Oliver Perater: Teaching Demo (Introduction to the Deontology Ethics of Immanuel Kant)

Oliver Perater
26 Jul 202015:35

Summary

TLDROliver Perratter introduces Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics, focusing on 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.' He outlines Kant's moral philosophy, emphasizing a priori knowledge, autonomy, and the categorical imperative. The video discusses Kant's challenge to divine command theory, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism, highlighting the importance of good will as the supreme good, independent of external influences or outcomes.

Takeaways

  • 📚 Immanuel Kant is a highly influential modern philosopher, with 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals' as a central work in moral philosophy.
  • 🏰 The historical background of Kant's philosophy emerged from a feudal society dominated by Christian ideals and a self-sufficient economy.
  • 🌏 The mercantilist period marked a shift in European mindset, leading to the Renaissance and Enlightenment, which questioned traditional authority and encouraged independent thinking.
  • 💡 The Enlightenment promoted the use of reason and senses over blind obedience, a significant departure from the prevailing feudal and religious practices.
  • 🤔 Kant's concept of 'Enlightenment' is about emerging from immaturity by using one's own understanding without reliance on external guidance.
  • 🧠 The debate between rationalism and empiricism highlights the difference between knowledge acquired through pure reason (a priori) and through experience (a posteriori).
  • 🔢 Kant asserts that the principles of morality are a priori, known through reason alone, similar to mathematical truths, independent of sensory experience.
  • 🆓 Autonomy of the will is the capacity to act according to one's own rational judgment, in contrast to heteronomy, which is influenced by external dictates.
  • 📜 Kant introduces categorical imperatives as unconditional moral laws self-imposed by reason, as opposed to hypothetical imperatives that are conditional and based on external influences.
  • 🛑 The categorical imperative is the foundation of authentic morality, commanding actions to be done for their own sake, without expectation of reward or avoidance of punishment.
  • 🌟 For Kant, a good will is the highest good, intrinsically valuable, and the only thing that is good in itself, regardless of the outcomes of actions.

Q & A

  • Who is Emmanuel Khan and what is the significance of his work 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals'?

    -Emmanuel Khan, commonly known as Immanuel Kant, is considered one of the most influential thinkers of the modern era. His work 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals' contains the core ideas of his moral philosophy, introducing concepts such as a priori knowledge, autonomy, and the categorical imperative, which have significantly impacted ethical theory.

  • What was the historical context of the period when Kant's moral philosophy emerged?

    -Kant's moral philosophy emerged during a time when society was transitioning from a feudal, Christian-dominated Europe to a more enlightened age. This period was characterized by obedience and loyalty, with the church and feudal lords holding significant power. The mercantilist period and the subsequent Age of Enlightenment led to a shift in mindset, encouraging the use of reason and challenging traditional authority.

  • What is the difference between a priori and a posteriori knowledge according to Kant?

    -A priori knowledge, according to Kant, is knowledge that can be acquired prior to experience, using only pure reason. It is independent of sensory experience. A posteriori knowledge, on the other hand, is acquired after experience and requires the use of the senses. For example, knowing colors is a posteriori because it requires the sense of sight.

  • What does Kant mean by 'autonomy of the will'?

    -Autonomy of the will in Kant's philosophy refers to the freedom of an individual's will to act according to moral laws that are self-imposed, without external influences such as orders or rewards. It is the capacity of a rational being to act according to principles of reason, acknowledging the intrinsic power from within.

  • What is the concept of 'heteronomy of the will' as opposed to autonomy?

    -Heteronomy of the will is when an individual's actions and choices are influenced or dictated by external factors, such as orders or rewards. This is in contrast to autonomy, where the will is self-governed and not subject to external control.

  • What are categorical and hypothetical imperatives in Kant's ethical theory?

    -Categorical imperatives are unconditional moral laws that are self-imposed and not influenced by external motives or commands. They are principles that one must follow regardless of the consequences. Hypothetical imperatives, however, are conditional and depend on external factors or outcomes. They guide actions based on achieving certain conditions or results.

