuss the role of capitalism in global inequality and the exploitation of resources?

The script suggests that capitalism is built on the logic of infinite growth on a finite planet, leading to boom and bust cycles and the sacrifice of people's health and the environment for profit. It contrasts this with socialism, which it says has been more capable and willing to provide benefits for populations as a whole.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Defining Socialism and Capitalism

The script begins by challenging the common misconceptions about socialism and capitalism. It clarifies that a capitalist country is characterized by private ownership of the means of production and market mechanisms, exemplified by the United States. In contrast, socialism involves heavy restrictions on private property, with collective and democratic ownership of production means, as seen in Cuba and the former USSR. The video also addresses the nuance of defining success in terms of longevity, quality of life, military strength, and economic performance, and criticizes the double standards often applied when comparing socialist and capitalist countries.

05:01

🌟 The Success of Socialist Countries

This paragraph discusses the achievements of socialist countries despite various challenges. It highlights the USSR's resilience and development over seven decades, starting from an underdeveloped state and facing numerous adversities such as sanctions, isolation, civil war, and World War II. The script argues that socialist countries generally provide a higher quality of life, better housing, healthcare, education, and cultural development compared to capitalist countries at the same level of economic development. It also touches on the USSR's military strength and its cautious approach to the arms race, contrasting it with the United States' warmongering history.

10:02

🚀 The Rise of China and Socialist Policies

The script then shifts focus to the People's Republic of China, emphasizing its rapid development and the role of Mao-era policies. It predicts that China will surpass the United States in development in the near future, with a confident and supportive population. The paragraph also discusses the impact of socialism on breaking neocolonial dependence and benefiting the populations of third-world countries, and it criticizes the United States for its efforts to sabotage socialist countries through various means. The success of socialist thought is evident in the support it garners from revolutionary and independence movements worldwide.

15:04

💡 The Failure of Capitalism and the Success of Socialism

The final paragraph delves into the concept of failure, challenging the notion that socialist countries have universally failed. It points out the double standards in evaluating the success or failure of countries based on their political systems. The script contrasts the stability and achievements of countries like Cuba despite sanctions with the issues faced by the United States, such as stagnant wages, debt, and inequality. It argues that capitalism, with its boom-and-bust cycles and prioritization of profit over people's well-being, is the real failure. The paragraph concludes by urging viewers to consider the vested interests that may drive the negative portrayal of socialism and the importance of a nuanced understanding of history.

Keywords

💡Socialism

Socialism is an economic and political system where the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned or regulated by the community as a whole. In the video, socialism is contrasted with capitalism, emphasizing collective ownership and democratic control over production. The script discusses socialism in the context of countries like Cuba and the USSR, highlighting their economic planning and lack of private property.

💡Capitalism

Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods and services for profit. It is characterized by market mechanisms and wage labor. The video script uses the United States as an example of a capitalist country and contrasts it with socialist systems, discussing the disparities in wealth distribution and social welfare.

💡Means of Production

The means of production refers to the resources used to produce goods and services, such as factories, machinery, and labor. The script explains that in a capitalist country, these are privately owned, while in a socialist country, they are collectively and democratically owned by society.

💡Quality of Life

Quality of life encompasses the level of health, comfort, and happiness experienced by individuals or societies. The video argues that socialist countries generally provide a higher quality of life in terms of housing, healthcare, education, and cultural development, despite being at the same level of economic development as capitalist countries.

💡Economic Performance

Economic performance measures how well an economy is doing, often through indicators like GDP growth, employment rates, and standard of living. The script uses the USSR's rapid development and space conquests as examples of strong economic performance under socialism, despite starting from a less developed position.

💡Unequal Exchange

Unequal exchange is a concept where wealth is transferred from one country or group to another through trade, often benefiting the richer party at the expense of the poorer one. The video mentions this in the context of how capitalist countries maintain wealth disparities and keep resource-rich countries poor.

💡Colonial Extraction

Colonial extraction refers to the exploitation of resources and labor from colonies by colonial powers. The script points out that some countries benefited from centuries of colonial extraction, which contributed to their political stability and economic development, while former colonies suffered and faced challenges in development.

💡People's Republic of China

The People's Republic of China is highlighted in the script as an example of a rapidly rising superpower that owes its development to socialist policies and the accomplishments of the Mao era. The video suggests that China's expected surpassing of the United States in economic terms is a testament to the effectiveness of socialist strategies.

