Don’t Buy the Wrong Resolution - 1080p vs 1440p vs 4K

techless
8 Sept 202212:27

Summary

TLDRThis video compares three 27-inch AOC gaming monitors with varying resolutions: 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. The script explores the impact of resolution on gaming and general use, highlighting the impressive clarity of 4K despite its high cost and performance hit. It also discusses the benefits of 1440p as a balance between cost, image quality, and frame rates, especially for competitive gaming. The video is sponsored by Squarespace and provides a discount code for viewers.

Takeaways

  • 🖥️ The video compares three 27-inch AOC IPS panel gaming monitors with different resolutions: 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.
  • 🔍 The 4K monitor impresses with its clarity and smoothness, especially noticeable in text and graphics.
  • 💻 Despite the high cost, the 4K monitor's pixel density (163 PPI) provides a noticeably sharper image compared to 1440p (109 PPI) and 1080p (82 PPI).
  • 💰 High refresh rate 4K monitors are expensive, with an average price significantly higher than 1440p and 1080p monitors.
  • 🕔 The 1080p monitor, while affordable, shows visible pixels at a normal viewing distance, making the image appear less cohesive.
  • 📏 Pixel density is crucial; a 24-inch 1080p monitor has a higher pixel density (93 PPI) and looks better than a 27-inch 1080p.
  • 🎮 For fast-paced gaming, the performance hit from upgrading to a 4K monitor can reduce frame rates significantly, affecting gameplay.
  • 🤔 The 'Retina display' concept suggests that beyond a certain pixel density, additional pixels are unnoticeable to the human eye.
  • 🎖️ 1440p monitors are popular as they offer a balance between resolution, frame rate, and cost.
  • 🏆 For competitive gaming, especially in esports titles, the slight visual improvements of higher resolutions may not justify the frame rate loss.
  • 🌐 The video is sponsored by Squarespace, which is highlighted as an easy platform for creating websites with various templates and customization options.

Q & A

  • What are the main differences among the three AOC monitors discussed in the video?

    -The main differences among the three AOC monitors are their resolutions: one is a 1080p monitor, another is a 1440p monitor, and the third has a 4K display, all within the same 27-inch IPS panel form factor.

  • What is the refresh rate of the 1080p and 1440p AOC monitors mentioned in the video?

    -Both the 1080p and 1440p AOC monitors technically have a refresh rate of 165 Hertz, but for the video, they were set to run at 144 Hertz.

  • How does the 4K monitor compare to the 1440p and 1080p monitors in terms of pixel density?

    -The 4K monitor has a pixel density of 163 pixels per inch (ppi), which is higher than the 1440p monitor's 109 ppi and significantly higher than the 1080p monitor's 82 ppi.

  • What is the average price difference between 4K, 1440p, and 1080p monitors according to the video?

    -The average price of the 10 most popular 4K monitors in Germany is about 680 euros, which is a significant price jump from 1440p monitors that average 79 euros more expensive than 1080p monitors.

  • What is the viewing experience like for the 1080p monitor at a normal viewing distance?

    -At a normal viewing distance, the 1080p monitor's individual pixels are easily visible, making the image appear less smooth and cohesive compared to the higher resolution monitors.

  • What is the term 'Retina display' and what does it signify in terms of pixel density?

    -The term 'Retina display' is a marketing term used by Apple to describe a display resolution that is high enough that the human eye cannot discern individual pixels. It is based on the concept that a display should have at least 57 pixels per degree of our field of view.

  • According to the video, which of the three monitors would qualify as a 'Retina display' at a typical viewing distance?

    -The 27-inch 4K monitor would qualify as a 'Retina display' even at a typical viewing distance, while the 1440p and 1080p monitors would require a viewing distance of more than 90 centimeters to qualify.

  • What is the impact of upgrading from a 1080p to a 1440p monitor on gaming performance in terms of FPS?

    -Upgrading from a 1080p to a 1440p monitor results in a noticeable reduction in FPS, with an average drop of about 28 FPS, depending on the game and hardware.

  • How does the video suggest the performance difference when upgrading from 1440p to 4K in gaming?

