Warner Brothers Removes CIRCLE CIRCLE DOT DOT CONTEST Video IT SPONSORED!

Summary

In this video, the speaker shares their frustration with Warner Brothers Records for blocking a video they submitted years ago as part of a contest. The contest, which invited users to create videos using the song 'Circle Circle Dot Dot' by Jamie Kennedy and Stu Stone, was officially sanctioned by the company. Despite following all contest rules, the speaker’s video was flagged for copyright infringement two years later. They criticize the inconsistency in enforcement, the overreach of corporations, and urge viewers to fight back against such unjust practices.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker discusses their frustration with YouTube's copyright claim process, particularly regarding a contest video they entered years ago.
• 😀 The contest was run by Warner Brothers Records, featuring Jamie Kennedy and Stu Stone's song 'Circle Circle Dot Dot.'
• 😀 Participants in the contest were asked to create videos using the song, and the speaker followed all the guidelines, including using the clean version of the song and not exceeding the time limit.
• 😀 The speaker's video was blocked years after the contest, despite it being officially sanctioned and explicitly promoted by Warner Brothers.
• 😀 The speaker argues that there was no clear stipulation in the contest rules that required the video to be removed after a certain period.
• 😀 They compare this situation to previous issues with Viacom over removing videos that were explicitly allowed for contests or challenges.
• 😀 The speaker is upset that their video was singled out while other contest entries remain active on YouTube, such as Blunty 3000's video.
• 😀 The speaker stresses that the contest was meant to promote Warner Brothers' song, and they believe the video helped fulfill that goal.
• 😀 They express frustration over the lack of organization and consistency from large corporations like Warner Brothers and Viacom in handling these claims.
• 😀 The speaker encourages others who face similar issues to fight against these unjust copyright claims, urging people to stand up to corporations that misuse their power.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the video?

The main issue discussed is the removal of a video created by the speaker for a contest held by Warner Brothers Records in partnership with YouTube, where the speaker used a song provided for the contest. The video was flagged for copyright infringement years after the contest, despite being explicitly authorized to use the song.

What was the contest about?

The contest was organized by Warner Brothers Records in collaboration with YouTube. It invited users to create and submit videos using the song 'Circle Circle Dot Dot' by Jamie Kennedy and Stu Stone. The aim was to promote the song and engage users in a creative way.

What were the conditions for entering the contest?

Participants were instructed to use the clean version of the song and not to alter the length of the video beyond the song's duration. The video also had to be original content, without using other copyrighted material apart from the song itself.

Why does the speaker feel their video was unfairly targeted?

The speaker feels their video was unfairly targeted because it met all the requirements set by Warner Brothers for the contest, yet it was flagged for copyright violation while other contest entries, such as Blunty3000’s video, remained unaffected. The speaker believes this is a case of corporate mishandling.

How does the speaker describe the behavior of corporations in relation to copyright claims?

The speaker describes the behavior of corporations as greedy and overreaching, accusing them of mismanaging their content and unfairly penalizing creators. They believe these companies treat creators like criminals and fail to properly oversee their own promotions and contests.

What does the speaker plan to do in response to the copyright claim?

The speaker plans to fight the copyright claim by submitting the video to YouTube News, reminding them of the contest's details, and holding Warner Brothers accountable for the confusion and the removal of the video.

How does the speaker suggest others should react to similar copyright issues?

The speaker encourages others who face similar issues to fight back against these unfair copyright claims. They suggest challenging these corporations to ensure that creators are treated fairly and that their work is not unjustly removed.

What does the speaker imply about the role of large corporations in managing copyright claims?

The speaker implies that large corporations are sloppy and fail to manage copyright claims properly, especially when it comes to content created in collaboration with users. They criticize these companies for not taking responsibility for their own contests and promotions.

Why does the speaker emphasize the need for accountability in corporate actions?

The speaker emphasizes the need for accountability because they believe that corporate mismanagement and overreaching harm creators. They argue that companies should be held responsible for ensuring that their actions align with the agreements made with users, especially in the context of contests and promotions.

What message does the speaker want to convey at the end of the video?

At the end of the video, the speaker conveys a message of resistance against corporate overreach, urging viewers to fight for their rights as creators and to demand fairness from companies that misuse copyright enforcement. They also wish for a more honest and transparent year ahead.