  • How does Kant define 'good will' and why is it considered the highest good?

    -For Kant, 'good will' is the will that acts according to the moral law out of a sense of duty, without any external motives or desires for reward. It is considered the highest good because it is the only thing that is good in itself, independent of the consequences of actions. Good will is an expression of autonomy and is intrinsically valuable.

  • What is the significance of the phrase 'Sapere Aude' in Kant's philosophy?

    -'Sapere Aude,' which means 'Have courage to use your own understanding,' encapsulates the spirit of the Enlightenment in Kant's philosophy. It is an invitation to individuals to think for themselves, to use reason, and not to rely solely on the guidance of others or external authorities.

  • How does Kant's concept of duty differ from other ethical theories such as divine command theory, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism?

    -Kant's concept of duty is grounded in the categorical imperative and the autonomy of the will, emphasizing that moral actions should be performed out of a sense of duty, not for external rewards or consequences. This contrasts with divine command theory, which bases morality on obedience to divine laws, virtue ethics, which focuses on the character of the moral agent, and utilitarianism, which judges actions based on their outcomes and the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

  • What is the role of reason in Kant's moral philosophy?

    -Reason plays a central role in Kant's moral philosophy. It is through reason that individuals can discern moral principles a priori and act autonomously. Reason allows individuals to craft moral laws for themselves, independent of sensory experience, and to act according to the categorical imperative.

  • How does Kant's moral philosophy address the issue of moral motivation?

    -Kant's moral philosophy emphasizes that moral motivation should come from a sense of duty and the internal principles of reason, rather than external rewards or consequences. The motive behind an action is more important than the action itself, as it reflects the good will of the moral agent.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Introduction to Kant's Deontological Ethics

This paragraph introduces the topic of Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics, focusing on his seminal work 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.' It sets the historical context of Kant's philosophy within the transition from feudal society to the Enlightenment era, emphasizing the shift from obedience and loyalty to the use of reason and autonomy. Kant's ideas on a priori knowledge, autonomy, and heteronomy of the will are mentioned, highlighting the intrinsic moral compass that humans possess, independent of external influences.

05:01

🔍 The Debate Between Rationalism and Empiricism

The second paragraph delves into the philosophical debate between rationalism and empiricism, both emerging from the Enlightenment. Rationalism, represented by René Descartes, posits that knowledge can be acquired through pure reason alone, while empiricism, represented by George Berkeley and John Locke, argues that all knowledge comes from sensory experience. Kant synthesizes these views by introducing the concepts of a priori and a posteriori knowledge, asserting that some knowledge is innate and can be understood through reason alone, such as mathematical truths, whereas other knowledge requires experience.

10:03

🏛 The Autonomy of the Will and Categorical Imperatives

This paragraph discusses Kant's concept of the autonomy of the will, where individuals act according to their own reason rather than external influences. It contrasts this with heteronomy, where the will is subject to external dictates. Kant introduces the categorical imperative, a moral law that is self-imposed and unconditional, as opposed to the hypothetical imperative, which is conditional and influenced by external factors. The categorical imperative is central to Kant's moral philosophy, as it is the source of authentic morality, guiding actions based on duty rather than desire for reward or avoidance of punishment.

15:05

🌟 The Supreme Good: The Good Will

The final paragraph concludes the discussion by emphasizing Kant's view that the good will is the highest good, an intrinsic quality that is good in itself, regardless of the outcomes of actions. It distinguishes between actions that are good in appearance but motivated by external factors, and those performed out of a genuine sense of duty. Kant argues that moral worth is determined by the motive behind the action, not the action itself, and that a good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Deontology

Deontology is a branch of ethics that focuses on duties and rules, rather than the consequences of actions. In the video, Emmanuel Kant's deontology is discussed as a central theme, emphasizing that moral actions are those that are done out of a sense of duty, regardless of the outcome. The script mentions Kant's 'categorical imperative' as a key concept within deontology, which is a moral law that one gives to oneself, independent of external influences.

