Duterte fumes at Hontiveros when asked if he takes responsibility for drug war deaths

Summary

The Senate hearing presents a tense interrogation of the former President regarding his accountability for extrajudicial killings during the controversial drug war in the Philippines. The questioning focuses on specific cases, particularly the deaths of minors, highlighting the moral implications of the policies implemented. The speaker expresses frustration over the casual attitude displayed towards serious allegations, demanding recognition of the consequences of these actions. As the discussion unfolds, the call for justice becomes increasingly urgent, underscoring a broader societal demand for accountability and the need for thorough investigations into the admitted abuses of power.

Takeaways

• 😡 The speaker expresses frustration over the casual attitude towards serious issues, particularly extrajudicial killings (EJKs) during a drug war.
• 🔍 There is an emphasis on accountability, with questions directed at a former president regarding his responsibility for deaths in the drug war.
• 📜 The speaker references specific cases, such as Kian de los Santos, questioning the lack of accountability for the deaths of innocent individuals.
• ❓ Questions are raised about the justification of police actions in drug-related operations, highlighting issues of mistaken identity.
• 🔒 The conversation points out the need for proper documentation and accountability regarding the number of firearms in police custody.
• 🚨 The speaker challenges the former president's earlier statements about assuming full responsibility for the consequences of the drug war.
• 🤔 The dialogue reflects on the serious nature of police operations and the expectation of following due process.
• 🛑 The speaker urges for a change in perception towards victims of the drug war, asserting that they should not be viewed as expendable.
• 💰 Personal circumstances are shared to emphasize the financial burden of attending the hearings, reflecting a commitment to seek justice despite challenges.
• 📢 The final remarks underline the expectation that the Department of Justice will take action against admissions of wrongdoing made during the session.

Q & A

What is the main concern expressed at the beginning of the discussion?

The speaker emphasizes that the topic being discussed is serious and criticizes the casual attitude of some participants, particularly regarding discussions about death.

What does the speaker ask about the presence of firearms in relation to extrajudicial killings?

The speaker questions whether all victims of extrajudicial killings (EJK) were armed, implying that if they were not, there should be a significant number of firearms in police custody.

How does the speaker challenge the responsibility of the former president regarding deaths in the drug war?

The speaker confronts the former president about taking full responsibility for the deaths, specifically asking about cases like Kian de los Santos and Carl Anthony Nunez, highlighting the contradiction in previous statements.

What examples does the speaker provide to illustrate their point about responsibility for deaths?

The speaker mentions specific cases, such as Kian de los Santos, a minor who was unarmed, and Carl Anthony Nunez, who was also unarmed and misidentified, to question the accountability of law enforcement.

What is the response of the former president when asked about specific deaths?

The former president avoids directly taking responsibility for the deaths, stating that the acts were criminal and shifting the focus to the responsibility of law enforcement and the policy he implemented.

How does the discussion about congratulating police officers unfold?

The speaker asks the former president if he congratulated a superintendent for killing high-value targets, to which the president denies any congratulatory message, asserting that such actions are part of their job.

What statement does the former president make regarding the lives of drug users and criminals?

The former president makes a controversial statement implying that drug users and criminals deserve to die or face severe consequences, highlighting a harsh stance on crime.

What does the speaker express about the Department of Justice's inaction?

The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of action from the Department of Justice regarding cases tied to the former president's admissions of involvement in criminal acts.

What procedural concerns are raised during the questioning?

There are procedural interruptions where the former president calls for recesses and discussions about the appropriateness of questions, indicating a tense atmosphere during the inquiry.

What is the overarching theme of the questions posed by the speaker?

The overarching theme revolves around accountability for violence and deaths related to the drug war, emphasizing the need for responsibility from leadership regarding the consequences of their policies.