Stellungnahme Ramin Yektaparast

Summary

In this video, the speaker counters sensationalized claims made by the Bild newspaper, particularly regarding their alleged flight from legal proceedings. They emphasize the principle of the presumption of innocence and criticize both the media's approach and the actions of law enforcement. The speaker discusses their prior legal issues, the disproportionality of certain police operations, and the political implications behind media coverage. They also express doubts about receiving a fair trial due to perceived political pressures and clarify their presence in Iran, refuting the claim of evasion. The speaker further addresses the complexities of extradition and ongoing investigations.

Takeaways

• 😀 The principle of presumption of innocence is emphasized, highlighting that everyone is innocent until proven guilty by a legally binding conviction.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the *Bild* newspaper's reporting, particularly regarding the claim that they have fled or gone into hiding, calling it exaggerated and misleading.
• 😀 The speaker questions how *Bild* newspaper gained knowledge of an ongoing legal procedure (the ENCO-Chat procedure) that neither they nor their lawyers were aware of.
• 😀 The speaker suggests that *Bild* has informants within the investigative authorities, implying that sensitive information is being leaked to the press.
• 😀 There is criticism of the excessive nature of police operations, where the speaker feels that force is often used for media spectacle rather than genuine legal necessity.
• 😀 The speaker expresses surprise at the recent media coverage and the police's actions, pointing out that such operations often seem designed for public display rather than effective investigation.
• 😀 The speaker defends their actions by clarifying that they have never avoided legal proceedings, even allowing themselves to be arrested previously when they knew an investigation was underway.
• 😀 The speaker addresses the lack of an extradition agreement between Iran and Germany, stating that their legal position makes it impossible for them to be forcibly removed from Iran.
• 😀 Political pressure surrounding the case is raised as a concern, with the speaker suggesting that media reports and police actions may be influenced by political agendas rather than legal principles.
• 😀 The speaker expresses doubt about receiving a fair trial, citing the growing political pressure and sensational media coverage, which they feel compromises the integrity of the legal process.

Q & A

What is the primary argument the speaker makes about the presumption of innocence?

The speaker stresses that the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of law, meaning that individuals should be considered innocent until proven guilty. They emphasize that this principle is not respected by the media, particularly by the Bild newspaper, which they claim has exaggerated the accusations against them.

How does the speaker criticize the media's coverage of their situation?

The speaker accuses the Bild newspaper of sensationalism, specifically alleging that they reported false information about the speaker fleeing the country and being in hiding. They also suggest that the newspaper had access to confidential information about an ongoing investigation that was not officially available to the public.

What is the speaker's stance on the 'Enco-Chat' procedure mentioned in the media?

The speaker denies any knowledge of the 'Enco-Chat' procedure that the Bild newspaper reported. They claim that neither they nor their lawyers were aware of this procedure, raising concerns about how the media had information that even the investigating authorities did not.

What does the speaker say about their legal history regarding the accusations of murder or attempted murder?

The speaker mentions that they have been under investigation for murder or attempted murder for several years and describes several past incidents where their property was searched, confiscated, and examined. They suggest that the authorities' actions were excessive and failed to yield results, leading to the eventual dismissal of the case.

How does the speaker describe the law enforcement operations against them?

The speaker criticizes the law enforcement operations, particularly the use of explosives during house searches, which they claim were excessive and unnecessary. They compare the current operations to earlier, less aggressive searches and question why such extreme measures were taken, given that there were alternative, safer methods available.

What is the speaker's view on the political motivations behind the police actions?

The speaker suggests that the increasing radical nature of law enforcement operations is politically motivated. They believe that the authorities are using spectacular raids to demonstrate strength and assertiveness to the public, often in collaboration with the media, to create a sense of public safety and control.

How does the speaker feel about the role of the Interior Minister in the situation?

The speaker criticizes Interior Minister Roll, accusing him of using excessive measures to create a public image of state power and law enforcement success. They also claim that Roll lacks the legal knowledge necessary for his position and has made legally inaccurate and politically charged statements.

What does the speaker say about their travel and residency in Iran?

The speaker clarifies that they are an Iranian citizen and that it is not unusual for them to spend time in Iran. They assert that their travels were not an attempt to flee legal proceedings but were instead a combination of business and vacation.

What is the speaker's response to the notion that they have fled or gone into hiding?

The speaker firmly denies the claim that they have fled or gone into hiding. They state that they have not concealed their whereabouts and continue to post about their daily life. They argue that trying to determine their location is pointless because they are not hiding.

What is the speaker's position on extradition from Iran to Germany?

The speaker points out that there is no extradition agreement between Iran and Germany, making any legal extradition impossible. They also express surprise at the recent operation against them, suggesting that the investigation has been reopened due to a key witness's statement made two years ago.