LAUGH TRIP MUNA TAYO | LAKAS NG TAMA NITO! HUMARAP PA NI FPRRD

Summary

The transcript showcases a heated exchange during a congressional hearing involving former President Duterte, questioning his role in the Davao Death Squad and the drug war. The discussion delves into the issue of extrajudicial killings, with Duterte dismissing accusations, stating he is not an accused, and rejecting any claims about death squads. The session highlights intense debates, with some lawmakers questioning the fairness of the justice system and due process, while others criticize the repeated nature of the questions. The former president’s responses are met with sarcastic remarks and reflections, adding a comedic tone to the intense political atmosphere.

Takeaways

• 😀 The discussion revolves around an investigation into extrajudicial killings (EJKs) allegedly linked to the Davao Death Squad (DDS) during Duterte's time as mayor and president.
• 😀 The former president, Duterte, repeatedly states that he is not an accused in the ICC investigation, distancing himself from any direct involvement in the killings.
• 😀 The controversy centers on the question of whether Duterte is willing to name the victims of EJKs linked to the DDS, with Duterte rejecting the idea of keeping a list of the deceased.
• 😀 The script includes a critique of a congressman (referred to as 'boing') who is questioning Duterte, with the speaker suggesting that the questions are repetitive and lacking substance.
• 😀 There is strong criticism towards the congressman for allegedly asking the same questions that were previously addressed, leading to frustration about the inefficiency of the hearing.
• 😀 The speaker also mocks the congressman's appearance and the nature of the questioning, implying that the questioning was done for publicity rather than genuine inquiry.
• 😀 A significant portion of the transcript is dedicated to discussing the treatment of accused individuals in the ICC, with a comparison made to how EJK victims in the Philippines, mostly from poor communities, were denied due process.
• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration that victims of the drug war and EJKs did not receive fair trials or proper legal treatment, as opposed to those accused in the ICC investigation who are afforded due process.
• 😀 Duterte is portrayed as dismissive of the ICC investigation, stating he would willingly go to The Hague for any hearings but implying he doesn't take the investigation seriously.
• 😀 The script includes a mix of serious commentary and humor, with the speaker making sarcastic remarks about the questioning process and the individuals involved in the investigation, particularly calling attention to the perceived incompetence of the congressional inquiry.

Q & A

What was the main focus of the questions directed at former President Duterte during the Congressional hearing?

The primary focus of the questions was related to the alleged involvement of Duterte in extrajudicial killings (EJK) during his time as Mayor of Davao City and later as President. The inquiries centered on the existence of the Davao Death Squad (DDS) and whether he authorized or was involved in the killings.

Why did the congressman accuse the questioning as repetitive and lacking depth?

The congressman criticized the questioning as being repetitive because the same questions were asked multiple times without addressing new issues or adding substantial value to the investigation. He also implied that the questions were designed for publicity rather than genuine inquiry.

What was Duterte's response to the suggestion that he was involved in creating lists of people killed during his time as mayor?

Duterte rejected the idea that he maintained a list of people killed, stating that he was not in charge of such records. He emphasized that he was not a bookkeeper and suggested that those asking for such lists should go to the civil registrar.

How did Duterte respond when asked if he would cooperate with the ICC investigation?

Duterte expressed his willingness to cooperate with the ICC investigation, but he also rejected the label of 'accused,' stating that he was not an accused person and therefore could not answer certain questions directly. He also humorously remarked that he would be willing to face any charges in the ICC, even suggesting that he would rather spend time in their prison.

What was the congressman's view on the rights of the accused in the ICC investigation?

The congressman, citing Attorney Chel Jokno, affirmed that the rights of the accused in the ICC would be the same as those in the Philippines, including the right to a fair trial, due process, the presumption of innocence, and the right to remain silent. The idea was to emphasize that the ICC offers the same protections to the accused as local courts.

What criticism did the congressman have towards the individual questioning Duterte, whom he referred to as 'boeing'?

The congressman referred to the individual questioning Duterte as 'boeing,' implying that the person was asking shallow and repetitive questions without a clear purpose. He suggested that this individual was only seeking publicity, and he ridiculed the person for not making meaningful contributions to the hearing.

How did the congressman feel about the treatment of victims of extrajudicial killings compared to those accused in the ICC?

The congressman expressed concern that victims of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, especially those affected by Duterte's war on drugs, did not receive fair treatment in court. He contrasted this with the rights and due process granted to those accused in the ICC, highlighting the inequality in how justice was dispensed.

What did Duterte imply about his willingness to face charges in the ICC?

Duterte implied that he would be willing to face charges in the ICC and was not afraid of the investigation. He humorously mentioned that he would rather spend his remaining years in a comfortable prison in the Netherlands rather than continue his political career in the Philippines.

What was the congressman's tone regarding the questioning and investigation as a whole?

The congressman’s tone was critical and sarcastic throughout the questioning. He expressed frustration with the repetitive nature of the questions and the lack of substantive inquiry. He seemed to mock the investigation process, particularly the individuals asking the questions, suggesting they were not serious in their approach.

What suggestion did the congressman make regarding the questioning process in the Congressional hearing?

The congressman suggested that there should be more selective questioning in the hearing and that someone should review the questions being asked to ensure they were relevant and valuable. He implied that the investigation could be more productive if the questioning was more focused and less repetitive.