💡Neocolonial Dependence

Neocolonial dependence is a situation where former colonies remain economically and politically dependent on their former colonial powers. The script argues that socialism helps break these ties, allowing countries like Cuba and Vietnam to develop for the benefit of their populations rather than the profits of the wealthy in imperial core countries.

💡Stasi

The Stasi was the secret police of East Germany, known for its extensive surveillance and repression. The video script contrasts the criticism of the Stasi with modern surveillance practices in the United States, suggesting a double standard and highlighting the hypocrisy in condemning socialist states for actions that capitalist societies also engage in.

💡Infinite Growth

Infinite growth refers to the economic concept where constant expansion is sought without considering the limits of resources or the environment. The script criticizes capitalism for being based on this flawed logic, which leads to environmental degradation and economic instability, in contrast to the more sustainable approach suggested by socialism.

Highlights

Defining socialism and capitalism: Capitalism involves private ownership of production means and market mechanisms, exemplified by the US; socialism restricts private property, with collective and democratic ownership, exemplified by Cuba and the USSR.

Success in a country can be measured by longevity, quality of life, military strength, economic performance, and political influence, not just by comparison to world powers.

The argument that socialism has never been successful is flawed due to the lack of clear definitions and uneven comparisons.

Socialist countries often provide a higher quality of life in terms of housing, healthcare, education, and cultural development, compared to capitalist countries at the same economic level.

The USSR's longevity and achievements, despite starting underdeveloped and facing numerous adversities, challenge the notion of socialism's failure.

Military strength is an unfounded fear when comparing the USSR and the US, with the former advocating for arms reduction.

Economic performance of the USSR, starting as a peasant society and reaching space conquest within decades, demonstrates remarkable progress.

The People's Republic of China's rapid development is attributed to Mao-era policies, expected to surpass the US in the near future.

Socialist countries like Cuba and Vietnam have broken neocolonial dependence, benefiting their populations over imperial core profits.

The US and other Western countries often overlook their own issues while scrutinizing socialist nations' failures.

The capitalist system is inherently flawed, with boom and bust cycles, prioritizing profit over people's health and the environment.

The US, despite being the richest country, faces issues like stagnant wages, debt, and inequality, questioning its success as a capitalist nation.

Cuba, despite sanctions, has a healthcare system that outperforms many developing countries, indicating success in providing for its citizens.

The argument that 'insert X socialist country failed' is often used to shut down conversation and lacks nuance.

Capitalist countries are often given a pass on failures, while socialist countries are heavily scrutinized and their achievements downplayed.

The video challenges viewers to consider why they recoil at the mention of socialism and to question the narratives they've been given.

The video concludes by emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of history and the importance of not ignoring the facts about socialist countries.