    -The video suggests that upgrading from 1440p to 4K results in a significant performance hit, with an average FPS reduction of 47, making it less desirable for fast-paced gaming.

  • What is the recommendation for gamers looking for the highest refresh rates and why?

    -For gamers seeking the highest refresh rates, especially above 300Hz, the recommendation is to opt for a 1080p monitor, as these typically offer the highest refresh rates available.

  • What is the conclusion about 1440p monitors in the context of gaming and cost?

    -The conclusion is that 1440p monitors are popular because they offer a good compromise between resolution, frame rate, and cost, making them suitable for most gamers.

Outlines

00:00

🖥️ Comparing 27-inch Gaming Monitors: Resolution Impact

This paragraph introduces a comparison of three AOC 27-inch IPS panel gaming monitors with varying resolutions: 1080p, 1440p, and 4k. The narrator admits to being impressed by the clarity of the 4k display despite the high cost associated with 4k monitors. The paragraph also touches on the technical specifications of the monitors, such as refresh rates, and the subjective experience of viewing text and graphics at different resolutions. The sponsor, Squarespace, is mentioned, but the main focus remains on the visual differences between the monitors.

05:02

💰 The Cost and Pixel Density of Monitor Resolutions

The second paragraph delves into the financial aspect of choosing between 1080p, 1440p, and 4k monitors, highlighting the significant price jump from lower to higher resolutions. It discusses pixel density and how it affects the perceived sharpness of an image, using the example of a 24-inch 1080p monitor versus a 27-inch one. The 'retina display' concept is introduced, explaining the idea of a resolution beyond which the human eye cannot discern individual pixels, and how this concept applies to different monitor sizes and resolutions.

10:03

🎮 Performance and Visual Quality in Gaming Context

This paragraph examines the impact of monitor resolution on gaming performance and visual quality. It provides empirical data on FPS drops when upgrading from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4k, suggesting that the performance hit may not be worth the visual improvement for fast-paced games. The narrator discusses the diminishing returns on resolution for competitive gaming and the importance of pixel density at different viewing distances. The paragraph concludes with a recommendation for 1440p monitors as a balanced choice for gaming, considering resolution, frame rate, and cost.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡IPS Panel

An IPS (In-Plane Switching) Panel is a type of LCD display panel technology known for its wide viewing angles and accurate color reproduction. In the context of the video, all three monitors being compared feature a 27-inch IPS panel, emphasizing the consistency in display technology across the different resolutions being tested.

💡Gaming Monitors

Gaming monitors are specialized displays designed to enhance the gaming experience with features such as high refresh rates and low response times. The video script discusses AOC-branded gaming monitors with varying resolutions, highlighting the impact of resolution on the gaming experience.

💡Resolution

Resolution refers to the number of pixels that a display contains, which affects the clarity and detail of the images shown. The script compares 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions on the same 27-inch form factor, exploring how resolution impacts the display quality and gaming performance.

💡Refresh Rate

The refresh rate is the number of times a display updates the image per second, measured in hertz (Hz). The video mentions that the full HD and QHD monitors have a refresh rate of 165 Hz, but for the video, they are set to run at 144 Hz, indicating the importance of this metric for smooth gaming visuals.

💡Pixel Density

Pixel density is measured in pixels per inch (PPI) and indicates how many pixels are packed into a given area of the screen. The script uses pixel density to compare the sharpness of the image on different resolution monitors, noting that a higher PPI generally results in a clearer image.

💡Retina Display

A Retina display is a marketing term coined by Apple to describe a display with a high enough pixel density that the human eye cannot discern individual pixels at a typical viewing distance. The video discusses the concept in relation to monitor resolutions, using it to determine the point of diminishing returns for increasing resolution.

💡Field of View (FOV)

Field of view refers to the extent of the observable environment visible to the human eye at a given moment. The script relates FOV to the pixel density required for a Retina display, explaining how the number of pixels per degree of FOV affects the perceived clarity of the display.

💡FPS (Frames Per Second)

FPS measures how many times an image is refreshed on the screen per second in video games, impacting the smoothness of motion. The video script discusses the performance impact of different resolutions on FPS, noting that higher resolutions like 4K can significantly reduce FPS, affecting gameplay.