💡A priori

A priori knowledge refers to knowledge that is independent of experience and is known through pure reason. The video explains that Kant believed moral principles are a priori, meaning they are intrinsic to human reason and can be understood without the need for sensory experience. The script uses the example of mathematical equations to illustrate a priori knowledge, which is contrasted with a posteriori knowledge that comes from experience.

💡Autonomy

Autonomy in the context of the video refers to the capacity of individuals to act according to their own will and reason, free from external influences. Kant's concept of autonomy of the will is discussed, where he argues that moral actions should be guided by internal rational principles rather than external pressures or rewards. The script contrasts autonomy with heteronomy, where the will is subject to external dictates.

💡Heteronomy

Heteronomy is the opposite of autonomy and refers to the state where one's will is subject to external influences or dictates. In the script, heteronomy of the will is presented as acting under the influence of external factors such as rewards or punishments, which Kant argues is contrary to true moral autonomy.

💡Categorical Imperative

The categorical imperative is a central concept in Kant's moral philosophy, presented in the video as an unconditional moral law that one gives to oneself. It is a principle of reason that determines the will a priori and is not influenced by external motives or commands. The script explains that the categorical imperative is the source of authentic morality, as opposed to hypothetical imperatives, which are conditional.

💡Hypothetical Imperative

A hypothetical imperative, as discussed in the video, is a conditional moral law that depends on external factors or outcomes. It is a principle that guides actions based on the desire for specific consequences or rewards. The script contrasts this with the categorical imperative, indicating that hypothetical imperatives do not represent true morality because they are influenced by external conditions.

💡Goodwill

Goodwill in the video is presented as a good will, which Kant argues is the only thing that is good in itself. It refers to the motivation behind actions that is intrinsic and not influenced by external rewards or consequences. The script explains that goodwill is the intention to do good for the sake of goodness, which is a key aspect of Kant's moral philosophy.

💡Enlightenment

The Enlightenment, as mentioned in the script, was an intellectual movement that emphasized the use of reason and individual judgment. The video discusses how the Enlightenment challenged traditional authority and promoted the idea that individuals are capable of making their own moral decisions. Kant's concept of 'Sapere aude' or 'have courage to use your own understanding' is an example of the Enlightenment's call for intellectual autonomy.

💡Rationalism

Rationalism, as discussed in the video, is a philosophical view that emphasizes the role of reason and logic in acquiring knowledge. The script contrasts rationalism with empiricism, noting that rationalists like Descartes believed that knowledge could be acquired through pure thinking, independent of sensory experience.

💡Empiricism

Empiricism is the philosophical position that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience. In the video, empiricism is presented as a counterpoint to rationalism, with philosophers like Berkeley arguing that knowledge is acquired through experience and the use of our senses.

💡Moral Philosophy

Moral philosophy is the study of ethical principles and moral values. The video provides an overview of Kant's moral philosophy, which is grounded in the metaphysics of morals. It discusses how Kant's ideas, such as the categorical imperative and autonomy, contribute to our understanding of moral duties and the nature of good actions.

Highlights

Introduction to Emmanuel Kant's deontological ethics, focusing on his book 'Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals'.

Kant is considered one of the most influential thinkers of modern time, with his philosophy emerging during the twilight of feudal thinking in Europe.

Feudal society was characterized by obedience and loyalty, with a self-sufficient economy and limited interaction with other kingdoms.

The mercantilist period saw European merchants flourish and trade not just goods, but also information, cultures, and moral standards.

The Age of Enlightenment encouraged the use of reason and senses, challenging the prevailing feudal and religious practices.

Kant's concept of enlightenment emphasizes the importance of using one's own reason and not relying on external guidance.

Kant's moral philosophy asserts that human beings have an intrinsic power to discern right from wrong through reason alone.