Transcripts

hello we are the argument fairly often

but insert X social's country failed or

socialism has never been successful

honestly it's a strange argument to make

let's humor this probably real person in

your life though firstly how would they

Define Socialism or capitalism for that

matter Norway isn't socialist for

example

for ease a capitalist country is one

with private ownership of the means of

production meaning factories lion

capsule Etc Market mechanisms as a major

determining force in the economy and

wage labor the prototypical example of

this is the United States a socialist

country is one where private property is

heavily restricted if not outright

abolished we're not talking about

personal property here that means the

production are collectively and

democratically owned by Society through

cooperatives and the state there is some

form of a national economic plan and

Market mechanisms are either subordinate

to the plan or entirely suppressed

referring to the likes of Cuba the USSR

Etc as socialist in this video and no

that doesn't make them perfect or any

other nonsense you may have just thought

of there's of course a lot more Nuance

to this discussion but I'm trying to

keep it brief without clear definitions

you can't have a conversation so check

out these two videos if you're

interested in further details

now more importantly how would one

define success longevity quality of life

military strengths economic performance

political and diplomatic influence

ceasing to exist or not measuring up or

not to world powers of the time

reductions of total human suffering

perhaps the conversation becomes stale

because the comparisons are never even

filled relatively politically stable

countries that suffered no major

external restriction and benefited from

centuries of colonial extraction for

example France are compared to

semi-futile former colonies that had

just won their independence in the grand

scheme of things and were made to suffer

for it by those same formerly Colonial

powers for example Vietnam by all these

criteria this or that socialist country

meet all of those previous expectations

and in many cases far exceed them on the

flip side many capitalist countries

simply don't the trick in this game

though is to excuse or look over

capitalism's failure at developing

otherwise resource-rich countries this

is done through dedicated mechanisms of

keeping them poor while enriching the

Imperial core Western Europe North

America

Etc and even then all those third world

profits usually flow only to the already

very wealthy top sectors of those

countries in the Imperial core this

delves into concepts of unequal exchange

and value transference a concept I'll

touch on in another video Let's actually

get to comparing we'll use the classic

example the USSR lasted seven decades

despite starting off from position as

underdeveloped as India in the early

20th century it was immediately besieged

sanctioned diplomatically isolated and

not given International recognition into

the 30s torn apart by a civil war an

external Invasion by over a dozen

countries overtaken by German invasion

World War II in which it suffered far

more than any other country in Europe

perpetually suffering from U.S and NATO

attempts at destabilization afterwards

and plenty more already a comparison

without taking these factors into

account is incredibly disingenuous if

we're going by quality of life well I

made several videos on that in short

socialist countries in general provided

a higher quality of life for their

population at the same level of Economic

Development meaning whatever

capabilities a country may have all

things equal socialism would provide

better housing Health Care education

women's rights cultural development and

so on than if the country were to be

capitalist you get some common

objections to this point but they all

fall flat skew data old research blah

blah etc etc which I deal with in the

above videos you just saw on screen

moving on the idea of military strength

is silly to even mention as the greatest

unfounded honestly fear of the US was

the ussr's military capability which

although powerful was used far less

liberally than Americas in fact the USSR

had pleaded with the us to stop the arms

race frequently stating that whatever

you develop

with neutron bomb development the Star

Wars program Etc being Prime examples it

was less an arms race in reality and

more of it keeping a parity with a

warmonger in the United States which

need to remind you has been at War 225

out of 243 years since 1776. regardless

even military strength a ridiculous

yardstick that falls apart at further

scrutiny isn't valid for this analysis

economic performance is also one of

those things that goes without saying

the USSR started as a peasant Backwater

where wooden plows were being used and

within three decades had conquered the

cosmos they Rose to such a high level

that to this day people still unfairly

compare it to the US a country that had

two centuries of development ahead of

the USSR and started off in far better

circumstances also not forgetting the

horror of the enslavement of One race

and the genocide of another take a look

at the book The Triumph of evil

on top of this the USSR had to endure

the aforementioned brutal Civil War

multiple invasions sanctions destruction

brought by the Germans as they destroyed

everything they came across etc etc this

point cannot be understated because it's

always forgotten and many times emitted

intentionally from the conversation

through all these trials the Soviet

Union not only recovered but was

competing with history's largest power

of the United States and even surpassing

it in certain cases

undoubtedly had it not been illegally

dissolved against the Democratic will of

the Soviet people and may have even

surpassed the us in our current age the

second rapidly Rising superpower this

time of the 21st century is the People's

Republic of China which could have never

achieved its current level of

development without Mao era policies and

accomplishments in fact China is

expected to surpass the United States in