💡Esports Titles

Esports titles refer to video games that are played competitively in a professional manner. The script uses the example of the game 'Veteran' to illustrate the difference in visual quality and performance between 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions in the context of competitive gaming.

💡Sponsor

In the context of video content, a sponsor is a company that financially supports the creation of the content, often in exchange for promotion. The script mentions Squarespace as the sponsor of the video, providing an example of how sponsorship works in online media.

💡Pixel Perfect

Pixel perfect refers to a display where individual pixels are not visible to the naked eye, resulting in a smooth and continuous image. The video script uses this term to describe the superior visual experience of a 4K monitor compared to lower resolutions, especially when viewed up close.

Highlights

Comparison of three AOC 27-inch IPS panel gaming monitors with different resolutions: 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.

The 1080p and 1440p monitors have a refresh rate of 165Hz, but are tested at 144Hz for the video.

The 4K monitor provides an impressive display quality, especially noticeable with text and graphics.

High resolution monitors are not only useful for photo editing but also enhance the gaming experience.

The 4K monitor's text appears smoother, resembling ink rather than being visibly pixelated like on the 1440p monitor.

High refresh rate 4K monitors are expensive, with the one in the video retailing for over 900 euros.

1080p monitors offer a large screen size at an affordable price but suffer from visible pixels at normal viewing distances.

Smaller 24-inch 1080p monitors have a higher pixel density and appear sharper than their 27-inch counterparts.

27-inch 1440p monitors have a pixel density of 109 PPI, providing a clear image but not as sharp as 4K.

The term 'Retina display' refers to a resolution where individual pixels are no longer discernible to the human eye.

Apple considers a display 'Retina' at 57 pixels per degree of field of view, not strictly at 300 PPI.

24-inch 1080p monitors can qualify as 'Retina' at certain viewing distances, unlike 27-inch monitors.

4K monitors provide a significant FPS hit compared to 1080p and 1440p monitors in gaming scenarios.

Upgrading to 4K resolution may not be worth the performance loss in fast-paced games like first-person shooters.

1440p monitors are a popular choice as they offer a balance between resolution, frame rate, and cost.

For competitive esports titles, the visual difference between 1080p and 1440p is noticeable but may not impact gameplay.

1080p monitors remain the default option for the highest refresh rates in gaming monitors.