Kant introduces the concepts of a priori and a posteriori knowledge, with a priori knowledge acquired through pure reason without sensory experience.

Moral principles, according to Kant, can be known a priori, independent of experience and external influences.

Kant argues for the autonomy of the will, where individuals act according to their own reason and not due to external dictates.

Heteronomy of the will is contrasted with autonomy, where actions are influenced by external orders and rewards.

Kant distinguishes between categorical and hypothetical imperatives, with the former being a self-imposed law for moral actions.

Categorical imperatives are unconditional and apply universally, while hypothetical imperatives are conditional based on external factors.

Kant's moral philosophy emphasizes duty and doing good for goodness' sake, not for external rewards or consequences.

The concept of goodwill is central to Kant's ethics, where moral value lies in the motive behind the action rather than the action itself.

Kant's philosophy confronts other ethical theories like divine command theory, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism by asserting the primacy of good will.

Good will is the only thing that is good in itself, according to Kant, and is the highest good that can be achieved.

Transcripts

play00:00

hello everyone i'm oliver perratter and

play00:02

i'm going to discuss a brief

play00:04

introduction to

play00:05

emmanuel khan's duty or deontology

play00:08

ethics

play00:09

somehow an overview of this book known

play00:11

as grounding for the metaphysics of

play00:13

morals

play00:13

which contains the core ideas of his

play00:16

moral philosophy

play00:17

as an introduction this will include

play00:20

discussions on

play00:21

historical background and some important

play00:23

notions contained in the book

play00:25

specifically his ideas of a priori and

play00:28

apostle

play00:30

autonomy and heteronomy of the will his

play00:33

teachings of duty and the goodwill

play00:36

immanuel kant is considered to be the

play00:38

most influential thinker of the modern

play00:40

time

play00:40

a modern philosophy emerged upon the

play00:42

twilight of migible thinking

play00:44

now mijibal philosophy generally

play00:47

represents the ideals of the christian

play00:49

feudal

play00:50

society europe this was the time when

play00:53

the businessmen were not the wealthiest

play00:55

people in the world

play00:56

the wealthiest were the people who were

play00:58

lording over thousands and thousands of

play01:00

hectares of lands

play01:02

they were known as the lords the cows

play01:04

and the dukes who commanded thousands of

play01:06

armies

play01:08

and of course as the wealthy as they

play01:09

took control of politics

play01:11

in in fact some of these lords turned

play01:14

out to become the kings or at the very

play01:16

least

play01:16

ministers of feudal politics but the

play01:19

most powerful institution of this period

play01:21

was none other than

play01:22

christian religion in fact this epoch is

play01:26

also known as the christian dom

play01:29

in general the life and morality of this

play01:31

period were based on obedience and

play01:33

loyalty

play01:34

note that a society of sculptures mainly

play01:37

based on obedience is a society which

play01:39

does not

play01:40

require too much thinking i am

play01:43

not attacking christianity here but i

play01:44

would like to emphasize this one because

play01:47

this is one of the starting points of

play01:49

god's moral philosophy

play01:51

now a feudal society had self-sufficient

play01:55

economy

play01:56

it means they had economy which was

play01:58

enough for itself

play01:59

they had everything they needed within

play02:01

the kingdom

play02:02

the product we had were the same

play02:04

products produced by most other kingdoms

play02:07

therefore export and import of goods and

play02:10

services were not that vital

play02:12

and of course businessmen could not

play02:14

flourish the way they do today

play02:16

kingdoms generally live in isolation

play02:19

and isolated economy would also mean

play02:22

isolated mindset

play02:24

people did not know too much about

play02:27

other kingdoms but everything started to

play02:30

change during the epoch known as the

play02:32

mercantilist period

play02:34

like spices from india silk from china

play02:38

blue colored pigments from

play02:40

afghanistan were just few of the

play02:42