just a few years and I'll do this with a

population more or less confident in

their development and agreeing with the

general direction their government is

taking at least a lot more than the Us

and other contemporary liberal states

along with a doubling real income by the

decade and more that's not mentioning

all the other examples that can be

listed from Cuba to Vietnam and Beyond

breaking the ties of neocolonial

dependence and resource extraction to

benefit the actual population of those

third world countries over the profits

of people unfathomably wealthy and

politically connected within the

Imperial core is the program of

socialism both historically as well as

today most clearly of all it showed in

all those countries despite the

sanctions and other hurdles artificially

placed upon them

honestly shouldn't go without saying but

if socialism will fail on its own

inevitably why does the US suspend so

many billions to sabotage invade bombs

sanction diplomatically isolate and

assassinate for just one example take a

look at this video here

back to the video in just a second let's

hear from today's sponsor Atlas VPN for

a lot of research that I do for my

videos I end up hitting pages that

aren't available in my location that's

frustrating as you can imagine GE

restriction really does suck but not

with Atlas VPN for those unaware a

virtual private Network makes all of

your internet traffic travel through an

encrypted tunnel this way it protects

you from spying public Wi-Fi dangers and

hides your IP address and your online

activities it even allows you to change

your location for all your researching

needs developed by top cyber security

Specialists and I.T engineers in 2019

Atlas VPN was created to make the

internet accessible and secure for

everybody currently it has more than 6

million users worldwide and boasts the

best VPN deal on the market with the

most affordable online protection plan

for just under two dollars per month if

you can believe it with a 30-day

money-back guarantee so what are you

waiting for go down to the description

and click that link and use my code

Hakeem to get a three-year subscription

for just 183 a month with three months

free but that's not all you get blazing

fast speeds for stream air gaming

unlimited protection from all your

devices and inbuilt add ml or blocker

and you'll get to save some extra cash

as Atlas VPN will find you the best deal

online for from everything from your

online subscriptions to Airlines hotels

and more right now Atlas VPN is running

a huge discount it means you can get a

three-year subscription for just 183 a

month with a 30 day money back guarantee

time is running out so get your deal by

clicking the link in the video

description below

massive thanks status VPN for the

sponsorship this is what allows me to

pay my editor fairly so the support is

highly appreciated alright back to the

video

if we were to go buy a social political

or diplomatic influence well this too is

fairly clear communism was considered to

be the greatest threat to the status quo

in the 20th century and continues to be

practically every single revolutionary

or Independence Movement sought Aid in

diplomatic support from the USSR

meanwhile every puppet dictator from

Latin America to Africa ran to the US

for protection every genuine Progressive

domestic movement has had some socialist

flavor usually of the pro-existing

socialism type from the US to Latin

America and each one was brutally shut

down with American help and fear of the

influence of socialist thought

furthermore I don't think the recent

upswing in anti-commiss medium

publication has gone unnoticed either

how about ceasing to exist Does that

mean a country has failed Iraq my

country is a massive mess yet it still

exists in some certain political order

does that mean it's succeeding if you

doubt it's failure then check out my two

recent videos in Iraq here

these terms are so vague and just

pointless they only serve to end the

conversation before this even started

how many countless capitalist countries

have quote-unquote failed because of

economic collapse political change or

military takeover far more than

socialist countries I can assure you

regarding human suffering this one is

tricky to calculate of course far more

has occurred under capitalism than under

socialism and if you believe the 100

million lie that's been reproduced time

and time again just know that's all well

nonsense they count non-births through

extrapolation and fertility data they

count dead Nazis on the Eastern front in

the total the Aether sleight of hand at

fifty thousand or a million just for the

memes amongst other fantasies if you're

interested in a deeper dive check out my

death total capitalism video here

regardless socialism has been

empirically proven through numerous

studies to provide better Healthcare

outcomes better nutrition more Equitable

access to healthcare and cultural

facilities as well as a more robust

system of care in general in society

things regular people actually need use

and objectively defined quality of life

likewise in the Soviet example with

Leisure more free time more Cultural

Center spas or treats for regular people

regular day-to-day life basically no

rent incredibly cheap Staples widespread

and accessible public transport Etc and

even working life with shorter and less

demanding working days as you're not

there to maximize profit it's good to

keep in mind to not fall into the crap

Austria for example might be nice in

their living standards but Senegal for

example doesn't and perhaps cannot

provide these amenities despite both of

them being capitalist socialism so far

has been the only system that has been

both economically capable and

politically willing to provide these

benefits for their populations as a

whole

let's discuss failure then how would you

define failure collapse in that case did

the Roman Empire fail did the numerous

Portuguese republics fail terms need to

be defined to me it sounds as more of an

emotional attacker than an objective

characterization if equally poor

starting position capitalist countries

achieve the same level of development as