Transcripts

play00:00

each of these three monitors has a

play00:01

27-inch ips panel and all of them are

play00:04

from aoc and being advertised as gaming

play00:07

monitors but yeah as you probably have

play00:09

guessed from the title of this video one

play00:11

of them is a 1080p monitor one is a

play00:13

1440p monitor and the other one has a 4k

play00:16

display all in the same 27-inch form

play00:18

factor by the way this video is not

play00:20

sponsored by aoc but they were kind

play00:22

enough to lend me these three monitors

play00:24

which are perfect for this comparison

play00:26

this video is sponsored by squarespace

play00:28

though more on them later in this video

play00:30

so how much of a difference does the

play00:32

resolution really make when the other

play00:34

specs are fairly similar i mean these

play00:36

are our 144hz gaming monitors of the

play00:39

same size with the same panel tag and

play00:42

they even are from the same brand okay

play00:44

to be fair the full hd and qhd monitors

play00:47

both technically have a refresh rate of

play00:49

165 hertz but for the sake of this video

play00:52

we'll have them running at 144 hertz so

play00:55

the designing factor really is the

play00:57

resolution but does a high resolution

play00:59

actually look that much better even for

play01:02

things like gaming or is it only really

play01:04

usable for photo editing and stuff like

play01:06

that well i gotta admit that i was

play01:08

genuinely impressed when i turned on the

play01:10

4k monitor for the first time believe it

play01:12

or not but despite that i've tested a

play01:14

ton of monitors i've never actually

play01:16

experienced a 27 inch 4k display and

play01:19

honestly having all those pixels cramped

play01:21

onto a relatively small 27 inch screen

play01:24

looks amazing so yeah you'll notice

play01:26

right away that everything even the text

play01:28

and graphics and the plain normal file

play01:30

explorer just look so much smoother i

play01:33

mean take a look at the 1440p display in

play01:35

comparison text by no means looks bad

play01:38

here but you can clearly see that this

play01:40

is text being displayed on a monitor

play01:42

that has individual pixels whereas the

play01:44

text on the 4k display looks much more

play01:47

like ink basically now i wouldn't say

play01:49

that i can clearly like see or even

play01:52

count individual pixels on the 1440p

play01:54

monitor at least not from a normal view

play01:56

and distance but despite that there is a

play01:58

certain roughness to text and other

play02:00

sharp edges that clearly makes it look

play02:02

worse than the 4k display but yeah text

play02:04

and such looking smoother truly isn't a

play02:07

big enough reason to sell a kidney for a

play02:09

4k monitor at least not for most people

play02:11

i assume and let's face it high refresh

play02:13

rate 4k monitors are expensive the one

play02:16

that i have here retails for over 900

play02:19

euros which is somewhat on the expensive

play02:21

side even for a 4k 144hz monitor the

play02:25

average price of the 10 most popular 4k

play02:27

monitors in germany right now is about

play02:29

680 euros so that's still a massive 96

play02:34

price jump from 4040p monitors and 1440p

play02:37

monitors on average are 79

play02:40

more expensive than the 1080p count

play02:42

parts so with this 1080p monitor right

play02:44

here we're certainly getting a lot of

play02:46

screen real estate for our money and i'm

play02:48

going to admit that a large but

play02:49

affordable monitor like this seems

play02:51

pretty appealing at first i mean for

play02:53

roughly 200 bucks that's a nice and

play02:55

large ips screen right here that's just

play02:58

as big as the other two monitors which

play02:59

both are much more expensive but as soon

play03:02

as you take a closer look it's pretty

play03:04

clear as to why this is so much cheaper

play03:06

than the other two the individual pixels

play03:09

are just huge and easily visible at a

play03:12

normal viewing distance i really have to

play03:14

move back quite far until the image

play03:17

actually looks cohesive and smooth

play03:22

i'm a bit over one meter or about four

play03:24

feet away from the monitor now and only

play03:26

at this distance the image actually

play03:28

starts looking good but yeah there are

play03:31

probably not a lot of people who sit

play03:33

this far from their monitor my typical

play03:35

viewing distance looks a bit more

play03:37

something like this

play03:41

which is about 50 to 60 centimeters away

play03:44

from the screen and here the 1080p

play03:46

resolution does not look good at all

play03:49

here you can compare 1080p and 4k side

play03:52

by side while i tell you about today's

play03:53

sponsor squarespace squarespace makes

play03:56

starting your own website super easy

play03:58

they have loads of templates for all

play04:00

kinds of websites so i made a decent

play04:02

looking website in just a few minutes by

play04:04

starting with one of their templates to

play04:06

really give your website a unique look

play04:08

