Intel Core Ultra 5 245K CPU Review & Benchmarks vs. 5700X3D, 13700K, & More

Gamers Nexus
25 Oct 202427:01

Summary

TLDRThe video analyzes the competitive landscape of Intel's latest CPUs, the 245k and 285k, particularly in comparison to AMD's offerings. Despite some improvements in efficiency and power consumption, Intel's processors struggle in performance benchmarks, especially in creative applications like Adobe Photoshop, where AMD excels. The speaker recommends waiting for AMD's upcoming 9000 x3d release, as it may further challenge Intel's market position. Ultimately, the video advises against purchasing Intel's current models due to their lack of compelling value amid fierce competition, urging viewers to subscribe for future updates.

Takeaways

  • 😀 AMD CPUs, especially the 13700K and 14700K, outperform Intel's 245K and 285K in multiple benchmarks, particularly in Adobe Photoshop.
  • 📅 Viewers should wait for AMD's upcoming 9000 X3D launch on November 7 before making any purchasing decisions.
  • ⚠️ Intel has acknowledged bugs in its CPUs and is expected to release updates to address these issues.
  • 🔋 Intel has made improvements in power consumption and efficiency, but this does not necessarily justify purchasing their CPUs at this time.
  • 📉 Certain workloads show performance regressions in Intel's CPUs compared to previous generations, despite some improvements in specific applications.
  • 🎮 In gaming scenarios, Intel's 245K is significantly outperformed by AMD's offerings, particularly the x3D models.
  • 💰 There are numerous competitive alternatives in the same price range as Intel's 245K, making it less attractive to consumers.
  • ⚡ AMD's x3D parts offer better performance and efficiency in both gaming and production workloads.
  • 🔍 The competition in the CPU market is intense, with AMD presenting a strong challenge to Intel's offerings.
  • ❌ The overall recommendation is to avoid purchasing Intel's 245K until they resolve existing issues and provide more reliable products.

Q & A

  • What are the main Intel CPUs discussed in the review?

    -The review primarily discusses the Intel i5-245K and i7-285K CPUs from the 14th generation.

  • How do the Intel CPUs compare to AMD's offerings in performance tests?

    -AMD dominates in performance tests, particularly in Adobe Photoshop and other production workloads, where the Intel CPUs rank lower.

  • What is the significance of the AMD 9000 X3D series mentioned in the review?

    -The AMD 9000 X3D series is anticipated to launch soon and may provide improved performance and value, making it worth waiting for before purchasing new hardware.

  • How have Intel's power consumption and efficiency improved?

    -Intel has reduced power consumption and improved efficiency in some scenarios, but AMD generally outperforms Intel in power efficiency, especially with X3D parts.

  • Why is the i5-245K not recommended for purchase at this time?

    -The i5-245K is not recommended due to its poor performance relative to AMD's offerings and ongoing issues that Intel needs to address.

  • What is a key factor influencing the recommendation against Intel CPUs?

    -A significant factor is the fierce competition from AMD, which provides better value and performance for similar price points.

  • What environmental considerations are mentioned regarding CPU choices?

    -AMD CPUs are considered more environmentally friendly due to their lower power consumption compared to Intel CPUs.

  • How do the price and performance of Intel CPUs impact their market position?

    -Intel's CPUs currently struggle to find a strong market position due to competitive pricing and superior performance from AMD, making them less appealing.

  • What impact does efficiency have on the overall performance of CPUs?

    -Efficiency influences overall performance by balancing power consumption and output, where even lower-performing CPUs can be more efficient, benefiting users in terms of energy costs.

  • What specific performance benchmarks were highlighted in the review?

    -Benchmarks for Adobe Photoshop, Premiere, and gaming performance were highlighted, showing AMD's superior results in these applications compared to Intel's offerings.

Outlines

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Mindmap

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Keywords

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Highlights

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Transcripts

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
CPU ReviewsIntel vs AMDGaming PerformanceTech IndustryProduct LaunchEfficiency MetricsMarket CompetitionPerformance AnalysisHardware InsightsConsumer Electronics
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?