socialist countries along with all the

hurdles artificially placed upon them

they'd be considered Miracles likewise

when your average capitalist country

think Bangladesh Ecuador Kenya Etc

collapses from some form of political

order it's never seen as a failing of

capitalism or shocked up to corruption

or some other nebulous explanation it

seems that only liberal quote-unquote

democracies are spared from being

considered a failure in the fullest

sense here's some food for thought the

United States is the richest country on

Earth and arguably in all of history yet

stagnant real wages despite skyrocketing

productivity most Americans can't afford

a 500 emergency people are drowning in

student and other debt there is no place

in the US where minimum wage workers can

afford rent and nearly half of Americans

don't earn enough to afford even a

one-bedroom rental inflation is

destroying savings and making any

likelihood of ever owning something in

actual fantasy infrastructure is

crumbling widening income inequality

climate catastrophe American government

support for every fascist Tyrant and

every dictator I could go on and on

rampant poverty unemployment

homelessness serious issues with women's

rights amongst many other things people

prefer to die rather than go into

medical debt stable employment and

workers rights are regularly trampled in

pursuit of profits as we've seen in Ohio

recently school shootings crumbling

indication is this not failure to remind

you this is with no sanctions on the US

no foreign Invasion no internal sabotage

nothing the American government has

every privilege it is the political

military and economic hegemon it

regularly dictates the policy of other

countries thousands of miles away to its

own benefit it dictates international

trade and dominates it through its

currency it can get away with whatever

it wants and still manages to not

guarantee a respectable and dignified

existence for all or even most of its

citizens Cuba a sanctioned third world

targeted by the largest superpower ever

known as a thriving and efficient

Healthcare System that is the Envy of

all developing countries they have a

stronger track record than the United

States when it comes to life expectancy

infant mortality child malnutrition

literacy and far more how is this not

success in comparison capitalism is a

system built on top of the cancer cell

logic of infinite growth despite a

finite planet with finite resources A

system that breaks down every few years

as a result of inherent boom and bust

cycles of which young people have

experienced several once in a lifetime

economic catastrophes a system where

People's Health and environment are

regularly sacrificed on the altar of

profit this is the definition of failure

the capitalist system working as it's

supposed to

but the fallacy in all this is to ignore

these facts and to only consider the

richest countries as capitalists France

U.S Britain Etc while ignoring places

like Peru Bhutan the Congo Moldova or

other less palatable yet fully

capitalist examples to use the Richard

wolfline if you had a car or electrical

grid system or even a roommate as

unstable as capitalism you would have

left a long time ago again I reiterate

my earlier point the insert X socialist

country failed statement is a sad and

Petty non-argument used to end the

dialogue before it even begins its use

shows less of a nuanced understanding of

history and more a certain level of

ignorance usually mixed with American

sexualism or a severe malanite scrutiny

placed over socialist Nations that

doesn't cross over to capitalist ones

unsurprisingly that honestly is the Crux

of the matter the most minute negative

of a socialist country is not only

magnified it's blown out of proportion

or outright lied about and the largest

most blatant positives are so heavily

and unfairly and in many cases

incorrectly scrutinized as to diminish

their accomplishments and trivialize

their struggles meanwhile capitalist

country usually wealthy Western ones can

get a pass I'll give you an example the

East German secret police deshdasi is

spoken of in ill terms to this day

hilariously by Americans who live in

practically bugged houses with numerous

public and private agencies spying on

their every word move and of course

purchase where their every detail is

intimately known they will condemn the

East Germans while not batting an eye at

their own peculiar situation of course

that's not to absolve the Stasi but to

give you food for thought you were told

that East Germany was the height of

totalitarianism for this but you living

in a hellscape far more grotesque and

they tell you not to worry as if you

ever worried at all if you're interested

in these Germany take a look at the

bookishtasi state or socialist Paradise

for a deeper dive

regardless it's a reproducible pattern

some will condemn Soviet utilitarian

housing blocks meant for temporary

post-war housing while living in

incredibly small apartments themselves

where two-thirds of their paychecks go

towards rent and homelessness is rampant

if you instantly recoil when hearing

Socialism or communism ask yourself why

maybe those that continuously villainize

social examples and ideas have a vested

interest in keeping the population

ignorant of the facts but those who own

everything those with all the money they

would never lie right

and that's about it for today if you

enjoy what I do then please consider

supporting me on patreon really does

help I'd like to thank my patrons so

thank you too Marcus lenuson red

commissar Adeline Hamid femi gavia 2000

Sushi fushi Victor Nyan hackerman

brisquette Eric ceterkist Julian Kovacs

weeb trash missey olinsky n3asu ugabuga

Jaybird chrislys Emily eater dude 420

Meiji

[Music]

Sean Stevens vegan Marxist Jeremy Miller

uretan prolif Tomas oljesky loose Vader

Nicolo guarantulo shiveru soleian D

furry comrade mantis himself Francis

fish Gregory samsa Chemtrails just lines

of coke for Jesus oh my God

John batakia Ryan Brown box Cinnabon

Badger fishtail will Edwin harmatto

vanbag Derek Joseph Abboud and Bananaman

ultimate thanks for watching thank you