luxurious commodities of the time

play02:44

it was when european merchants started

play02:46

to flourish

play02:47

and little by little established

play02:49

economic

play02:50

power but these merchants did not only

play02:55

traded goods and services they also

play02:58

consequently

play02:59

traded information as well different

play03:02

cultures and traditions

play03:04

different religious beliefs different

play03:06

ideals

play03:08

different sets of moral standards

play03:10

different cuisines

play03:11

and all sorts of lifestyle from many

play03:14

parts of the world

play03:15

had also become talk of the town in

play03:17

europe now this

play03:19

epoch drastically changed the mindset of

play03:22

the european world

play03:23

that led to italian renaissance and the

play03:25

age of reason or enlightenment

play03:27

it was when the new breed of thinkers

play03:30

started to emerge and question the

play03:31

political and religious practices of

play03:34

obedience loyalty and absolute power of

play03:37

authorities in general

play03:41

age of enlightenment was an invitation

play03:44

to use our minds and our senses

play03:47

instead of simply rolling over on

play03:48

commands and impose rules

play03:51

the ideas were spread that in general

play03:55

people also possess intelligence and are

play03:58

fully capable of decision making

play04:00

as much as the lords the kings and

play04:02

church leaders

play04:04

therefore people's opinion and political

play04:06

decisions must also be

play04:08

respected in khan's ideas

play04:12

it was the copernican revolution of

play04:14

mindsets

play04:15

instead of simply following rules from

play04:18

the outside

play04:19

imposed on the self one has to

play04:21

acknowledge the power emanating from

play04:23

within the self

play04:24

because human have the intrinsic power

play04:27

from within

play04:29

in this is say an answer to the question

play04:31

what is enlightenment

play04:33

can't invites people to go back to the

play04:36

self

play04:37

use one's own reason and stop relying

play04:40

too much on someone else's guidance

play04:42

in the first paragraph he says

play04:45

enlightenment

play04:46

is man's emergence from his

play04:48

self-incurred

play04:50

immaturity immaturity is the inability

play04:53

to use one's own understanding without

play04:55

the guidance

play04:56

of another this immaturity is

play04:58

self-incurred

play04:59

if its cause is not lack of

play05:01

understanding but

play05:02

lack of resolution and courage to use it

play05:05

without the guidance of another

play05:08

the mode of enlightenment is therefore

play05:10

sapiri

play05:11

aude have courage to use your own

play05:15

understanding can't synthesize the early

play05:19

modern rationalism and increases them

play05:22

both of these schools of thought are

play05:24

outcomes of the age of enlightenment

play05:26

and both have generated ideas and

play05:28

principles that run in contrary with the

play05:30

reigning feudal religious teachings

play05:33

in general rationalism represented by

play05:37

randy cards argues that knowledge can

play05:40

only be acquired with the use of pure

play05:42

reason or pure thinking without the aid

play05:45

of the senses

play05:46

meaning the cards believe that we do not

play05:48

need our senses in order to know the

play05:50

truth

play05:52

while in physicism represented by george

play05:54

berkeley

play05:55

john luck and davidium claims that all

play05:58

knowledge is derived from sen's

play06:00

experience that is

play06:01

no knowledge can ever be acquired or

play06:04

produced without the use

play06:06

of at least one of our senses

play06:10

now while the debate between russian

play06:12

realism and empiricism progress

play06:15

can't intervene claiming that both are

play06:17

just two sides of the same coin

play06:19

and that there is a knowledge that can

play06:21

only be acquired after experience

play06:24

with the aid of the census but there is

play06:26

also a knowledge

play06:28

which can be acquired prior to

play06:30

experience

play06:31

using only pure reason these knowledges

play06:35

are classified as a

play06:37

priori and eposteriori

play06:40

a posteriori knowledge is analyse

play06:43

acquired

play06:43

after experience all scientific

play06:46

knowledge produced from experiments are

play06:48

examples of knowledge that belong to

play06:50

this category

play06:51

because these knowledges are impossible

