S.T.A.R vs C.A.R interview method - Best interview method/technique

Summary

In this video, the speaker argues that the STAR interview technique is superior to the CAR method for structuring responses to behavioral interview questions. By testing both techniques with seasoned interviewers, they found that STAR's detailed guidance—covering Situation, Task, Action, and Result—yields clearer and more effective answers. The speaker compares vague instructions from IKEA furniture assembly to the clarity provided by STAR, emphasizing how well-structured responses lead to better interview outcomes. Ultimately, they encourage viewers to embrace the STAR method for improved success in job interviews.

Takeaways

• 😀 The STAR method is superior to the CAR method for structuring interview responses.
• 🤔 Behavioral interview questions often start with phrases like 'tell me about a time' or 'give me an example when.'
• 🛠️ STAR stands for Situation, Task, Action, and Result, while CAR stands for Context, Action, and Result.
• 🔍 Using STAR provides better guidance for candidates, helping them organize their thoughts effectively.
• 💡 The Situation and Task elements in STAR clarify the context and responsibilities, making answers more comprehensive.
• 🎯 Interviewers preferred answers structured using the STAR technique during the speaker's tests.
• 📏 Having more detailed instructions, like those in STAR, helps keep interview stories coherent.
• 😩 Vague instructions can lead to frustration, similar to building IKEA furniture without clear guidance.
• 👍 Effective use of the STAR method can enhance a candidate's chances of success in job interviews.
• 📈 Improved clarity and structure in responses can lead to better understanding and assessment by interviewers.

Q & A

What are the main differences between the STAR and CAR interview techniques?

The STAR method stands for Situation, Task, Action, Result, while the CAR method stands for Context, Action, Result. STAR provides a more detailed structure by including 'Situation' and 'Task,' offering better guidance for candidates.

Why does the speaker prefer the STAR method over the CAR method?

The speaker tested both methods with seasoned interviewers and found that responses structured with the STAR method were preferred. The STAR technique provides clearer instructions and helps interviewers better understand candidates' experiences.

What types of questions are best suited for the STAR and CAR methods?

Both methods are best suited for behavioral interview questions, which typically start with phrases like 'Tell me about a time' or 'Give me an example when.'

How does the STAR method improve the interview experience?

The STAR method allows candidates to present their stories in a structured way, making it easier for interviewers to follow along and grasp the candidate's accomplishments, ultimately leading to better success rates in interviews.

Can you give an example of how to apply the STAR technique?

Certainly! For a question like 'Tell me about a time you overcame a challenge,' a candidate might structure their answer using STAR: 1) Situation: Describe the challenge, 2) Task: Explain their role, 3) Action: Detail the steps taken to overcome it, and 4) Result: Share the outcome.

What does the speaker compare the STAR technique to, and why?

The speaker compares the STAR technique to IKEA furniture assembly instructions, emphasizing that clear guidance (like that provided by STAR) is crucial for success, while vague instructions can lead to frustration and mistakes.

What common misconception do people have about STAR and CAR?

Many people mistakenly believe that STAR and CAR are interchangeable because they serve similar purposes. However, the speaker emphasizes that STAR provides a more comprehensive structure for responses.

What kind of feedback did the speaker receive from interviewers when using STAR?

The seasoned interviewers expressed a preference for the responses structured using the STAR technique, indicating that it provided a clearer and more effective way to convey information.

How does the length of the acronyms (STAR vs. CAR) influence people's choices?

The speaker notes that some candidates might choose CAR simply because it has fewer letters, assuming that shorter is easier. However, this oversimplifies the importance of the additional structure provided by the STAR method.

What should candidates do to prepare for interviews regarding these techniques?

Candidates should familiarize themselves with both the STAR and CAR methods, but prioritize practicing the STAR technique to structure their answers to behavioral questions effectively.