the design panel offers hundreds of

play04:09

custom settings that allow for deep

play04:12

customization and every design

play04:13

automatically works on mobile as well

play04:16

you can try out the design process for

play04:18

free and when you're ready to launch

play04:19

your own website use the code teclas to

play04:22

save 10 of your first purchase of a

play04:24

website or a domain or just go to

play04:26

squarespace.com

play04:28

tagless back to the video now i said

play04:30

that the 1080p monitor doesn't look good

play04:33

up close but that's not to say that

play04:35

every 1080p monitor looks bad at this

play04:37

viewing distance a smaller 24 inch

play04:40

monitor like this with the same

play04:42

resolution really looks substantially

play04:44

better than its 27-inch counterpart and

play04:46

that's thanks to its higher pixel

play04:48

density so how sharp the image looks

play04:50

really isn't a matter of the absolute

play04:52

resolution but mostly a combination of

play04:54

the resolution and the size of the

play04:56

screen the bigger screen only has 82

play04:59

pixels per inch while the smaller 24

play05:01

inch panel uses 93 pixels for every inch

play05:05

so if you're on a budget i'd suggest

play05:06

getting a 24 inch 1080p monitor instead

play05:10

1080p just isn't enough when you're

play05:12

sitting close to a big 27 inch screen

play05:15

now if you have a bit more money to

play05:16

spend and want a larger monitor you can

play05:18

also just go for a 27-inch 1440p monitor

play05:21

instead despite that the display is

play05:24

larger this has an even higher pixel

play05:26

density of 109 ppi so is this high

play05:29

enough to give us the perfect image well

play05:32

i wish it was but the 27 inch 4k display

play05:35

with its 163 ppi does look noticeably

play05:39

better but that raises the question of

play05:41

how many pixels per inch we really need

play05:43

like when does the image look perfect

play05:45

already and when are we starting to hit

play05:47

diminishing returns territory now i

play05:50

guess you've heard the term retinal

play05:51

display before

play05:53

what's that

play05:55

well that's basically apple's marketing

play05:58

speech for a display resolution that's

play05:59

high enough that you can't see

play06:01

individual pixels anymore so when a

play06:03

display is classified as retina adding

play06:05

more pixels beyond that should pretty

play06:07

much be unnoticeable and it really

play06:09

shouldn't add much to the image quality

play06:11

so would either of these monitors

play06:13

qualify as a retina display now back in

play06:16

2010 when steve jobs introduced the

play06:18

iphone 4 he stated that 300 ppi was this

play06:22

magic number at which the human eye

play06:24

basically won't notice individual pixels

play06:26

anymore that seems pretty high at first

play06:28

considering the 4k monitor right here

play06:30

has about half of that but remember the

play06:33

300 ppi number is for a phone which

play06:36

typically is held up really close to the

play06:39

face and therefore covers quite a large

play06:41

portion of our field of view so how can

play06:44

we transfer that to a monitor that

play06:46

typically isn't that close in your face

play06:48

well it turns out apple calls a display

play06:50

retina when it has at least 57 pixels

play06:53

for every degree of our field of view

play06:56

this might sound a bit complicated at

play06:57

first but once we've done all the math

play07:00

it's actually pretty straightforward so

play07:02

here are the ppd numbers for some common

play07:04

display resolutions and sizes remember

play07:06

the goal is to hit 57 ppd and yeah even

play07:10

the 24-inch 1080p monitor manages to

play07:12

qualify as a retina display so how's

play07:15

that possible while the 24-inch 1080p

play07:18

monitor only qualifies as a retina

play07:20

display when we type in a viewing

play07:22

distance above 90 centimeters which is

play07:24

pretty far 60 centimeters would be far

play07:27

more realistic and well at this distance

play07:29

only 4k monitors qualify not even the

play07:32

27-inch 1440p display i gonna have this

play07:36

dock linked down below in case you want

play07:37

to play around with these numbers so 4k

play07:40

monitors actually make sense even with a

play07:42

reasonably small 27-inch panel so why

play07:45

are 4040p 27-inch monitors so popular

play07:48

then well even when ignoring how much

play07:50

money you can save by going with a 4040p

play07:52

monitor instead of a 4k1 you just can't

play07:55

ignore these numbers this is called

play07:57

warzone running in 4k on a relatively

play07:59

decent gaming pc with competitive low

play08:02

settings and this honestly is not much

play08:04

fun to play we're averaging just shy of

play08:07

70 fps which isn't exactly great for a

play08:09

fast paced game like warzone also tried

play08:12

lowering the render resolution to 75

play08:14

percent which brought me a bit closer to

play08:16

100 fps but at this point you could also

play08:19

just get a low res monitor instead and

play08:21