play06:53

to achieve without experience and

play06:55

without the aid of the senses

play06:57

now for instance we know colors because

play06:59

we see colors

play07:00

such as blue or red and anyone who were

play07:03

born blind would never have any idea

play07:05

what colors are

play07:06

and this is an example of knowledge a

play07:08

posteriori

play07:10

again it is a knowledge that we acquire

play07:13

after experience

play07:14

and those who cannot experience them can

play07:17

never know them

play07:19

but not all knowledge is acquired a

play07:22

posteriori

play07:24

there is also a knowledge that can only

play07:26

be acquired prior

play07:28

to experience or a priori that is

play07:30

knowledge which could be known by

play07:32

pure reason or pure thinking devoid of

play07:36

any sensual experience

play07:38

like pure mathematical equations and

play07:40

numbers

play07:42

numbers can neither be seen or touched

play07:45

number three for example can be

play07:47

expressed in so many ways

play07:48

like this and the verbal word

play07:52

three to lo or

play07:55

but these are nothing but symbols of the

play07:58

idea of number three

play08:00

that exist only in the mind all of these

play08:04

are nothing but representations of the

play08:06

idea of

play08:07

number three numbers are abstract and do

play08:10

not exist in space and time

play08:13

numbers then were not discovered through

play08:16

the senses but by means of a

play08:18

priori grounds and kant asserts that the

play08:22

principles of morality can only be known

play08:24

by a priori grounds

play08:26

just like numbers and pure mathematical

play08:29

equations

play08:31

how do we know that telling a lie and

play08:33

not keeping premises are morally wrong

play08:36

and how do we know that helping people

play08:39

and giving arms are morally good

play08:43

in god's teaching one does not need

play08:44

experience in order to learn these moral

play08:47

principles

play08:48

we could know their moral worth from the

play08:51

inner core

play08:52

of our beings in the grounding kant

play08:55

argues that

play08:56

all moral concepts have their seat and

play08:59

origin

play09:00

completely a priori in reason they

play09:03

cannot be abstracted

play09:04

from any empirical and hence merely

play09:07

contingent

play09:08

cognition we could learn them by

play09:11

ourselves because as rational beings

play09:13

internally we have the capacity to know

play09:16

the principles of morality a

play09:18

priori this means that the knowledge of

play09:21

the principles of morality

play09:23

can only be acquired a priori just like

play09:26

pure mathematical equations

play09:28

if you are capable of knowing the

play09:31

principles of morality

play09:32

priori then it implies that you can be a

play09:35

good

play09:36

person even if no one is telling you

play09:38

what to do and what you should not be

play09:40

doing

play09:41

human intellect is capable of knowing

play09:43

right and wrong even without

play09:45

imposed rules and since every rational

play09:48

could possess the knowledge of the

play09:50

principles of morality

play09:51

all right then it follows that human

play09:54

beings deserve to exercise

play09:55

autonomy of the will that is i must be

play09:58

my own master

play10:00

i don't have to be told what to do since

play10:03

by virtue by being rational

play10:05

i have internal capacity to know what is

play10:07

right and wrong

play10:10

thus human does not need anyone's law or

play10:12

dictate in order to know and do the good

play10:15

autonomy of the will is when the will in

play10:18

performing good deeds is free from any

play10:20

dictates of external

play10:21

influences such as orders and rewards

play10:24

contrary to this

play10:25

is the heteronomy of the will it is when

play10:28

someone's will is imposed on you

play10:30

in doing actions and choices making you

play10:33

unable to act according to your own will

play10:36

we have distinguished two types of will

play10:39

the autonomy of the will

play10:41

and the heteronomy of the will kant also

play10:44

identifies two types of imperatives

play10:46

the categorical and hypothetical

play10:48

imperatives

play10:51

imperative means law categorical

play10:54

imperative

play10:55

is a law that the self has crafted only

play10:57

for itself

play10:58

not influenced by external motives or

play11:01

commands

play11:03

can teach us that we can be our own

play11:05

lawmakers

play11:07

this law or this is a lobby craft

play11:10

without external influences such as

play11:12

commands or rewards

play11:13

that one may get out of doing good deeds

play11:17

this means also that we do good for

play11:19

goodness sake

play11:20

and it is unconditional we do good

play11:23

without expecting anything in return

play11:26

any law that does not subscribe to this

play11:28

principle of legislation

play11:30

is hypothetical imperative in khan's

play11:34

idea categorical imperative

play11:36

is the only source of authentic morality

play11:39

while hypothetical imperative is the

play11:41

source of unscrupulous

play11:43

or fake morality because hypothetical

play11:45

imperative is a law that

play11:47

others made for you or a law that you

play11:50

made but

play11:50

out of the influence of external forces

play11:53

that consequently make your good actions

play11:56

and attributed to you

play11:58

hypothetical imperative is conditional

play12:01

it obliges

play12:02

rational beings to do good for certain

play12:04

conditions

play12:06

while categorical imperatives are

play12:08

unconditional loss they could be obeyed

play12:11

without conditions

play12:12

that is regardless of your status sexual

play12:15

preference

play12:16

gender situations and existential

play12:19

conditions

play12:20

i utter the word obey but this obedience

play12:24

in khan's moral teaching

play12:26

is not emanating from the rule of

play12:27

external authorities

play12:30

if we have to follow rules then it must

play12:33

only be the rule of reason

play12:37

kansas this duty prior to all experience

play12:42

is contained as a duty in general in the

play12:45

idea of a reason

play12:47

that determines the will by means of a

play12:49

priori grounds

play12:51

the idea is do good not because you are

play12:54

being told

play12:55

not because you want to be in heaven

play12:57

someday not because

play12:58

it makes you happy not because it will

play13:01

give you reward

play13:02

or excuses you from punishment not

play13:05

because it is your nature or

play13:07

inclination to do good you do good

play13:10

because it is what you ought to do

play13:20

it is your duty imposed by your own

play13:24

reason and goodwill do good and avoid

play13:28

evil even if it will give you

play13:30

undesirable outcome

play13:32

and even if you are going to hell

play13:36

in this sense kant is directly

play13:38

confronting the ideas of divine command

play13:41

theory

play13:42

aristotle's virtue ethics saint thomas

play13:45

natural or theory and even

play13:47

utilitarianism

play13:49

in the grounding kansas

play13:52

there is no possibility of thinking of

play13:55

anything at

play13:56

all in the world or even out of it which

play13:59

can be regarded as good without

play14:01

qualification

play14:02

except a good will

play14:05

for kant the highest good is not

play14:08

pleasure

play14:09

not happiness not even happiness with

play14:12

god

play14:14

but the good will it is the only thing

play14:17

that is good in itself

play14:20

good will can be translated into tagalog

play14:25

from its root word which literally means

play14:29

inside or internal in cebuano

play14:33

goodwill could be translated as

play14:36

from the word could mean intelligence

play14:40

while at the same time

play14:42

it is also the root word for buutan

play14:44

which means a good person

play14:47

helping people in need arms giving and

play14:50

saving lives

play14:51

are not good in themselves good and bad

play14:54

people alike would also do all of this

play14:56

but only some could do this without

play14:59

external motives and influences

play15:02

what is important is not really the

play15:04

action but the motive

play15:06

behind the action the goodwill

play15:10

kansas for when moral value is being

play15:13

considered

play15:14

the concern is not with the actions

play15:17

which are seen

play15:18

but rather with their inner principles

play15:20

which are not

play15:21

seen thank you very much

play15:26

i hope this is good enough to get you

play15:28

acquainted with khan's moral notions

play15:30

and have a nice day and keep safe once

play15:33

again thank you

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Kantian EthicsMoral PhilosophyDeontologyAutonomyDutyEnlightenmentReasonGoodwillModern PhilosophyEthical Principles
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?