save some money a 1080p monitor will of

play08:23

course achieve the highest fps my fps

play08:26

took a 23 hit from 1080p to 1440p which

play08:30

is kind of acceptable for an upgrade

play08:32

like this i mean going from about 150

play08:35

fps to 115 fps is definitely noticeable

play08:39

but so is the better image quality we're

play08:40

getting from 1440b the 40

play08:43

fps hit from the upgrade to 4k though is

play08:46

just too much in my opinion the

play08:47

additional sharpness and detail just

play08:49

isn't that noticeable while playing fast

play08:52

paced games having 40

play08:54

less fps is very much noticeable though

play08:57

and such an fps hit is not just

play08:59

exclusive to warzone or my particular

play09:01

hardware i crunched some numbers from

play09:03

hardware unboxed who tested 12 games on

play09:06

15 different gpus and on average the 4k

play09:09

upgrade reduces the fps by 47

play09:12

while going from 1080p to 1440p leads to

play09:15

28 lower fps so as an easy to remember

play09:19

rule of thumb planning to lose about a

play09:21

quarter of your fps when upgrading from

play09:23

1080p to 440b and be ready to lose half

play09:26

of your fps from 1440p to 4k however

play09:29

there are exceptions to this for

play09:31

instance if you heavily cpu limited in

play09:33

certain games you might not lose any fps

play09:36

with a resolution upgrade or just very

play09:38

few for example this is veteran running

play09:41

in 4k with competitive settings and my

play09:43

2070 super has no issues pushing close

play09:45

to 300 fps in a crowded death match i

play09:48

used the spike pen scenario as a

play09:50

benchmark and here i got a whopping

play09:52

371 fps and 4k with my somewhat dated pc

play09:56

hardware both the 4040p and 1080p

play09:59

numbers don't really look that much

play10:01

better so there really isn't a

play10:02

noteworthy fps hit with esports titles

play10:05

like velerand visually though there is a

play10:07

difference rounded edges for instance

play10:10

like on the head of the dummy look a lot

play10:12

more like they're actually round with a

play10:14

high resolution monitor everything looks

play10:16

less fuzzy and that's especially

play10:18

noticeable between 1080p and 1440p now

play10:21

better looking edges or details is

play10:23

clearly not something that would win you

play10:25

rounds and competitive esports titles

play10:28

though take a look at what happens when

play10:29

the character model is at a 50 meter

play10:32

distance on the 1080p monitor it becomes

play10:34

somewhat difficult to even tell the head

play10:37

and torso of the dummy apart it's

play10:39

clearly not as easy to see as with the

play10:40

1440p or even 4k display and in my

play10:43

opinion this is enough to make hitting

play10:45

headshots just a bit more difficult in

play10:48

this distance with the 1080p monitor

play10:50

considering that upgrading to 1440p only

play10:53

has a minimal impact on the framerate

play10:55

it's maybe about time to move to 1440p

play10:57

for games like veteran unless of course

play11:00

you're looking for the absolute highest

play11:01

refresh rate because only 1080p will

play11:04

give you these crazy high refresh rates

play11:06

above 300hz at least until the 360hz

play11:10

4040p monitors arrive but even then

play11:12

1080p would probably continue being the

play11:14

default option for the highest refresh

play11:16

rate monitors and if you're after that

play11:18

i'd really suggest getting a smaller 24

play11:21

inch display and 4k well there's no

play11:24

doubt that this is the superior

play11:25

resolution even on a 27 inch screen if a

play11:28

sharp and clear looking image for

play11:30

working with text consuming content or

play11:32

playing slow paced cinematic games is

play11:35

your number one priority then go for it

play11:37

if you can also afford the hardware to

play11:39

drive all these pixels of course it does

play11:41

look noticeably better than 4040p that's

play11:44

already true for a 27-inch monitor and

play11:47

for larger monitors 4k becomes even more

play11:49

important though for fast-paced games

play11:52

like first-person shooters and such it's

play11:54

really not worth the additional

play11:55

investment 4k monitors are so much more

play11:58

expensive and decent graphics cards

play12:00

aren't cheap either so yeah it really

play12:02

makes sense that 1440p monitors are so

play12:05

popular as these really are great

play12:07

compromise between resolution fps and

play12:10

cost i'll leave some of my favorite

play12:11

4040p monitors linked down below and in

play12:14

case you're wondering if you should get

play12:15

a monitor with an ips panel or with a v8

play12:18

panel instead i've made a comparison

play12:20

video about that as well which is linked

play12:22

on screen right now

play12:24

thanks for watching this next video

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Gaming MonitorsResolution Test4K Display1440p Upgrade1080p ReviewIPS PanelAOC BrandPixel DensityGaming FPSRetina DisplayMonitor Comparison
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?